PPTA Members Support Additional Salary Claim
Members of PPTA Te Wehengarua, the secondary school teachers' union, have overwhelmingly supported lodging an additional pay claim in their upcoming collective agreement negotiations now that new pay equity law has locked them out of any future process.
'This additional claim recognises that a pay equity claim process is no longer available to us, because of the changes that were steamrolled through Parliament to fill gaping holes in the Budget,' says Chris Abercrombie, PPTA Te Wehengarua president.
The claim, along with others, will be presented by PPTA when negotiations for the Secondary Teachers' Collective Agreement begin next Wednesday 18 June.
The new equal pay law prevents secondary teachers from making a future pay equity claim as they do not meet the new threshold of being in a profession that is made up of at least 70% women. New comparator rules also lock teachers out from pay equity claims as the education sector is female-dominated.
Chris Abercrombie said teachers were further dismayed to learn this week that Education Minister Erica Stanford did not receive any advice about what the changes to the equal pay legislation would mean for 90 000 teachers, who were part of the largest claim that was extinguished.
'It would seem an absolutely fundamental thing to do, as a Cabinet Minister considering changes to legislation, to find out what the impact of those changes will be for the people you are responsible for in your portfolio. Clearly, however, filling massive holes in the Budget was all that mattered.'
The revelation about the lack of any advice follows an admission from Employment Relations Minister Brooke Van Velden earlier this week that no-one was consulted about the changes, apart from Cabinet Ministers.
'This demonstrates an unbelievable lack of regard for working people, and for democracy in Aotearoa New Zealand.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mata Season 3 Episode 11 Tania Waikato
In the wake of an unprecedented punishment for the haka that drew global attention to the Treaty Principles Bill, Te Pāti Māori legal representative Tania Waikato reflects on the fallout, the opposition to the Regulatory Standards Bill, and what this moment reveals about Māori political power. Parliament took the unprecedented step of suspending both Te Pāti Māori leaders - Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi - for 21 days. Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke was suspended for seven days - but had also been punished with a 24-hour suspension on the day over a haka all three had performed in Parliament, against the Treaty Principles Bill, in November. It is against the rules of the House for members to leave their seats during a debate - which all three did. Waikato said one of the most galling things about the entire process was that the haka was said to be intimidatory and that the process the committee adopted was framed in that way from the beginning. She said in her 20 years of being a lawyer she had not seen a process that "disrespected the laws of natural justice" in the way it did. "I was actually flabbergasted at the lack of respect that that body had for very very basic rights that had anyone who's been accused of any type of behaviour that could have a censure result, let alone a censure of this magnitude, imposed on them should be given." Requests to the committee to have a hearing at a time when both counsels were available and for the accused to bring evidence to defend themselves against the allegations were rejected even though that was provided for in the standing orders, she said. "So right from the beginning of the process they were not following their own rules and they were ... in my opinion trumping up the charges to make them sound as serious as possible and to slant the outcome towards what we ended up with." Asked why the MPs chose not to appear before the committee, Waikato said it was because the MPs felt they would not get a fair hearing. "They felt, and quite rightly I believe, that they had already predetermined what they were going to decide." Waikato, who is also a health and safety lawyer, said Parliament was supposed to be the height of democracy but the behaviour of MPs within the House had degenerated and was "sliding towards this gutter politics style". "I watched some of the behaviour that goes on in the House and particularly in that last debate before the suspensions were made and there is no way that you could behave like that in any other workplace and get away with it - it would be illegal and you would be hauled up on workplace bullying charges in an instant if you behaved like that in any other workplace." Waikato said she would have advised Te Pāti Māori MPs to do the haka had she been their lawyer prior to this on the basis that the Treaty Principles Bill was "the most divisive, racist piece of legislation that has ever been introduced during our lifetimes". It was an exceptional event which required an exceptional response, she said. "And the Speaker took action on the day, it's not like there was nothing that happened on the day, Hannah was censured for what happened, it should have stopped there." It should not have been referred to the Privileges Committee, she said. Photo: Te Māngai Pāho Photo: NZ On Air
NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Whakatāne Grey Power launches petition for funding second bridge
The Landing Road Bridge in Whakatāne is at capacity and vulnerable to seismic and flooding risks, according to a Whakatāne District Grey Power petition currently on Parliament's petitions website. The Whakatāne District Grey Power Association has started a petition on the Parliament website for the Government to prioritise funding for a second bridge in Whakatāne. The Whakatāne Grey Power petition, titled Additional Bridge for Whakatāne, supports a proposal by Mayor Victor Luca advocating for a second bridge. Grey Power
The Spinoff
16 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Golden visas bring in big bucks as one-percenters look to NZ
The government is celebrating a $25 million boost from wealthy migrants, but questions remain about the visa's wider economic impact, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Big names, big money Immigration minister Erica Stanford is hailing the revamped Active Investor Plus visa as a major success, reports The Post's Thomas Manch, with more than $25 million already transferred and around $1 billion worth of applications in the pipeline. Launched on April 1, the updated scheme lowered the investment threshold, removed the English language requirement, and slashed in-country time obligations. Applicants under the new 'growth' category need to invest a minimum of $5 million in higher-risk assets over three years and spend just 21 days in New Zealand during that time. 'It's been so successful, and the people are amazing,' said Stanford, claiming some applicants are tech co-founders of 'very big, well-known companies that you would probably use every day'. The majority of applications have come from the United States, followed by China, Hong Kong and Germany. Not all capital is created equal It's certainly a tidy sum of money, but will it meaningfully grow the economy? Writing in Newsroom, Brent Burmester, a business lecturer at the University of Auckland, says passive capital injections into funds or existing businesses rarely drive widespread economic transformation. 'Wanting residency and having the capital to secure it is not a measure or indicator of future entrepreneurial breakthrough,' he argues. Instead, Burmester supports prioritising migrants with ambition, skills and drive over those with simply a big chequebook. 'The research is very clear on this: such immigrants grow an economy like ours and give established Kiwis a reason to stay. They typically demand less and deliver more. Not because they are wealthy, but because they are not. Yet.' A residence visa without residents? Under the new rules, investors may spend as little as a week a year in New Zealand, raising concerns about their long-term contributions to the local business environment. If they're hardly ever here, it seems doubtful that they can engage meaningfully with the companies their money supports or with the communities they're theoretically helping grow. Immigration lawyer Nick Mason tells Morning Report the requirement 'does seem very minimal' but in his experience, golden visa holders spend a lot longer in-country than they have to. RNZ's Liu Chen also reports that potential Chinese applicants have found their way into the country blocked due to their inability to use China's Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) scheme, which is virtually the only pathway for individuals from China to transfer capital overseas. One immigration lawyer told Chen that excluding QDII effectively shuts off the golden visa to most Chinese investors, despite the government claiming the programme is 'country neutral'. Parent Boost visa raises equity concerns While wealthy investors are being courted, many migrant families are reacting to a more personal policy change. The new Parent Boost visa, announced on Sunday, will allow parents of citizens and residents to stay in New Zealand for up to 10 years. Though widely welcomed, community leaders warn it is largely out of reach for the working-class migrants who need it. 'For them, the Parent Boost Visa is a promise they cannot afford to fulfill,' writes Vineeta Rao in Indian Newslink. Applicants must meet high financial thresholds – $160,000 in savings for a single applicant with no other income, or $250,000 for a couple – that skew the visa in favour of migrants from wealthier countries. The result is a tiered system, Rao writes, that effectively '[sidelines] many Indian families, despite their cultural and emotional capability to support their parents here'.
