Pinterest Settles Lawsuit From Female ‘Co-Creator' for $34.7 Million
Pinterest recently agreed to pay $34.7 million to settle a lawsuit from an early adviser who claimed she had co-created the platform without compensation.
Christine Martinez, 44, who was a friend of Ben Silbermann and Paul Sciarra, two of Pinterest's three co-founders, sued the company in 2021 for breach of implied contract, idea theft, unjust enrichment and unfair business practices. She said she came up with many ideas for the app — like organizing images on 'boards' — but was never paid for her contributions, despite promises she would be.
Pinterest, a virtual pinboard company that has many female users, disclosed the settlement with Ms. Martinez in a November 2024 financial filing.
'No one wants to find themselves in the litigation process, and I'm just really, really excited and frankly just relieved to be past it,' Ms. Martinez said in an interview on Friday.
'Ms. Martinez provided beneficial marketing and community growth input and strategies during the early phase of Pinterest's founding,' according to a statement that was part of the settlement, which was provided by Ms. Martinez. 'The parties are pleased to amicably resolve this legacy matter.'
Pinterest declined to comment.
The settlement follows a series of complaints and legal disputes against Pinterest by some of its female employees and executives.
In 2020, Pinterest paid $22.5 million to settle a gender discrimination suit filed by Françoise Brougher, its former chief operating officer, who said she was fired after experiencing sexist treatment at the company. That same year, more than 200 employees signed a petition demanding the company change its policies after three former workers accused Pinterest of racial and sex discrimination and retaliation.
Mr. Silbermann, who was Pinterest's chief executive, left that role in 2022.
Ms. Martinez, who had a background in e-commerce and interior design, claimed in her lawsuit that Mr. Silbermann and Mr. Sciarra sought her advice for the company that became Pinterest a year before it was founded in 2010.
She said she came up with the idea for the picture boards and the platform's signature 'Pin it' phrase, and also helped persuade top design and lifestyle bloggers to use and promote the site. A portion of Pinterest's programming code was named after her in homage, according to the lawsuit.
She never signed a formal contract with Pinterest, but it was implied she would eventually be compensated, she said. Pinterest went public in 2019 and has a market capitalization of more than $18 billion.
Ms. Martinez is now a board member and strategic adviser for Jingo, an online A.I. shopping platform that caters to women.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg: The Asia Trade 9/6/25
"Bloomberg: The Asia Trade" brings you everything you need to know to get ahead as the trading day begins in Asia. Bloomberg TV is live from Tokyo and Sydney with Shery Ahn and Haidi Stroud-Watts, getting insight and analysis from newsmakers and industry leaders on the biggest stories shaping global markets. Note: US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a post on X that Marines could be sent next if protests intensify in California. (Source: Bloomberg)
Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Meta in Talks for Scale AI Multi-Billion Investment
Live on Bloomberg TV CC-Transcript 00:00Not exactly a household name. What do scale AI do. And how significant is the investment? Yeah, absolutely. Few people have heard outside of the world of technology and of course of this company, but it has grown in prominence. And now, of course, it's making headlines with this potential investment, 0 billion from META, as you say, one of the biggest private sector investments that we would have seen for years. So Scale AI it focuses on one of the three key components that you need to build out large language models, which is data. So you have energy chips and data, though those are the three main components that come together. And scale AI is squarely focused on data. So they train up, or at least they build out quality data that these models then feed in to train on and they hire PhDs and others to help work through that data and quantify it and tag it. So that's essentially the business model. They've also providing their own solutions into enterprise and have been pushing into defence as well. And I think what this deal tells us is a few things. One Meta of course, that Mark Zuckerberg is not going anywhere in terms of its investments around A.I.. They've pledged to invest at least $60 billion this year and 10 billion now for scale A.I.. If this, of course, comes to pass, so Meta is full bore on the focus on AI, particularly as well around data, it's a reminder that data is becoming a key battleground because along with energy and chips getting hold of the data, quality data is becoming increasingly difficult for these large language models. And so there is a fight on that spectrum as well. And then the third part of this, I think, in terms of what it tells us is defence technology Meta is increasingly working with the Pentagon, particularly further around things like virtual helmets and AI infused helmets for the military. And scale AI already has relationships with the Pentagon. So I think it's also a reminder that matter is getting closer in terms of defence technology as well. So on all three levels, I think those are the significance In terms of the deals that came through this company. Scale AI was valued at 14 billion USD back in 2024. You can imagine that that valuation is much higher now. Yeah. And also we've got London Tech Week kicking off today. What's the top of the agenda? Well, I was talking about data and energy and chips while chips will be front and center because Jensen Huang of nvidia will be giving the keynote speech at London Tech week later this morning alongside the Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Nvidia also expected to announce Jensen Huang some investments here in the UK around training the workforce to be able to use these A.I. applications. They've pledged to train about 100,000 people up until about 2030, investing in the R & D space as well in Bristol, Bristol here in the UK. So the focus is going to be on Jensen Huang has to say at that keynote speech and those investments and how the UK is trying to position itself in this AI race versus the US versus China and also as well versus their counterparts across the channel in Paris because France is also hosting Viva Tech, which is a big tech event and Jensen Huang will be going there as well. And France has been able to build out an AI ecosystem with tax cuts. That is something that arguably the UK government be looking for, which is desperate for growth. And there is one solution for this UK government. They hope to drive growth levels higher in the UK.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
By Sam Tobin LONDON (Reuters) -Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI begins at London's High Court on Monday, with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI. The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to "train" its Stable Diffusion system, which can generate images from text inputs. Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion. Stability AI – which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP – is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights. A Stability AI spokesperson said that "the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas," adding: "Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression." Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the U.S. and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. WIDER IMPACT Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material. Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists. Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI. "Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI," Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said. She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits. Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling "could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development".
