Le Drian returns to Beirut, revives French role in Lebanon's crisis
Report by Toni Mrad, English adaptation by Mariella Succar
France — often referred to as Lebanon's 'tender mother' — has renewed its diplomatic engagement in the country through the return of presidential envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian.
One of Le Drian's most notable meetings took place away from the media spotlight with Mohammad Raad, head of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, Loyalty to the Resistance. According to information obtained by LBCI, the talks were described as positive.
During the meeting, Raad emphasized that the key to stability in Lebanon lies in halting Israeli attacks and ensuring a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory — goals that require strong international pressure, particularly from guarantor countries such as France and the United States.
On the issue of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), Raad affirmed that Hezbollah supports the extension of the peacekeeping mission under the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 — a position aligned with the stance of Lebanon's three top officials.
While Le Drian heard Hezbollah's views, he, in turn, stressed the importance of advancing reforms — particularly the banking restructuring law and legislation addressing the financial gap. According to sources, he received support for moving forward on these key reforms.
Le Drian also discussed these issues — along with the question of ensuring the state's exclusive control over arms — in meetings with several Lebanese political figures, including MPs Michel Douaihy and Fouad Makhzoumi, Free Patriotic Movement leader Gebran Bassil, Kataeb Party leader Samy Gemayel, and Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea.
But the broader question remains: What real and effective role can France play in Lebanon? And is it capable of easing pressure from Saudi Arabia and the United States, both of which place Hezbollah's disarmament at the forefront of their demands?
What can be said is that Paris appears to be trying to revive the reform agenda, which has taken a backseat to the issue of weapons. Whether France will succeed in this effort remains to be seen.
France's role may be more impactful when it comes to the extension of UNIFIL's mandate in southern Lebanon. In addition to being a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, France also holds the role of "penholder" — responsible for drafting Council resolutions and statements, including those related to Lebanon.
Since Le Drian's last visit to Beirut, France has managed to reopen discussions on UNIFIL ahead of the renewal deadline in late August — a renewal that this year coincides with a rise in tensions and incidents involving the international force.
In the end, France — through Le Drian — appears once again not only to be offering assistance to Lebanon, but also working to reinforce its presence and role on the Lebanese stage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
an hour ago
- LBCI
Reform or relapse: French envoy Le Drian backs arms monopoly, UNIFIL role in securing Lebanon's future—LBCI interview
French envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian says Lebanon is entering a "critical moment of opportunity" and must accelerate reforms to avoid squandering the international goodwill it has recently regained. In an interview on LBCI's "Vision 2030" program, Le Drian said the first 100 days of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's government have marked a shift from years of stagnation and dysfunction to renewed state functionality, albeit still incomplete. "There is now a Lebanese state again. It's not yet operating at full capacity, but basic stability has been restored after years of paralysis. That's a major achievement," he said. Le Drian credited the election of President Joseph Aoun by Lebanon's long-deadlocked parliament with restoring a sense of national pride and direction. He emphasized that this "Lebanese moment" must be seized—especially as the country begins to recover credibility on the international stage. "When President Aoun and Prime Minister Salam travel abroad, they are now met with respect. Lebanon is once again recognized," he said. "It's a new deal." Le Drian acknowledged that 100 days is not enough to judge a government's full performance, but said it is enough to confirm the political will to change. He praised the current cabinet as "coherent, competent, and determined," noting a level of unity and technical professionalism he hadn't seen in Lebanon for years. Several reforms are already underway, he said, including a more transparent appointment process, a judicial independence law approved by the government, banking secrecy reforms passed by parliament, and a draft bank restructuring law, which is under review. However, Le Drian warned that without further legislative action, Lebanon risks falling back into crisis. He called on parliament to urgently adopt the remaining key reforms, including a law on deposit recovery. The French envoy stressed that prolonging reform until after the next parliamentary elections would be a mistake, noting the extension of the current legislative session through the summer is a positive step. Le Drian also addressed the European Union's recent decision to place Lebanon on a money laundering watchlist. He said it's a reflection of previous international assessments and reinforces the urgency of banking reforms. "Unless Lebanon implements serious reforms, it will again be seen as the bad student of the class," he warned. Asked whether the International Monetary Fund (IMF) support remains necessary, Le Drian said it is "a prerequisite" for recovery, but he now sees serious engagement between Lebanon and the IMF. He also discussed the possibility of organizing new international donor conferences like the CEDRE conference, which failed to deliver results due to Lebanon's lack of follow-through on promised reforms. "That's when trust was broken," he said. "We must rebuild that trust." Le Drian concluded by warning that Lebanon cannot afford to miss this rare window of opportunity, especially with regional dynamics shifting after the war in Syria. When asked about the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) and its future role, the envoy said there is broad support for renewing its mandate, highlighting the close link between Resolution 1701 and UNIFIL's mission. He warned that undermining UNIFIL could increase the risk of renewed conflict in southern Lebanon. He stressed the importance of recognizing, respecting, and strengthening its role to maintain stability, noting many Lebanese remain fearful of war returning. The French envoy also stressed that rebuilding southern Lebanon cannot start without establishing security and ensuring all weapons are exclusively controlled by the state. He emphasized that only the Lebanese Armed Forces should be tasked with maintaining security and supporting reconstruction efforts. Le Drian expressed full support for President Aoun's approach, commending his blend of determination and caution as the ideal model for the president's role in upholding the state's monopoly on arms.
LBCI
an hour ago
- LBCI
Iran escalates after IAEA rebuke; US pulls staff amid rising tensions — are war drums beating?
Report by Wissam Nasrallah, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian Iran has issued orders to open a new uranium enrichment facility, increase the production of enriched materials, and replace first-generation centrifuges with more advanced sixth-generation models. This was followed by the launch of Iranian military drills and official statements declaring that Tehran was prepared for any scenario. Iran also released the first batch of intelligence documents it had obtained, accusing the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of cooperating and coordinating with Tel Aviv. All of this unfolded within two hours of the IAEA's announcement that Iran was not complying with its nuclear safeguards commitments—for the first time in nearly 20 years. That announcement was preceded by a series of escalating security developments across the region. Washington issued an urgent order to withdraw nonessential staff from its embassy in Baghdad and consulate in Erbil. Soon after, the U.S. State Department advised Americans against traveling to Iraq. At the same time, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) agency urged commercial ships in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Strait of Hormuz to exercise extreme caution due to what it described as 'increased tensions within the region.' As war drums grew louder, Oman confirmed it would host a new round of U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations on Sunday. Those talks will be preceded by meetings between U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, Mossad head David Barnea, and Israeli Minister Ron Dermer. Iran's position was made clear by its president, who said: 'We do not want war with the world—we seek dialogue with it. But we will not surrender to force, injustice, or tyranny.'
LBCI
an hour ago
- LBCI
Strike or bluff? Israel raises stakes ahead of US-Iran talks
Report by Amal Shehadeh, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian Israeli military officials and experts have ruled out the possibility that Tel Aviv will launch a military strike against Iran, but they say the local, regional, and U.S. context makes the coming days critical. Following communication between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff—and ahead of talks in Washington involving Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and Mossad head David Barnea—Israel began signaling its readiness to strike Iran. This coincided with measures taken by Washington concerning its diplomatic missions and citizens in the region. The suggestion of an imminent strike has met skepticism. Some doubt the Israeli air force's ability to effectively target Iran's nuclear program and uranium enrichment facilities, while others believe the threats are intended to pressure Tehran into reaching a deal. Against this backdrop, an Israeli report warned that even if Tel Aviv takes the risk and carries out the operation, it may achieve tactical objectives. However, the outcome of the strike, its repercussions for Israel and the region, and its ability to support the broader strategic goal of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon remain uncertain. Adding to doubts is the inconsistency in Israeli assessments. Some now argue that a strike is necessary because Iran is accelerating its ballistic missile production and seeking nuclear weapons capability—despite Tel Aviv's earlier claim, following its most recent strike on Iran, that it had succeeded in delaying Tehran's missile development for years. Attention now turns to the upcoming U.S.-Iran negotiations on Sunday, amid signs that the parties involved in the nuclear issue are working to make a military strike a last resort, given the potentially grave consequences for Israel and the region.
