logo
Deadly Pakistan train hijack: What happened, and what's next?

Deadly Pakistan train hijack: What happened, and what's next?

Al Jazeera11-03-2025

Islamabad, Pakistan – Pakistan's security forces are locked in what they describe as a 'complex operation' against a group of separatists who attacked a train earlier on Tuesday. The train was traveling from Quetta, the provincial capital of the southwestern province of Balochistan, to Peshawar, the capital of the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
Fighters belonging to the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), a separatist group seeking Balochistan's secession from Pakistan, claimed responsibility for the attack.
They targeted the Jaffar Express as the train was passing through a series of tunnels near Sibi city, about 160km (100 miles) from Quetta.
While security sources have said that their military operation was under way, authorities also confirmed that a group of passengers safely made their way to a smaller station near the site of the attack.
Rana Farrukh, a Pakistan Railways official in Quetta, said that nearly 70 passengers, including women, children, and the elderly, reached the Panir railway station, approximately 6km (4 miles) from the attack site.
'They completed the journey on foot, following the railway track,' Farrukh told Al Jazeera, without providing further details about the passengers.
The train was passing the Bolan Pass area, which is a rugged, mountainous region, when it was attacked.
Here is what we know so far about the attack, the current situation and what is the background behind the decades-long conflict between separatist groups and the Pakistani state in Balochistan.
What happened to the Jaffar Express?
The train was carrying more than 400 passengers, including many women and children, as well as dozens of security personnel.
It departed from Quetta at 9am (04:00 GMT) on Tuesday morning, embarking on a journey of more than 1,600km (994 miles) through Punjab to reach its final destination in Peshawar. The trip takes roughly 30 hours, with stops at around 30 stations across the country.
Railway officials said the attack occurred around 1pm (08:00 GMT) as the train passed through the Bolan Pass. The area is home to several tunnels, originally constructed during British colonial rule.
Who claimed responsibility, and how has the government responded?
The BLA, which has carried out numerous attacks in the province over the past several years, claimed responsibility for the assault.
In a statement, the group claimed they had killed at least six military personnel and blown up the railway track, forcing the train to a halt. The BLA warned that any military operation in response would have 'severe consequences'. The attackers claimed that passengers on the train were hostages now — though dozens of passengers later reached Panir.
The Pakistani military has not so far issued any official statement regarding the claims, and it did not respond to queries from Al Jazeera.
Shahid Rind, a provincial government spokesperson, said authorities had imposed an emergency in hospitals in Sibi, the nearest city, in essence placing all medical professionals there on alert to attend to any victims of the attack.
Government officials also strongly condemned the attack. Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi also expressed prayers for the recovery of the injured.
'The beasts who fire on innocent passengers do not deserve any concessions,' Naqvi's statement read.
What do we know about casualties, and how is the government responding?
Hospitals in Quetta and Sibi are on high alert, but no injured passengers had been brought there until late on Tuesday night.
Railway officials said mobile connectivity in the remote, rugged terrain is virtually nonexistent, making it difficult to get timely updates.
Security sources claim the attackers are using some women and children as human shields, preventing an all-out offensive against them.
Authorities have also warned of an online disinformation campaign aimed at spreading panic.
Why has there been a surge in attacks in Balochistan?
Balochistan is Pakistan's largest province by area but the least developed, with a population of 15 million people.
Despite being rich in minerals and natural resources, including copper and gas, the province has long been the site of conflict between the local population and the government.
Baloch separatists, who demand independence from Pakistan, accuse the state of abducting and persecuting those who speak out against it.
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a $62bn mega-development project launched a decade ago, has added another layer of complexity to the conflict.
The BLA has carried out numerous attacks on Chinese interests, including at Gwadar Port, the flagship project of CPEC. Several Chinese citizens have been killed in these attacks.
In recent months, Balochistan has witnessed a dramatic surge in violence. Last month, at least 18 soldiers were killed in a BLA attack in Kalat city. Earlier in March, a female suicide bomber detonated herself, also in Kalat, killing a law enforcement officer.
The Jaffar Express has also been targeted multiple times. Last year, BLA fighters blew up a section of the track, halting the train service for two months.
In November, a suicide bombing at Quetta's railway station targeted the train just before departure, killing at least 30 people, including security personnel.
How has the BLA enhanced its capabilities?
Analysts believe the BLA's growing strength reflects the state's failure to counter BLA fighters and its reliance on outdated strategies.
Malik Siraj Akbar, a Balochistan specialist based in Washington, DC, said the BLA has evolved from carrying out small-scale attacks, such as targeting individuals or sabotaging pipelines, to large-scale operations.
'The group now undertakes major attacks, like the recent assault on a passenger train. This shift reflects both its increasing audacity and its confidence that the government lacks the capability to contain them, let alone pursue them effectively after such high-profile acts of terrorism,' Akbar told Al Jazeera.
Rafiullah Kakar, a political analyst specialising in Balochistan affairs, said the BLA has strengthened its command structure, giving field militants more direct control over operations.
'Additionally, access to advanced weaponry, some of which was left behind by US forces in Afghanistan, has enhanced the group's firepower, making their attacks more lethal and sophisticated,' Kakar told Al Jazeera.
Why has the state failed to curb the BLA's rise?
In January, the Islamabad-based think tank Pak Institute of Peace Studies (PIPS) warned that the situation in Balochistan was 'alarming'. Its report noted a 119 percent increase in attacks, with more than 150 incidents recorded last year.
The state announced plans for a major military campaign in Balochistan, but it has yet to materialise.
However, Akbar says that in the aftermath of such attacks, the state has repeatedly launched military operations – with those crackdowns often targeting innocent Baloch civilians, without evidence linking them to the BLA or the insurgency.
'The government seems more concerned with optics than justice, considering its job done once it parades a few dead bodies on camera, claiming swift retaliation,' he said.
He also argued that the military was at a disadvantage in retaliatory action against fighters in Balochistan.
'The BLA has superior knowledge of the terrain, whereas security forces, who mostly come from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab, lack familiarity with the land and routes. This gives insurgents a major advantage,' Akbar said, adding that the military was suffering from intelligence failures.
Can the government stop the BLA's resurgence?
Kakar, who is pursuing a doctorate at the University of Cambridge, argued that the worsening security situation stems not just from intelligence failures, but from a widening disconnect between the state and Baloch citizens.
'Over the past decade, the province has become a laboratory for political engineering led by the military establishment, with six different chief ministers in 10 years, excluding caretaker setups,' he said.
This instability, he added, has eroded democratic processes, undermining parliamentary politics as a viable means of political struggle.
'The biggest beneficiaries of this growing state-citizen divide have been Baloch insurgents, who are increasingly able to recruit young men willing to embark on suicidal missions,' Kakar said.
Akbar agreed, arguing that the state refuses to treat the Baloch population with dignity.
'Islamabad relies on a provincial administration that acts as a puppet of the military, pushing propaganda to convince the world that there is no crisis in Balochistan and that the state remains firmly in control,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's behind Russia's ‘evolving' drone warfare in Ukraine?
What's behind Russia's ‘evolving' drone warfare in Ukraine?

Al Jazeera

time10 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

What's behind Russia's ‘evolving' drone warfare in Ukraine?

Kyiv, Ukraine – Swarms of Russian kamikaze drones broke through Ukrainian air defence fire early on Tuesday, screeching and shrilling over Kyiv in one of the largest wartime attacks. Oleksandra Yaremchuk, who lives in the Ukrainian capital, said the hours-long sound of two or perhaps three drones above her house felt new and alarming. 'This horrible buzz is the sound of death, it makes you feel helpless and panicky,' the 38-year-old bank clerk told Al Jazeera, describing her sleepless night in the northern district of Obolon. 'This time I heard it in stereo and in Dolby surround,' she quipped. Back in 2022, she crisscrossed duct tape over her apartment's windows to avoid being hit by glass shards and spent most of the night in a shaky chair in her hallway. This week's Russian attack involved seven missiles and 315 drones – real, explosive-laden ones as well as cheaper decoys that distract and exhaust Ukraine's air defence, Kyiv's officials said. The assault was the third since Ukraine's June 1 sting to destroy Russia's fleet of strategic bombers on four airstrips, including those in the Arctic and Siberia. The wave of attacks also showed Russia's tactics of overwhelming Ukrainian air defence units with the sheer number of targets that approach from different directions. 'The drones have been evolving for a while, now [the Russians] use massiveness,' Andrey Pronin, one of Ukraine's drone warfare pioneers who runs a school for drone pilots in Kyiv, told Al Jazeera. The attack mostly targeted Kyiv, killing one woman, wounding four civilians, damaging buildings in seven districts and causing fires that shrouded predawn Kyiv in rancid smoke. It damaged the Saint Sophia Cathedral, Ukraine's oldest, whose construction began a millennium ago after the conversion of Kyivan Rus, a medieval superpower that gave birth to today's Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. The onslaught also hit the southern city of Odesa, killing two civilians, wounding nine and striking a maternity ward in the Black Sea port that lies close to annexed Crimea and lacks Kyiv's Western air defence systems. The Russia-Ukraine war triggered the evolution of drones that already rewrote the playbook of warfare globally. While Kyiv focuses on pinpointed strikes on Russian military infrastructure, oil refineries, airstrips and transport hubs, some observers believe Moscow deliberately chooses to strike civilian areas to terrify average Ukrainians – and perfects the strikes' lethality. 'Of course, [Russians] learn, every time, after each flight. They make conclusions, they review how they flew, where mobile [Ukrainian air defence] groups were,' Pronin said. To save pricey United States-made anti-drone missiles, Ukraine employs 'mobile air defence units' that use truck-mounted machineguns often operated by women and stationed on the outskirts of urban centres. The Russians 'used to fly the drones in twos, now they fly in threes,' Pronin said about the Iranian-made Shahed drones and their modified Russian Geran versions that carry up to 90 kilogrammes of explosives. Nikolay Mitrokhin, a researcher with Germany's Bremen University, named three factors that contribute to the harrowing efficiency of recent drone attacks. Firstly, the number of Russian drones rose dramatically, requiring more air defence power and, most importantly, more ammunition, he told Al Jazeera. 'The latter causes most problems, and after three massive attacks within a week, their number possibly didn't simply suffice,' he said. Earlier this week, the White House diverted 20,000 advanced anti-drone missiles intended for Ukraine to Washington's allies in the Middle East. Secondly, the Geran ('Geranium') drones 'evolve' and fly more than five kilometres above the ground at a height unreachable to firearms and many surface-to-air missiles, Mitrokhin said. These days, Gerans have a range of 900km (660 miles) and are linked to their operators via satellite, US-made Starlink terminals smuggled into Russia or even hacked SIM cards of Ukrainian cellphone operators, according to Ukrainian officials and intelligence. A Russian plant in the Volga River city of Yelabuga started manufacturing Gerans in 2023 and now churns out some 170 of them daily. Thirdly, Russia uses more decoy drones that waste air defence ammunition, Mitrokhin said. Therefore, Kyiv 'needs massive amounts of drones that could quickly gain the height of five to six kilometres, locate flying Gerans and their analogues and shoot them down', he said. Instead, Ukrainian forces have focused on long-distance strike drones such as Lytyi ('Fierce') that have hit military and naval bases, oil depots, arms factories and metallurgical plants in western Russia, he said. 'Now, Ukraine needs to quickly change its strategy and produce 5,000-10,000 high-flying drone hunters a month. Which is not easy,' he concluded. Russia's attacks underscore Washington's failure to start the peace settlement of Europe's largest armed conflict since 1945. The attacks 'drown out the efforts of the United States and others around the world to force Russia into peace,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram, hours after Tuesday's attack. US President Donald Trump pledged to end Russia's war on Ukraine 'in 24 hours,' but his administration's diplomatic efforts yielded no results. Despite occasional criticism of the Kremlin's warfare in Ukraine, Trump prefers not to use the White House's diplomatic and economic arsenal to force Russia to start a peace settlement or even a 30-day ceasefire that Kyiv proposed. While Washington continued to supply US military aid in accordance with the commitments of President Joe Biden's administration, Trump's cabinet did not pledge to provide any additional arms or ammunition shipments. 'This administration takes a very different view of that conflict,' US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told a congressional hearing on Tuesday. 'We believe that a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests, especially with all the competing interests around the globe,' he said, without specifying the extent of cuts. Trump's policies leave many Ukrainians reeling. 'He single-handedly lost the Cold War to Putin,' Valerii Omelchenko, a retired police officer in central Kyiv told Al Jazeera. 'I honestly can't fathom how one can be so indecisive and cowardly towards Russia.' The horror of drone attacks, however, helps further unite Ukrainians, he said. 'In the morning, I felt the return of what we all felt in 2022, when we were treating total strangers like family, asking them how they were, trying to help them,' he said.

The Take: Was hope of aid for Gaza seized with the Freedom Flotilla?
The Take: Was hope of aid for Gaza seized with the Freedom Flotilla?

Al Jazeera

time17 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

The Take: Was hope of aid for Gaza seized with the Freedom Flotilla?

The seizure of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla in international waters has not deterred other aid convoys from heading towards Gaza. Palestinian-American writer Ahmad Ibsais explains how humanitarian aid has become a politically charged weapon of war. In this episode: Episode credits: This episode was produced by Amy Walters, Sonia Bhagat, Chloe K Li and Haleema Shah, with Phillip Lanos, Spencer Cline, Sari El Khalili, Mariana Navarette, Kisaa Zehra and our host, Manuel Rapalo. It was edited by Noor Wazwaz. Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Our video editor is Hisham Abu Salah. Alexandra Locke is The Take's executive producer. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera's head of audio. Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Instagram, X, Facebook, Threads and YouTube

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store