logo
Trump says will sign order aimed at cutting US drug prices

Trump says will sign order aimed at cutting US drug prices

Korea Herald12-05-2025

US President said he would reduce prescription prices by between 30 and 80 percent
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Donald Trump says he planned to sign an executive order on Monday that, if implemented, could bring down the costs of some medications -- reviving a failed effort from his first term on an issue he's talked up since even before becoming president.
The order Trump is promising will direct the Department of Health and Human Services to tie what Medicare pays for medications administrated in a doctor's office to the lowest price paid by other countries.
'I will be instituting a MOST FAVORED NATION'S POLICY whereby the United States will pay the same price as the Nation that pays the lowest price anywhere in the World,' the president posted Sunday on his social media site, pledging to sign the order.
'Our Country will finally be treated fairly, and our citizens Healthcare Costs will be reduced by numbers never even thought of before,' Trump added.
His proposal would likely only impact certain drugs covered by Medicare and given in an office -- think infusions that treat cancer, and other injectables. But it could potentially bring significant savings to the government, although the 'TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS' Trump boasted about in his post may be an exaggeration.
Medicare provides health insurance for roughly 70 million older Americans. Complaints about US drug prices being notoriously high, even when compared with other large and wealthy countries, have long drawn the ire of both parties, but a lasting fix has never cleared Congress.
Under the planned order, the federal government would tie what it pays pharmaceutical companies for those drugs to the price paid by a group of other, economically advanced countries -- the so-called 'most favored nation' approach.
The proposal will face fierce opposition from the pharmaceutical industry.
It was a rule that Trump tried to adopt during his first term, but could never get through. He signed a similar executive order in the final weeks of his presidency, but a court order later blocked the rule from going into effect under the Biden administration.
The pharmaceutical industry argued that Trump's 2020 attempt would give foreign governments the 'upper hand' in deciding the value of medicines in the US. The industry has long argued that forcing lower prices will hurt profits, and ultimately affect innovation and its efforts to develop new medicines.
Only drugs on Medicare Part B -- the insurance for doctor's office visits -- are likely to be covered under the plan. Medicare beneficiaries are responsible for picking up some of the costs to get those medications during doctor's visits, and for traditional Medicare enrollees there is no annual out-of-pocket cap on what they pay.
A report by the Trump administration during its first term found that the US spends twice as much as some other countries in covering those drugs. Medicare Part B drug spending topped $33 billion in 2021.
More common prescription drugs filled at a pharmacy would probably not be covered by the new order.
Trump's post formally previewing the action came after he teased a 'very big announcement' last week. He gave no details, except to note that it wasn't related to trade or the tariffs he has announced imposing on much of the world.
'We're going to have a very, very big announcement to make -- like as big as it gets,' Trump said last week.
He came into his first term accusing pharmaceutical companies of 'getting away with murder' and complaining that other countries whose governments set drug prices were taking advantage of Americans.
On Sunday, Trump took aim at the industry again, writing that the 'Pharmaceutical/Drug Companies would say, for years, that it was Research and Development Costs, and that all of these costs were, and would be, for no reason whatsoever, borne by the 'suckers' of America, ALONE.'
Referring to drug companies' powerful lobbying efforts, he said that campaign contributions 'can do wonders, but not with me, and not with the Republican Party.'
'We are going to do the right thing,' he wrote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk calls Trump's tax-cut and spending bill ' disgusting abomination'
Musk calls Trump's tax-cut and spending bill ' disgusting abomination'

Korea Herald

time9 minutes ago

  • Korea Herald

Musk calls Trump's tax-cut and spending bill ' disgusting abomination'

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Billionaire Elon Musk plunged on Tuesday into the congressional debate over President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that will increase the federal deficit. Several fiscally conservative Republicans in the US Senate supported the views Musk expressed in social media posts, which could complicate the bill's path to passage in that chamber. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Tesla and SpaceX CEO Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." He added, "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Musk's comments hit a nerve. Republican deficit hawks have expressed concerns about the cost of the bill, which would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative accomplishment, while boosting spending on the military and border security. The House of Representatives passed it by one vote last month, after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the measure would add $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt. The Senate, also controlled by Trump's Republicans, aims to pass the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" in the next month, though senators are expected to revise the House version. Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, which oversees tax policy, are due to meet with Trump at the White House on Wednesday afternoon to discuss making the bill's business-related tax breaks permanent, according to Senator Steve Daines, a panel member. Analysts have warned that such a move would greatly increase the measure's cost. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he disagreed with Musk's assessment about the cost of the bill and stood by the goal of passage by July 4. "We have a job to do -- the American people elected us to do. We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president of the United States, and we're going to deliver on that agenda," the South Dakota lawmaker told reporters. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson also dismissed Musk's complaints, telling reporters, "my friend Elon is terribly wrong." Musk's loud opposition to a bill that Trump has urged Republicans to pass presents a test of his political influence a week after leaving his formal role in the administration as a special government employee with the Department of Government Efficiency came to an end. As DOGE chief, he upended several federal agencies but ultimately failed to deliver the massive savings he had sought. The richest person in the world, Musk had spent nearly $300 million to back Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans in last year's elections. But he has said he would cut his political spending substantially while returning to his role as Tesla CEO. The White House dismissed Tuesday's attack, just as Trump dismissed earlier Musk complaints about the legislation. "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said at a White House briefing. "It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." Senate Republicans were divided about the bill even before Musk's missives. Deficit hawks are pushing for deeper spending cuts than the $1.6 trillion over a decade in the House version, while another coalition of rural-state Republicans are pushing to protect the Medicaid healthcare program for low-income Americans. One of the hawks, Senator Mike Lee, called on party members to use the Trump bill and future spending measures to reduce the deficit. "We must commit now to doing so, as this is what voters justifiably expect -- and indeed deserve -- from the (Republican) Congress," the Utah Republican said on X while reposting Musk's message. Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate and can afford to lose support from no more than three members, if they expect to pass the legislation with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance by a July 4 deadline. Another hardliner, Senator Ron Johnson, predicted that lawmakers would not be able to meet the deadline and secure an adequate number of cuts. Lee and Johnson are among at least four Senate hardliners demanding that the bill be changed to restrict the growth of the debt and deficit. The faction of party lawmakers determined to limit spending cuts to project Medicaid beneficiaries and business investments in green energy initiatives is of similar size. "I certainly have an interest in making sure people with disabilities are not harmed. But also, there's the broad issue of how does it affect hospital reimbursements," Sen. Jerry Moran told reporters. "There's a set of my colleagues who are pushing to do more. And so it turns on how do you get the votes to pass a bill," the Kansas Republican said. Other Senate Republicans said lawmakers may have to look elsewhere to boost savings, including the possibility of leaving Trump's much touted tax break proposals for tips, overtime pay and Social Security benefits for later legislation. "Those are all Democrat priorities. I'm not sure why we shouldn't be doing that in a potential bipartisan bill to create headspace for this bill," said Republican Sen. Thom Tillis.

[Patricia Murphy] 'Big beautiful bill' a boondoggle
[Patricia Murphy] 'Big beautiful bill' a boondoggle

Korea Herald

time6 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Patricia Murphy] 'Big beautiful bill' a boondoggle

Days before the US House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' Moody's Ratings agency had an ominous warning about the US economy. Because of America's recent history of running up huge debts and deficits, and no change in sight, 'the United States' fiscal performance is likely to deteriorate' relative to similar countries. As a part of that warning, Moody's downgraded the country's credit rating from its Aaa score to Aa1. Despite that red flag, House leaders forged ahead, passing their 10-year tax-and-spend plan, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, by a single vote. Unfortunately, the bill not only ignores Moody's debt warning, it looks more like one big, beautiful boondoggle. Included in the gargantuan bill are $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, more than $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and other social programs, and significant boosts in spending for defense and immigration enforcement. Costs of some social programs, including food stamps, are also shifted to states by the House. My colleague Tia Mitchell reported this week that Georgia officials could now be on the hook for more than $800 million in food spending if the Republicans' bill goes through. All of the cuts to social safety net programs came, in part, to help pay for the tax cuts in the bill, which are heavily weighted toward high-income earners. For example, the working-class tax breaks that Trump promised on the campaign trail, namely eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest, will only last through the end of Trump's term in 2028. But the income tax cuts, including for the richest Americans, as well as tax breaks for estates and investment income all become permanent. The House also stuffed loads of perks for special interests into the 1,100-page bill. One measure bans states from passing new regulations on artificial intelligence for 10 years. So if Georgia lawmakers decide they want to limit the use of AI in Georgia classrooms, like they did with cellphones this year, the Big Beautiful Bill Act would stop that until 2036. It would also mean Georgia lawmakers could not pass SB 9, a bill to ban deepfakes in political ads, which passed the state House and Senate earlier this year, but did not get to final passage. A different measure, this one for gun dealers, was put into the bill by Georgia's US Rep. Andrew Clyde. The Republican from Athens owns two large gun stores, which both sell gun silencers. Clyde flipped from a 'no' to a 'yes' after the $200 tax on silencers was eliminated, at a cost of $1.4 billion. Of all of the special interests in the bill, the most special of all seems to be Trump himself. The bill mentions Trump's name 52 times. It also creates new $1,000 savings accounts for babies born during Trump's second term called 'Trump Accounts.' It even has language to make it harder for federal courts to enforce injunctions against executive branch officials, a lot like the injunctions Trump has run into as he tries to expand his own powers in the White House. Every spending bill is a political document, of course, and a Republican Congress cutting taxes and rolling back Biden-era climate measures is no surprise. But what is a surprise is the bill's price tag, $3.94 trillion, which will all get piled onto the nation's $36 trillion debt that Moody's just warned about. For every tax cut and spending measure that may be a good idea on its merits, it's all getting paid for with more borrowed money. It's a long way from the Tea Party movement, which exploded onto the scene in 2009 after the US Congress passed big bailouts for banks following the 2008 financial crisis. The national debt then was $13 trillion, one-third of what it is today. Republicans then promised they would finally tackle the debt and the deficit. This bill does the opposite. Even Elon Musk, the mastermind of the "Department of Government Efficiency," said so on his last day as a government employee this week, adding that the bill 'undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' 'It can be big or beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both,' he said. If I were a House Republican at the beginning of this year, I would have had one job: to reduce the debt and deficit. With Trump in the White House, Republicans in control of Congress, and Musk promising to modernize and remake the federal government, the House bill was supposed to be the vehicle for all of that to happen. Instead, they just passed one big, beautiful boondoggle.

[Kim Seong-kon] What we expect from our new president
[Kim Seong-kon] What we expect from our new president

Korea Herald

time6 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Kim Seong-kon] What we expect from our new president

The 2025 presidential election day is over now. Whoever may be inaugurated as our next president, he will be heavily burdened with so many urgent tasks because the country's situation is unprecedentedly dire. Among others, our new leader must put an end to the chronic sickness of political revenge that has plagued our country for the past two decades. In the eyes of foreigners, South Korea may look like a politically underdeveloped country because no president has been safe since 2009: one died by suicide, one was imprisoned and two were impeached. Another one is presently under investigation by the prosecution. Such incidents are far from normal. They are not supposed to happen in a fully developed, advanced country. Indeed, that is why our new president must find and appoint truly able and competent cabinet members. Some of his predecessors ran the country with the help of amateurs, such as their former high-school buddies, or those who were already personally close to them, regardless of their aptitude or qualifications. Such nepotism has caused a lot of damage to our country. Our new president also must not forget or ignore the fact that South Korea is a Free World country of liberal democracy, not an authoritarian socialist country of a so-called 'people's democracy.' It is imperative that he honor and value liberal democracy and should not attempt to change the fundamentals of our country according to his own political ideology. These days, experts have pointed out that democracy is in jeopardy, as it produces legitimately elected dictators. Thus, we hope that our new leader is an unpretentious, humanitarian person, not an elected tyrant who manipulates and controls the administrative, the legislative and the judicial branches all together. If he is self-righteous, opinionated and tyrannical, he will surely ruin our country and make our lives miserable. To ensure Korea survives these international crises, our leader needs to be a skillful diplomat who, depending on the situation, can use, as needed, both what Dag Hammarskjold has called "quiet diplomacy," and 'wolf warrior diplomacy,' another term that one of our neighboring countries is using these days. The most outstanding and compelling diplomatic issue we are now facing is how to deal with America's 'reciprocal benefits' policy. In other words, how to deal with the heavy tariffs recently imposed by the US and the expense-sharing issue for the US troops stationed in Korea. Experts suggest that South Korea's unparalleled shipbuilding industry and semiconductor technology could serve as good leverage when we deal with America. Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration is now considering the relocation of 4,500 out of 28,500 American soldiers in South Korea to Guam and other Indo-Pacific regions. The US government may think that such 'strategic flexibility' is necessary, especially when war clouds are hanging over Taiwan. However, according to the Wall Street Journal, it is 'a move that could stir new anxiety among allies worried about the White House commitment to Asia.' Therefore, our new president must find the best way to deal with the above issues. For one thing, he should persuade the US government that the American troops in Korea are mutually beneficial because they also serve America's strategies to deter North Korea. He also should remind American politicians how America, too, greatly benefited from the help of their blood ally, South Korea, during the Vietnam War. Another diplomatic conflict our new leader must solve is our neighboring countries' violation of our sea and air borders. We hope our new president can valiantly stand tall, strongly protest and boldly exercise countermeasures, if necessary. If our president seems timid or weak, our country will not only lose respect but also end up inviting more aggressive violations of international laws from other countries. In addition, our new president also must prepare for the anticipated side effects of a possible war in Taiwan. Experts have warned of two possibilities if a Taiwan War broke out by any chance. One is that US airbases in South Korea might be attacked by missiles. The other possibility is that North Korea might provoke a war by miscalculation. Either way, we should be prepared. These days, political analysts worry that the world is now regressing to the World War II era when the strong manipulated the weak. It is unnerving and disheartening news to us, to say the least. To protect us from foreign aggression, we may need to join the league of countries sharing the same values, including Japan, Australia and Southeast Asian countries. We hope that our new president knows where to go and what to do to protect his people and the nation, instead of simply enjoying the fame of his privileged post. In a 2025 American film, 'Sniper: The Last Stand,' a military commander says, 'A leader knows the way, goes the way and shows the way. Leadership is an action, not a position.' Indeed, the future of Korea depends on our new president's superb leadership.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store