logo
CT public health officials fear federal cuts could affect vaccination clinics and education

CT public health officials fear federal cuts could affect vaccination clinics and education

Yahoo30-04-2025

Last month, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont announced massive federal cuts coming to the state with the bulk of it coming at the expense of the Connecticut Department of Public Health.
Among the hardest hit was $118,897,449 in estimated funding loss for the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Program, as well as $26,267,097 in grant funding for immunization activities. Other areas that could be affected include essential public health services such as disease outbreak surveillance, newborn screenings, childhood immunizations and testing for viruses and other pathogens.
Connecticut Department of Public Health commissioner Dr. Manisha Juthani said impacts have already been felt with the 43 contracts with local health departments that the Connecticut Department of Public Health had to issue stop-work orders.
Local health departments help enhance vaccination rates, access, equity and vaccine confidence. The lost funding could result in a loss of vaccination clinics, and the distribution of vaccine education materials would be stopped, according to Lamont.
'The immunization grant was to help keep up with immunization rates across communities and help with childhood vaccinations required for school admission,' Juthani said. 'This grant helped find pockets of undervaccinated and meeting communities where they were by opening vaccination clinics or doing vaccine outreach to at-risk communities whether they be homebound or disabled. Those were what these grants were helping to fund.'
Juthani said the first tangible place where people would be able to notice the cuts would be vaccinations in at-risk communities.
'It may not be as easy in certain circumstances (to get vaccinations) but we do know you still have your child provider, you still have a pharmacy, and you still have doctors' offices,' Juthani said. 'It may require a little bit extra work, but there are still other ways in the state to be vaccinated. But what we were trying to do was to make it as convenient and easy as possible so there were less hurdles to overcome to get what they need to achieve their best health.'
Juthani said there have been some updates since the governor's March 27 press conference, and the cuts remain in a 'holding pattern' because of court proceedings. Juthani said there is a lawsuit regarding the cuts from 23 different states.
'Then we heard at (recently) that the judge has offered more time and needs more information for the federal government to come back to see if these grants are officially terminated or not on April 29,' Juthani said. 'We communicated with the local health department to say they have another week of expenses that they could submit to us. You can't plan large-scale projects or initiatives just one week at a time. … We are in a little bit of a holding pattern because things are so uncertain.'
Juthani said another change in recent weeks is that syndromic surveillance was initially feared to be one of the programs cut, but the commissioner said there has been a one-year reprieve to continue the program.
'Syndromic surveillance is where anyone that comes into the emergency department and complains about any sort of symptom, it would get put into a database,' Juthani said. 'That information would come to the state of public health. That is how we find out if something expected is happening.
'During flu season, we would see the normal uptick that we see every season. Sometimes we can learn if something new is going on. We thought that system was going to be completely offline,' Juthani added. 'That was an immediate program cut we weren't prepared for.'
Juthani said the week-to-week funding with each judge ruling has forced some of the state's health departments to let people go because the departments do not have the capacity to keep people if funding is not continued.
'It's varied by each department by their budgetary needs,' Juthani said.
Juthani said the state has one of the top vaccination rates in the country due to a 'cohesive, concerted effort across the board.' She included healthcare professionals and school nurses and others.
'We do have an advantage in our state which is you can have great efforts, but you need a population open and interested in hearing the message,' Juthani said. 'There is always a desire to meet people where they are at and explain things the way they would understand. Funding can always enhance that.
'I hope we don't slide back because of funding cuts because the open-mindedness of the population has not changed,' she added. 'The access to healthcare has yet to change. I hope it doesn't happen. But is there a risk? Of course. One of the other things the immunizations grant helped with was optimizing our CT WiZ platform which helps us track what those rates actually are.'
Juthani said school vaccination records are on CT WiZ and during the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations were logged. The cuts will stop enhancements to that program that provides a real-time public-facing dashboard on vaccination rates in the state.
'All you have to do on CT WiZ is put your name in and you can get your own vaccination records,' Juthani said. 'We've been using this funding to expand our capacity to work on other platforms with CT WiZ so if you get a vaccination in one of our sister states on our platform you can see that on your record in Connecticut. It would include vaccinations from out of state if it was in one of our sister states.
'That's the kind of upgrade we have been doing and that funding is in question whether we are going to be able to expand on that type of capacity,' she added.
Juthani said she is concerned about what she has seen in the cuts but is focused on everything the Department of Public Health can do to prepare for the cuts.
'Our goal here in Connecticut is to make sure we don't lose ground on protecting public health despite cuts we receive. That's what we are focused on,' Juthani said.
Dr. Ulysses Wu, the chief epidemiologist and system director for infectious diseases at Hartford HealthCare, said he has concerns about cuts to immunization education.
'The impact is not just the immunizations themselves, but it's the education that is associated with it,' Wu said.
'As you know, immunization is very divisive,' Wu said. 'The science is solid. I think people should be concerned at many different levels. On a broad level, public health is not being prioritized. Cuts are going to be made for that. On a micro level, the access and education and cost that may be associated with this. Yes, people should be concerned on a micro and macro level.'
Wu said given the current measles outbreak in the country, immunizations are even more important. According to the CDC, as of April 24, there were 884 cases in the country. There were no cases in Connecticut, but surrounding states had some reported including Vermont, Rhode Island, New York and New Jersey. In total, 30 states
According to the CDC, the 884 cases are a large jump from the 285 in all of 2024, and 96% of the cases are individuals who are unvaccinated or are of unknown vaccination.
'Measles is a highly contagious, highly dangerous disease that is also entirely preventable with the MMR vaccine,' Juthani said. 'Before 1963, there were over 500,000 cases of measles in the U.S. every year. In 2000, that number plummeted to just 85, proving the MMR vaccine works.
'Now is the time to act to prevent an outbreak here and to ensure you are vaccinated while there are no cases in Connecticut,' she added. 'Staying up to date on vaccinations not only protects you and your family but also helps protect people who cannot be vaccinated due to medical conditions or are too young to get vaccinated, like infants below 6 months of age.'
The Connecticut Department of Public Health is urging residents to 'ensure they are adequately protected if they are traveling to areas with active outbreaks.' It is also recommended that the MMR vaccine be given to infants 6-11 months of age who are traveling internationally or in areas of the country with active measles transmission.
'Most of the measles transmissions in the United States prior to this year were due to international travel,' Wu said. 'Now we have to worry about domestic travel with every exposure that is possible and brought back to Connecticut. Remember they can be contagious before the rash or after the rash has subsided. There can be people that are infectious that don't even know it.
'What happens is, when more people are immunized, it creates that safety net and that herd immunity,' he added. 'When you start losing that herd immunity, let's just say it's the state of Connecticut. Your chances of getting measles are going to be increased. For those who are immunized for the most part should be protected. What can take hold of is those who are not immunized. The immunization rate in Connecticut is very good but it is also not 100%. This is all going to be impacted for Connecticut mostly indirectly. But there may be some direct effects as well.'
Wu said the worst-case scenario of more cuts would be 'any transmissible disease that results in an epidemic or a pandemic that was preventable.'
'That is what this is all about,' Wu said. 'It's about preventable disease. All of these measles cases were preventable. We understand the greater picture of people's rights in terms of what they can and can't do. The only problem is that it changes a little bit in the sense that what you do may impact someone else.
'With these transmissible diseases, it's not only about the individual but it's also about the community at large,' he said. 'We run into these issues where it's not just an individual decision at this point and sometimes you have to look at the greater good.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Mind Medicine Gave Investors a Powerful Buzz in May
Why Mind Medicine Gave Investors a Powerful Buzz in May

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Why Mind Medicine Gave Investors a Powerful Buzz in May

Connecticut lawmakers advanced a bill that would decriminalize psilocybin if ultimately passed. Investors were also cheered by a C-suite appointment. 10 stocks we like better than Mind Medicine (MindMed) › Mind Medicine (NASDAQ: MNMD), a healthcare company that's looking to develop treatments based on psychedelic compounds, was something of a sleeper stock in May. Several positive developments pushed the highly specialized enterprise's share price higher, to the point where it closed the month up almost 14% in price. The main driver of this gain was a small step forward in the decriminalization of psilocybin. That's the psychoactive compound that Mind Medicine -- or MindMed, as it's known for short -- is aiming to develop into substances that can help treat certain psychological disorders. That tiny movement forward came from the Connecticut House of Representatives, which in mid-May passed a bill that would drastically change the legal status of psilocybin. It now must go through a process that includes a vote in the state Senate before it can become law. In its current form, the bill would decriminalize the substance, chiefly found in so-called "magic" mushrooms, to the point where possession of a small amount would be punishable only by a $150 fine. That's quite a shift from the current regime, in which violators can be sentenced to jail time. The vote in the House was narrow, however, with 74 in favor versus 65 against, and Gov. Ned Lamont rejected an earlier psilocybin decriminalization bill, so this wasn't exactly a slam dunk. Still, MindMed investors saw it as a win that there's continued movement on nudging the substance toward at least a soft form of legalization. Company management is clearly anticipating movement on the decriminalization front, whether or not the Connecticut effort is successful. Toward the end of May, the company announced it had appointed a new CFO. Brandi Roberts wasted little time in formally taking up the position several days later. Roberts has significant experience as a CFO in various businesses in the life sciences sector, which should help boost the credibility and viability of Mind Medicine. According to the company, her experience also includes bringing her previous employer, Longboard Pharmaceuticals, to its initial public offering and later being instrumental in its sale to Denmark-based peer H. Lundbeck. Things were looking up for MindMed in May, but we should always bear in mind that as a company focused on a substance that is currently illegal throughout the U.S., it remains a very speculative investment. I like its uniqueness, and I feel that if the legal framework shifts it could do quite interesting work. But this is a stock for investors with high risk tolerance only. Before you buy stock in Mind Medicine (MindMed), consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Mind Medicine (MindMed) wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,385!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $842,015!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 987% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Mind Medicine Gave Investors a Powerful Buzz in May was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

CT Dems move toward free child care. Republicans say it's the end of fiscal stability
CT Dems move toward free child care. Republicans say it's the end of fiscal stability

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

CT Dems move toward free child care. Republicans say it's the end of fiscal stability

After years of work, state legislators voted Saturday evening to approve landmark legislation to fund an endowment account to create more affordable child care in Connecticut by 2032. Lawmakers agreed with Gov. Ned Lamont to set aside as much as $300 million per year from the state's future budget surpluses in order to create a large endowment fund that would be invested by the state treasurer and could grow in future years. This year's allocation is expected to be $200 million, based on the size of the surplus. The debate started at noon in a rare Saturday session, which essentially happens one day each year at the end of the legislative session. The bill passed on strict party lines, by 101 to 45, at 5:30 p.m. after five hours of debate. The measure had been approved the previous day on a bipartisan basis in the state Senate by 32 – 4. Democrats hailed the plan for 'affordable and accessible' child care, but Republicans questioned the use of large amounts of money for an off-budget account instead of allocating more money for the state's unfunded liabilities like pensions for state employees and public school teachers. Under the plan, families earning $100,000 or less would pay nothing for child care starting in 2028, as it would be paid by the endowment, lawmakers said. 'I think it's the most important initiative we have in this budget,' Lamont said Saturday at the state Capitol in Hartford. 'If I can get universal early childhood free of charge for every family under $100,000, it's great for the kids. It helps mom and dad get back to work. It helps with affordability.' State Rep. Jennifer Leeper, a Fairfield Democrat who co-chairs the education committee, said the legislature would be 'achieving something many people thought would never be possible.' The legislation is known as Senate Bill 1 to show that it is the highest priority for Senate Democrats, who control the numbers of the bills. A key feature is that the measure establishes an early childhood endowment fund with a national model in a move to bring down the cost of early childhood for families. But House Republican leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford said creating an off-budget endowment fund was a mistake that lawmakers would see in future years. 'It really is the beginning of the end of good fiscal practices,' Candelora told reporters before the debate. 'They are turning the faucet off on Connecticut paying down its unfunded liabilities. The glory days are over of paying down unfunded liabilities. … This legislation right now is doing away with surpluses as we know it.' Candelora, who said he was surprised that there was not more Republican opposition in the Senate, said many members of the House caucus were opposed to the bill. The debate was delayed Saturday afternoon when Rep. Tina Courpas, a freshman Greenwich Republican who graduated from Columbia University Law School, asserted on the House floor that the bill required a three-fifths vote to pass because uses of the state's surplus funds are heavily restricted unless there is a 60% vote. The Democrats initially told Courpas twice on the floor that she was wrong, but then House Speaker Matt Ritter of Hartford consulted with colleagues before ruling that Courpas was, in fact, correct. 'I have grave concerns about this bill,' Courpas said on the House floor. 'More importantly, the financial aspects of this bill concern me greatly. … The very things that put our state on a better fiscal path are on the table in this bill. … This is a bill which takes a very radical step, hence the three-fifths vote. … I ask the chamber really to consider what is at stake here.' The goal by lawmakers is that the endowment would help pay the costs to create 16,000 spaces for preschool, infants, and toddlers by 2030. While those under $100,000 would be free, those earning more than $100,000 would not pay more than 7% of their household income, lawmakers said. 'Our kids are our most important gifts,' Rep. Lezlye Zupkus, the ranking House Republican on the education committee, said during Saturday's debate. 'They are our leaders of tomorrow.' Zupkus gave examples on the House floor of students who need assistance. During a tour at a public school in New Haven, Zupkus said that she asked about a 5-year-old girl who was a student in the school. 'She saw her father murder her mother,' Zupkus said she was told. 'That's heavy. … I always keep that little girl in the back of my mind.' The multi-faceted bill calls for pay increases for child care workers, who historically make low salaries. This year, an estimated $200 million is expected to be placed into the endowment fund, lawmakers said. The maximum under the bill is $300 million, but that will depend on the size of the state surplus each year. In the first two years, officials could spend a maximum of 12% of the fund. 'We do view this as a sustainable source of funds,' said Rep. Kate Farrar, a West Hartford Democrat who outlined the bill on the House floor. The omnibus bill also includes sections on special education, which are combined with additional provisions in House Bill 5001, which is another high-priority bill. 'I struggle with our state because we want to fund everything,' Zupkus said of the costs. 'We have to pick and choose. … I do struggle with all of this funding and ensuring it is put to the best use.' With costs reaching more than $100,000 per year for some students, Lamont called this year for an additional $54 million for special education to help Connecticut communities shoulder the cost. Lamont and the state legislature both earmarked special education this year as a high priority and a renewed area of interest, noting that expenses have been rising for services. Part of the focus is to keep students in their own district, rather than sending them by bus as much as an hour away for specialized programs for which tuition and transportation costs can reach as high as $200,000 per student, officials said. The plan calls for $14 million in competitive grants for in-district programs, plus $40 million in the second year of the two-year budget for 'excess costs' for the most expensive cases. Out of 512,652 students in the public schools statewide, more than 92,000 students, or 18%, are in special education classes. The state and federal governments are spending a combined $324 million annually for the 92,000 students, officials said. Some communities, such as Hartford, have more students in special education and subsequently costs that are higher than the state average. About 80% of all transportation costs in the Hartford schools are for out-of-district trips. While about 20% of Hartford students are in special education classes, the high costs mean that 31.6% of the overall school budget is for special education, according to Mayor Arunan Arulampalam. On Friday night, senators passed the same measure after a long debate. 'Parents have been telling us that child care is unaffordable, and municipalities have been clear they need help with special education. Senate Bill 1 tackles both,' said Senate majority leader Bob Duff, a Norwalk Democrat. 'We're taking sustainable steps toward universal child care so parents can stay in the workforce without breaking the bank. And we're overhauling special education to bring more oversight, more efficiency, and a system that actually works for families and educators.' During the debate, Sen. Ryan Fazio, a Greenwich Republican who voted against the overall bill, offered an amendment that would have created a scholarship fund to help low-income students to attend either public or private schools. Test scores, he said, have dropped 'over the last 10 years or so,' particularly in lower-income areas. 'This is a simple and straightforward amendment,' said Fazio, who also represents parts of Stamford and New Canaan. 'It creates more options and more hope for families and students who need it the most.' The amendment failed along strict party lines at 7:45 p.m. Friday with Republicans in favor and Democrats against. Sen. Doug McCrory of Hartford, a longtime educator, said the overall bill will help students, particularly in lower-income areas. 'Right now, families in underserved communities have fewer child care options and face higher barriers to access. Senate Bill 1 is designed with equity in mind,' said McCrory, who co-chairs the education committee. 'It ensures that funding doesn't just flow to the communities that can afford to pay more, but reaches the families who need it most. Every child deserves the same strong start, no matter where they live.' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@

CT city awarded $450K+ for a new, inclusive playground for children with disabilities
CT city awarded $450K+ for a new, inclusive playground for children with disabilities

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

CT city awarded $450K+ for a new, inclusive playground for children with disabilities

Newington has been awarded a $485,000 grant to build a new, inclusive playground at Candlewyck Park, town officials said. The town project, announced by Gov. Ned Lamont on Friday, is part of a $30 million package distributed to 46 small towns across Connecticut for capital improvement projects focused on infrastructure, community development and quality-of-life upgrades. The Candlewyck Park project will be matched by $121,365 in local funding, bringing the total project cost to $606,976, officials said. The grants are all part of the state's Small Town Economic Assistance Program. 'We are incredibly grateful to Governor Lamont and his staff for their support for this important infrastructure project,' said Newington Mayor Jon Trister. 'This grant will help establish a state-of-the-art playground and play space for the residents of the Candlewyck neighborhood. We are thrilled with this announcement.' The new playground will feature accessible play elements for all children, regardless of ability. Officials said the project also supports the town's long-term commitment to neighborhood revitalization and inclusive park access throughout Newington. 'The Newington Parks and Recreation Department happily announces that Governor Lamont and the State Legislature have awarded the town of Newington this critical funding to replace the outdated playground equipment in the Lamplighter Lane area,' said Don Woods, chair of the town's parks and recreation board. 'This grant allows us to move forward with the second and final stage of renovations at Candlewyck Park.' The Candlewyck Park project builds upon the town's ongoing work to enhance parks town wide. In recent years, the town has completed major renovations at Mill Pond Park Playground, Churchill Park Playground, Clem Lemire Playground, Beacon Park Playground, Beechwood Park Playground, Eagle Park Playground, and Seymour Park Playground. For additional information on the Candlewyck Park inclusive playground or other ongoing projects, contact the Newington Parks and Recreation Department at 860-665-8666 or visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store