
Jenrick: Prosecutors must push for harsher knife crime sentences
Crown prosecutors are not 'playing their part' in stopping courts giving unduly lenient sentences for knife crime, Robert Jenrick has claimed.
The shadow justice secretary wrote to Stephen Parkinson, the head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), calling for urgent action on the record number of repeat knife offenders escaping jail.
He said Ministry of Justice (MoJ) figures, revealed last week by The Telegraph, showed only 54.8 per cent of repeat knife offenders had been jailed in the last quarter of last year – the lowest proportion on record.
This was despite a 2015 law 'expressly mandating' that all repeat offenders should be imprisoned unless there were 'genuinely exceptional circumstances'.
It came with an independent review of sentencing commissioned by the Government due to be published on Thursday.
The review is expected to pave the way for offenders to be released as early as one third of the way through their sentences, if they behave well.
It will also scrap jail sentences of under one year except in exceptional circumstances and propose greater use of community punishments with an expansion of the use of electronic tags.
Mr Jenrick wrote: 'Sentencing is of course a matter for judges. However, I am concerned that the CPS is not playing its part in upholding the law by routinely challenging unduly lenient sentences.
'When a statute lays down a mandatory minimum, failure to impose that sentence is not a matter of discretion but of error, and surely demands appeals.
'The law was designed to break the cycle of violence. Instead, only 27.9 per cent of knife offenders are jailed, the lowest figure since records began, while knife crime itself has reached a near-record high.
'The deterrent value of custodial sentencing has been severely eroded and one can only conclude that this has fuelled spiralling violence on our streets.
'When the CPS declines to appeal cases in which Parliament's will has plainly been ignored [that] offends the rule of law.'
Mr Jenrick asked what steps the CPS was taking to ensure prosecutors identified knife crime sentences which fell below the statutory minimum, and referred them to appeal.
The CPS said there was no clear legal avenue to challenge cases, as knife crime was not one of the offences covered by the Government's Unduly Lenient Sentence (ULS) scheme.
The ULS is the formal process by which individuals or organisations can ask the Attorney General to refer cases to the court of appeal for the judges to consider whether sentences should be toughened.
A CPS spokesman said: 'The CPS has no role in handing down sentences and they can only be appealed if they are covered by the ULS scheme – which these knife offences are not.
'Our prosecutors never hesitate to refer eligible cases for appeal where the punishment doesn't fit the crime.'
The proportion of offenders sent to prison after being convicted of knife crime stood at 27.9 per cent in the last quarter of last year, down from a peak of 42.9 per cent in 2020, despite knife crime hitting near-record levels, according to Ministry of Justice data.
It comes just a month after figures showed knife crime increased by two per cent to 54,587 offences in a year, 600 short of the all-time high. Nine forces, including the Metropolitan Police, the biggest in England and Wales, reported record levels.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
7 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Chagossians want sovereignty deal to go ahead, says Mauritius legal adviser
Philippe Sands KC, who has represented Mauritius in its legal battle with the UK since 2010, told a House of Lords committee he wanted to 'knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved' in negotiations over the deal. His comments came a day after a panel of UN experts urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to abandon the agreement reached with Mauritius last month and negotiate a new one. The panel, appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, said it was 'gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in the processes that have led to the agreement'. The experts also criticised the continuing bar on Chagossians returning to Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands, because of the ongoing presence of a joint UK-US military base. On Wednesday, Mr Sands told the Lords International Relations and Defence Committee: 'To be clear, it is not the case that Chagossians had no role in the negotiations. 'I can tell you that Chagossians in Mauritius and Seychelles were deeply involved in consulting with successive prime ministers of Mauritius and they attended the hearings at the International Court of Justice.' He added: 'I want to really knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved in the various processes. That is simply not true. 'It is true, however, that the Chagossian community is divided and I respect that division.' Earlier, he had told the committee that, while some UK-based Chagossians wanted the islands to remain British territory, 'most in Mauritius and Seychelles have made very clear…that they wish this deal to go ahead'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the Diego Garcia base and have not been allowed to Mr Sands told peers the 'quid pro quo' for the military base remaining on Diego Garcia was Chagossians would be allowed to settle on the outer islands of the archipelago. The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has said will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States, the UN secretary general and the African Union, but heavily criticised by the Conservative Party as a 'surrender'. Mr Sands disagreed with that on Wednesday, saying the deal 'will enhance Britain's position in the world'. He said: 'I can tell you from personal experience, direct comments from countries, ambassadors, prime ministers, presidents around the world, this is seen as Britain back on the world (stage), acting honourably and decently, protecting its interests and safeguarding…the rule of law.'


South Wales Guardian
9 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Chagossians want sovereignty deal to go ahead, says Mauritius legal adviser
Philippe Sands KC, who has represented Mauritius in its legal battle with the UK since 2010, told a House of Lords committee he wanted to 'knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved' in negotiations over the deal. His comments came a day after a panel of UN experts urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to abandon the agreement reached with Mauritius last month and negotiate a new one. The panel, appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, said it was 'gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in the processes that have led to the agreement'. The experts also criticised the continuing bar on Chagossians returning to Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands, because of the ongoing presence of a joint UK-US military base. On Wednesday, Mr Sands told the Lords International Relations and Defence Committee: 'To be clear, it is not the case that Chagossians had no role in the negotiations. 'I can tell you that Chagossians in Mauritius and Seychelles were deeply involved in consulting with successive prime ministers of Mauritius and they attended the hearings at the International Court of Justice.' He added: 'I want to really knock on the head this idea that all of the Chagossians were not involved in the various processes. That is simply not true. 'It is true, however, that the Chagossian community is divided and I respect that division.' Earlier, he had told the committee that, while some UK-based Chagossians wanted the islands to remain British territory, 'most in Mauritius and Seychelles have made very clear…that they wish this deal to go ahead'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the Diego Garcia base and have not been allowed to Mr Sands told peers the 'quid pro quo' for the military base remaining on Diego Garcia was Chagossians would be allowed to settle on the outer islands of the archipelago. The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has said will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States, the UN secretary general and the African Union, but heavily criticised by the Conservative Party as a 'surrender'. Mr Sands disagreed with that on Wednesday, saying the deal 'will enhance Britain's position in the world'. He said: 'I can tell you from personal experience, direct comments from countries, ambassadors, prime ministers, presidents around the world, this is seen as Britain back on the world (stage), acting honourably and decently, protecting its interests and safeguarding…the rule of law.'


Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rayner rough sleeping plan ‘could lead to San Francisco-style tent cities'
Angela Rayner's plans to decriminalise rough sleeping could lead to San Francisco-style tent cities in Britain, the Tories have warned. The Deputy Prime Minister announced on Tuesday that the Vagrancy Act, introduced in 1824 to tackle a worsening homelessness crisis after the Industrial Revolution, will be repealed by next spring. However, the Tories claimed the plans would create a 'charter for chaos' if Labour failed to replace the repealed Act with new offences to tackle nuisance rough sleeping and begging. The Tories' proposals for repealing the Act when they were in government included two offences that would have given police powers to prosecute nuisance beggars and rough sleeping, which covered any damage they did to property and the environment including 'excessive' noise, litter and waste. Labour insists the police will be able to tackle nuisance begging and rough sleeping by using existing powers in the Crime and Policing Act of 2014, which were created to combat anti-social behaviour. Ms Rayner has also proposed new laws to target organised begging by gangs and trespassing with intention to commit a crime to replace powers in the Act which will be repealed. The row comes during a sharp rise in homelessness which has led to encampments sprouting up even in some of the most prosperous areas of cities. Last September, rough sleepers set up a camp of some 24 tents on Park Lane in central London. The number of people classed as living on the streets in London has risen by more than a third (38 per cent) year-on-year to 706 from 511, according to figures for April. The number recorded as sleeping rough in the capital has also increased by 8 per cent, to 4,427 in the three months to March this year, from 4,118 in the same quarter last year. 'Charter for chaos' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Ms Rayner's plans are a charter for chaos. The Government is repealing legislation without providing an adequate replacement. 'The police will not have the powers needed to ensure that high streets and town and city centres are kept clear of nuisance rough sleeping. 'Of course, people need to be helped and supported but the police also need the powers to take action when necessary to maintain order in city centres and maintain a pleasant environment for the majority. 'This move risks turning British cities into a version of San Francisco, which has become overrun by encampments of homeless people. 'We need to ensure support but there needs to be strong enforcement powers as well.' But in a letter to MPs Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said the Government was 'satisfied that generally where nuisance begging meets the threshold of anti-social behaviour, it is open to the police and others to use the existing powers in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014'. She said the Home Office would issue statutory guidance to police to 'make this clear' so officers could tackle nuisance begging that caused distress to the public and residents. Two new offences will replace powers which were in the Vagrancy Act, she added. An offence of arranging or facilitating begging for gain would target people who organised begging gangs or drove people to places for them to beg. It would carry a maximum sentence of six months in jail. An offence of trespassing with intent to commit a criminal offence would replicate the one already in the 1824 act with a maximum penalty of three months in jail. Ms Rayner has also secured an extra £233 million this financial year to provide a total of nearly £1 billion for support services to divert homeless people away from the street and rough sleeping and into accommodation.