logo
How Canadians really feel about America - and Trump - revealed in new poll

How Canadians really feel about America - and Trump - revealed in new poll

Daily Mail​07-05-2025

More than 50 percent of Canadians no longer feel safe or welcome traveling to the United States amid heightened tensions between the two nations.
The shocking revelation comes on the back of President Donald Trump 's repeated attempts to pressure Canada and the nation's leaders into becoming the 51st state of America.
He has also imposed significant tariffs on America's northern neighbors, arguing that the United States needs 'nothing' from Canada to justify his trade war.
The survey of 1,626 people conducted for the Association for Canadian Studies found 52 percent of participants agreed with the statement: 'It is no longer safe for all Canadians travelling to the United States.'
Broken down into age brackets, 59 percent of respondents aged above 55 agreed, and 47 percent aged between 18 and 54.
Additionally, 54 percent of total participants agreed with a statement that they don't feel welcome in the United States anymore.
A whopping 60 percent in the above 55 age bracket agreed with that sentiment.
Meanwhile, just 27 percent said they disagreed with the statement, with 19 percent unsure.
CEO and President of the Association for Canadian Studies Jack Jedwab warned the National Post this could have serious ramifications on the US tourism sector and relations between the neighboring nations.
'If Canadians have serious concerns about this, it has ramifications for our ongoing travel and interaction with Americans and with the United States,' he said.
'It's something that needs to be addressed and it's something that Mr. Carney needs to help Mr. Trump understand.
'There are economic ramifications arising from Canadians not feeling secure when travelling to the United States and not feeling welcome in the country that we generally see as the home of our main allies.'
But the biggest shock of the poll found that significantly more participants did not know how to respond to a question about Trump's recent comments that the border between Canada and America is no more than an 'artificially drawn line.'
Some 53 per cent of respondents voted they either agreed with the statement (23 percent) or were unsure how they felt (30 percent).
For respondents between 18 and 24, 39 per cent said 'I don't know.'
Jedwarb warned the results indicated young Canadians in particular might be 'more vulnerable' to that messaging from Trump.
'The most surprising part was that younger people were less sure about (the line/boundary being artificial), so they may be sort of more vulnerable to that type of rhetoric,' he said.
During the recent election, Canadians came out strongly to vote for Liberal candidate Mark Carney, banishing 'Canada's Trump' Pierre Poilievre in what was largely seen as a referendum on Trump north of the border.
A poll conducted by DailyMail.com determined the majority of Canadian voters were going to the ballot boxes with the consideration of who would be best suited to stand up to Trump.
Carney assured Canadians he would 'win this trade war with America' and continue to build a relationship with Trump despite 'a crisis that we did not create.
'As I've been warning for months, America wants our land, our water, our resources, our country... never,' he said.
Carney said these were not 'idle threats,' adding: 'President Trump is trying to break us so that America can own us.'
'That will never, ever happen. But we also must recognize the reality that our world has fundamentally changed,' he said to applause.
He met with Trump in the Oval Office earlier this week, where the President doubled down on his '51st state' plans.
The explosive meeting was intended to foster better relations between the two nations as they seek to come to an agreement over the imposition of massive tariffs.
Trump said if the two nations joined together it would be a 'wonderful marriage.' He added: 'But it takes two to tango, right?'
Carney told the former real estate developer flatly: 'There are some places that are never for sale,' mentioning the White House and Buckingham Palace.
Trump refused to give up hope, jovially adding: 'I say ''never say never''.'
He went on to hail the meeting a success, later telling reporters: 'We had a very great meeting. No tension, we want to do what's right for our respective peoples.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Carney invites Modi to G7, signalling thaw in Canada-India relations
Carney invites Modi to G7, signalling thaw in Canada-India relations

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Carney invites Modi to G7, signalling thaw in Canada-India relations

Mark Carney has invited his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi to the upcoming G7 summit in Alberta, marking a shift in Canada-India relations that had soured in recent two spoke over the phone on Friday, during which the Canadian prime minister extended the invite to Modi and agreed to stay in contact, according to a readout released by Carney's confirmed the invite and thanked Carney in a post on X, adding that he looked forward to meeting him at the summit in between the two countries have been strained since former PM Justin Trudeau accused India of carrying out the killing of a Sikh separatist leader on Canadian soil. Hardeep Singh Nijjar was shot and killed outside a Sikh temple he led in Surrey, British Columbia in June 2023. He had been a vocal advocate for the creation of a separate state for Sikhs in India, called Khalistan. India has accused him of being a terrorist and of leading a militant separatist group - accusations his supporters call "unfounded".Four Indian nationals have since been arrested and charged in connection to Mr Nijjar's alleged that agents of the Indian government were involved in the killing, while the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) said it had strong evidence that India was involved in orchestrating campaigns of violence and extortion on Canadian strongly rejected the allegations, calling them "preposterous", and the row led both Canada and India to expel their top envoys along with other defended his decision to invite Modi despite the allegations while speaking to reporters on Friday. While India is not a member of the G7, Modi has attended meetings at previous summits. Carney, who is chairing this year's G7 summit, said key discussions will be held that "certain countries" should be at the table readout said Carney and Modi agreed to "continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns" surrounding the if he believed Modi was involved in the killing of Mr Nijjar, Carney said it was not appropriate to comment on an ongoing legal decision to invite Modi was condemned by some members of Canada's Sikh community. The World Sikh Organisation called it a "betrayal of Sikh Canadians" in a statment, while the Sikh Federation of Canada called it "a grave insult".Mr Nijjar was prominent in British Columbia's Sikh community. Supporters of his have said that he was the target of threats in the past because of his activism over Khalistan.A trial date has not yet been set for the four men accused of killing Mr G7 summit is set to take place between 15 and 17 June in Kananaskis, Alberta. Topics on the agenda, according to the summit's website, include "international peace and security," "global economic stability," and the "digital transition".Alongside India, Carney has also extended an invite to Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum - though she said in late May that she was undecided on whether to Volodymyr Zelensky and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will attend.A full list of invitees has not yet been released.

Explosive truth behind Trump and Musk's 'abusive' bromance collapse... and which billionaire was secretly the CLINGY one
Explosive truth behind Trump and Musk's 'abusive' bromance collapse... and which billionaire was secretly the CLINGY one

Daily Mail​

time35 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Explosive truth behind Trump and Musk's 'abusive' bromance collapse... and which billionaire was secretly the CLINGY one

The abrupt break-up between President Donald Trump and his First Buddy played out in spectacular public fashion. The bromance began almost immediately after a bullet grazed President Trump's ear at a campaign rally last fall in Pennsylvania. When images of the then-candidate being supported off the stage with a fist pumped into the air, mouthing 'fight!' went viral, Musk weighed in. 'I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery,' the X platform owner wrote that night. It was the first of many expressions of public support that relationship experts say hint at some dynamics more typically reserved for romantic partnerships. Dr Isabelle Morley, a clinical psychologist specializing in couples therapy, said: 'I would best describe it [their falling out] as a perfect example of the idealization devaluation cycle that we see typically associated with narcissists in abusive relationships. 'There is this initial obsession that it can include love bombing, this over the top flattery, and this sort of perfect image of the other person being anything and everything wonderful. 'And then there's always the devaluation phase, where the person gets ripped off the pedestal, typically, because, especially with people who have narcissism, the other person disappointed them, made them feel bad, disagreed with them, made them look bad, and which is unforgivable to a narcissist, because their self esteem is so low.' Musk has been a fixture by Trump's side since he made an energetic rally debut exactly one month before the election, hopping around on stage with his arms aloft. 'The true test of someone's character is how they behave under fire. And we had one president who couldn't climb a flight of stairs and another who was fist-bumping after getting shot,' Musk told the crowd. But the honeymoon phase of the bromance came to a screeching halt in May on the heels of a less-than-stellar Tesla earnings call when shares were down more than 40 percent over the year so far. Musk publicly criticized Trump's marquee achievement thus far, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, saying it undercuts the government-slashing work DOGE has carried out since Trump's return to office. He didn't stop there; he doubled down in TV interviews and online barbs, ensuring Trump would see them What ensued was an ego-fueled Hindenburg-style disaster that played out on smartphones worldwide. Mental health and couples therapy experts insist that this was not unexpected. Dr Holly Schiff, a licensed clinical psychologist, told 'I definitely have seen some elements of idealization in the relationship, which can be an early sign of love-bombing, where you overwhelm someone with praise and attention in order to foster loyalty or dependence. 'However, when we see admiration that is so publicly inflated, it's usually quite brittle. 'If the relationship doesn't provide ongoing affirmation or mutual gain, then the dynamic can flip into devaluation just as quickly.' She said Musk emerged as the 'clingy' partner, admiring Trump performatively and publicly to secure his status as First Buddy. 'Elon was often seeking approval from Trump and was more eager for validation. Trump asserted more dominance in their interactions.' His position at the right hand of the President afforded Musk insurance that his companies' lucrative contracts and dealings with the federal government - SpaceX's $14billion in federal contracts and Tesla's EV tax credits - would continue bolstering his status as the world's richest man. Musk would also hate to see his legacy as chief chainsaw-wielder at DOGE be undercut by adding to the federal debt rather than reducing it. Dr Morley added that the Musk-Trump 'situation' is particularly interesting because it's a rare case of mutual ego combustion. Both men, accustomed to bending relationships to their will, lavish praise on allies whenever valuable and then discard them the moment the balance of power shifts. In the days and weeks after the election, Musk was a fixture at Trump's Mar-A-Lago club in Florida, sitting in on meetings, weighing in on key staffing decisions, and taking part in phone calls with world leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. He even had a seat at the Trump family table for Thanksgiving. Musk was not the only one in the partnership who issued effusive praise early on. During his inauguration speech, Trump lavished praise on his top campaign donor, saying: 'We have a new star. A star is born. Elon!' Trump then embraced Musk to head up the new Department of Government Efficiency, which put tens of thousands of federal employees out of work. Since his inauguration, Trump's X account and that of the White House have been peppered with dozens of posts praising Musk and his DOGE cuts, which he has praised Musk repeatedly on camera. On March 11, Trump said on Truth Social that Elon Musk 'is 'putting it on the line' in order to help our Nation, and he is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' A few days later, he wrote on TruthSocial: 'THANK YOU, ELON—MAGA!' Around the same time, Musk said: 'President Trump has put together the best Cabinet I do not give false praise. This is an incredible group of people. I don't think such a talented team has ever been assembled.' 'The very public declarations of admiration signal a kind of exaggerated closeness,' Dr Schiff said. 'These behaviors usually serve a strategic purpose, especially in a power alliance. Build someone up publicly, so they are harder to criticize later, it creates a debt of loyalty.' The two turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom in March, where Trump touted his adviser's electric vehicles: 'Number one, it's a great product—as good as it gets—and number two, because Elon has devoted his energy and his life to doing this and I think he has been treated very unfairly.' Musk, whose company at the time was seeing precipitous drops in share prices and acts of vandalism, basked in his buddy's praise, telling reporters: 'As a function of the great policies of President Trump and his administration, and as an act of faith in America, Tesla is going to double vehicle output in the United States within the next two years.' Around that time, Dr Schiff said, eagle-eyed politicos caught subtle behavior clues in Musk that hinted at simmering tensions under the surface. Standing next to Trump at the Resolute Desk on more than one press occasion, Musk has stood with his arms crossed, staring up at the ceiling, and rolling his eyes back and forth. While the public and some health experts chalked this up to evidence of his rumored heavy use of ketamine and other psychedelics, Dr Schiff suggested that 'these are microexpressions of distancing.' She said: 'In public moments, there appeared to be a growing incongruence between Musk's body language and the performative alliance. More subtle cues usually precede more overt breaks.' The splinter in their relationship deepened the more Musk spoke up about the Big Beautiful Bill, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave around 11 million Americans without health insurance. Trump seemed willing to discard Musk, telling the world that the billionaire was 'wearing thin' and threatened to cancel the EPA Tailpipe Emissions Rules, which effectively required over a third of new cars to be sold either electric or hybrid by 2032 – cars that Trump said 'nobody else wanted.' The result was a scorched earth campaign to tank the other's reputation. Dr Morley said: 'People are expendable with this mindset of like, you take what you can until they're no longer useful, then you discard them, and they've discarded each other. 'And my guess is that behind the scenes Trump discarded Musk first, and now Musk is retaliating, whereas usually we see this in a less even way, with a bigger power imbalance, where the discarded person goes off and licks their wounds and quietly takes it because they don't have either like a platform or whatever to fight back. 'That's obviously not the case with these two people.'

Canada's PM faces backlash for inviting India's Narendra Modi for G7 summit
Canada's PM faces backlash for inviting India's Narendra Modi for G7 summit

The Guardian

time44 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Canada's PM faces backlash for inviting India's Narendra Modi for G7 summit

Canada's prime minister Mark Carney has defended his decision to invite India's prime minister Narendra Modi to the upcoming G7 summit in Alberta, despite Canada's federal police's conclusion that the murder of a prominent Sikh activist in British Columbia was orchestrated by the 'highest levels' of the Indian government. Carney declined to answer reporters' questions over whether he believed Modi had a role in the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar – a killing on Canadian soil that shattered relations between the two countries. 'There is a legal process that is literally under way and quite advanced in Canada, and it's never appropriate to make comments with respect to those legal processes,' he said on Friday. Four Indian nationals living in Canada have been charged with Nijjar's murder. The summit, attended by key world leaders, runs from 15 to 17 June in Kananaskis, Alberta. Carney said because India was the 'fifth largest economy in the world, the most populous country in the world and central to supply chains', he said it was important to invite the country's leader despite the continuing investigation to discuss energy, artificial intelligence and critical minerals. 'I extended the invitation to Prime Minister Modi and, in that context, he has accepted,' Carney said. Modi said he was glad to receive a call from Carney and congratulated the Liberal leader on his recent electoral victory. 'As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the summit,' Modi said in a statement. Canada and India expelled each other's top diplomats last year over Nijjar's politically motivated murder in the British Columbia city of Surrey. Canadian law enforcement also alleged India was involved in extortion, gang violence and intimidation. Carney's decision to invite Modi prompted an outraged response from the World Sikh Organization. 'For Sikhs in Canada, this is a betrayal, not just of our community, but of core Canadian values. Prime Minister Carney's decision to invite Narendra Modi, while India continues to deny any role in the assassination of Bhai Hardeep Singh Nijjar and refuses to cooperate with Canadian authorities, is both shameful and dangerous,' its president Danish Singh wrote in a statement. 'We would never welcome leaders from Russia, China, or Iran under such circumstances. Yet India has done far more on Canadian soil in terms of foreign interference and transnational repression, including orchestrating murders, and is being rewarded with a red carpet welcome.' Carney's decision comes as his new government looks to ease tensions with other nations feuding with Canada. Late Thursday, he posted a readout of a call with the Chinese premier Li Qiang and said there was interest on both sides to 'regularize channels of communication' amid a trade spat that has cost both sides billions through tariffs on seafood, electric vehicles, canola, pork and peas. In the call, the first high-level call since becoming prime minister in March, Carney said both sides were also fighting illegal production of the opioid fentanyl. Carney is also in direct talks with Donald Trump, the US president, to end a trade war between the two allies following economically damaging tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. Doug Ford, the Ontario premier, told reporters the Canadian prime minister was engaged in 'deep, deep discussions' with Trump's team – a development confirmed by Canada's industry minister hours later.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store