Delay in integration of 181 & 112 helpline numbers impacts emergency response in Maharashtra
Pune: Critical gaps in Maharashtra's emergency response system have left women in distress without adequate support, as the integration of women's helpline 181 with police emergency number 112 remains incomplete nearly two years after its announcement.
Currently, the state govt-run call centre (181) is functioning with only five operating systems across Maharashtra, against the required 15. A mere 15 personnel are struggling to handle 3,000-4,000 calls every day at the Pune-based facility. The shortage of manpower forces the operators to manually coordinate with police through time-consuming conference calls, delaying crucial interventions in domestic violence cases.
The women and child development (WCD) department had sent a proposal to Central govt, seeking 10 additional systems and 36 more staff members, but they were yet to be sanctioned, a senior official told TOI on Friday. "The proposal was put up again. But we have still not heard from them."
The official is, however, hopeful that integration would begin next month after due tests, as the areas covered under the WCD department have already been shared with the home department.
Genuine distress calls remain unanswered often. "We tried calling 181 several times to report domestic violence but got no response," said a Pune resident.
Another caller reported similar frustration when seeking help for a security concern. "There is no one attending to the calls."
"I tried calling 181 to help me get a shelter due to violence at home. However, no one answered the first two to three times. Later, when I actually got through they asked me to contact the one stop centre (where women in distress get shelter) again.
I had to stay at a relative's house," shared a victim of domestic abuse.
Helpline 181, launched nationally after the 2012 Nirbhaya case, began dedicated operations in Maharashtra only last year. The service handles domestic abuse cases, health concerns, and shelter needs, making its seamless integration with police systems crucial for timely intervention.
The Centre for Development of Advanced Computing has been entrusted with the task to implement technical solutions and create a centralised response unit in Pune.
This unit will also absorb the child helpline currently run by Childline NGO. "For the first time, there will be a dedicated unit for distress calls," the WCD department official said.
"The helpline was supposed to work jointly with Sakhi centres for counselling. This overhaul was much-needed," said Seema K, who is working at a women's NGO.
The delay in integration underscores the challenges in creating an effective emergency response mechanism, particularly for vulnerable populations requiring immediate intervention, said another woman activist running an NGO.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Brother's Day wishes
,
messages
and quotes !
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Ruling On Gun Companies: Supreme Court Blocks Mexico's Gun Lawsuit Against US Companies, ET LegalWorld
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday spared two American gun companies from a lawsuit by Mexico's government accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence in the southern neighbor of the United States. The justices in a 9-0 ruling authored by liberal Justice Elena Kagan overturned a lower court's ruling that had allowed the lawsuit to proceed against firearms maker Smith & Wesson and distributor Interstate Arms. The lower court had found that Mexico plausibly alleged that the companies aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels, harming its government. Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles Scan to download App The justices embraced the argument made by the companies for dismissal of Mexico's suit under a 2005 U.S. law called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that broadly shields gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had decided in 2024 that the alleged conduct by the companies fell outside these Supreme Court decided that while it has little doubt that U.S. companies are aware of some unlawful sales to Mexican gun traffickers, Mexico's lawsuit failed to allege that the companies had aided and abetted such illegal firearms sales by deliberately helping to bring about the transactions."Mexico's plausible allegations are of 'indifference' rather than assistance," Kagan wrote. "They are of the manufacturers merely allowing some unidentified 'bad actors' to make illegal use of their wares." The case came to the Supreme Court at a complicated time for U.S.-Mexican relations as President Donald Trump pursues on-again, off-again tariffs on Mexican goods. Trump has also accused Mexico of doing too little to stop the flow of synthetic drugs such as fentanyl and migrant arrivals at the lawsuit, filed in Boston in 2021, accused the two companies of violating various U.S. and Mexican laws. Mexico claims that the companies have deliberately maintained a distribution system that included firearms dealers who knowingly sell weapons to third-party, or "straw," purchasers who then traffic guns to cartels in suit also accused the companies of unlawfully designing and marketing their guns as military-grade weapons to drive up demand among the cartels, including by associating their products with the American military and law enforcement. The gun companies said they make and sell lawful avoid its lawsuit being dismissed under the 2005 law, Mexico was required to plausibly allege that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales and that such conduct was the "proximate cause" - a legal principle involving who is responsible for causing an injury - of the harms claimed by Mexico. The Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case on March 4, declined to resolve the proximate cause question after finding that Mexico's suit failed to adequately allege aiding and Arrocha Olabuenaga, the legal adviser for Mexico's Foreign Ministry, vowed that Mexico will continue pursuing its legal fight."While we are disappointed with the decision from this Supreme Court, we are convinced of the strength of our arguments and the evidence that upholds them, and we are encouraged by the support at home and abroad for Mexico's actions," he in the lawsuit had sought monetary damages of an unspecified amount and a court order requiring Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to take steps to "abate and remedy the public nuisance they have created in Mexico."The Second Amendment Foundation, a gun rights group that backed the U.S. gun companies in the case, welcomed Thursday's ruling."The lawsuit, dreamt up by multiple gun control groups, had one goal - bankrupt the American firearms market by allowing civil liability to apply for the criminal misuse of its products," the group said in a social media post. "Thankfully the Supreme Court stepped in and squashed it."Gun violence fueled by trafficked U.S.-made firearms has contributed to a decline in business investment and economic activity in Mexico and forced its government to incur unusually high costs on services including healthcare, law enforcement and the military, according to the a country with strict firearms laws, has said most of its gun homicides are committed with weapons trafficked from the United States and valued at more than $250 million Perez Ricart, an international affairs researcher at Mexico's Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), criticized the ruling."Once again, the industry is shielded. It doesn't matter how many bullets cross the border or how many people are killed on the Mexican side. Bullets are not the only things that kill; so does the legal impunity guaranteed by Washington," Ricart said in a social media post.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Lucknow trader dead, 2 injured in e-way accident
Kanpur: A Lucknow-based surgical equipment trader died while two others were injured in the Auras police station area of Unnao in a hit-and-run case on Agra-Lucknow Expressway on Thursday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The accident occurred when a high-speed truck hit a stationary car parked in the parking lane near Hajipur Gosha village at around 4am on Thursday. Aditya Singh (24), son of Krishna Kumar Singh, a trader dealing in surgical equipment, and resident of Geetapalli Alambagh, Lucknow, was travelling to Agra by car with his younger brother Abhay Singh (21) and friend Mohit (23), son of Omprakash Kashyap from Jayrajpur, Lucknow. Mohit was driving the car. When they reached near Hajipur Gosha village in Auras police station area, they stopped the car in the parking lane of the Expressway for a short break. As soon as the trio three opened the car door to get back in, a high-speed truck coming from Lucknow hit them. Aditya died on the spot, while his brother Abhay and friend Mohit sustained severe injuries. Upon being informed, the rescue team from UPEIDA and the police arrived at the scene. Both injured were admitted to Auras CHC. Due to the severity of Abhay's condition, he was referred to Lucknow Trauma Center while Mohit, was sent home after treatment. Superintendent of Police Deepak Bhker stated, "It was a hit-and-run case. With the help of CCTV footage, investigations are underway to locate the truck and its driver, who fled along with the vehicle after the accident."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Alert villagers help stop minor girl's marriage in Kaushambi
Prayagraj: Marriage of a minor girl in Uttar Pradesh's Kaushambi district was stopped on Thursday. With the help of police and social welfare department officials, members of Child Welfare Committee rushed to Kaushambi's Paschim Sarira village to prevent family members and relatives from forcing the minor girl into wedlock. A senior official said a man from the village made a call to ChildLine number 1098 and reported the marriage of the minor girl, following which, officials from child welfare committee, social welfare department and police rushed to the spot. The joint team also checked the documents, including Aadhaar card of the minor girl and found her to be 16 years of age. They informed the family members about the child marriage law and the girl was handed over to the One Stop Centre where she was to remain till investigations into the case were complete. CWC officials said joint team of CWC, anti-human trafficking unit and child helpline rushed to the spot after alert. Officials added that the girl, as per the complainant, was being married to a Kanpur-based man who was twice her age. They counselled the family on the ill effects of child marriage, besides warning them of legal action. "We convinced the relatives of the girl and the man to call off the marriage as the girl was minor. Officials of the child welfare committee will be conducting a detailed probe into the incident," said an official.
