
Major European capital is set to 'BAN cars' in bid to tackle its gridlock
Berlin is looking to ban cars driving in the city almost completely in efforts to overcome its gridlock traffic.
A high court has ruled that people living in the German capital can vote next year on whether they should forbid most vehicles from passing through after years of campaigning.
If passed, this would see drivers only being allowed to drive into the city centre 12 days of the year.
However, the ban would exempt emergency services, taxis, buses, delivery vehicles and public service vehicles like rubbish collectors.
Cars would also be allowed to still use the 'car-reduced' zone on federally-run highways.
The 'car-free Berlin' campaign group proposed a referendum after gathering thousands of signatures but were blocked by the city government in 2022.
They argued that the proposal violated the German constitution but this was dismissed in Berlin's high court yesterday.
The judge said that the referendum can go ahead if it meets all the usual requirements - namely, gathering 170,000 signatures, or seven per cent of the Berlin electorate, in the next three month.
A high court has ruled that people living in the German capital can vote next year on whether they should forbid most vehicles from passing through after years of campaigning
More than 50,000 signatures have already been provided when the proposal first went to court in 2022.
If completed, the choice will make it onto the ballot paper for next year's local elections.
It will then need to be voted in by at least half of voters representing a quarter of all eligible voters.
Berlin is not the only European city to have made efforts to ban cars.
Amsterdam has slowly been phasing out cars in an attempt to completely eradicate them in the city by 2030.
From 2020, they banned diesel cars older than 15 years inside an environmental zone, which was extended to public and private buses two years later.
This year, mopeds and motorcycles will also be banned.
Zermatt in Switzerland has banned private cars while Pontevedra in Spain has pedestrianised a large section of its city centre.
Venice has also typically always been car-free thanks to its many canals that run through the city.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nato was a victory for Starmer on the global stage, but now he's at war with his own MPs
Sir Keir Starmer seemed chipper as he boarded the plane home from the Nato summit on Wednesday evening. He cheerily thanked hacks in the travelling press delegation for what he said had been a great two-day trip to The Hague. And looking at Nato alone, it had been a success. Across the board, allies signed up to a historic increase in defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. After briefly wavering on his commitment to Article 5, even Donald Trump fell in line. And following a public love-in with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – who unnervingly, dubbed him the 'daddy' between the two warring nations of Iran and Israel – the US president conceded that the alliance was no longer a 'rip off', saying he is with is his European friends 'all the way'. Meanwhile, Starmer was able to pitch Britain as a leader on the world stage by cosying up to Mr Trump and purchasing 12 new F-35A fighter jets, massively ramping up Britain's nuclear capabilities. But what was left unsaid when the PM briefly greeted the media sharing the plane with him was that he was flying back into the most significant rebellion of his premiership – a revolt which threatens to shake the foundations of the historic majority he won just 11 months ago. Speaking at a press conference about Britain's contribution to defence spending at the Nato summit just hours earlier, the prime minister was forced to deny suggestions that he might be forced out of office before the next election. 'Many people predicted before the election that we 'couldn't read the room' we 'hadn't got the politics right' we 'wouldn't win an election after 2019' because we lost so badly. "We got a landslide victory. So I'm comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs', Sir Keir insisted. But at home, his MPs are much less convinced. More than 120 Labour MPs have signed an amendment which would kill off the government's flagship £5bn welfare reforms entirely. And there is a growing feeling that the prime minister has failed to listen to them, after he used part of his Nato presser to dismiss the rebellion as 'noises off'. 'No 10 sees MPs as irritants and fodder', one Labour MP with her name on the amendment said. 'We're all working hard and this is how they treat us. It goes back to the point about how arrogant and out of touch they are.' The prime minister's comments at the Nato press conference displayed a real lack of empathy for his own MPs, and ironically, a distinct failure to read the room. It would be hard to argue the prime minister is a wholly unempathetic person. An in-depth profile of the prime minister in the New Statesman published earlier this month showed how deeply he feels the weight of sacrifices made by individuals putting their lives on the line to serve their country. But in his first year in office, it has become increasingly clear that the prime minister is much more comfortable navigating foreign diplomacy than he is with dealing with angry backbenchers. It is in this area that Sir Keir seems entirely unable to empathise. He is known for being pragmatic rather than ideological, and appears to be bored by political manoeuvring. At times, this can provide a refreshing break from the Westminster bubble. But, taken too far, it can be the opposite. Starmer seems to have lost sight of the fact that in some scenarios, political manoeuvring is more than just self-serving posturing. Sometimes, it's a fight for hundreds of thousands of disabled people who are scared of losing vital financial support. The prime minister is now frantically meeting with leading MPs involved in the amendment to try to secure their backing by offering concessions. But the fact that it was allowed to get this far in the first place has angered those who would naturally be inclined to back the prime minister. Many are now threatening to dig their heels in until the bill is dead in the water. As Starmer returns from what was a strong showing at Nato, he must now display some of the empathy and political nous that he so effectively shows on the global stage. If he is unable to do so, he may well lose the domestic battle – and it could be catastrophic for his authority.


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kari Lake's embarrassing flub on softball question on the language of Armenia
Watch as Kari Lake fails to answer a question on the language spoken in Armenia, in an awkward exchange on Wednesday (26 June) with a House Democrat. The Senior Advisor for the US Agency for Global Media was being questioned on the future of her agency at Capitol Hill when Rep. Jim Costa decided to ask her about the European country. Mr Costa asked her: 'I assume you know what language the people of Armenia speak?', to which Ms Lake replied: 'I've actually heard it. It's a beautiful language. I can't name it. Can you please tell me?' The democrat shot back 'yeah, it's Armenian', with Ms Lake laughing off the fumble, calling it a 'trick question'.


The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's US accuses UK of backing ‘state-subsidised suicide' after assisted dying bill passes
The Trump administration criticised the UK's recently passed assisted dying bill, labelling it as 'state-subsidised suicide'. The US State Department 's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour stated that the 'western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death' in response to the legislation. The Terminally Ill Adults Bill, introduced by MP Kim Leadbeater, passed the House of Commons by a narrow margin of 23 votes. The bill would permit terminally ill individuals with less than six months to live to apply for assisted death, pending approval from two doctors and a panel of professionals. The legislation is now advancing to the House of Lords for further review, and this marks the second instance of the US State Department criticising Britain under Sir Keir.