Second flight to evacuate Britons from Israel scheduled for Tuesday
Flight tracking websites show a A-400M plane is scheduled to depart Tel Aviv for the UK's military base in Larnaca, Cyprus.
Passengers are then expected to be transferred onto a civilian charter aircraft for their onwards journey to the UK.
British nationals in Israel will want to make their own judgments Hamish Falconer, Foreign Office minister
The first Britons to be evacuated from Israel via this route landed at Birmingham airport in the early hours of Tuesday.
Passengers paid £350 each for the journey, which was organised by the Foreign Office.
Israeli airline El Al is also operating a commercial flight from Tel Aviv to Heathrow airport, which is due to arrive at 8.20pm on Tuesday.
Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer told the Commons that the 'flow of flights out of Israel still remain limited' because of the country's conflict with Iran.
He went on: 'British nationals in Israel will want to make their own judgments about whether they will want to wait for a flight or make a land journey, and my officials are available to advise every constituent on the options before them.'
He added: 'We are providing support and advice to more than 1,000 British nationals as they seek to leave the region by land and air.
'We have deployed teams to Israel, Cyprus, Egypt and Jordan.
'Our embassy in Tehran has been temporarily withdrawn but continues to provide support for British nationals in Iran remotely.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
16 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump's state visit set for September due Charles' and US leader's busy diaries
Donald Trump is to make a full state visit to the UK this year after Britain's King Charles and the US president's busy diaries mean they are unable to meet informally first over the summer, it is understood. The Times reported that UK prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has gone against the wishes of Charles by bringing Mr Trump's 'bells and whistles' state visit forward to September. Advertisement The newspaper said the Palace had been hoping for a more leisurely approach building towards the state visit, amid concern over Mr Trump's threat to make Canada the US's 51st state. The then-prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall with US president Donald Trump and his wife Melania in 2019 (Chris Jackson/PA) Charles, who is King of Canada, suggested in a letter personally delivered to Mr Trump by Mr Starmer in the Oval Office in February that they might meet at Balmoral or Dumfries House Scotland first before the much grander state visit. But it is understood that, although all options were explored, there were logistical challenges surrounding an informal visit, with complexities in both Charles and Mr Trump's diaries meaning a private meeting was not possible over the course of the summer months. The diary issues come despite Charles heading to Scotland for his summer break each year, and Mr Trump being expected to visit his new, second golf course in Aberdeenshire when it opens this summer. Advertisement US president Donald Trump is presented with a letter from Charles in February suggesting a first meeting and then a state visit (Carl Court/PA) It is said that the logistical reasons why the private meeting cannot precede the state visit are understood and appreciated by all parties. Formal planning for the official state visit has now begun. The Manu Regia, the hand-signed formal invitation from the monarch to Mr Trump for a second state visit, was hand-delivered last week by British representatives from the Washington embassy to the White House. A Palace aide said: 'His Majesty has known President Trump for many years and looks forward to hosting him and the First Lady later this year.' Advertisement US president Donald Trump and Queen Elizabeth II during the state banquet at Buckingham Palace in 2019 (Dominic Lipinski/PA) The exact dates of Mr Trump's stay will be announced in due course, but September is said to be the most likely. The politician was already feted with a grand state visit to the UK, hosted by the late Queen at Buckingham Palace in 2019. Precedent for second-term US presidents who have already made a state visit is usually tea or lunch with the monarch at Windsor Castle, as was the case for George W Bush and Barack Obama. But Mr Trump is being treated with an unprecedented second state visit for a US president, this time at Windsor. Advertisement The Times suggested Mr Starmer was hoping to prioritise his attempt to curry favour with Mr Trump and capitalise on the president's fascination with the royal family. Asked if No 10 had overruled Charles over the visit, a Downing Street spokesman said: 'That's untrue. During his visit to the White House in February the Prime Minister was delighted to extend His Majesty the King's invite for a historic second state visit to the president and first lady and the president was pleased to accept. 'Of course the Prime Minister looks forward to welcoming President Trump.'
New Statesman
17 minutes ago
- New Statesman
The pro-Palestine movement's alternative campus
Photo by Guy Bell/Alamy Live News On 17 June, I visited the Soas Liberated Zone. It is a complex of tents occupied by Soas students, which has existed in multiple forms on and outside the School of Oriental and African Studies campus since 6 May 2024. This makes it the longest held of the student encampments that sprang up in Britain following the Gaza Solidarity Encampment at Columbia University, whose occupants were demanding their university divest from Israel. The day of my visit, Israeli forces had opened fire on crowds of Palestinians in Gaza waiting to receive crucial aid. They killed at least 70 people. Al Jazeera called it 'Gaza's deadliest day at aid sites'. Inside the large tent that serves as the living-cum-dining room for the encampment, I met Ayah, a Palestinian Soas alumna who recently completed her masters in comparative literature. We have returned to an attitude of silence, which serves to normalise an ongoing genocide in Gaza, Ayah told me. It has gone on so long that people are becoming numb or even apathetic in the face of the daily roll call of Palestinian people who have died under occupation. 'Encampments are a way of saying this is not normal and we will not go on with our normal lives,' she said. The current encampment has about 20 regular members who take it in turns to sleep outside, between a church and a row of pop-up food stalls, only a few minutes' walk from the university. It's a space that feels lived in and cared for: packs of biscuits and an ashtray on the table, a daily to-do list written on a whiteboard. This is their third location; the first two were on Soas property, the second removed by enforcement agents on instructions from the University of London. Ayah and other members of the encampment whom I would meet once they returned from a protest at BAE Systems Rochester have been here since the start. After the war on Gaza began, Ayah withdrew socially from the university because, she said, it offered her neither the support nor the solidarity she needed. Once the encampments began, she actually felt 'integrated into the community'. Those who had been at the protest outside BAE returned: Haya, a second-year student and political refugee from Egypt; Tara, a third-year student; and a fresher called Qasim who told me he joined the encampment after learning that Soas invests in companies linked to Israel and has a partnership with Haifa University. 'Once you find that out, you really only have two choices,' he said. 'Silence or do something about it.' Both Haya and Tara are suspended and prohibited from entering the campus for the rest of the academic year, at minimum, for their roles in pro-Palestine activity on campus. (A Soas spokesperson said that protest and dissent can take place at the university 'as long as it remains peaceful and does not undermine the safety and security of all within our community'.) Haya and Tara are two of the named defendants on an injunction the University of London had approved by the courts late last year, which has temporarily guaranteed that students cannot hold protests on university property unless they seek permission from the relevant authorities 72 hours in advance. 'But things happen overnight!' Ayah cut in. 'How can Soas continue to declare that it supports free speech and decolonial rhetoric when it's actively suspending students for doing those very things?' Tara asked. For the last year, student encampments like this one have functioned to expose the hypocrisies at the heart of universities as institutions. On Soas's website it says that its undergraduate degree is for 'those who want to re-examine preconceptions and not just accept the status quo'. And yet, it is choosing to suppress student protest unless management first ordains it. I asked Ayah what she now thinks university is for; she replied sardonically, 'A fancy degree!' To Tara, what is beautiful about the encampment is the way it has made free education possible. Not just financially, Tara clarified – they make the seminars and screenings held available for free online as well as free from censorship. What they learn here seems more transformative than what you might discover in the classroom: not just political theories, but the ability to apply them in practice. After the start of the war, Haya told me a lot of students were pro-Palestine but in quite a passive way. 'It's our responsibility to reach out to them, to get them to join us, to provide political education,' she said. This space has provided students with an alternative form of university experience: it is where they come to study, make sense of the world and discover how they might become forces of change – things they ought to have received from inside the university gates. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe In court during the injunction case, the students, as defendants, were reminded that they were still free to protest on social media. To Tara, this illustrated that the university is not threatened by online activism. Suspending its students is a university's attempt to cut them off from community and action. Instead, these Soas students have spent the last year constructing a sustaining, galvanising and educational community. The point of encampments is that they exist as obstructive, disruptive, physical reminders of institutional and societal failures when it comes to Israel's actions in Gaza. The Soas Liberated Zone has seven demands – along with divestment they include an end to the repression of Palestinian solidarity activism on campus. They tell me they will stay here for as long as necessary. [See also: Jeff in Venice] Related
Scottish Sun
23 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Threat is MUCH closer than we think, Keir warns as UK prepares for war on home soil & Nato confirms 5% defence boost
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SIR Keir Starmer has chillingly warned that threats to national security are closer to home than we think. Speaking at the Nato summit in The Hague, the PM said the UK is "regularly" the victim of cyber attacks by Russia and Iran. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks during a media conference at the end of the NATO summit on June 25 Credit: Getty 7 NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (R) and Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof (L), welcome British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (C) to the World Forum for the NATO Summit in The Hague Credit: EPA 7 Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet with soldiers from the Operation Interflex at Downing Street Credit: EPA Speaking in the wake of the UK's new strategic review, he reiterated: "It is a mistake to think that the only threat we face is external and far off." Sir Keir added: "We do face threats at home, all of the time. On a daily basis, there are cyber attacks that have to be dealt with and are being dealt with. "They are ever more sophisticated, and we need to have the capability to deal with them. "Equally in relation to energy that has been weaponised quite obviously in the last few years. "There are very many attempts to penetrate our systems having been dealt with by our security and intelligence services, but the fact that they are very good their job shouldn't detract from the fact that that is a real threat to our country, which we have to take seriously." It comes after all Nato members agreed to raising defence and security spending to five per cent of GDP by 2035 to make it "stronger, fairer and more lethal than ever". The UK will also provide "hundreds more defence missiles" to protect Ukraine. These will be paid for with money from frozen Russian assets. It follows a chilling new national security blueprint which set out what the UK can expect as Russia, China and Iran ramp up threats. A strategic defence review, unveiled on Tuesday, announced that the UK will perform annual drills to anticipate what war on UK soil may look like. Britain will now hold the yearly drills to prepare for a wide range of enemy attacks. The new national security strategy included plans for the exercises designed to test the country's "whole-of-society preparedness". These will include war and other security threats such as sabotage to power plants and undersea cables. 7 Royal Navy warships shadow Russian vessels in the English Channel and waters off the Outer Hebrides Credit: Royal Navy 7 Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks to British and Albanian troops at Berzite military museum in Tirana, Albania Credit: AP Ministers have committed to the annual drills which will test the response to the Government, emergency services and devolved administrations. Possible drills may include a missile strike by a foreign state, a mass terror attack, cyber attacks or the assassination of a public figure. The first drill will be held this autumn and will be codenamed "Pegasus". It will test how the Government and other public bodies would respond to a new global pandemic - five years after Covid-19 wrecked havoc across the country, triggering multiple lockdowns. A part of these preparedness drills will include mock-ups of Cobra meetings, which are held in an emergency. Tuesday's report also promised "greater vigilance to the public" going forward. This may lead to a return of Cold War-style "protect and survive" information films. They were used between 1974 and 1980 and advised the public on how to survive a nuclear attack. Instructions included how to prepare a fallout room, stockpiling supplies like food and water, and recognising warning signals. The new plan focuses on three key areas - protecting the UK at home, working with allies to strengthen global security, and rebuilding Britain's defence industries and technological capabilities. The warning comes after Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, declaring that without a major increase in defence spending, the British 'better learn to speak Russian'. The strategy said threats from other countries are on the rise. It revealed that the UK has been "directly threatened by hostile activities including assassination, intimidation, espionage, sabotage, cyber attacks and other forms of democratic interference". The stark message came as the PM jetted into The Hague for a crunch NATO summit, where leaders confirmed plans for all allies to spend five per cent of GDP on defence and security by 2035. Sir Keir Starmer admitted the country faces 'daily challenges on the home front' when asked about the growing threat after the security strategy's release. The Government's strategy lays bare the scale of the danger, warning: 'We are in an era in which we face confrontation with those who are threatening our security. 'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario.' The strategy said the UK's enemies are spreading disinformation and using social media to "stoke tensions between generations, genders and ethnic groups". Critical infrastructure such as undersea cables will "continue to be a target", the document added. It comes after RAF Top Guns will get nuclear bombers for the first time in 30 years — after PM Sir Keir Starmer said we must prepare for possible war. The F-35As will be based at RAF Marham in Norfolk, which housed Britain's air-launched nuclear weapons until 1998. That was the year then—PM Tony Blair scrapped Britain's air-launched bomb, the WE-177. The new B-61 bombs, made by US-firm Lockheed Martin, can take out small areas — unlike Trident 2 missiles on Britain's submarines which can obliterate whole cities. The F-35As can also carry conventional weapons. 7 The Government said the jets would support Nato's nuclear mission
