Waitākere Ranges Co-Governance: Better Councillors Needed To Protect Democracy
Auckland Council's plan to set up a co-governed committee to manage the Waitākere Ranges shows why Kiwis need councillors who believe in democracy, says ACT Leader David Seymour.
'The Waitākere Ranges belong to all Aucklanders, and should be managed democratically. But Auckland Council's plan would see unelected decision-makers closing tracks and dictating land use in the surrounding rural areas.
'The ranges are governed under the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act. That is a local act, which means any change to the legislation, such as a prohibition on co-governance arrangements, has to come from the elected council.
'We've seen the same problem with the Ngāi Tahu Representation Act, where the Minister for Local Government has had to go cap-in-hand to a left-wing regional council asking them to repeal co-governance. The council (Environment Canterbury) declined.
'The Coalition is rolling back co-governance of public services. But when it comes to local co-governance, local action is needed.
'This is exactly why ACT is standing candidates in council elections, not just in Auckland, but across the country. ACT councillors will fight for democracy, equal rights, and accountable government. That means ensuring beloved public spaces are governed by people directly accountable to ratepayers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 hours ago
- 1News
'Trump wants chaos': On the frontline of the LA protests
Rubber bullets. Tear gas. Fireworks. Graffiti. The never-ending chanting. This is Downtown Los Angeles, which has found itself the epicentre of protests against immigration raids. US Correspondent Logan Church reports from the front lines in Los Angeles. This all kicked off when federal immigration agents – colloquially referred to here as "ICE" – began raiding businesses and arrested dozens of "illegal immigrants". Donald Trump's administration calls these people "violent criminals" and "terrorists". Some are. Some are not. Some are just dads. Members of the community with people who love them. All of them, though, live in what is probably the most migrant friendly city in America – Los Angeles. ADVERTISEMENT And Angelinos are furious. Speaking from Los Angeles, 1News US correspondent Logan Church said "people here are deeply angry". (Source: Breakfast) As soon as I drove into the centre of the city, the first thing I noticed was the graffiti. Everywhere. All federal buildings were covered in messages – the most common being the simple "f*** ICE". People were casually adding more as I walked past, not caring if I filmed them. Most welcomed it. The second thing I noticed was the huge numbers of police and federal guards. They surrounded all those buildings like an army. And when protestors got too close – or the odd one threw something – they shot rubber bullets and tear gas. Standing a few blocks from the front line, a young protestor came running up, asking if I had seen a medic. He pointed frantically to an older man sitting on a bench with blood pouring down his tattered trousers. He'd just been shot with a rubber bullet. What was more surreal was seeing the line of police less than 5m away, doing nothing to help. 1News US Correspondent Logan Church reports from the front lines in downtown Los Angeles. (Source: 1News) Talking to protestors this week, they told me they were furious about the ICE raids – and that was why they were there. But they were even more angry about what they called a heavy-handed police response directed by Trump. ADVERTISEMENT "He's wanting to cause chaos," one protestor told me. "He's wanting to incite fear and cause violence in order to do martial law on us. He wants to enact something so he can have more rule over us and I don't stand for that." Another man said the reason he'd come out to protest was simple. "Everything they are doing is illegal, so when someone breaks the law you've gotta come and make sure they follow the law." Authorities stand in tear gas while trying to clear protesters at the metropolitan detention centre in downtown Los Angeles, Sunday, June 8, 2025, following last night's immigration raid protest. (Source: Associated Press) Perhaps the most fascinating chat I had though was with a pair of Kiwis who just happened to walk past where I was filming. They'd decided to join the demonstrators as they marched around the city. "We just arrived in LA about an hour ago, we are staying in downtown LA and we could hear the sirens, we could hear the helicopters, so we decided to go for a walk to check it out," said Tiana Griffin. "We had to join because this is the equivalent of the Te Tiriti Hikoi, fighting for the greater good, fighting for the most vulnerable communities. The people that are serving this country, it makes you want to sob at the mamae that you feel for these people is the same mamae that you feel for Māori in Aotearoa at the moment. So we had to. We were just drawn to it." ADVERTISEMENT "This felt like home," added Meretini. "We are standing in the middle of something that resonated for the both of us, having walked the hikoi down to government and this is their form of it — and everyone is really worried at home about how it would be for us in LA, but really this has been the best introduction to LA – to be able to stand with their people." For the pair, joining the marchers was an easy decision. "It's meaningful – our children are telling us to stay safe and stay out of trouble – but this is so peaceful. This is exactly like the Te Tiriti marches that we had in Aotearoa. Everyone is carrying their flags calling out in Spanish – I wish I knew what they were saying so we can join in but it's the same feeling, it's the same aroha as our marches back home." In my travels throughout America, I have met many people who believe that illegal immigrants are the cause of much of the country's woes. They're concerned about jobs not being available, housing costs rising, and crime. I've also met people deeply concerned about their friends, family, and neighbours, being increasingly treated as lesser beings by this country's leaders. As a reporter who has covered countless protests at home and here in America, I can confidently say this one in Los Angeles feels different. ADVERTISEMENT It's a city that has birthed protest movements that have swept the nation, and this feels just like that.
The Spinoff
3 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Golden visas bring in big bucks as one-percenters look to NZ
The government is celebrating a $25 million boost from wealthy migrants, but questions remain about the visa's wider economic impact, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Big names, big money Immigration minister Erica Stanford is hailing the revamped Active Investor Plus visa as a major success, reports The Post's Thomas Manch, with more than $25 million already transferred and around $1 billion worth of applications in the pipeline. Launched on April 1, the updated scheme lowered the investment threshold, removed the English language requirement, and slashed in-country time obligations. Applicants under the new 'growth' category need to invest a minimum of $5 million in higher-risk assets over three years and spend just 21 days in New Zealand during that time. 'It's been so successful, and the people are amazing,' said Stanford, claiming some applicants are tech co-founders of 'very big, well-known companies that you would probably use every day'. The majority of applications have come from the United States, followed by China, Hong Kong and Germany. Not all capital is created equal It's certainly a tidy sum of money, but will it meaningfully grow the economy? Writing in Newsroom, Brent Burmester, a business lecturer at the University of Auckland, says passive capital injections into funds or existing businesses rarely drive widespread economic transformation. 'Wanting residency and having the capital to secure it is not a measure or indicator of future entrepreneurial breakthrough,' he argues. Instead, Burmester supports prioritising migrants with ambition, skills and drive over those with simply a big chequebook. 'The research is very clear on this: such immigrants grow an economy like ours and give established Kiwis a reason to stay. They typically demand less and deliver more. Not because they are wealthy, but because they are not. Yet.' A residence visa without residents? Under the new rules, investors may spend as little as a week a year in New Zealand, raising concerns about their long-term contributions to the local business environment. If they're hardly ever here, it seems doubtful that they can engage meaningfully with the companies their money supports or with the communities they're theoretically helping grow. Immigration lawyer Nick Mason tells Morning Report the requirement 'does seem very minimal' but in his experience, golden visa holders spend a lot longer in-country than they have to. RNZ's Liu Chen also reports that potential Chinese applicants have found their way into the country blocked due to their inability to use China's Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) scheme, which is virtually the only pathway for individuals from China to transfer capital overseas. One immigration lawyer told Chen that excluding QDII effectively shuts off the golden visa to most Chinese investors, despite the government claiming the programme is 'country neutral'. Parent Boost visa raises equity concerns While wealthy investors are being courted, many migrant families are reacting to a more personal policy change. The new Parent Boost visa, announced on Sunday, will allow parents of citizens and residents to stay in New Zealand for up to 10 years. Though widely welcomed, community leaders warn it is largely out of reach for the working-class migrants who need it. 'For them, the Parent Boost Visa is a promise they cannot afford to fulfill,' writes Vineeta Rao in Indian Newslink. Applicants must meet high financial thresholds – $160,000 in savings for a single applicant with no other income, or $250,000 for a couple – that skew the visa in favour of migrants from wealthier countries. The result is a tiered system, Rao writes, that effectively '[sidelines] many Indian families, despite their cultural and emotional capability to support their parents here'.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Free Speech Union Warns Stalking And Harassment Bill Risks Abuse, Changes Make It Worse
The Crimes Legislation (Stalking and Harassment) Amendment Bill suffers from the common fault of slogan laws with good intentions, without realism about the risks of misuse. The announced expansion of what is considered a 'specified act' goes in the wrong direction, says Stephen Franks, Council Member of the Free Speech Union. 'We've already seen the broad and vague terminology in the Harmful Digital Communications Act being used to silence legitimate dissent many times. This Bill is likely to be similarly abused. 'Truth should be a defense for 'damaging, or undermining [a person's] reputation, opportunities, or relationships'. That would save the centuries-long principle that protects the public interest in learning home truths about powerful people and wrongdoers. It is not enough to say the Bill lets you argue that truth is for a proper purpose. We know that courts have not held that telling the truth is presumptively a proper purpose. 'The broad definition of 'specified acts' as inducing fear or distress, combined with the low threshold for establishing a 'pattern of behaviour', already leaves wide scope for misuse against legitimate surveillance, and dissent. Likewise, the inclusion of 'contacting or communicating with a person' is vague and has the potential to be weaponised. 'By prioritising the term 'fear or distress' without a clear objective override, the Bill raises similar issues to 'hate speech' legislation. The law does not recognise that some people ought to be ashamed ('distressed') by exposure of their own conduct. 'The Government's decision to increase the timeframe for establishing a 'pattern of behaviour' from contact twice over 12 to 24 months also widens the net, making it more likely that isolated or infrequent expressions of dissent could be criminalised. 'We submitted our concerns in February, urging the Justice Select Committee to narrow their definitions, to clarify 'specified acts', and to provide better defences that would let the courts protect free speech. We call on the Minister of Justice to protect Kiwis' speech rights as well as victims of stalking and harassment.'
