logo
'Undoubtedly disappointing' voter turnout in 2025 Pennsylvania primary

'Undoubtedly disappointing' voter turnout in 2025 Pennsylvania primary

Yahoo27-05-2025

Voters cast their ballots at Fairmont Junior High in Boise during the Idaho primary on May 17, 2022. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)
Pennsylvania was at the center of the political universe in 2024 as a key battleground state in the presidential election, and as a result, saw record high voter turnout.
But, most voters stayed home when it came to last week's primary, even with races that would likely determine who would lead the state's biggest cities on the ballot.
'The turnout was undoubtedly disappointing,' said Berwood Yost, the director of the Franklin & Marshall College Poll.
Low voter turnout in 'off-year' municipal primaries is not uncommon for a variety of reasons. Local races tend to not garner the same attention as those for statewide or federal offices do, despite the bigger impact the positions have on communities across the state.
'They're for offices that probably affect you most directly and in a most regular way,' Yost said. 'And yet the turnout is low.'
Some potential voters often don't realize which elections are on the ballot, while voter fatigue may also contribute to lower turnout, since Pennsylvania was in the spotlight last year.
In 2025, turnout appears to be lower than the previous two off-year municipal primary elections. Yost told the Capital-Star it looks like about 22% of Democrats voted last week, while 18% of Republicans cast ballots.
Two years ago, 27% of Democrats and 24% Republicans voted in the primary. In 2021, the numbers weren't much different with 28% of Republicans and 25% of Democrats participating in the primary election, he said.
This year's primary didn't feature state Supreme Court candidates on the ballot like those two previous years, which can impact turnout. However, candidates for the Superior and Commonwealth courts were up for a vote.
In addition to the statewide judicial races, several of the largest cities including Pittsburgh, Allentown, and Erie, held mayoral elections, while Philadelphians went to the polls to vote in a closely watched district attorney race.
The Democratic Party is the dominant party in those cities, and the winner of the primary ultimately enters November as the heavy favorite to win a full term in office.
Sam Chen, principal director and chief strategist of The Liddell Group, previously served in various roles for former Republican elected leaders including Gov. Tom Corbett, U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, and U.S. Rep. Charlie Dent.
He says he believes there was lower turnout in the GOP primary for a few reasons, including that some in the Republican Party are more complacent since President Donald Trump won the White House and the party claimed control of both chambers of Congress.
'We tend to vote for change, and if everything is great, (some say) I'm not going to the polls,' Chen said.
Even though turnout wasn't particularly high for Democrats, Larry Ceisler, a public affairs expert, believes they should be optimistic about their chances of winning races in November and potentially 2026.
His example? Bucks County.
The suburban county located just north of Philadelphia is viewed as one of the premier purple counties in Pennsylvania. In 2024, Republicans regained a narrow voter registration edge over Democrats in the county, while Trump became the first Republican candidate for president to win Bucks since 1988.
Despite the recent momentum for the GOP there, Democrats saw higher turnout in the same countywide races in the primary.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Did the primary election signal which way the Democratic Party is moving?
The results in the state's two biggest cities showed that it isn't clear which direction Democrats are headed.
In Philadelphia, incumbent progressive District Attorney Larry Krasner cruised to earning the Democratic Party nomination over former Philadelphia Municipal Court Judge Pat Dugan, who was viewed as the moderate candidate.
Turnout was 17%, which is lower than the 2021 primary in the city, the last time the district attorney was on the ballot.
Lauren Cristella, President and CEO of the Committee of Seventy, said the low voter turnout in Philadelphia should 'alarm all of us.'
'We cannot dismiss this as 'just another low-turnout election' or chalk it up to the 'Philly Shrug.' Turnout this low goes well beyond that kind of reasoning, and that kind of thinking lets a broken system off the hook,' Cristella said. 'Low turnout like this is a warning sign. It means too many of our neighbors feel disengaged, disillusioned, or disconnected from the process.'
Cristella added that the most recent primary election's turnout in the city 'should be a wake-up call' and called for 'bold action,' including changes such as open primaries and 'selecting judges based on merit rather than electing them.'
Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey, who was backed by various progressive organizations and elected officials, lost his bid for a second term in the Democratic primary to Allegheny County Controller Corey O'Connor.
Turnout in the city was 'slightly higher than 26%,' which was a 2% increase in comparison to the 2021 mayoral primary election, according to WESA.
The experts who spoke with the Capital-Star agreed that each race was unique.
'I think that's what we're seeing now. The Democrats are trying to define themselves, trying to figure out what their message is and what they stand for, and find candidates that can express that effectively,' Yost said. 'And I don't think this particular election did anything to settle that question.'
'I don't think there's an overarching narrative to this one, besides turnout is low and people don't care about local elections,' Chen added.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Next test? November's retention races.
Pennsylvanians in November will vote to fill one open seat on the Superior Court and Commonwealth Court.
However, all eyes are expected to largely be on the vote for retention of three Democratic Supreme Court justices.
Earlier this year, an open seat on Wisconsin's Supreme Court garnered a lot of attention and outside spending.
'You saw the way they pursued the open Supreme Court seat in Wisconsin, a pivotal swing state. You've got three bites at the apple in Pennsylvania to start changing the dynamics of that court,' Yost said. 'And so you better believe Republican operatives are going to be here trying to keep those justices from being retained, but that's hard to do.'
Justices in retention races in Pennsylvania are often not close, but if efforts from conservative organizations are successful, the Democratic majority of the court could change.
Yost noted since Trump won in November, there has been a swing towards Democratic candidates, including in a special election for a state Senate seat in conservative Lancaster County which was won by a Democrat earlier this year.
'It's going to be an uphill fight for (Republicans), because I suspect that the turnout is going to favor Democrats,' Yost said. 'But I think there'll be more spending, and there'll be more conversation and probably more activity around the races. So, we'll see higher turnout even than we saw in 2023, just because the more money that's spent and the more aware people are about the campaigns and the candidates, the more likely they are to vote.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump
Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller spammed social media Tuesday night in a raging display of his unwavering support for President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as it faced increasing backlash from MAGA figures, including Elon Musk. The Trump loyalist went in hard to sell the 1,038-page document that passed the House by a single vote on May 22. Miller's comments came hours after former DOGE chief Musk attacked the mega-spending bill as the legislation moves to the Senate, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest man also threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' at next year's midterm elections. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. Miller responded by calling Trump's bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations' and 'the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House.' Miller pointedly described those on Trump's side of the argument as the president's 'closest allies.' It is unclear how much personal animus there is between Miller and Musk after the tech billionaire walked out on the administration, taking Miller's wife Katie with him. Katie Miller was hired by DOGE under the same 'special government employee' status as Musk, meaning that she was also time-limited to 130 days in office, but that has done little to quell unsubstantiated internet speculation about Musk and the Millers. She will now reportedly work for Musk full-time. Miller began his own barrage of posts on X, first by claiming Trump's bill would fund increased deportation. '[The bill] will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale, and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens from the United States,' Miller wrote. 'For that reason alone, it's the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World, in generations.' 'Now or never,' the 39-year-old wrote in another post. Trump's bill is estimated to increase the budget deficit by approximately $600 billion in the next fiscal year. Miller tried to explain his take on the bill by breaking it down into three sections: 'The most significant border security and deportation effort' in history, a full 'extension and expansion' of Trump's tax cuts and finally cutting almost $2 trillion through 'the largest welcome reform in history.' 'Item 1 alone (border security + deportation),' Miller wrote, 'makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' Critics of Trump's bill fear it would lead to millions of Americans losing health coverage by slashing Medicaid and introducing budget cuts to food assistance programs, with spending on border security and military programs increased. Some Republicans have also expressed fears about the rising cost of the bill, despite a deadline of July 4 to get the measure passed and signed into law. Miller's flurry of posts included him bragging that the bill 'was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close.' 'The bill was designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People,' he wrote in another post. Miller also called out GOP Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who told Fox Business his biggest objection to Trump's bill was the addition of '$5 trillion to the debt ceiling' over the next decade. 'Why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals?' Miller asked in a post. Miller clarified Trump's bill would not fund the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or the Environmental Protection Agency. Experts have, however, warned the bill could ruin student loan borrowers and universities and will have an environmental impact through increased mining and logging of public lands to raise revenue. 'We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017,' Miller posted on X. Miller's loyalty comes as other Republican senators have joined Musk in questioning the contents of Trump's bill. At least four are demanding changes, according to Reuters. They include Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson. While Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate, they cannot afford to lose support. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had not read a part of the bulky bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of (the bill) that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene posted on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' California Republican Jack Kimble was also critical of the bill on Tuesday. He posted on X: 'Full transparency, I did not know that the big beautiful bill was a real budget and would be used to determine spending levels. It seems to me that this is something that should have been made known to those in the House of Representative[s].' When a follower told him 'you're supposed to read the bills before you vote on them' Kimble replied 'Yeah, my bad.' Ron Johnson also agreed with Musk's 'disgusting abomination' comments on the bill. Speaking to NewsNation's The Hill on Tuesday, Johnson said, 'He's telling the truth... that's all I'm doing, too.' 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long-term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down. It supports it going up.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was already aware of 'where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that he would not be changing it. 'This is one, big, beautiful bill,' Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'And he's sticking to it.'

Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay
Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay

HONOLULU (KHON2) — Congress continues to discuss possible cuts to Medicaid and many in Hawaii are concerned about the potential impacts. Some officials warn pregnant women and children could be hit the hardest. Those who rely on the service for themselves and their children also fear the worst. On Aug. 8, 2023, wildfires rip through the Lahaina community forcing thousands to flee. Mairey Garcia, then 10 weeks pregnant with her second child, made it out alive with her husband and daughter. Wanted man arrested after 'crime spree' leads to officer-involved shooting 'We live in Maui, for almost 16 years,' she said. 'Thinking and looking back after the fire, I don't want to think about it anymore.' They lost everything. Uprooting her family and relocating after the devastation on Maui she dealt with so many stressors and the added responsibility of another baby on the way. Garcia said having Aloha Care medical coverage was a huge weight off her shoulders. 'It's the only thing I have that time to support my babies and my family as well, because I can't afford to get a medical,' she Feb. 23, 2024 she gave birth to a healthy baby girl. 'Aloha Care has been there for me from the very start. It's been a blessing for me,' Garcia said. She is not alone. According to Aloha Care CEO Francoise Culley-Trotman, 1,500 moms delivered babies last year covered by Aloha Care. With 70,000 members it's the states second largest medicaid-medicare health plan. But if a bill to cut more than $600 billion in funding for Medicaid passes congress in the coming weeks, many will lose that lifeline. Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news 'The Republican tax bill makes the biggest cuts to Medicaid in history, meaning many people on Med-QUEST will lose coverage and hospitals and clinics may be forced to reduce services or close altogether,' U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz said in a statement. 'These cuts will disproportionately impact pregnant women and children.' 'This issue goes beyond just our membership or even the Quest recipients to what happens to our state and our ability to take care of people,' Culley-Trotman explained. She said cuts this extreme will increase preterm births and impact the long term health of mothers. 'Just an overall worsening of maternal and infant statistics in our state,' she added. For Garcia, it's personal. She worries about what will happen to her family and had this message for lawmakers. 'Please don't pass the bill,' she said. 'Because a lot of people need help and and rely on this program.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Editorial: Another UN failure — US had to veto a lopsided resolution that would not bring peace to Gaza
Editorial: Another UN failure — US had to veto a lopsided resolution that would not bring peace to Gaza

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Another UN failure — US had to veto a lopsided resolution that would not bring peace to Gaza

We wish that Elise Stefanik was sitting at the large C-shaped table in the UN Security Council chamber over on the East Side on Wednesday, where she would have ripped apart the fecklessness of the diplomats (from both friend and foe) who lined up to do the bidding of Hamas in support of a lopsided resolution that had to be vetoed by the United States. But due to D.C. politics and the narrowness of the Republican control of the House, Stefanik remains a congresswoman from upstate and is not the U.S. ambassador and the veto task fell to Chargé d'Affaires Dorothy Shea, a career Senior Foreign Service officer. Shea cast her veto, making for a 14-1 tally and correctly killing the resolution, which called for a ceasefire in Gaza without blaming Hamas, who started the fighting by launching the Oct. 7 onslaught against Israel and can stop the fighting by freeing the hostages, giving up, disarming and leaving Gaza. The way to peace is simple: get Hamas out and get aid in. They are stealing the supplies being shipped to the needy Palestinians in the territory. Hamas started this horrible situation by launching the Oct. 7 surprise attack on Israel, the deadliest day for Jews since Hitler's genocidal 1,000-year Reich was destroyed by the heroic soldiers and airmen of the Red Army and the Western Allies. Hamas has been defeated by Israel. Hamas has lost the war, but they are not willing to surrender and they are prolonging the agony for the innocent Palestinians by using them as human shields. The U.S., Egypt and Qatar have been conducting peace talks for months. Israel keeps saying yes, while Hamas keeps saying no, as recently as this past weekend. The U.S. policy has been consistent since Oct. 7: Hamas is the cause of the bloodshed and the suffering and any UN resolution must assign them the blame. The Biden administration vetoed prior Security Council resolutions that failed to condemn Hamas and now the Trump administration is continuing to do so. The Security Council cannot be allowed to deliver Hamas a propaganda victory, while in the real world, the terrorists refuse to accept a way out that the negotiators are offering. There was some hope for a breakthrough when Israel killed Hamas honcho Mohammed Sinwar last week, the younger brother of Yahya Sinwar, the fiend who masterminded Oct. 7 and who was killed last October. But this UN vote, which the Hamas champions will heap blame on Washington for, will only make a getting deal take that much longer and that means more suffering for the people of Gaza who have suffered under years of cruel Hamas dictatorship and now a war started by Hamas. But that's to be expected from the UN, which still hasn't labeled Hamas as a terror organization. As for what's happening in Gaza while the UN dickers, Hamas terrorists hide in their tunnels and ordinary Palestinians pay for their intransigence. There are still 58 Israeli hostages being held by Hamas, now for 608 days. The way forward is clear for Hamas: lay down your weapons, release the hostages and leave Gaza behind to be rebuilt. The Hamas legacy of death and suffering has to end. The UN is only postponing that day. _____

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store