
From Valenza to Rome: Bulgari CEO Jean-Christophe Babin maps out global jewelry expansion
Nothing seems to slow down Bulgari 's chief executive, Jean-Christophe Babin, who has just assumed leadership of the Watches division at LVMH. Under his direction, the Roman house inaugurated on April 16 the world's largest jewelry manufacturing facility in Valenza, located in the Piedmont region of northern Italy. FashionNetwork.com spoke with the CEO about Bulgari's growth strategy, market outlook and an ambitious new project in Rome.
FashionNetwork.com: You've just inaugurated a new facility in Valenza, eight years after you opened what was then called "Europe's largest jewelry factory." What prompted this new expansion?
Jean-Christophe Babin: This is now the largest jewelry factory in the world working with precious materials. We're not talking about costume jewelry here. This site, launched in 2017, was Bulgari's first true manufacturing facility—a large-scale operation that brought together all trades. We organized large-scale production while preserving the spirit of responsibility typical of small jewelry workshops, which often represent the strength of small businesses. However, the project turned out to be far too small, even though we thought it was very large. By 2020, we realized we needed to expand because we had already reached capacity. That's when we launched the Valenza 2 project.
FNW: Can you share more details about this new project?
JCB: The new facility covers 33,000 square meters. We currently have 1,100 employees and plan to grow that number to over 1,600 while doubling production by 2029. We also collaborate with approximately 1,200 people through partner companies in Valenza. Altogether, we engage nearly 30 percent of the city's workforce, including around 6,000 jewelers—a significant share.
FNW: Won't this increase in production capacity dilute Bulgari's exclusivity?
JCB: We clearly have ambitious growth plans, and recent developments have shown these are realistic. As we've grown, internal production has decreased due to capacity limits. We aim to restore that balance. So, while production is increasing, it's not enormous for Bulgari because we'll outsource less and bring more in-house. It's a rebalancing between what we control internally and what we outsource.
FNW: What's your strategy?
JCB: We aim to internalize previously fully outsourced roles, such as stone setting. We're also bringing in-house certain trades that were either marginal or didn't exist within the company. I aim for every craft to be understood internally, even if not executed entirely by us. Some processes will be fully managed in-house; others may remain 70 or 50 percent internal. That distinction matters. The best way to collaborate with external partners is to understand their craft firsthand—it fosters healthy competition and drives innovation. This project is also about deepening our expertise in jewelry craftsmanship.
FNW: Is it difficult to find skilled labor?
JCB: We created an academy to attract and train talent interested in the art of jewelry-making, drawing students from across Italy. We also welcome Europeans and immigrants referred by the government. Many of our current artisans are from Africa. They previously worked with gold in their home countries and are skilled in engraving and polishing. They've trained at our academy to learn our specific styles and techniques. We've also just opened a second school, La Scuola, in partnership with the renowned Tarì Design School in Naples.
FNW: Valenza focuses on "everyday" jewelry. What about high jewelry?
JCB: High jewelry is crafted in Rome, and we're currently undergoing major changes there. With the Valenza expansion, we're simultaneously launching a project to triple our high jewelry production. We'll be moving operations from the current dense, limited space to a new building from the 1930s. It's a beautiful, historic building in the EUR district, near Fendi 's headquarters and about five kilometers from the city center. The goal is to have a larger production site and expand from 60–70 goldsmiths to 150–160. That's a major effort because it involves people with 15+ years of experience. A master jeweler not only crafts the pieces but also contributes to their creation.
FNW: Will this new site be solely dedicated to high jewelry?
JCB: No. We'll also move our jewelry division into this building. It was previously based at our offices near the Tiber River, a few hundred meters from our flagship store and hotel, which will remain our headquarters. The goal is to build a fully integrated jewelry hub in Rome's EUR district, where marketing, development, and manufacturing teams can collaborate closely under one roof to drive innovation and craftsmanship. This location will become both a production site and the global headquarters for our jewelry and high jewelry operations. It will also serve as a relationship-building hub for jewelry enthusiasts, clients and the media—offering a behind-the-scenes look at our craftsmanship.
FNW: When will this project be completed?
JCB: We're currently in the permitting phase. Since it's a historic building, the exterior will be restored to its original glory. Internally, everything must be redone—it's currently an administrative building jointly owned by the city and the state.
FNW: Aside from jewelry, where are your other production sites?
JCB: We have a silk site in Como—for scarves, ties and small accessories. Our leather goods are made in Florence, where we use many exotic skins for premium evening bags and small-sized items. For watches, we have three sites in Switzerland: Neuchâtel, Le Sentier (for movements) and a casing site in Saignelégier. Eyewear is the only category we don't produce ourselves—it's handled by Thélios, LVMH's eyewear division.
FNW: How are your product categories performing in terms of sales?
JCB: When we were acquired in 2011, jewelry was already important but not dominant. Today, it's overwhelmingly dominant alongside watches. Fragrances and accessories, which used to represent a higher percentage of revenue, have been repositioned with specific roles. Both help recruit younger clients. These categories are typically more accessible to younger demographics. Perfume tops out at €350, small leather goods sell for €300–400 and handbags start at €2,500. Our hospitality segment plays the opposite role—it recruits at the top end with the world's most luxurious hotels.
FNW: How many hotels do you operate?
JCB: We have nine hotels and five under construction, totaling 14, with more in development. We don't want too many. They have a limited number of suites and target the high-end boutique hotel segment, offering a very personalized experience.
FNW: Hospitality was the last segment you entered. What has it brought to the brand?
JCB: It's given us a much deeper understanding of brand immersion and clienteling than most other luxury brands—and we did it earlier. Hospitality is the most complex form of luxury because you sell an intangible emotion at the price of a tangible good. It's our school of immersive luxury, and we apply these principles in our 300 jewelry and watch boutiques. A one-hour visit to a 200-square-meter boutique is a relatively superficial brand experience. But a 24-hour hotel stay—from check-in to spa to restaurant—immerses you in the brand at every touchpoint. It also helps us attract ultra-wealthy clients who may become high jewelry customers.
FNW: Are you planning any further diversification?
JCB: No. Aside from hospitality, where we're leaders in reputation and price according to LQA standards, we're not global leaders in our other categories, even though we are among the biggest brands in jewelry and watches. There's no reason to branch out into other fields when we still have so much potential in our core segments. Unlike watches, where nearly 100% of the players are global and 90% are based in Switzerland, jewelry is still 75% made by local or regional brands. Only seven or eight global jewelry brands exist, including Bulgari, and they hold just 25% of the market.
FNW: So, what's the growth potential for jewelry?
JCB: In a world where clients are increasingly mobile, global brands offer the trust factor that's essential in jewelry. The global jewelry market is evolving at two speeds. Global brands are growing at 7–8% annually, while local/regional brands grow at 2–3%. This sociological shift toward mobile consumers favors global brands gaining market share more rapidly.
FNW: So that's the current market trend in jewelry?
JCB: Yes. Jewelry is the only luxury segment that always retains value. For 15,000 years, gold and precious stones have had intrinsic value, and gold is hitting record highs today. Jewelry remains a safe investment—durable in quality and in value. That's particularly appealing in uncertain times. It's a reassuring luxury purchase—what I'd call a defensive investment.
FNW: Where does Bulgari stand today?
JCB: The brand is performing well, even in a volatile and unpredictable environment. Bulgari's image and desirability have never been stronger—from China to the U.S. to Europe. Let's not forget that we are in a business of subjective desirability. Unlike mass-market goods, we have to generate 70 to 80 percent of new business every January 1. People don't buy jewelry or watches every year. A client who buys today might not return for a decade. So we must ensure they don't go to a competitor in the meantime.
FNW: What defines this industry?
JCB: You must be highly desired—we're not essential. We provide emotional and status-based gratification that pasta or detergent never will. We operate in the realm of emotion—through desire, surprise, wonder and dreams. That's how we grow, even in tough times. It's not just about gold—it's about storytelling, perspective and design. You'll notice that, unlike watchmakers, jewelry houses never copy each other. There's deep mutual respect among us because we all reflect our unique heritage.
FNW: What defines Bulgari's identity?
JCB: We're Roman. Our jewelry is bold, colorful and full of character. It contrasts with Parisian jewelry, which is more Haussmannian and restrained. Our heritage is entirely different—we carry 2,700 years of art, history and architecture with a globally unique source of inspiration. Rome has been a protagonist in every era of art and architecture—except perhaps the Middle Ages.
FNW: What are your ambitions for Bulgari?
JCB: To be increasingly desired. We want to offer the most desirable luxury experience in the world—as a jeweler, a time jeweler, a hospitality jeweler, a scent jeweler and a rare leather jeweler. We aim to be seen as the most creative and skilled artisan in every field we operate in.
FNW: How has the luxury market evolved over the past two years?
JCB: 2024 was a year of normalization after the post-COVID boom. As for 2025, it's hard to predict. We're continuing along 2024's path. There's still a war in Europe, economic challenges in China and new measures being implemented in the U.S., the impact of which remains unclear. It's a time of uncertainty.
FNW: What's your strategy in this context?
JCB: We haven't changed a thing. All planned activities are moving forward. We keep going because jewelry has existed for 15,000 years—it now needs to be reimagined for the next hundred or thousand. We think long-term. What matters most is brand equity, not chasing maximum profit every year. Sure, profit can be optimized for a year or two, but building a brand takes resilience and patience. In the end, that's the real return on luxury.
JCB: At 66, most people retire. On my birthday, the group gave me a promotion. I was surprised. The good news is that I'm energized and enthusiastic. I know the watch industry well—I've spent 25 years in it, first at TAG Heuer, then overseeing Bulgari's watch division. Being responsible for brands like Hublot, Zenith and TAG Heuer is incredibly motivating. And being promoted at 66 proves that seniors still have a place in the workforce.
FNW: Taking the helm of LVMH Watches comes with its challenges, as the division has yet to reach its full potential. How do you view this new role?
JCB: I'm aware it's a challenge. That said, of the three brands, I know one very well since I once led it, and I've been closely following the other two for 25 years—not just because they're part of the group, but because I've watched them evolve, just like every major watch brand. I know the suppliers. I also know what mistakes not to repeat. But it won't necessarily be easy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
28-05-2025
- Fashion Network
Tanja Ruhnke exits Valentino after six weeks as communication director
Just weeks after stepping into her new role as communication director for Italian luxury house Valentino, Tanja Ruhnke has chosen to step down for personal reasons. Ruhnke, who officially joined Valentino on April 7, exited the role just six weeks later, catching the company by surprise. The German executive had recently returned to the Roman fashion house, where she previously worked in 2019. The brand, which is owned by the investment company Mayhoola, a fund of the Qatari royal family, and 30% by Kering, confirmed her departure—revealed by the American publication WWD—although without giving any further details. Of German origin, Tanja Ruhnke lived for a long time in New York, where she graduated from the Fashion Institute of Technology. Since 2020, she has worked as marketing director at Maison Margiela and has extensive experience in the luxury world, where she has become known for her communication skills. She began as a consultant for various fashion brands before joining Helmut Lang to lead communications. In 2005, she moved to Paris to join communications agency KCD, where she rose to vice president. In 2012, she returned to New York to become vice president of global branding and communication at Alexander Wang. In 2017, she moved to Birkenstock, then joined production agency North Six before returning to Valentino as vice president of communications for North America. A year later, she joined Maison Margiela, owned by Italian fashion group OTB.


Fashion Network
28-05-2025
- Fashion Network
Behind the seams: Shein's PR shift amid EU scrutiny and French legislative pressure
Pressure mounts for Shein. Last week, the European Commission announced that it was considering imposing a handling fee of €2 per parcel worth less than €150. As most of these products come from China, Europe intends to better control the entry into the common market of products marketed by platforms such as Shein and Temu. On May 26, the European Commission issued a warning to the e-tailer over consumer protection concerns. Meanwhile, France will begin examining a proposed law next week—unanimously adopted by the National Assembly in 2024—that aims to reduce the textile industry's environmental impact. The legislation specifically targets ultra-fast fashion players. So much so that Shein spokesman Quentin Ruffat was quick to denounce it as an attack on the purchasing power of French consumers, speaking to journalist Jean-Jacques Bourdin on Sud Radio. For him, the various measures would increase the price of Shein products by €12 by 2030. His comments are part of a carefully crafted communications strategy that has been gaining momentum over the past two years. Here's how it works. Shein is not a simple e-commerce site. The company was founded in 2008 in the Chinese city of Nanjing as a specialist exporter of various types of products. Its founder, Xu Yangtian (or Chris Xu), specialized in textiles in 2011 when he created the wedding dress website SheInside. His approach was already based on the model of ultra-rapid response to trends via data analysis. He had his products produced in short runs in small workshops in the Guangzhou region of southern China—a model that was duplicated with the Shein women's ready-to-wear version from 2015 and its development in Western markets in the U.S. and Europe. The brand does not sell in China. In its early years, the site passed under the fashion world's radar but has grown ultra-fast, supported by a powerful marketing strategy on social networks, particularly TikTok. This success has enabled Shein to become one of the major players in fashion, with sales jumping 19% in 2024 to reach $38 billion (€33.3 billion), according to data collected by the Financial Times, although Shein remains very discreet about its results. Founded in China but now based in Singapore with a parent company in the Cayman Islands, Shein is today more powerful than H&M, with its €20 billion in sales. And it clearly has Inditex, with its €38.6 billion in sales, in its sights. According to the Financial Times, which had access to the investor presentation file for its IPO, Shein was even forecasting sales of $45 billion (€39.5 billion) in 2024, with a net income of $4.8 billion. In fact, its net income would have fallen from nearly $2 billion in 2023 to $1 billion in 2024. This is yet another thorn in the side of Shein's management team, which in recent years has seen a number of obstacles thrown in its path—both in terms of criticism and regulatory frameworks—particularly since the beginning of 2025, with the U.S. market (a key market for the company) being closed off by the end of the 'de minimis' rule and, above all, with longer lead times to enter the market for international packages. 7,000 new products up for sale each day, all shipped directly by parcel In recent years, the company has faced mounting criticism from labor rights organizations and European fashion industry representatives. Allegations range from the poor quality and potential safety risks of imported garments, to harsh working conditions in subcontracted workshops, a lack of transparency across operations, and the environmental toll of mass production and air transport. Critics also point to the negative impact of Shein's rapid expansion on local fashion ecosystems, as well as the promotion of a hyper-consumerist culture. To defend its business model and profit margins, the group has spared no expense in rolling out aggressive communication and influence campaigns. Just five years ago, it was nearly impossible to access any details about Shein's origins, founders, or shareholders. Today, however, the company is actively engaging with both the press and government officials. 'Every company grows at its own pace,' said Leonard Lin, Shein's head of public affairs, in an interview with 'We've come to realize that it's time to explain our model, highlight what sets us apart from the rest of the industry, and demonstrate the value we offer.' Gone are the days of lightning growth in the shadows; Shein is now under scrutiny. In the face of criticism, the brand defends the fact that it applies the laws of the various countries in which it operates and complies if a problem arises. Nevertheless, the group remains active in making its vision heard with regard to new European or French regulations. A four-pronged strategy After years of criticism, the ultra-fast fashion giant has structured a strategy to de-demonize itself. First step: whether in Europe or the United States, Shein has invested heavily to surround itself with specialized firms and leading political figures. Spending is estimated at several million euros a year, particularly since 2022 and the first actions around a planned IPO. In the U.S., Shein has called on the law firms Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures to deal with legislative and regulatory issues, but has also created links with personalities close to Donald Trump, such as his former advisor and candidate for FBI director Kash Patel, or Hope Hicks, the former White House communications manager. On the Old Continent, Shein has also called on specialist firms such as Kekst CNC, which specializes in strategies for European bodies, and, in France, the communications agency Plead and, more recently, the corporate and political communications agency Image 7. Only around twenty employees in France Internally, Leonard Lin, who has been head of Europe since last year, has also been the group's global public affairs director since 2022. Shein, which has only around twenty employees in France, has recruited specialists in political communications with Fabrice Layer, director of government relations who previously worked for Chinese telephony specialist Huawei, and Quentin Ruffat, director of brand communications in France and formerly of the Havas and 35°Nord agencies. Last year, the group's management, and in particular its president Donald Tang, met with representatives of the fashion industry in Europe, as well as various political representatives, to present its model. The company has also enlisted the support of key political figures such as former European Commissioner for Energy, the Digital Economy, and the Budget, Günther Oettinger; former French Secretary of State Nicole Guedj; Medef representative Bernard Spitz; and high-profile former Interior Minister Christophe Castaner. Since last year, the latter has been involved in disseminating some of the ultra-fast fashion giant's key communication axes in the context of the future law. Shein built its remarks around four axes: social impact, economic impact on fashion, innovation, and environmental impact. 'We're in the process of inventing a VAT on the products of the poorest people. I find that quite disgusting,' declared the former minister at the beginning of the year. Noting a gap between the actions of consumers and criticisms of its activity that could be perceived as coming from a certain French elite, Shein has since dug this furrow in the run-up to the Senate debates on the anti-fast fashion law. Last week, two associations sent a letter to the president of the Haute Autorité pour la Transparence de la Vie Publique, asking him to 'exercise his right of control' over Shein's lobbying activities, pointing to 'potential irregularities in the Shein group's declarations of interest representation activities,' and in particular to the work carried out by Christophe Castaner. With the version of the bill put forward by Senator Sylvie Valente Le-Hir, chairwoman of the committee, the text targets platforms like Shein with an evolving malus reaching an additional €10 per product in 2030. At the end of April, Shein ran a campaign devised by the Havas agency in the regional daily press and certain mainstream media, deliberately ignoring the offerings of other low-cost fashion players, associating a law affecting its business as being against the purchasing power of the French. The subject is necessarily a sensitive one, given that 8 out of 10 people in France are concerned by it (according to a Toluna Harris Interactive survey published in early May)… and therefore by members of parliament. However, the group is also leveraging additional strategies to address the wide range of criticism it faces. On the environmental and social front, it emphasizes supplier audits and points to a €15 million investment plan announced in 2023. Spanning four years, the initiative aims to improve working conditions and upgrade equipment across its network of partner workshops. Like the big names in the sector, Shein's management uses graphs and figures to highlight these audits of working conditions and product quality. The aim is to provide reassurance on its products' social and hazard aspects, and even to position itself as a player in the sector's eco-responsible transition. Shein has set itself the target of having 31% of its polyester (which accounts for three-quarters of its production) recycled by 2030. With this in mind, the company has announced the launch of its own recycled polyester production facility. But one of the key points of criticism concerns the millions of pieces produced by Shein every year. The group struggles to justify the massive shipments of products by air from China. The company's argument sidesteps the issue and highlights its real-time on-demand model. According to the group, its series of 100 to 200 pieces of a model to meet consumer demand dramatically reduces return rates. 'Where the industry is around a 20% return rate, we have a single-digit return rate,' claims the company, arguing that its garments are desired and therefore kept. A defense of its model that relies on long-term work to present itself as an innovative company, not a fashion retailer. The company explains that its integrated R&D teams, based in China, are currently working on new, more efficient and ecological printing solutions, or on optimizing the use of materials. It is positioning itself as a partner for European players in textile innovation. Last July, the group announced that it was dedicating a budget of €200 million over 10 years to support innovative start-ups in textile recycling. Step by step, this approach is bearing fruit. Next month, Shein will be participating for the first time in the VivaTech trade show, dedicated to technological innovation and start-ups. The ultra-fast-fashion giant is organizing two competitions for French and European textile recycling start-ups under the slogan 'Shaping the Future of Circularity in Fashion.' It's fair to say that the platform's detractors, whether fashion industry representatives or environmentalists, have little taste for the green light given by VivaTech's management (supported by the LVMH group). And Shein is just the thing to turn criticism on its head. In terms of economic impact, for example, while a number of long-established fashion brands and retailers deplore Shein's unfair competition (the company does not, they claim, declare its sales by country and does not pay a tax linked to its actual volume of activity), and its impact on European ecosystems, the group claims a positive impact. This began with a rather classic report by Oxford Economics, which gauged Shein's economic impact on the French economy in 2023 at '€640 million, for 2,900 jobs,' most of these figures being indirect impacts, as the group has no intention of opening permanent stores. A policy of supporting young designers to improve its image Well aware that public authorities and federations have limited resources to support creators and companies, Shein began its offensive by supporting young creators. The company highlighted the fact that anyone who designs a garment can sell it on its site and benefit from royalties via its Shein X designers competition. 'With Shein X, you're a designer, you own the intellectual property of your creations. I help you source, manufacture, market and sell your products,' explains Leonard Lin. 'But today, we want to extend this model. How can we work with established brands, or even young brands struggling to evolve, and take them to the next level? We offer them our expertise in digital services, digital marketing and, if they wish, they can benefit from the platform.' So the group is currently setting up a new Paris office to house its Shein X Fashion Forward service, to integrate some fifty brands over the next six months. Management has indicated that several well-known names have submitted applications. Not surprisingly, for a number of fashion players in a delicate position, opening up to the platform's tens of millions of European customers could represent an opportunity—despite the potential notoriety risk of launching themselves on the platform. And for Shein, it would guarantee being able to present itself as a supporter of French fashion. By working on these four fronts, it is not certain that Shein will succeed in modifying in its favor the wording of the bill to be proposed by the Senate on June 10. In the medium term, however, the Asian giant's investment in its model and communications could dilute the relevance of its criticisms. It won't change the minds of its critics, but it will pave the way for the group's European resilience and, above all, for its key IPO project.


Fashion Network
28-05-2025
- Fashion Network
Jennyfer: French court to review employee fate amid partial buyout offers
Jennyfer, primarily targeting a teenage audience, has faced financial difficulties for several seasons. The company entered receivership in 2023 and was sold in the summer of 2024 to two of its executives, Yann Pasco and Jean-Charles Gaume, with backing from their Chinese supplier, Shanghai Pure Fashion Garments Co. Ltd. Despite efforts to modernize its image and expand its customer base; the relaunch failed to deliver. As employees await the court's decision, uncertainty looms. On May 21, stores across the network closed for the day in protest, allowing staff to voice their concerns and push for fair severance arrangements. Signs displayed in store windows read: 'We, the employees, continue to work to the end, with courage, loyalty, and professionalism, despite the uncertainty, moral pressure, and lack of prospects. And today, no recognition. NONE. No bonuses, no compensation, no acknowledgment of our efforts.' Following the protest, employees reportedly secured a modest gain. Myriam Boumendjel, a representative from the CFE -CGC union, told 'A value-sharing bonus and a performance bonus tied to work done since the liquidation—about 1,800 euros per employee—were granted. We're working like crazy under difficult conditions, so it's only fair that we receive recognition. The administrators and receivers shouldn't be the only ones benefitting.' According to reporting by Le Monde, an internal survey by employee representatives revealed that two-thirds of the workforce would prefer to be laid off rather than join a new company under a new owner. A final decision on the bids is not expected this Wednesday but is anticipated in two weeks.