logo
Judge maintains Macomb veteran's claim of sexual pursuit against VA psychiatrist

Judge maintains Macomb veteran's claim of sexual pursuit against VA psychiatrist

A federal judge has determined a military veteran's lawsuit can proceed against both the U.S. government and a federal psychiatrist on the accusations the she engaged in an improper romantic and sexual relationship with the veteran.
U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain ruled last week that Veterans Administration psychiatrist Dr. Jennifer Robinson can be sued personally by Marine veteran Trey Cholewa on his claims she initiated an intimate relationship with him while Cholewa was being treated in 2017 for brain injury and PTSD from his combat action in the Middle East. Also, the federal government can be sued for alleged non-sexual misconduct related to the alleged abuse, according to the ruling.
The ruling in a 37-page opinion was in response to Robinson seeking full government immunity.
The lawsuit was filed in 2019.
It means Robinson cannot be protected by immunity because the alleged sexual and romantic instances occurred outside the scope of her employment, and that the government can remain a defendant because she allegedly took related actions that were within her scope of employment.
A spokesperson for Ven Johnson Law, which is representing Cholewa, in an email to The Macomb Daily calls the ruling a 'major win for Cholewa and for veterans nationwide who've faced abuse from those entrusted with their care.'
'It also is a major step forward in the fight against blanket governmental immunity, because it means that those in positions of authority will be held accountable for their actions, regardless of title or employer,' says the spokesperson for the Detroit-based firm.
In his ruling, Drain determined 'as a matter of fact' that Robinson engaged in romantic and sexual acts with Cholewa despite some inconsistencies in his statements.
'Regardless of the inconsistencies, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's testimony is credible in part and not credible in part,' the judge wrote. 'Plaintiff has changed the details of the sexual contact in several ways throughout the litigation, and there are reasons to question Plaintiff's memory and reliability. … Plaintiff struggled to remember the dates that sexual contact did or did not occur.'
However, he notes a key piece and only direct evidence in the case is an audio recording Cholewa made during one of his many visits to Robinson at the John D. Dingell VA Medical Center in Detroit during which Robinson does not refute Chelow's references to prior sexual contact.
'Certain allegations by Plaintiff have remained consistent throughout the litigation,' the judge goes on to say. 'Plaintiff has proven his testimony to be reliable in part, because the audio recording supports his allegations that Dr. Robinson professed her romantic feelings for him, and at the very least kissed and massaged him. Moreover, Plaintiff's general allegation that sexual touching occurred at some point is supported by the audio recording and other circumstantial evidence.'
Also in Cholewa's favor is that Robinson declined to give sworn testimony by invoking her Fifth Amendment due to potential self-incrimination, according to the opinion.
Cholewa's trio of claims against Dr. Robinson include medical malpractice, ordinary negligence and medical battery.
The judge says the government can be held responsible for numerous allegations over the claim that 'Robinson's failure to do certain non-romantic and non-sexual acts that were a necessary part of her job as a psychiatrist.' Robinson may have failed to:
* 'refrain from exploiting the power differential she enjoyed over Plaintiff by virtue of his reliance on her stated goal of assisting him;
* discontinue the professional and therapeutic physician-patient relationship immediately upon feeling the impulse to act upon her feelings of emotional connection, physical attraction, or both;
* refer Plaintiff to an alternative psychiatrist immediately upon her feeling the impulse to act upon her feelings of emotional connection, physical attraction, or both.'
Cholewa says the encounters contributed to his divorce from his wife, though they reconciled.
Robinson began treating Cholewa in October 2015 at the VA in Detroit after he was medically discharged due to PTSD and chronic pain. He alleges Robinson initiated sexual activities with him in March 2017, following months of progressively provocative remarks. Cholewa says there were 10 to 20 encounters over five months ending in August 2017, although he reduced the number of incidents and time frame in another statement, according to the opinion. Cholewa stopped treatment and in June 2018 began treatment with another psychologist, to whom he revealed the encounters with Robinson, according to the lawsuit.
Cholewa served five deployments in the Middle East, three of which he served in active combat and suffered a head injury. In 2015, Cholewa was medically discharged with a 100% disability rating for both physical and mental trauma, and returned home to his wife and children in Macomb County.
In January 2024, Drain denied the government and Robinson's attempt to dismiss the case.
No new court dates have been scheduled, according to online records.
___
© 2025 The Macomb Daily
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Saudi Arabia executes a journalist after 7 years behind bars. Activists say it was over his tweets.
Saudi Arabia executes a journalist after 7 years behind bars. Activists say it was over his tweets.

Boston Globe

time8 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Saudi Arabia executes a journalist after 7 years behind bars. Activists say it was over his tweets.

According to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, Saudi authorities maintained that Al-Jasser was behind a social media account on X, formerly Twitter, that levied corruption allegations against Saudi royals. Al-Jasser was also said to have posted several controversial tweets about militants and militant groups. Advertisement CPJ's program director Carlos Martínez de la Serna condemned the execution and said the lack of accountability in the wake of the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul in 2018 allows for continued persecution of journalists in the kingdom. 'The international community's failure to deliver justice for Jamal Khashoggi did not just betray one journalist,' he said, adding it had 'emboldened de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to continue his persecution of the press.' Al-Jasser's 'execution once again demonstrates that in Saudi Arabia, the punishment for criticizing or questioning Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is death,' said Jeed Basyouni, head of the Middle East and North Africa section at Reprieve, an international anti-death penalty advocacy group. Advertisement Basyouni added that Al-Jasser was tried and convicted 'in total secrecy for the 'crime' of journalism.' A Saudi assassination team killed Khashoggi at the consulate in Istanbul. The U.S. intelligence community concluded that the Saudi crown prince ordered the operation but the kingdom insists the prince was not involved in the killing. Al-Jasser ran a personal blog from 2013 to 2015 and was well-known for his articles on the Arab Spring movements that shook the Middle East in 2011, women's rights and corruption. Saudi Arabia has drawn criticism from human rights groups for its numbers and also methods of capital punishment, including beheadings and mass executions. In 2024, executions in Saudi Arabia rose to 330, according to activists and human rights groups, as the kingdom continues to tightly clamp down on dissent. Last month, a British Bank of America analyst was sentenced to a decade in prison in Saudi Arabia, apparently over a since-deleted social media post, according to his lawyer. And in 2021, a dual Saudi American national, Saad Almadi, was arrested and later sentenced to more than 19 years in prison on terrorism-related charges stemming from tweets he had posted while living in the United States. He was released in 2023 but has been banned from leaving the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia executes a journalist after 7 years behind bars

time8 hours ago

Saudi Arabia executes a journalist after 7 years behind bars

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- A prominent Saudi journalist who was arrested in 2018 and convicted on terrorism and treason charges has been executed, the kingdom said. Activist groups maintain that the charges against him were trumped up. Turki Al-Jasser, who was in his late 40s, was put to death on Saturday, according to the official Saudi Press Agency, after the death penalty was upheld by the nation's top court. Authorities had raided Al-Jasser's home in 2018, arresting him and seizing his computer and phones. It was not clear where his trial took place or how long it lasted. According to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, Saudi authorities maintained that Al-Jasser was behind a social media account on X, formerly Twitter, that levied corruption allegations against Saudi royals. Al-Jasser was also said to have posted several controversial tweets about militants and militant groups. CPJ's program director Carlos Martínez de la Serna condemned the execution and said the lack of accountability in the wake of the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul in 2018 allows for continued persecution of journalists in the kingdom. 'The international community's failure to deliver justice for Jamal Khashoggi did not just betray one journalist,' he said, adding it had 'emboldened de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to continue his persecution of the press.' Al-Jasser's 'execution once again demonstrates that in Saudi Arabia, the punishment for criticizing or questioning Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is death,' said Jeed Basyouni, head of the Middle East and North Africa section at Reprieve, an international anti-death penalty advocacy group. Basyouni added that Al-Jasser was tried and convicted 'in total secrecy for the 'crime' of journalism.' A Saudi assassination team killed Khashoggi at the consulate in Istanbul. The U.S. intelligence community concluded that the Saudi crown prince ordered the operation but the kingdom insists the prince was not involved in the killing. Al-Jasser ran a personal blog from 2013 to 2015 and was well-known for his articles on the Arab Spring movements that shook the Middle East in 2011, women's rights and corruption. Saudi Arabia has drawn criticism from human rights groups for its numbers and also methods of capital punishment, including beheadings and mass executions. In 2024, executions in Saudi Arabia rose to 330, according to activists and human rights groups, as the kingdom continues to tightly clamp down on dissent. Last month, a British Bank of America analyst was sentenced to a decade in prison in Saudi Arabia, apparently over a since-deleted social media post, according to his lawyer. And in 2021, a dual Saudi American national, Saad Almadi, was arrested and later sentenced to more than 19 years in prison on terrorism-related charges stemming from tweets he had posted while living in the United States. He was released in 2023 but has been banned from leaving the kingdom.

Wasn't the president supposed to be deporting criminals?
Wasn't the president supposed to be deporting criminals?

Los Angeles Times

time10 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Wasn't the president supposed to be deporting criminals?

This will strike the literal-minded as illogical, but I think Huntington Park Mayor Arturo Flores, a Marine veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan, had a righteous point when he declared at a news conference with Southern California mayors that immigrants being rounded up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in communities like his 'are Americans, whether they have a document or they don't.' 'The president keeps talking about a foreign invasion,' Flores told me Thursday. 'He keeps trying to paint us as the other. I say, 'No, you are dealing with Americans.'' California's estimated 1.8 million undocumented immigrants who have lived among us for years, for decades, who work and pay taxes here, who have sent their American-born children to schools here, have all the responsibilities of citizens minus many of the rights. Yes, technically, they have broken the law. (For that matter, so has President Trump, a felon, and he continues to violate the Constitution day after day, as his mounting court losses attest.) But our region's undocumented Mexican and Central American immigrants are inextricably embedded in our lives. They care for our children, build our homes, dig our ditches, trim our trees, clean our homes, hotels and businesses, wash our dishes, pick our crops, sew our clothes. Lots own small businesses, are paying mortgages, attend universities, rise in their professions. In 2013, I wrote about Sergio Garcia, the first undocumented immigrant admitted to the California Bar. Since then, he has become a U.S. citizen and owns a personal injury law firm. These Californians are far less likely to break the law than native-born Americans, and they do not deserve the reign of terror being inflicted on them by the Trump administration, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has pointlessly but theatrically called in the Marines. 'So we started off by hearing the administration wanted to go after violent felons gang members, drug dealers,' said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who organized the mayors' news conference last week, 'but when you raid Home Depot and workplaces, when you tear parents and children apart, and when you run armored caravans through our streets, you're not trying to keep anyone safe. You're trying to cause fear and panic.' And please, let's not forget that when Congress came together and hammered out a bipartisan immigration reform bill under President Biden, Trump demanded Republicans kill it because he did not want a rational policy, he wanted to be able to keep hammering Democrats on the issue. But it seems there is more going on here than rounding up undocumented immigrants and terrorizing their families. We seem to have entered the 'punish California' phase of Trump 2.0. 'Trump has a hyperfocus on California, on how to hurt the economy and cause chaos, and he is really doubling down on that campaign,' Flores told me. He has a point. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and this mayor placed on this country,' Noem told reporters Thursday at a news conference in the Westwood federal building, during which California Sen. Alex Padilla was wrestled to the ground and handcuffed face down for daring to ask her a question. 'We are not going away.' So now we're talking about regime change? (As former Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe put it on Bluesky, the use of military force aimed at displacing democratically elected leaders 'is the very definition of a coup.') Noem's noxious mix of willful ignorance and inflammatory rhetoric is almost too ludicrous to mock. It goes hand in hand with Trump's silly declaration that our city has been set aflame by rioters, that without the military patrolling our streets, Los Angeles 'would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years,' and that 'paid insurrectionists' have fueled the anti-ICE protests. What we are seeing play out in the news and in our neighborhoods is the willful infliction of fear, trauma and intimidation designed to spark a violent response, and the warping of reality to soften the ground for further Trump administration incursions into blue states, America's bulwark against his autocratic aspirations. For weeks, Trump has been scheming to deprive California — probably illegally — of federal funding for public schools and universities, citing resistance to his executive orders on diversity, equity and inclusion programs, on immigration, on environmental regulations, etc. And yet, because he is perhaps the world's most ignorant head of state, he seems to have suddenly realized that crippling the California economy might be bad politics for him. On Thursday, he suggested in his own jumbled way that perhaps deporting thousands of the state's farm and hospitality workers might cause pain to his friends, their employers. (Central Valley growers and agribusiness PACs, for example, overwhelmingly supported Trump in 2024.) 'Our farmers are being hurt badly by, you know, they have very good workers. They've worked for them for 20 years,' Trump said. 'They're not citizens, but they've turned out to be, you know, great. And we're going to have to do something about that.' Like a lot of Californians, I feel helpless in the face of this assault on immigrants. I thought about a Guatemalan, a father of three young American-born children, who has a thriving business hauling junk. I met him a couple of years ago at my local Home Depot, and have hired him a few times to haul away household detritus. Once, after I couldn't get the city to help, he hauled off a small dune's worth of sand at the end of my street that had become the local dogs' pee pad. I called him this week — I have more stuff that I need to get rid of, and I was pretty sure he could use the work. Early Friday morning, he arrived on time with two workers. He said hadn't been able to work in two weeks but was hopeful he'd be able to return to Home Depot soon. 'How are your kids doing?' I asked. 'They worry,' he said. 'They ask, 'What will we do if you're deported?'' He tells them not to fret, that things will soon be back to normal. After he drove off, he texted: 'Thank you so much for helping me today. God bless you.' No, God bless him. For working hard. For being a good dad. And for still believing, against the odds, in the American dream. @ @rabcarian

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store