Steve Jobs Believed Teamwork Required 'Bumping Up' Each Other Like 'Old Ugly Rocks' — Here's What He Meant
Steve Jobs once likened a high-performing team to "common stones" spinning in a rock tumbler, noisy, abrasive and ultimately polished to brilliance.
What Happened: The anecdote, recorded in a 1995 interview for PBS's "Triumph of the Nerds" and rediscovered after his death, captures what the Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) co-founder saw as the alchemy of collaboration.
Jobs told interviewer Bob Cringely that, as a boy, a widower neighbor showed him a homemade tumbler, "a motor and a coffee can and a little band between them," filled with "regular old ugly rocks," water and grit. After a night of clattering, the stones emerged "amazingly beautiful," he recalled.
Don't Miss:
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — this is your last chance to become an investor for $0.80 per share.
Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can invest with $1,000 at just $0.30/share.
The tumbling, he said, mirrors "incredibly talented people bumping up against each other, having arguments, having fights sometimes, making some noise" until both ideas and individuals are refined. Jobs, then running NeXT and poised to return to Apple, argued that the best companies court constructive friction. '...Working together, they polish each other and they polish the ideas,' he remarked.
According to an NBC article from 2017, former colleagues say Jobs organized project rooms so engineers and designers could not avoid debate, a practice later echoed in Apple's iPhone and Pixar's story-brain sessions.
Why It Matters: Steve Jobs routinely engineered tension to sharpen ideas, whether by ringing Pixar colleagues "at any time, day or night, three in the morning" and expecting instant answers, a habit Pete Docter says he now refuses to copy.
His intolerance for half-measures surfaced again this month when tech watchers joked that Jobs would "have fired everyone" over a lackluster iOS interface, an exaggeration that nonetheless echoed stories of him dismissing teams that failed to hit the mark on the first iPhone's glass swap and other last-minute pivots.
Yet the same razor-edged perfectionism often came wrapped in jolts of generosity meant to keep morale high. Former quality chief Ron Givens recalls Jobs buying a tardy secretary a new Jaguar on the spot, a reward delivered only after a public grilling about her commitment.
Read next:
Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Back a bold new approach to cancer treatment with high-growth potential.
Jeff Bezos-Backed Arrived Homes Hits A Big Sale On Charlotte Property – Investors Earning A 34.7% Return
Image via Kemarrravv13/ Shutterstock
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
This article Steve Jobs Believed Teamwork Required 'Bumping Up' Each Other Like 'Old Ugly Rocks' — Here's What He Meant originally appeared on Benzinga.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Four Major Drivers of the Gold-Silver Price Ratio
In recent months, gold prices have risen to new record highs, topping $3,500 for the first time before easing to $3,350. Silver prices have also been rising in tandem, peaking at above $37 per ounce but remaining well below its twin highs from 1980 and 2011 (Figure 1). Over time, the relative value of gold and silver as measured by their price ratio has varied amid supply growth, central bank buying, advances in technology (photography and solar panels) as well as the pace of Chinese growth. On a day-to-day basis, gold and silver prices are often highly correlated with a one-year rolling correlation coefficient ranging from 0.68 to 0.95. Currently, the two metals are experiencing their weakest price correlation in over two decades (Figure 2). Moreover, even during periods of high correlation, the gold-silver ratio can move a great deal. During gold's period of outperformance over silver, the gold-silver price ratio (the number of troy ounces of silver it takes to buy a troy ounce of gold) crossed over 100 for the first time since 2020 before falling back towards 90 in June. During the period from 1997 to 2011, one ounce of gold typically bought anywhere from 25 to 83 ounces of silver, so its current trading level of around 90x as expensive as silver is still far from what was once historical norms (Figure 3). At first glance, gold's outperformance relative to silver may seem mysterious from a supply perspective. In recent years, gold mining supply has been around 97 million troy ounces whereas silver mining output has been around 800 million (Figures 4 and 5). Mining production of both gold and silver peaked in the mid-2010s, fell in the late 2010s and then stabilized. Secondary supply (recycled metal) has been rising but secondary supply tends to respond to price changes rather than drive them. But gold has an advantage that silver lacks: central banks. Central banks have been net buyers of gold since 2008 after having been net sellers previously (Figure 6). Central bank buying removes gold from the market permanently or at least until the central banks choose to reduce their holding, which they haven't done since 2007. Net of official central bank transactions, gold supply is lower today than it was in 2005 (Figure 7) while silver supply is up by over 35%. On the demand side, gold and silver are connected through the jewellery market. Unlike silver, however, gold has very few industrial uses (Figure 8). By contrast, silver has a myriad of practical uses. A quarter century ago, the biggest of these applications was photography, but that dwindled from 25% of annual silver mining output to less than 4%, explaining, in part, silver's underperformance relative to gold. On the positive side, silver is finding increased applications in batteries and solar panels. That said, most silver is used for other industrial purposes, and this leaves silver at the mercy of the strength of global industrial demand (Figure 9). Central-bank buying of gold has contributed to its outperformance relative to silver. The decline of photography has hurt silver prices. Growth in solar panel manufacturing may provide support for silver. The gold-silver ratio has been tightly connected to the pace of Chinese growth. Trade inter-market metal spreads with our variety of products from standard-sized benchmarks to smaller-sized contracts. Find out more Erik Norland Economic Research Education Futures Article Metals Gold Silver All examples in this report are hypothetical interpretations of situations and are used for explanation purposes only. The views in this report reflect solely those of the author and not necessarily those of CME Group or its affiliated institutions. This report and the information herein should not be considered investment advice or the results of actual market experience. Derivatives are not suitable for all investors and involve the risk of losing more than the amount originally deposited and any profit you might have made. This communication is not a recommendation or offer to buy, sell or retain any specific investment or service. All examples in this report are hypothetical interpretations of situations and are used for explanation purposes only. The views in this report reflect solely those of the author and not necessarily those of CME Group or its affiliated institutions. This report and the information herein should not be considered investment advice or the results of actual market experience. CME Group Inc. does not have control over the content, accuracy, quality, or legality, of any third-party product, service, or content advertised on this webpage. The presence of such advertisements on this webpage does not signify any association, partnership, or endorsement of the third-party or its content by CME Group Inc. Full disclaimer Copyright © 2025 CME Group Inc. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Oil Prices Should Head Much Lower Again: 3-Minute MLIV
Anna Edwards, Guy Johnson, Kriti Gupta and Mark Cudmore break down today's key themes for analysts and investors on "Bloomberg: The Opening Trade." (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
KB Home (KBH) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Financial Performance Amid Market Challenges
Total Revenue: $1.5 billion in the second quarter. Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS): $1.50 in the second quarter. Gross Margin: 19.7%, excluding inventory-related charges. SG&A Expenses: 10.7% of housing revenues. Operating Income Margin: 9% of homebuilding revenues. Net Orders: 3,460 in the second quarter. Average Community Count: 254, a 5% increase year-over-year. Backlog: 4,776 homes valued at $2.3 billion. Average Selling Price: Approximately $489,000. Net Income: $108 million in the second quarter. Book Value Per Share: Nearly $59, a 10% year-over-year increase. Share Repurchases: $200 million in the second quarter. Land Investment: Over $513 million in land acquisition and development. Total Liquidity: $1.2 billion, including $309 million of cash. Debt to Capital Ratio: 32.2%. Release Date: June 23, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. KB Home (NYSE:KBH) delivered solid financial results in the second quarter, meeting or exceeding guidance ranges across key metrics. The company repurchased $200 million of its shares in the second quarter, demonstrating a commitment to returning cash to shareholders. Build times improved sequentially by seven days, returning to pre-pandemic levels, which contributed to exceeding delivery expectations. The company achieved a gross margin of 19.7%, excluding inventory-related charges, which was above the guidance range. KB Home (NYSE:KBH) maintained a high customer satisfaction level, receiving numerous division-level honors from Avid CX. Affordability challenges persist due to elevated mortgage interest rates and macroeconomic uncertainties, impacting consumer confidence and home purchase decisions. Net orders declined in April and May, not following the typical spring trajectory, leading to a revision of fiscal 2025 guidance. The average absorption pace per community decreased to 4.5% net orders compared to 5.5% in the previous year's second quarter. Municipal delays in utility signoffs and certificates of occupancy impacted the timing of community openings, affecting net orders. The company revised its revenue expectation for fiscal 2025 to between $6.3 billion and $6.5 billion, indicating a lower top line and contributing to lower margins. Q: What steps is KB Home taking to manage SG&A costs amid a revenue cut? A: Jeffrey Mezger, Chairman and CEO, explained that KB Home is focused on aligning overhead with revenue and scale. They are adjusting headcount based on delivery needs and exploring various cost-saving measures. The goal is to reduce the SG&A ratio back under 10% over time. Q: Can you explain the factors affecting the gross margin outlook? A: Robert Dillard, CFO, stated that the gross margin outlook is impacted by operating leverage, land costs, and regional mix. While construction cost reductions have offset some pricing pressure, the overall expectation for the full year is a margin between 19% and 19.4%. Q: How is KB Home planning to achieve its fourth-quarter closing targets? A: Rob McGibney, President and COO, highlighted improvements in build times as a key factor. The company needs to sell about 2,500 homes to meet delivery targets, which is less than last year. They are targeting high backlog turnover ratios and leveraging inventory homes for sales. Q: What is the strategy behind KB Home's pricing adjustments in response to market conditions? A: Jeffrey Mezger, CEO, emphasized that KB Home will continue to adjust pricing based on market conditions and community performance. The strategy involves offering the best value through base price adjustments rather than relying on incentives, which is already factored into their guidance. Q: How is KB Home addressing community opening delays and their impact on sales? A: Rob McGibney, COO, acknowledged that community opening delays impacted sales, resulting in missed opportunities for a couple of hundred sales. The company is enhancing coordination with municipal stakeholders to improve forecasting and responsiveness to such delays. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
