logo
Trump signs executive orders on immigration, law enforcement, and English skills

Trump signs executive orders on immigration, law enforcement, and English skills

India Today29-04-2025

US President Donald Trump's administration touted the early results of his immigration crackdown on Monday despite concerns over due process, as Trump acted to take further steps while photos of alleged criminal offenders were displayed on the White House lawn.Trump signed three executive orders on Monday.The first calls for the attorney general to identify cities and states failing to comply with federal immigration laws.advertisement
The second relates to protections for law enforcement officers.The third is tied to English literacy for commercial truck drivers.Trump launched an aggressive enforcement campaign after taking office, surging troops to the southern border and pledging to deport millions of immigrants in the United States illegally.The Republican president, who made immigration a major campaign issue in 2024, said the actions were needed after years of high illegal immigration under his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden.White House officials at a press briefing touted a steep decline in illegal crossings at the border during Trump's first three months in office - even as concerns have emerged over the due process rights of immigrants and U.S. citizens swept up in the dragnet.\The US Border Patrol arrested 7,200 migrants illegally crossing the border in March, the lowest monthly total since 2000 and down from a peak of 250,000 in December 2023.advertisement"We have the most secure border in the history of this nation and the numbers prove it," Trump border czar Tom Homan said at the briefing.Democrats and civil rights advocates have criticized Trump's heightened enforcement tactics, including the cases of several children who are US citizens who were recently deported with their parents. One of the children has a rare form of cancer, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.Homan blamed the parents for putting their children at risk of deportation by remaining in the United States."If you choose to have a US-citizen child, knowing you're in this country illegally, you put yourself in that position," he said.Under the US Constitution, anyone born in the country is automatically granted citizenship, a right that Trump has tried to ban under an executive order he issued when he took office in January. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments in the case next month.In his first hundred days in office, Trump has moved to strip legal immigration status from hundreds of thousands of people, increasing the pool of those who can potentially be deported.While arrests of immigrants in the United States illegally have spiked, deportations remain below last year's levels under Biden when there were more people illegally crossing the border who could be quickly returned.advertisementDeportations were down in Trump's first three months in office from 195,000 last year to 130,000 this year, Reuters reported last week. Homan defended the figures and said it was not fair to compare them to Biden-era tallies.U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities have been over capacity, with some 48,000 people in custody as of early April, beyond the funded level of 41,500.Homan said that Texas military base Fort Bliss could be ready "in the very near future" to hold migrant detainees. The Trump administration has already been using the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.Photos posted on the White House lawn featured 100 people charged or convicted of serious crimes, including murder, rape and fentanyl distribution. Numerous studies show immigrants do not commit crimes at a higher rate than native-born Americans.Sanctuary StandoffTrump has criticized cities and states that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, labeling them "sanctuaries" and blaming them for releasing criminal offenders instead of coordinating their transfer to ICE.His order on Monday said some state and local officials were engaging in a "lawless insurrection against the supremacy of Federal law" by obstructing immigration enforcement.advertisementA second order seeks to strengthen local law enforcement with better training, higher pay and benefits, and enhanced legal protections. It directs the attorney general to create a mechanism that would provide "legal resources and indemnification to law enforcement officers who unjustly incur expenses and liabilities for actions taken during the performance of their official duties to enforce the law."A third order said proficiency in English should be a "non-negotiable safety requirement for professional drivers" and said his administration would enforce that requirement.Last week, a federal judge blocked Trump's administration from withholding federal funding from more than a dozen so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that have declined to cooperate with Trump's hardline immigration crackdown.US officials arrested a Wisconsin judge on Friday and charged her with helping a man in her court briefly evade immigration authorities. The arrest triggered backlash from Democrats and immigrant rights advocates who raised concerns that immigrant victims may not feel safe in courthouses.Homan defended the arrest, saying that the administration would enforce laws prohibiting harboring of a person in the United States illegally.'You will be prosecuted, judge or not," he said.advertisementAmericans are split on Trump's immigration approach, but he has a 45% approval rating on immigration, better than other major issues, a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in mid-April found.Also Read: Houthi rebels claim US airstrike killed 68 migrants in Yemen

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manesar land scam: Court to rule on charges against 3 more accused
Manesar land scam: Court to rule on charges against 3 more accused

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Manesar land scam: Court to rule on charges against 3 more accused

Panchkula: In a significant development in the Manesar land scam, a special CBI court has opted to first decide on framing charges against three more people before consolidating the chargesheet against former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda and 30 others. Special CBI Judge Rajiv Goyal made the ruling last Friday, following the Punjab and Haryana high court's vacation of a stay on proceedings. The three individuals facing potential charges are former IAS officer D R Dhingra and private persons Dhare Singh and Kulwant Singh Lamba. The court has scheduled July 10 for resumed arguments regarding the chargesheet against this trio. The extensive case implicates former CM Hooda, his three ex-principal secretaries – Murari Lal Tayal (also facing another trial), S S Dhillon, and Chhattar Singh – as well as various companies and their office bearers involved in the controversial land transactions. The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings against another accused bureaucrat, Rajiv Arora, who was named in the initial chargesheet. The scam revolves around 914 acres of land in Manesar, Gurugram district, originally slated for acquisition to develop an Industrial Model Township (IMT). Following the Aug 2004 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, a rush to acquire land at low prices ensued. Builders and land mafia reportedly capitalised on residents' panic, acquiring plots at "throwaway rates". Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo In 2007, the industrial department released the land from the acquisition process. Allegations of political patronage in the builder-official-land mafia nexus led aggrieved parties to court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court directed the CBI to probe the matter, leading to the chargesheet naming former CM Hooda. MSID:: 121731795 413 |

Teachers' associations want rollback of 3-lang policy
Teachers' associations want rollback of 3-lang policy

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Teachers' associations want rollback of 3-lang policy

Pune: Over 20 associations and groups working in the education sector have written to the state govt asking it to scrap the recently introduced compulsory third language in Stds I to V and revert to the two-language policy adopted until now. Schools are set reopen for the new academic year on June 16. The controversy started when govt issued an order on April 16 stating that Hindi will be compulsory as the third language. When it ran into opposition, school education minister Dada Bhuse, on April 22, announced that Hindi was not compulsory, it could be any other language. However, teachers' associations and education experts have told govt to scrap the three-language policy until Std V and issue a fresh GR to this effect. Mahendra Ganpule, spokesperson for Maharashtra School Principals' Federation, said, "Until now, in local body-run schools, Marathi was the first language and English the second or vice versa. Hindi was added in Std VI. We want that system to continue." The letter also opposes Bhuse's statements on making military training part of the curriculum from Std I and seeks a discussion with education experts before new changes are decided. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Good News: You May Be Richer Than You Think Undo Vasant Kalpande of Shikshan Vikas Manch said the lack of dialogue between govt and stakeholders was a problem. "Before every decision, there should be a healthy discussion between govt and the stakeholders that the decision affects. This should be a statewide discussion and not limited to certain centres. But lately, there has been no dialogue at all and decisions are being announced without considering anything. We oppose this," Kalpande said. Until the physical abilities of the children are fully developed, military training is useless and will likely harm the students in Std I and II, the letter added. Sushil Shejule, a member of Marathi Abhyas Kendra, wrote the letter on behalf of teachers' organisations. He said that the organisations want govt to either cancel the GR issued on April 16 or issue a revised GR rolling back the three-language policy. "There is a lot of confusion among schools because the first GR still stands. The minister saying something orally doesn't hold much value. It has to come in writing," he added. quote Even Sainik Schools start from Std VI and there is no scientific link proving that implementing military education will increase patriotism. Children at that age won't understand concepts of nation, a soldier's training, or their duties. Such military education may lead the country to a dictatorship. Hence, we oppose it Sushil Shejule I Marathi Abhyas Kendra Member

Can Donald Trump call for Gov Newsom's arrest over LA riots? Here's what the law says
Can Donald Trump call for Gov Newsom's arrest over LA riots? Here's what the law says

Hindustan Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Can Donald Trump call for Gov Newsom's arrest over LA riots? Here's what the law says

President Donald Trump on Monday suggested his border czar Tom Homan should arrest Gov Gavin Newsom amid riots in Los Angeles. 'I would do it … I think it would be a great thing,' Trump responded when asked if Homan should arrest the governor, who has challenged the administration's mobilization of National Guard in LA. Newsom, too, was quick to slam Trump. "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America," he said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: Los Angeles protests: 'Incendiary devices' hurled at police horses, says LAPD No, Trump cannot unilaterally arrest Gov Newsom over riots in Los Angeles. The US Constitution and legal system have clear checks and balances that prevent a former president—or even a sitting president—from directly arresting state officials without due process. Separation of Powers (Article II & III of the Constitution) The president does not have the judicial authority to issue warrants. Only law enforcement, backed by court orders, can detain someone. Any attempt to arrest Newsom without due process would violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which guarantee fair legal procedures. State Sovereignty – Tenth Amendment Under the US system of federalism, states like California retain control over their own officials and law enforcement. The president cannot interfere in state governance unless federal law is violated and due process is followed. Read More: After tear gas and street fires, an Los Angeles community cleans up as National Guard troops arrive Military Limitations – The Posse Comitatus Act (18 US Code § 1385) This law forbids the use of the US military to carry out domestic law enforcement activities without explicit congressional authorization. Even in times of civil unrest, the president cannot use the military to detain or arrest state leaders like Newsom. No Legal Authority Post-Presidency As a former president, Trump has no legal powers—executive, military, or judicial. He cannot issue federal commands or make arrests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store