logo
UND med school funding, plus a look at other Grand Forks-related bills

UND med school funding, plus a look at other Grand Forks-related bills

Yahoo15-03-2025

Mar. 15—GRAND FORKS — After state lawmakers pulled millions of dollars of potential funding from a bill circulating in the Legislature, a doctor from southwest North Dakota is suggesting they amend the bill and reinsert the money.
Dr. Joshua Ranum, a graduate of the UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences who practices internal medicine in Hettinger, gave testimony on Senate Bill 2286 during a March 11 meeting of the House Education Committee. Ranum also is a past president of the North Dakota Medical Association and serves on the medical school's advisory council.
During a recent committee hearing, he was among several speakers who spoke in favor of SB 2286, which
started off as a proposal that would have provided $55 million
to UND for building out the medical school's facilities. Introduced Jan. 20, SB 2286 originally sought to cover more than half of the cost of a 95,000-square-foot addition to the School of Medicine and Health Services. However, it later was amended and the funding portion was removed.
Instead, SB 2286 now only seeks to have legislative management "consider studying the funding necessary to provide education and internships statewide for all programs at an expanded University of North Dakota health professions collaborative facility."
Ranum, during the March 11 hearing, commented on the changed wording — from funding to a study.
"As we all know, the longer a proposed adjustment to or delay in construction is more cost ... " Ranum said. "The advisory council has been studying this and looking at this and talking about this for the better part of two years."
He added: "I think it is a very prudent idea to reinstate the funding for the building."
Marjorie Jenkins, who recently took over as the medical school dean, also spoke, noting how she learned soon after arriving at UND that "we have to vacate Columbia Hall" over the next 15 months. Deferred maintenance on Columbia Hall and the UND Nursing Building have a combined price tag of approximately $60 million, she noted.
A new health professions building would cost approximately $95 million, she said, of which UND could cover $40 million. The other $55 million would conceivably come from the state.
"We are still hopeful we can get (the state) funding," she said. "First the health professions building was a want. Now, it's a need."
The committee only heard testimony on March 11 and did not immediately make a recommendation on the bill, which awaits a full vote in the House.
Following are other bills still alive in the Legislature that have Grand Forks or immediate regional implications:
SB 2376: A bill to allow the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa to operate in Grand Forks.
Although SB 2376
failed 29-15 in a Senate vote
on Feb. 14,
it might get a second chance,
the Herald reported on March 12. Sen. Scott Meyer, R-Grand Forks, said there are discussions happening at the Capitol about ways to bring the proposal back in another form this session, although details remain limited. He expects to know more in the coming days.
The initial proposal sought to add language into state law to
allow the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa to operate
its gambling facilities outside of Rolette County — and specifically in Grand Forks County. Without state approval (and from federal entities later on), the tribe is not allowed to cross its own borders with gambling operations.
The $300 million resort and casino could bring as many as 400,000 non-local guests to Grand Forks annually, a recent study concluded. It would have gross revenues of approximately $80 million in its first year.
HB 1524: A bill to fund and define rural councils.
HB 1524 passed the House 60-27 on Feb. 20 and was referred to the Senate Industry and Business Committee.
It seeks to provide $2.4 million — amended from $8 million — to the North Dakota Department of Commerce
to fund regional planning councils
for the July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2027, biennium, according to past Herald coverage. Half of the funding would be allocated equally to the eight regional councils, with the remaining 50% awarded based on a "funding formula established jointly by the Department of Commerce and the association of regional councils," the bill says.
SB 2390: A bill to create and fund a rural catalyst committee and grant program.
SB 2390 passed the Senate 39-8. It then was heard by the Senate Political Subdivisions Committee on March 13.
If passed, the bill would
create a rural catalyst committee
as well as a grant program and fund to support North Dakota towns of 8,500 or fewer. The proposed $5 million — amended from $30 million — grant program would fund projects that will "address a critical need in the areas of art and culture, community and economic development, education or health and wellness" for rural communities, according to past Herald coverage. Recipients would have to match $1 for every $2 awarded.
The bill comes with a stipulation that the Department of Commerce would submit a report to Legislative Management regarding the program's results, the number of requested projects and information on projects that receive funds, as well as how many matching funds were raised and how the project affected the community. An amendment added a stipulation to the bill that 50% of the fund not used for travel, per diem, and related expenses must be
specifically distributed to communities with a population of less than 1,000.
SB 2398: A bill to create a military compatibility commission.
SB 2398 passed the Senate 47-0 on Feb. 19 and was most recently heard by the House Government and Veterans Affairs Committee on March 6. The committee has not yet given its recommendation, and it awaits its final fate before the full House.
SB 2398 would
establish a military compatibility commission and so-called "military impact zones,"
which would extend from bases and installations that already exist within the state, including Grand Forks Air Force Base. The goal of the bill, according to its prime sponsor, is to get various stakeholders "seated around a table to say
'this is what has to be done in order for you to operate here,"
according to past Herald coverage. Gone from the version of the bill passed by the House is the original verbiage to include a stipulation that the zones extend a predetermined distance from each installation. For GFAFB, for instance, the original distance was 25 miles in each direction, which prompted
early concern from the Grand Forks City Council
that it could hinder future development in and around the city.
HB 1332: A bill to establish incentives to bring big agribusiness to North Dakota.
HB 1332 passed the House 82-8 on Feb. 25 and was heard in the Senate Ag and Veterans Affairs Committee on March 7. It will next be heard before the full Senate.
The bill has been designed and discussed with
a proposed $450 million Agristo potato processing facility in Grand Forks
in mind, past Herald coverage says.
The proposal would allow Agristo to
apply for an up to $30 million grant
funded by the Bank of North Dakota through the state agriculture commissioner that would be paid in two parts. The appropriation measure would only be valid for the upcoming biennium that ends in June 2029.
But it's not just about the Grand Forks project; if approved, future potential projects throughout the state could benefit from its funding.
HB 1600: A bill to establish an immigration law clinic at UND.
HB 1600 passed the House 67-25 and was referred to the Senate Education Committee. Its hearing will be Tuesday, March 18.
If passed, HB 1600 would allocate some
$400,000 over the next biennium
to a clinic employing one full-time attorney offering low-cost immigration legal services, according to past Herald coverage. Supporters of the legislation have said it would increase access to much-needed legal services for migrant workers and their employers, and would offer law students a chance to gain experience in a niche and in-demand practice.
Opponents raised concerns about the lack of precedent for establishing a legal clinic via legislation, and whether the clinic would serve migrants whose legal status fell into a "gray area."
SB 2254: A bill to adjust the state public transportation funding formula.
SB 2254 passed the Senate 43-4 on Feb 21 and was most recently heard by the House Appropriations Committee on March 11.
Past Herald coverage has noted that SB 2254 is a proposal to increase what the state gives to the four biggest metropolitan areas for public transit services, which transit directors across the state have called
a necessity as costs climb.
In its current form, Senate Bill 2254 would provide $2 million in grant opportunities for the cities of Grand Forks, Minot, Fargo and Bismarck for their public transit services over the course of the next biennium. The bill would also require the state to conduct a study to investigate the best ways for North Dakota to fund public transit services. The original proposal had $15 million in funding, which legislators later amended to $5 million and finally $2 million.
HB 1612: A bill to establish a North Dakota center for aerospace medicine for mental health support.
In the wake of a student pilot intentionally crashing a plane in 2021, lawmakers are considering creating a first-of-its-kind mental health program for pilots at UND's John D. Odegard School of Aerospace Sciences.
The goal is to provide mental health resources for flight students and aviation professionals. State funding could be as high as $500,000.
It passed the House on Feb. 21 via an 82-7 vote and has been referred to the Senate Human Services Committee.
SB 2003: Higher education funding (and funding for a new STEM building at UND).
In another UND-related item, the university is hoping for $55.6 million for a science, technology, engineering and mathematics (commonly known as STEM) building. It's a bullet item found deep within SB 2003, the higher-education funding bill.
SB 2003 passed the Senate 44-2 on Feb. 25 and is in the midst of a number of committee hearings on the House side.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WV Board of Education to keep vaccine requirements against governor's wishes
WV Board of Education to keep vaccine requirements against governor's wishes

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

WV Board of Education to keep vaccine requirements against governor's wishes

CHARLESTON, (WBOY) — The West Virginia Board of Education voted unanimously Wednesday to keep the current vaccine requirements for students, despite an executive order from Gov. Patrick Morrisey aiming to grant religious exemptions to the rule. The board told State Superintendent Michell Blatt to direct local public schools to follow current compulsory immunization law, which does not include religious exemptions. A bill that would have granted philosophical exemptions failed in the West Virginia Legislature this past session. Randolph County Schools placed under 'State of Emergency' The American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia also filed a lawsuit last month attempting to block the governor's executive order. Gov. Morrisey has reaffirmed in the past that his executive order will not be rescinded. He claimed that religious exemptions for vaccines are necessary under the federal Protection for Religion Act of 2023, which 'prohibits government action that substantially burdens a person's exercise of religion.' As of this publication, Gov. Morrisey's office has yet to issue a comment on Wednesday's vote. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Maine won't require medical cannabis to be tested for contaminants -- this year
Maine won't require medical cannabis to be tested for contaminants -- this year

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Maine won't require medical cannabis to be tested for contaminants -- this year

Jun. 11—Maine's medical cannabis providers have once again fought off a controversial requirement to start testing their products — at least for now. A legislative committee killed one bill and carried over another that would have instituted testing and tracking requirements that industry members have said for years would put them out of business or force price increases. While Maine's recreational cannabis market requires testing for contaminants and potency and includes potency limits, the medical market requires neither. Maine is the only state that doesn't mandate medical cannabis to be tested. LD 104, proposed by the state's Office of Cannabis Policy and sponsored by Rep. Marc Malon, D-Biddeford, would have required seed-to-sale plant tracking and standardized chemical, mold and heavy metal testing between recreational and medical cannabis. LD 1847, sponsored by Rep. Anne Graham, D-North Yarmouth, sought to do the same while also adding potency caps on edibles. The latter will be taken up again next year. "I have listened and I've read testimony and I've worked with public health advocates to make sure that the medical cannabis industry survives, thrives and (can) be regulated so that when patients buy cannabis, they know that they have a safe product and they know what the potency is," Graham said. " ... Clearly our regulations and how we look at (testing), it needs work, a lot of work." But it's also "hugely complicated," she said, and needs more time. Jennifer Belcher, president of the Maine Cannabis Union, said there's a "sense of relief now that we know that nothing is going through this year. If either bill passed as written, she said "the medical program would be done." Belcher was encouraged by how receptive the committee was to the industry's concerns, and while "it is nerve-racking that we are going to face this next session," there's also an exciting opportunity for collaboration. "(LD) 1847 gives us an opportunity to focus on the facts, the research, the science," she said. AN ONGOING FIGHT John Hudak, director of the office, has been clear that implementing a testing program is a top priority, but this session was the first time since he was appointed to the office in late 2022 that an official proposal has been before the committee. Following a 2022 law, any major substantive rule-making from the department must be approved by the Legislature. "If a business model is one in which producing clean cannabis is too costly, there's something wrong with the business model," he said previously. "We're not going to focus on profits at the expense of patients' health." Supporters of the bill have referenced a 2023 report by the Office of Cannabis Policy that found about 45% of the cannabis in Maine's medical market would fail the standards set for the recreational market. They also pointed to the influx of suspected illegal growers allegedly tied to Chinese organized crime who have been selling bulk cannabis at "rock bottom" prices to legal dispensaries. However, in a public hearing last month, dozens of medical cannabis caregivers and consumers testified in opposition to the bills and the committee received roughly 1,000 pieces of written testimony. They criticized the state's testing program, citing several recalls in the recreational program last year that have brought the science behind the tests and the state's standards into question. The recent recalls, they argue, prove the testing doesn't work and shouldn't be forced on the medical program. The fight is just the latest in a series of uphill battles for Maine's medical cannabis providers. Oversaturation, competition with recreational cannabis and high costs have caused revenue to plummet and people to leave the industry in droves. Unlike many other states, Maine's medical cannabis market has always outperformed its recreational counterpart. But the gap between the two is narrowing, and last year the medical market brought in about $280 million (down from $371 in 2021), while the recreational market brought in $217 million. The number of providers, known in the industry as caregivers, has been cleaved in half from its 2016 peak of 3,257 to 1,627 in May, according to state data. "We are literally fighting for our lives at this point," Belcher said. OTHER BILLS The committee carried over several other bills, including one that would require the director of the Office of Cannabis Policy be confirmed by the Legislature rather than appointed by the commissioner of the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, which oversees the office. Sen. Craig Hickman, D-Winthrop, who drafted the bill, said the committee needed time to investigate whether there are other directors, like the heads of the state's alcohol and gambling control agencies, that should also be subject to legislative approval. Lawmakers also carried over a proposal to allow cannabis "social clubs" or public consumption, based off recommendations in a task force report this winter. Earlier this session, the committee killed two bills that would have implemented revenue sharing across Maine's cannabis industry, meaning towns and cities that allow recreational businesses could receive a portion of the tax revenue they generate. Legislators hoped the bills would encourage more towns and cities to allow cannabis shops and help them recoup the costs of overseeing the recreational program. Copy the Story Link We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion. You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs. Show less

Defying Morrisey executive order, WV board of ed directs schools to follow existing vaccines law
Defying Morrisey executive order, WV board of ed directs schools to follow existing vaccines law

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Defying Morrisey executive order, WV board of ed directs schools to follow existing vaccines law

A child under 12 years old receives a dose of Pfizer vaccine as part of the COVID-19 immunization campaign on Jan. 18, 2022 in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. (Pedro Vilela | Getty Images) West Virginia school officials will instruct public schools to follow the state's existing vaccine laws, going against an existing executive order from Gov. Patrick Morrisey that students be exempted from the requirements based on their religious beliefs about the shots. At its regular meeting Wednesday, the state Board of Education signed off on directing Superintendent Michele Blatt to issue the vaccine mandate guidance to county school boards. West Virginia state law allows only medical exemptions to school-required vaccines, making the policy one of the strongest in the country. Morrisey issued an executive order earlier this year requiring the state to allow religious exemptions. Speaking at the school board meeting, Sean Whelan, Morrisey's general counsel, told the school board there's been a misunderstanding about the basis of Morrisey's executive order. The governor isn't second guessing science or defying a law passed by the Legislature, he said. 'Instead, he is reading that vaccine law together with another law, the Equal Protection for Religion Act of 2023, which prohibits government action that substantially burdens a person's exercise of religion unless it serves a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest,' he said. 'That language mirrors the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which federal courts across the country have described as a super statute, displacing the normal operation of otherwise applicable federal laws.' The executive order applies only to the state health officials under Morrisey's purview, and the governor is not ordering the Board of Education or county school boards to do anything, Whelan said. 'But he is asking for your partnership and support in applying the Equal Protection for Religion. Act that has been on the books since 2023 and until he came into office, wasn't applied,' Whelan said. 'That law should be applied as written, and when it is, it requires the religious exemptions to compulsory vaccination that the health department provides.' State lawmakers this year did not pass Senate Bill 460, which would have made the religious exemptions part of state law. Despite the bill not passing, Morrisey's executive order stands. The state Department of Health had approved approximately 300 religious exemptions as of late last month. The difference between the governor's order and state law has led to a fractured response from schools. Blatt issued a memo May 2 to county superintendents recommending that students not be allowed to attend schools next year without the required vaccinations but rescinded the guidance before the end of the day at the governor's request. Some private and religious schools opted not to follow the governor's order. Last month the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia and legal advocacy organization Mountain State Justice filed a lawsuit asking the Kanawha County Circuit to compel the state's Department of Health and Bureau for Public Health to stop complying with the executive order. In a statement Wednesday, Morrisey spokesman Alex Lanfranconi said the school board is 'trampling on the religious liberties of children, ignoring the state's religious freedom law, and trying to make the state an extreme outlier on vaccine policy when there isn't a valid public policy reason to do so. This decision isn't about public health — it's about making West Virginia more like liberal states such as California and New York,' he said. The Department of Health will continue to grant religious exemptions, he said. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store