Glenville-Emmons moving forward with $24.4M bond referendum in August
Jun. 12—The Glenville-Emmons School District is moving forward with a bond referendum in August that will ask voters to consider a $24.425 million bond to fund facilities improvements at its existing buildings instead of building new as previously considered.
Improvements would include a secure elementary entrance, upgraded Career and Technical Education spaces, ADA accessibility updates, asbestos removal and repairs to HVAC, roofing and water systems, according to a press release.
The bond proposal represents priorities shared by community members during and after the failed 2023 referendum, the district stated.
"This plan is different because it reflects the current sentiments and priorities of our community," said school board Chairwoman Tabitha Page. "While the previous referendum in 2023 was based on community feedback at that time, we have shifted our focus to addressing deferred maintenance projects and making the most of our existing facilities. This is a more practical and affordable path forward that still meets our students' needs."
She said the referendum reflects the core values of their rural community, including responsibility, stewardship and a deep commitment to one another.
"As a board, we are dedicated to ensuring that our schools remain strong, safe and equipped to provide high-quality education for generations to come," she said.
A press release states the improvements focus on three key areas:
—Healthy and safe learning environments with better air quality, upgraded HVAC, ADA accessibility, lead remediation in water systems, asbestos abatement and a safer, more secure entrance at the elementary school.
—Relevant, updated classrooms that support hands-on learning in Career and Technical Education (CTE), agriculture and the trades, reflecting careers and life skills valued in the community.
—A sustainable investment that protects our existing schools and strengthens the district's ability to serve students into the future.
The proposal was reviewed and approved by the Minnesota Department of Education, and copies of the state's review and comment summary are available from the district upon request.
The district will host open house and building tours ahead of the referendum, where attendees will hear a presentation on the referendum and get a facility tour highlighting key concerns and project scope areas. They will also have the opportunity to ask questions of district leadership.
These are scheduled for 5:30 to 7 p.m. July 10, July 24 and Aug. 6. The July 10 and Aug. 6 dates will be at Glenville-Emmons Elementary School, while the July 24 date will be at the high school.
The district also has a referendum website at https://bit.ly/ge-ref25 with more information about the project scope and tax impact.
Early voting begins June 27 and runs through Aug. 11.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cardano's Charles Hoskinson Suggests Swapping $100M of ADA for Bitcoin, Stablecoins
Cardano co-founder Charles Hoskinson has floated the idea of converting $100 million worth of ADA tokens into bitcoin BTC and stablecoins. "We could take $100 million of ADA in the treasury, convert it to a blend of stablecoins incumbent in Cardano so USDM and USDA and convert some of it in bitcoin to prime bitcoin DeFi," Hoskinson said on a YouTube live stream. He then hit back at critics that claimed a $100 million sale would impact the price of ADA, calling them "inexperienced" before adding that the sale "would not cause any problems at all." The goal of the sale would be getting the ratio of stablecoin issuance and TVL to around 30% to 40% versus the current roughly 10%. Total value locked on Cardano stands at $356 million with just $31 million worth of stablecoins minted on-chain, DefiLlama data shows. Solana meanwhile has $9.8 billion in TVL and $11 billion worth of stablecoins minted on-chain. In a tweet Hoskinson said that the stablecoin situation is "killing Cardano" and that the proposal would generate "non-inflationary revenue" and help build the Cardano DeFi economy. Hoskinson's comments are at odds with those of Cardano Foundation CEO Frederik Gregaard, who told CoinDesk in March that TVL is not a metric he used for adoption. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Upturn
17 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Cloud Mining Demand Soars as VNBTC's Cardano Contract Sells Out, Drawing Attention from Global Cardano Investors
London, United Kingdom, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — On June 9, Cardano (ADA) founder announced the launch of Cardinal, a DeFi protocol built to enable Bitcoin holders to access services like staking and lending. Following the announcement, the ADA price, which has dropped by over 10% in the past month, started looking bullish. Now the weekly charts show a 5% increase and about a 2% increase in the past 24 hours. Could the Cardinal news push ADA price higher? In the same period, VNBTC, a popular cloud mining platform saw a surge in ADA investors leading to the ADA cloud mining contract selling out. With analysts predicting a 585% ADA price surge, it's no surprise that investors are looking for alternative ways to accumulate Cardano (ADA). Despite VNBTC's Cardano cloud mining contract selling out, ADA investors can still make substantial profits with the platform as they hold and wait for the anticipated ADA price surge. VNBTC offers a range of mining contracts, with its Bitcoin and Dogecoin cloud mining contracts offering the highest return on investment. Why Should Cardano Investors Invest In Cloud Mining? Cardano stands out for its continuous development, placing it among the top altcoins. Also, the coin has a strong community, establishing a set up for long-term growth. The launch of its new DeFi protocol will certainly increase Cardano network activity and, with it, Cardano (ADA) price. However, Cardano investors looking for significant profits every day cannot solely rely on trading ADA price movements. This is where VNBTC flips the script with its daily profits on Bitcoin and Dogecoin cloud mining. VNBTC: A Smarter Way to Earn Crypto with Your ADA Holdings VNBTC introduces a different era of making money through crypto investment. Imagine earning profits daily without having to constantly analyze charts. Even better, VNBTC cloud mining is completely hands-off, meaning no expertise or mining hardware is required to start earning substantial profits. Widely known as the top Bitcoin and Dogecoin cloud mining site, VNBTC has been operating since 2019. The company has a track record of delivering daily profits and protecting investor funds, with the principal investment withdrawable at the end of a contract. VNBTC isn't asking you to wait for years; the cloud mining durations range from 5 days to 35 days. After which, you can decide to withdraw or reinvest. Now, ADA investors can use their holdings to purchase any of these contracts and start earning mining rewards instantly. This opportunity is not limited to ADA holders. VNBTC supports Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB, Polygon, and AVAX. If you hold these coins and you seek the best way to earn crypto, join VNBTC. A Daily Income Cloud Mining Platform That Actually Works! What makes VNBTC truly revolutionary is its commitment to helping investors make money. The platform offers a $79 welcome bonus that gives access to its Dogecoin cloud mining contract. As such, new users can start earning crypto without spending a dime. Behind the scenes, VNBTC introduced other ways to build wealth through the platform without spending a dime. VNBTC Affiliate Program: Invite friends, family, and online followers to the platform. Earn 3% commission for investors you refer directly and an additional 1.8% commission for investors your referrals bring on board. VNBTC Million Dollar Bounty: Perfect for crypto influencers and people with a decent online following Perform small tasks like posting content about VNBTC Earn USDT for each post and more USDT for reactions on your posts These two programs can build considerable earnings over time. It's a win-win situation. With a considerable number of people joining VNBTC, you could build a million-dollar passive income stream. In Summary… Riches Are Rarely Promised. But This Comes Close Enough VNBTC might not make you an overnight millionaire, but it sure gives you an easy way to boost your income. With contracts earning up to $10,000 in 10 days, financial freedom is only a few months away. As ADA investors onboard VNBTC Bitcoin and Dogecoin cloud mining, this could be your chance before the contracts sell out. It's impossible not to get excited when your assets increase without you lifting a finger. Visit: Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release does not constitute an investment solicitation, nor does it constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risks and the possibility of losing funds. It is strongly recommended that you perform due diligence before investing or trading in cryptocurrencies and securities, including consulting a professional financial advisor. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With Disabled Student in Lawsuit vs. District
In a unanimous opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday sided with the family of Ava Tharpe, a teen with a rare form of epilepsy whose suburban Minneapolis district denied her request for a modified school day. The decision, A.J.T. vs. Osseo Area Schools, means K-12 students do not have to meet a higher standard of proof than others suing under the Americans with Disabilities Act. If the justices had agreed with the district's longstanding argument, children with disabilities would have had to prove their school system intentionally acted in bad faith in denying them in-school accommodations. In 'friend of the court' briefs, numerous advocacy groups had warned that holding special education students to a different — and extraordinarily strict — definition of discrimination would have made it virtually impossible for families to assert their rights. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter The court agreed, saying everyone who files suit under the ADA should have to meet the same standard of 'deliberate indifference,' or disregard for an individual's need for accommodations. 'That our decision is narrow does not diminish its import for A.J.T. and 'a great many children with disabilities and their parents,' ' Roberts wrote, citing language from a lower court decision. 'Together they face daunting challenges on a daily basis. We hold today that those challenges do not include having to satisfy a more stringent standard of proof than other plaintiffs to establish discrimination under Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.' In a concurring opinion, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson elaborated, citing examples of discrimination that, intent notwithstanding, must still be addressed. 'Stairs may prevent a wheelchair-bound person from accessing a public space,' Sotomayor wrote. 'The lack of auxiliary aids may prevent a dead person from accessing medical treatment at a public hospital; and braille-free ballots may preclude a blind person from voting, all without animus on the part of the city planner, the hospital staff or the ballot designer.' Related 'Today's decision is a great win for Ava, and for children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools across the country,' said Roman Martinez, a lead attorney on the case. 'This outcome gets the law exactly right, and it will help protect the reasonable accommodations needed to ensure equal opportunity for all.' In a statement to The 74, a district spokesperson said the high court 'declined to decide what the particular intent standard is for such claims,' noting that 'the case will now return to the trial court for next steps consistent with the court's ruling.' In 2015, when Ava was in fourth grade, her family moved from Kentucky to Minnesota. Because her severe form of epilepsy causes frequent seizures during the morning, she had been allowed to attend school in the afternoon and early evening. Initially, the Osseo district agreed to a modified schedule, but reneged after the family moved, saying it was unwilling to provide services outside the normal school day. The state administrative law judge who heard the family's initial complaint called the district's arguments 'pretextual,' saying it was more concerned with 'the need to safeguard the ordinary end-of-the-workday departure times for its faculty and staff' than with outside evaluators' assessments of Ava's needs. As the case made its way to the Supreme Court, the district had consistently argued Ava had to prove the school system acted out of ill intent — a standard that would have applied only to K-12 students. But in the brief it submitted before oral arguments, Osseo widened its argument, saying that a showing of bad faith is required in all ADA cases, not just those involving schools. The April 28 hearing erupted in rare verbal fireworks when Justice Neil Gorsuch took exception to a statement by the district's attorney that lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice, who sided with the family, were 'lying' when they said the district had changed its argument. Justice Amy Coney Barrett characterized the district's shift as 'a pretty big sea change,' while Jackson questioned whether the district was saying the ADA does not necessarily require accommodations for people with disabilities. In their concurring opinion, Sotomayor and Jackson noted that when they wrote the act, lawmakers addressed the question at the heart of the case head-on: 'Congress was not naïve to the insidious nature of disability discrimination when it enacted the ADA and Rehabilitation Act. It understood full well that discrimination against those with disabilities derives principally from 'apathetic attitudes rather than affirmative animus.' ' The decision comes at a time when disability protections have come under fire from the second Trump administration and a number of Republican governors. In October, motivated by new rules that said gender dysphoria could be considered a disability, 17 states sued the federal government. Gender dysphoria is the clinical term for distress caused when a person's gender does not match their sex assigned at birth. That suit, Texas vs. Kennedy, originally sought to have Section 504, the portion of the ADA that outlaws in-school discrimination, declared unconstitutional. The states have since dropped that demand from the suit but are still asking courts to overturn rules prohibiting discrimination in a wide array of public settings. Whether the states will continue to press the new, broader case in the face of Thursday's decision remains to be seen. For their part, disability advocates were quick to celebrate. The district's position was 'flatly inconsistent with the law and would have stripped millions of people with disabilities of the protections Congress put in place to prevent systemic discrimination,' said Shira Wakschlag, senior executive officer of legal advocacy and general counsel for The Arc of the United States, which submitted a brief on the issues. 'The very foundation of disability civil rights was on the line.'
