logo
Germany defends AfD extremist classification after Rubio slams 'tyranny in disguise'

Germany defends AfD extremist classification after Rubio slams 'tyranny in disguise'

Yahoo03-05-2025

Germany's Foreign Office has defended a decision to classify the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party as right-wing extremist, after sharp criticism from the White House.
US Vice-President JD Vance accused "bureaucrats" of rebuilding the Berlin Wall, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio slammed the designation as "tyranny in disguise".
In an unusual move, the foreign office directly replied to Rubio on X, writing: "We have learnt from our history that right-wing extremism needs to be stopped."
The intelligence agency that made the classification found AfD's "prevailing understanding of people based on ethnicity and descent" goes against Germany's "free democratic order".
The AfD came second in federal elections in February, winning a record 152 seats in the 630-seat parliament with 20.8% of the vote.
The agency, Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), had already classed the AfD as right-wing extremist in three eastern states where its popularity is highest. Now, that designation has been extended to the entire party.
The AfD "aims to exclude certain population groups from equal participation in society", it said in a statement. The agency said specifically that the party did not consider citizens "from predominantly Muslim countries" as equal members of the German people.
Joint party leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla said the decision was "clearly politically motivated" and a "severe blow to German democracy".
Beatrix von Storch, the party's deputy parliamentary leader, told the BBC's Newshour programme that the designation was "the way an authoritarian state, a dictatorship, would treat their parties".
AfD classified as extreme-right by German intelligence
The new classification gives authorities greater powers to monitor the AfD using tactics like phone interception and undercover agents.
"That's not democracy - it's tyranny in disguise," wrote Marco Rubio on X.
But the German Foreign Office hit back.
"This is democracy," it wrote, directly replying to the politician's X account.
The post said the decision had been made after a "thorough and independent investigation" and could be appealed.
"We have learnt from our history that right-wing extremism needs to be stopped," the statement concluded - a reference to Hitler's Nazi party and the Holocaust.
JD Vance, who met Weidel in Munich nine days before the election and used a speech to the Munich Security Conference to show support for the AfD, said that "bureaucrats" were trying to destroy the party.
"The West tore down the Berlin Wall together. And it has been rebuilt - not by the Soviets or the Russians, but by the German establishment," he wrote on X.
The Berlin Wall, built in 1961, separated East and West Berlin for nearly 30 years during the Cold War.
The new designation has reignited calls to ban the AfD ahead of a vote next week in the parliament, or Bundestag, to confirm conservative leader Friedrich Merz as chancellor. He will be leading a coalition with the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD).
Lars Klingbeil, the SPD leader who is expected to become vice-chancellor and finance minister, said that while no hasty decision would be made, the government would consider banning the AfD.
"They want a different country, they want to destroy our democracy. And we must take that very seriously," he told Bild newspaper.
German politics froze out the far right for years – is this about to change?
AfD embraces mass deportation of migrants as German election nears
Musk interviews German far-right frontwoman

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lead EU lawmaker on sustainability laws proposes more cuts
Lead EU lawmaker on sustainability laws proposes more cuts

Business of Fashion

time10 minutes ago

  • Business of Fashion

Lead EU lawmaker on sustainability laws proposes more cuts

The European Union should further slash the number of companies subject to its environmental and corporate sustainability rules, the European Parliament member leading negotiations on the policies said on Thursday. The European Commission proposed a 'simplification omnibus' in February that it said would help European firms compete with foreign rivals by cutting back on sustainability reporting rules and obligations intended to root out abuses in their supply chains. Those proposals did not go far enough, according to Swedish centre-right lawmaker Jörgen Warborn, who has drafted amendments to scale back the laws further to only cover companies with 3,000 employees or more and over 450 million euros ($521 million) in turnover. The Commission proposal would exempt companies with fewer than 1,000 employees - already, cutting out more than 80 percent of the roughly 50,000 companies currently covered by the green reporting rules. The EU counts around 6,000 companies with more than 1,000 employees. 'Europe is falling behind the US and China in the global race for competitiveness. I'm entering this process with a clear ambition: to cut costs for businesses and go further than the Commission on simplification,' Warborn said in a statement on Thursday. His draft proposal must be negotiated in the European Parliament where other lawmakers can propose their own amendments. The Parliament will agree the final changes with EU member countries in the coming months. Warborn, a member of the centre-right European People's Party lawmaker group, is facing competing calls from some right-wing lawmakers to scrap the policies entirely, and Socialist and Green lawmakers vowing to preserve them. French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz have both demanded the EU scrap the supply chain law. But the walk-back on ESG rules has met resistance from some investors and campaigners, who have warned it weakens corporate accountability and hurts the bloc's ability to attract more investments towards meeting climate goals. Warborn said his proposed changes will not weaken Europe's sustainability standards, but rather free up resources that companies can instead invest in innovation. By Kate Abnett; Editor: Joe Bavier Learn more: Op-Ed | Dear Fashion CEOs, Stop Undermining Climate Action Too many brands have set ambitious emissions goals while their trade associations quietly work to block the regulations needed to achieve them, argues Maxine Bédat.

Tesla analyst makes surprise move on stock ahead of Robotaxi debut
Tesla analyst makes surprise move on stock ahead of Robotaxi debut

Miami Herald

time28 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Tesla analyst makes surprise move on stock ahead of Robotaxi debut

Maybe Elon Musk should make a stop in Paris. The Tesla (TSLA) chief executive and former head of the Department of Government Efficiency has been on what analysts have described as an apology tour after his much-publicized falling out with President Donald Trump. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Musk said on his X social-media platform that he regretted some of his posts about Trump, saying "they went too far." Yeah, you could probably say that, seeing as how Musk said Trump's One Big Beautiful budget bill was a "disgusting abomination"; called for Trump to be impeached; said the president wouldn't have been elected without him; and implied that Trump's name was in Justice Department files regarding the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. In response, Trump said Musk had "lost his mind." The president threatened to cancel Musk's government contracts, which have been valued at roughly $38 billion. Musk reportedly called Trump and deleted some of his nastier posts, including the impeachment comment and the Epstein a coalition of 10 Tesla owners in France is suing Tesla over Musk's former role in the White House and support of the far right in Europe, Politico reported. "They don't want to be associated anymore with Tesla or personified by Elon Musk and his recent political stances," said Ivan Terel, a partner for GKA, a Paris law firm representing the owners. GKA filed the suit in the Paris Commercial Court on Wednesday, seeking to have the vehicle leases voided and for its clients to be repaid the original cost of ownership, plus other damages. Tesla sales have tumbled across Europe after Musk spoke at a rally for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in January, telling the crowd it was time for Germany to "move on" from its Nazi past. The remarks sparked calls to boycott the EV brand. Related: Analysts turns heads with surprise Tesla rating ahead of Robotaxi launch This is all going on as Tesla gets ready to launch the long-awaited Robotaxi, the company's autonomous ride-hailing service, which Musk said is slated tentatively to begin on June 22. A Tesla Robotaxi has been spotted on Austin streets, according to a video posted on X and reshared by Musk, according to NBC News. The 10-second video showed the Tesla slowly turning left off an avenue in the state capital, as two pedestrians walk in a crosswalk just ahead. No one appeared to be in the driver's seat, but someone appeared to be in the front passenger's seat, while the rear windows were tinted, NBC said. Tesla stock has been climbing recently after Musk buried the hatchet with Trump. The company's shares are down about 19% year-to-date but up about 91% from this time in 2024. At last check on June 12 the shares were trading around $326. Investment firms have been issuing research notes on Tesla, including Piper Sandler analyst Alexander Potter. He affirmed an overweight rating with a $400 price target on the company and contended that the stock will likely sustain its upward momentum over the coming weeks. Related: Tesla faces new challenge as leader announces exit Piper warns, however, that any high-profile robotaxi accidents would likely be met with "violent downside," according to The Fly. Wells Fargo said most of Tesla's May delivery results are now public. It noted that global deliveries once again were trending meaningfully weaker, with May trending 23% lower from a year earlier and second-quarter-to-date trending down 21%. The investment firm rates the shares underweight with a price target of $120. And JP Morgan analyst Ryan Brinkman recommended selling Tesla shares and buying stock in auto-supply companies Aptiv (APTV) and BorgWarner (BWA) . The JP Morgan analyst said he saw an opportunity in U.S. auto-supplier shares. He said they have underperformed those of the U.S. automakers since the Trump administration unveiled its tariff policy. That market weakness came even though headwinds from the Trump administration's tariffs and other regulatory changes appeared "much more benign for suppliers than for automakers," Brinkman wrote. Tesla and electric-vehicle maker Rivian (RIVN) are less affected by tariffs than General Motors (GM) and Ford (F) are, Brinkman said. But he also warned that planned legislative cuts to electric-vehicle subsidies could cut substantially into both EV makers' profits. Such subsidy cuts have been advancing in Congress alongside the president's actions on tariffs and subsequent trade negotiations, the analyst said. Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Trump's New ‘Apprentice' Boardroom: The Oval Office
Trump's New ‘Apprentice' Boardroom: The Oval Office

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Trump's New ‘Apprentice' Boardroom: The Oval Office

'This is going to be great television, I will say that.' So concluded President Trump after a stunning Oval Office confrontation in February, in front of live cameras, in which he and Vice President JD Vance took turns castigating President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine and held out the prospect of withholding support for the country invaded by Russia. At a May meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa, Mr. Trump brought his own television, playing video clips to support his false claims that white South African farmers have been the victims of genocide. The ambush, which also found Mr. Trump showing a news image actually taken from the Democratic Republic of Congo, left Mr. Ramaphosa scrambling to respond. But again, the cameras broadcast it all. The confrontations were shocking compared with how diplomacy has long been conducted in that stately office. But they were not surprising — at least, not to anyone who had watched Mr. Trump during his 14 seasons as the capricious, demanding host of the NBC business-competition series 'The Apprentice.' In his high-drama Oval Office meetings, carried live on cable news, Mr. Trump has created himself a reality show right inside the White House. It is a serial production, tailored to his tastes for attention and drama, in which his guests submit to judgment and win a blessing or a tongue-lashing. The dynamic in these showdowns is oddly similar to the climactic 'firings' Mr. Trump conducted on the NBC show. Then, as now, Mr. Trump was installed in a set designed to magnify his power — in 'The Apprentice,' it was a sleek 'boardroom' custom-built to improve on Trump Tower's underwhelming real-life offices. Reality competition shows and Mr. Trump's politics operate on the same principles: shock value, conflict, shows of dominance. Escalating a fight is almost always better for ratings than defusing one. So it was in Mr. Trump's TV career; so it is in his administration, whether the tussle is with a world leader or Elon Musk. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store