Strong ties with US don't mean blind support for unjust policies, says Ishaq Dar
FM Ishaq Dar in meeting to review ongoing evacuation of Pakistani nationals/zaireen presently stranded in Iran & Iraq on June 18. Photo: x.com/ForeignOfficePk
Strong ties with the United States will not mean unconditional support for its policies, especially when they are unjust, said Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar on Friday.
Briefing the press in Islamabad, the deputy PM emphasised that Pakistan was aware that Iran would not remain passive after the US bombed three of its nuclear facilities.
Dar was speaking in reference to the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) meeting, where the 12-day Iran-Israel war was a primary topic of discussion.
He highlighted Pakistan's efforts to ensure that a special session on Iran was held, which was agreed upon by the foreign ministers of OIC member states.
Dar also noted that Pakistan had been in constant communication with Iranian officials, including discussions between Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and the Iranian leadership.
During the briefing, Dar explained that Iran had praised Pakistan's diplomatic efforts in both the United Nations Security Council and their parliament.
He shared details of an important meeting in Istanbul, which took place during a visit by Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, which was attended by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu and other Turkish leaders to address the situation in Iran.
Dar said that after the US attack on Iran, Pakistan had been informed by Tehran that while Iran was not developing nuclear weapons, it could not ignore the US attack and would retaliate. Iran's response entailed an attack on a US airbase in Qatar.
Dar made it clear that while Pakistan values its relationship with the US, this does not mean aligning with Washington on every issue, especially when it comes to unjust military actions.
He reiterated Pakistan's commitment to a peaceful resolution and its efforts to ensure the ceasefire holds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Lessons for India, Israel and Pakistan
Listen to article Should India draw any lessons from the latest fiasco that an arrogant Israel suffered? Technological superiority can guarantee defence but it can hardly enforce total submission by a nation that prides itself on thousands of years of nationhood – also gelled by a common religious belief. Let us first glance through the Indian conduct post Pahalgam. It unilaterally suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and dared to establish a neo-normal by sending drones and missiles deep inside Pakistan between May 7 and 10. Regardless of who did it and whether the entire episode was somehow multilaterally scripted, the Indian government's narrative evoked both negativity as well as skepticism at home and abroad. Officials mostly hid behind ambiguity, pretending innocence wrapped in a self-righteousness. Not many abroad bought the Indian projection of being a victim of Pakistan-driven terrorism after the May 7 strikes deep inside Pakistan. The consternation caused in Tehran by India's explicit support for Israel – no condemnation at all – its refrain from calling out Israel for its aggression, and its refusal to sign off the SCO statement during the conflict that called out Israel for the violence against Iran has had its impact too. India endured more isolation – if not insult – at the SCO Defence Ministers/Security Advisors huddle at Qingdao, China (June 26) when the joint communiqué made a reference to "militant activities in Balochistan", but made no mention of the April 22 attack in Kashmir. In protest, India refused to endorse the statement, accusing it of disproportionately highlighting Balochistan-related terrorism while downplaying or ignoring attacks affecting India - a stance seen as favouring Pakistan. The toll such self-serving posturing – during the Iran-Israel conflict and at the SCO security officials conference – took became evident in a statement by the Iranian Embassy in New Delhi; it thanked "all honourable people and political parties of India" for standing by Iran. Surprisingly, the only glaring omission from this was the Indian government – no mention of it at all – an expression presumably of the Iranian displeasure over the duplicitous attitude of India, a non-aligned country that touts democratic credentials. More similar setbacks await Indian diplomacy in coming weeks and months unless the Modi cohorts enforce a review of the country's policies. In contrast, the Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan, Reza Amiri Moghaddam, expressed deep gratitude to the people and government of Pakistan, saying, "The Iranian nation will never forget the brotherly support extended by the Pakistani people and the government." This duplicity is not lost on China or Russia either – both of whom seem to be reconnecting with Iran, stand firm with Pakistan and subtly snubbing India, albeit in a diplomatic offensive. These countries also watch as India now has put Bangladesh on notice for renegotiating the Ganga Waters Treaty (GWT) that had been signed on December 12, 1996. India, according to an NDTV report, has conveyed to Dhaka its desire for a new 10-15 year duration treaty on the pretext that it requires more water to meet its developmental needs – as if there is no such need for the lower riparian Bangladesh. "Before Pahalgam, we were inclined to extend the treaty for another 30 years, but the situation changed drastically afterward," the report quoted a Ministry of External Affairs official as saying. Again a very self-serving approach – premised in the Pahalgam incident – by the upper riparian India, unlike China which as the upper riparian for India always insists on dialogue and warns against actions that may harm the neighbour. As for Israel, it overlooked the fact that Iran was well-prepared for dealing with the Israeli assault because of the perennial state-of-conflict and the shadow wars through proxies between the two states. The carte-blanche for the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza – that Israel got from the US and key NATO allies after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack – apparently obscured the Israeli assessment of the Iranian missile capacity. A unified and unflinching Tehran – the clergy led by the Ayatollah, the IRGC and the Iranian People at large – also surprised the cold-blooded, self-righteous Israeli warmongers. Israel had to eventually swallow the bitter pill i.e. acceptance of a face-saving ceasefire – as "commanded" by the US President. India had apparently taken cue from the Israeli high-handedness vis a vis the helpless Palestinians and the Lebanese when it decided to launch trans-boundary attacks on Pakistan. Both seemed to over-rely on their technological prowess – assuming the adversary would melt away once subjected to kinetic attacks. Both India and Israel simply underestimated the Iranian and the Pakistani national resolve. They also forgot one critical element: technological superiority can inflict damage on the rivals but is no guarantee for defeating the national resolve – more so in the case of Iran which boasts history and culture spanned over thousands of years. Common religious faith of the majority – the Shia school of thought – only further solidified the cultural pride in the face of the Israeli aggression. Armed with nuclear weapons and fully backed by the time-trusted friend China, Pakistan too blunted the Indian belligerence and the diplomatic/communications offensive. Israeli and Indian aggressive posturing has enforced fresh strategic realignment. Finally, the unravelling of a massive Mossad-led espionage network in Tehran and elsewhere in the country must raise alarm in Pakistan too. Such networks are the key to kinetic and cyber invasions which can compromise national security. And hence the need for urgent closer cooperation among the SCO nations to guard against such hazards.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan welcomes UN decision to remove references in child conflict report
Listen to article Pakistan on Friday welcomed a decision by the United Nations secretary general to remove references to the country in the annual report on Children and Armed Conflict, calling it a recognition of Islamabad's efforts to protect child rights. In a statement issued by the Foreign Office on Friday, Pakistan termed the development a 'significant outcome' and a testament to its 'constructive, sustained, and intensive engagement' with the United Nations, particularly the Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict (SRSG-CAAC). The UN's Children and Armed Conflict (CAAC) agenda monitors six grave violations against children in conflict zones: killing and maiming, recruitment and use of children, sexual violence, abduction, attacks on schools and hospitals, and denial of humanitarian access. PR No.1️⃣9️⃣1️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣ Pakistan Welcomes United Nations Secretary General's Decision to Remove References to Pakistan from the Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict 🔗⬇️ — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) June 27, 2025 The report, published on June 17, acknowledged the agreement between Pakistan and the United Nations on a child protection roadmap, formalised in June 2025, and urged its effective implementation. While noting progress, the UN secretary general expressed concern over reports of grave violations, including attacks on schools—particularly girls' schools—health workers, and incidents along the Afghan border. However, he added that, given Pakistan's cooperation and preventive measures adopted under the agreement, the country would not be listed in the next annual report. 'In view of the level of grave violations in Pakistan and the preventive measures adopted as agreed by the Government in June 2025 in cooperation with the United Nations to protect children, the situation of Pakistan will be removed from my next report,' the secretary general noted. Also Read: Trump ends trade talks with Canada over tax on US tech firms The FO said the decision reflects international recognition of Pakistan's legislative, institutional, and policy measures to protect and promote the rights and well-being of children while reaffirming country's commitment to aligning national frameworks with international norms and best practices in child protection. Pakistan, it added, remains committed to close cooperation with the UN to ensure a safer and brighter future for children. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, in a statement on X, also welcomed the UN secretary general's decision, calling it 'a reflection of our sustained, constructive engagement and Pakistan's unwavering commitment to child protection.' He added, 'It also marks a significant recognition of Pakistan's national efforts to uphold child rights and ensure their well-being. Pakistan remains committed to working with the United Nations and international partners to secure a safer, more hopeful future for all children. Pakistan welcomes the UN Secretary General's decision to remove references to Pakistan from the Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict. This reflects our sustained, constructive engagement and reaffirms Pakistan's commitment to child protection. It also marks a significant… — Ishaq Dar (@MIshaqDar50) June 27, 2025 Report reveals grave violations against children According to the United Nations report, violence against children in armed conflicts surged to record levels in 2024, with a 25% increase in grave violations compared to the previous year. The report, prepared following consultations and in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2427 (2018), covers the period from January to December 2024. It outlines trends in the impact of armed conflict on children and includes a list of parties involved in violations such as recruitment and use, killing and maiming, sexual violence, abductions, and attacks on schools and hospitals. The UN verified 41,370 grave violations, including 36,221 that occurred in 2024 and 5,149 from previous years that were verified during the reporting period. At least 22,495 children were affected. Among the most widespread violations were the killing and maiming of children, with 4,676 children killed and 7,291 injured. Other grave violations included 7,906 incidents of denied humanitarian access, 7,402 cases of child recruitment and use, and 4,573 abductions. Read More: Israeli soldiers ordered to shoot at unarmed aid seekers in Gaza: report The report also noted that 3,018 children were detained in 2024, often for alleged or actual ties to armed groups — including those sanctioned by the UN Security Council — or on national security grounds, raising serious concerns about violations of their rights. The highest numbers of violations were recorded in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (8,554), followed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (4,043), Somalia (2,568), Nigeria (2,436), and Haiti (2,269). The largest percentage increases occurred in Lebanon (545%), Mozambique (525%), Haiti (490%), Ethiopia (235%), and Ukraine (105%). Sexual violence against children rose by 35%, including a sharp increase in cases of gang rape. The report described sexual violence as being used deliberately as a tactic of war — to terrorize populations, assert control over territory, displace communities, or target children based on ethnicity or gender. The denial of humanitarian access also reached unprecedented levels in 2024. The report said more humanitarian workers, including UN staff, were killed last year than ever before. Aid convoys and personnel were attacked, humanitarian workers were arbitrarily detained, and numerous bureaucratic and administrative barriers were imposed, severely disrupting operations. These actions left countless children without access to healthcare, education, protection services, or life-saving humanitarian aid, the report said. The report has urged all parties to uphold their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law, and to respect the rights and special protections granted to children.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Iran says IAEA chief request to visit bombed sites suggests ‘malign intent'
TEHRAN: Iran on Friday rejected a request by UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi to visit facilities bombed by Israel and the United States, saying that it suggested 'malign intent'. International Atomic Energy Agency director general 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent,' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X. 'Iran reserves the right to take any steps in defence of its interests, its people and its sovereignty.' Araghchi again hit out at Grossi personally for not speaking out against the Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, describing it as an 'astounding betrayal of his duties'. UN nuclear chief urges 'more transparency' from Iran He charged that the IAEA chief had 'directly facilitated… the unlawful Israeli and US bombings' by 'obfuscating' Iran's efforts to allay the watchdog's concerns in a May 31 report that accused it of 'less than satisfactory' cooperation. That report led to the adoption of a censure motion by the IAEA board of governors that Iran says cleared the way for the 12-day war Israel launched on June 13. The minister's comments came after the Iranian parliament approved a bill suspending cooperation with the UN watchdog. Araghchi said the new relationship with the IAEA would continue 'until the safety and security of our nuclear activities can be guaranteed.' Grossi had called on Monday for IAEA inspectors to be granted access to Iran's nuclear facilities so that they could establish what had happened to its large stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Concerns have been raised in Israel and in Western countries fearful of Iran's ambitions over whether Iran was able to relocate its stockpile before the Israeli and US strikes.
