Stolen childhoods: Israel's war on Palestinian children
Israeli air strikes shatter Gaza. Photo: Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto/Getty Images
Ramallah, Occupied West Bank: More than 350 Palestinian children have been imprisoned by Israeli forces in military camps and central prisons across the country, according to recent reports by human rights groups. Of those detained, more than 100 are being held without charge or trial under Israel's controversial and unlawful military court system.
Palestinian child detainees face a grim reality behind bars. Like thousands of other political prisoners, they endure systemic abuse, including starvation; physical and psychological torture; denial of medical care and inhumane treatment. On 22 March 2025, the death of Walid Ahmad, a young detainee from Ramallah, marked the first known child martyr since the start of the genocide that began in October 2023.
Since then, mass arrests have intensified throughout the occupied territories, targeting civilians of all ages. Children have not been spared. In occupied Jerusalem and the West Bank alone, more than 1 200 child arrest cases have been documented. The situation in Gaza remains opaque, because Israeli authorities have blocked lawyers and human rights organisations from access to data regarding arrests and detentions.
Israel's military court system permits the use of administrative detention against children — a practice where detainees are held without charge, often based on undisclosed evidence. Lawyers and even the children themselves are denied access to these 'secret files', undermining the most basic principles of justice. Since the escalation of violence in October 2023, the number of children held under administrative detention has reached an unprecedented level, with reports indicating that 3 498 Palestinian children are detained under this system.
In addition to imprisonment, Palestinian children are subjected to military trials that lack due process and transparency. Legal experts and human rights advocates describe these proceedings as 'charade trials' that serve only to legitimise the occupation's continued violation of children's rights. Even more concerning is the imposition of house arrest, particularly in occupied Jerusalem, where children are cut off from education, social contact and essential support networks.
These actions are in direct violation of several international laws and conventions:
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which Israel has ratified, prohibits arbitrary detention and requires that detention of children be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time (Article 37).
The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the transfer of protected persons from occupied territories and outlines protections for civilians, including children, during military occupation.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantees the right to a fair trial and protection from arbitrary arrest or detention (Articles 9 and 14).
The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment prohibits torture and mistreatment under any circumstances.
By continuing to detain children without charge, deny them fair trial guarantees and subject them to inhumane treatment, Israeli authorities are committing serious breaches of international law. These practices amount to grave violations of human rights and constitute war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
It is evident tht Israel has not only stolen the childhoods of Palestinian children — it is systematically trying to erase their future.
Behind bars, these children are denied the chance to dream, to learn, to grow. Instead, they are subjected to trauma, isolation and violence — not because of what they have done, but because of who they are. Children are the seeds of tomorrow, but under occupation, they are treated as threats to be crushed. Through mass incarceration, psychological torment and physical abuse, Israel is waging war on a generation, attempting to break their bodies and spirits before they ever have the chance to blossom.
This is not collateral damage. It is deliberate.
It is a calculated strategy to strip Palestinians of their next generation of leaders, thinkers and dreamers — to suffocate resistance by extinguishing hope at its root. If the world continues to look away, it becomes complicit in a system that dehumanises children and buries their futures behind prison walls. Justice demands not silence, but urgent action.
Sõzarn Barday is an attorney based in South Africa and has a particular interest in human rights in the Middle East.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
Anti-War Protests at RDM Factory
Dozens of anti-war activists gathered outside the Rheinmetall Denel Munition (RDM) factory on Tuesday, 10 June 2025, for a peaceful protest against the company's alleged involvement in supplying weapons to conflict zones. The demonstration, marked by passionate chants and vibrant placards, was dispersed by police, with several activists detained and taken to the station. Protesters of all ages lined up at the factory gates, holding signs reading: 'No bombs for Ukraine and Israel', 'Stop killing Palestinian children', and 'End arming apartheid'. They demanded an immediate halt to RDM's alleged weapon supplies, which they claim fuel violence in hotspots like Palestine, where they say the population faces genocide by Israel, and Ukraine, backed by the Global North in its war against Russia. The protest began peacefully, with participants chanting slogans and trying to engage factory workers. Tensions escalated when security called the SAPS. Police detained several protesters and took them to the station. Four hours later, they were released without charges. 'We stand for peace, not war!' chanted the activists, voicing frustration that South Africa, despite its laws, may be complicit in supplying weapons to conflict zones. Legal Context and Demands for Transparency Under South Africa's National Conventional Arms Control Act 41 of 2002, the country must avoid exporting weapons that could escalate regional conflicts or destabilise situations. The National Conventional Arms Control Committee (NCACC) is responsible for vetting export deals to ensure compliance. Protesters and political groups, including the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), question whether RDM adheres to this law by supplying weapons to conflict zones. Critics demand full transparency from the NCACC regarding RDM's export activities and strict adherence to the law, stressing that South Africa, with its history of fighting for peace and human rights, should not supply weapons to countries engaged in armed conflicts. 'South Africa cannot claim neutrality while its factories produce weapons that kill the innocent. We demand accountability,' said one protester. Questions about RDM's compliance with the National Conventional Arms Control Act remain unresolved, especially amid 2023 statistics showing arms exports rising to nearly R7.1 billion, including supplies to conflict-affected countries like the DRC.
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
The battle on antisemitism: Fighting prejudice with prejudice
People attend a community gathering at the site of an attack against a group people holding a vigil for kidnapped Israeli citizens in Gaza oin Boulder, Colorado on June 4. The man suspected of a Molotov cocktail attack on Jewish protesters in Colorado is facing federal hate crime charges, officials said as President Donald Trump's administration vowed to pursue "terrorists" living in the US on visas. Image: Chet Strange / AFP Robin Givhan In the aftermath of the fiery attack on a group of people in Boulder, Colorado, who had gathered for a march calling for the release of hostages in Gaza, the brick plaza where they once stood was cordoned off with police tape. Men and women had essentially been fire bombed on a Sunday afternoon, so workmen washed the residue of mayhem from the ground in front of the county courthouse. In the distance, hanging over the courthouse's double doors was the rainbow flag, a symbol of tolerance and inclusivity - more hope than fact. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the Egyptian man who was arrested for the violence, which the FBI has characterized as a 'targeted terrorist attack,' was reported to have shouted, 'Free Palestine,' before allegedly flinging molotov cocktails at the marchers. The story of Boulder calls to mind the tragedy in Washington just 11 days earlier, when two employees of the Israeli Embassy were killed in front of the Capitol Jewish Museum after attending a reception there. The man who was arrested at the scene confessed, according to the FBI, stating, ''I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza.' The tragedy in the nation's capital is a reminder of the terrifying moments in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, when police officers pounded on the doors of the official residence of Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) to alert him that the mansion was on fire. A man was arrested for climbing over security fencing and setting the house ablaze not long after Shapiro and his family, who are Jewish, had marked Passover with a seder. That suspected attacker also had Gaza on his mind. In the bleak hours and days after these attacks, the sky fills with the lights of police cars glowing brightly. Officers wearing helmets and bulletproof vests, and holding big guns, huddle around tactical vehicles. And all of those officers and weapons remind one of what has long been a familiar scene in front of synagogues across the country: Police cars parked out front as a visible deterrence to those who simply can't tolerate the worshipers being themselves in fellowship. The country has fought back with stern words and heartfelt prayers, deeply moving museums, congressional investigations, more and more security, and a death sentence in the federal trial of the man who killed 11 people at the Tree of Life synagogue in 2018. But in Washington's most recent battles in the war against intolerance, the choice of weapons has been … more intolerance. And what does that get us? Statistics tell the story in its breadth. Incidents of antisemitic harassment, vandalism and assaults have risen significantly since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, killing nearly 1,200 people and kidnapping more than 200. Hatred was already on the rise before that deadly day, but it spiked dramatically afterward. The war in Gaza, with Israel's stated aim being to destroy Hamas, gave rise to widespread death and suffering among Palestinians. More than 54,000 people have died, about a third of them children under 18, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for high-ranking members of both Hamas and the Israeli government, charging that they have committed crimes against humanity. So much suffering stirred protests, most notably on college campuses, where students constructed tent encampments and barricaded themselves inside buildings. According to a report from the Anti-Defamation League, many campuses became rife with antisemitism. For 2024, the ADL recorded 9,354 examples of antisemitic harassment, vandalism and assaults. Of those, 1,694 incidents occurred on college campuses. The ADL does not consider 'criticism of Israel or general anti-Israel activism' to be antisemitic. But often, the distinction was blurred. The White House has offered its own blurry response. In social media posts, officials quickly labeled the Boulder attack as terrorism. They promised to seek swift justice. Then Immigration and Customs Enforcement took the suspect's family into custody and pledged to deport them immediately. The family's lawyer argued, among many points, that Soliman's wife and children, who are also Egyptian and who had applied for asylum, are being punished for the alleged crimes of a relative, which is not how justice is supposed to work. A federal judge on Wednesday barred their deportation. The administration has also vowed to stamp out antisemitism on college campuses, with much of its animus aimed at Harvard University and its academic freedom, research grants and international students. In much the same way that careless and reckless protesters have conflated the Israeli government's policies in Gaza with the Jewish people at large, the Trump administration has merged eradicating antisemitism with controlling how broad swaths of the population speak, think and exist. It can be seen as fighting prejudice with prejudice. Fear with more fear. Hostility with hostility. It's a war on nuance and complexity, which is to say, it's a war on what it means to exist as an individual. In 2025, the ADL issued an updated campus report card assessing the actions that 135 colleges had taken in the prior year to root out antisemitism in their community. By the ADL's measure, Harvard's grade improved, from an F to a C. A significant number of institutions, however, received failing grades, among them the University of Illinois Chicago and nearby DePaul University, as well as the New School in New York and Haverford College in Pennsylvania. But they are not in the administration's crosshairs the way that Harvard, with its $53.2 billion endowment and reputation for cultural elitism, has been. About 10 percent of Harvard's undergraduate population is Jewish. At the University of California at Santa Barbara, for example, Jewish students make up 13 percent of the undergraduate population and the school received a grade of D for dealing with antisemitism on campus. But a campaign against UC-Santa Barbara doesn't have the same political resonance as one aimed at Harvard. And that's what so much of this devastation comes down to: People get conflated with politics and posturing. Their humanity can get lost in the fog of political one-upmanship. There's rarely a straight line between words uttered in one part of the culture and actions taken in another. A single deadly gesture typically springs from a perfect storm of fact and fiction, outrage and desperation, single-mindedness and isolation, mental illness and toxic social media where everything is written in all-caps and there's no space for complications. But this much is clear: Deporting immigrants, whether documented or undocumented, hasn't erased antisemitism. Silencing foreign students raising their voices against Israeli or American foreign policy hasn't made Jewish men and women safer on city streets. Putting ivy-covered institutions in the crosshairs of politicians doesn't seem to be helping either. Incidents of antisemitism have continued to grow since 2023's dramatic spike. Prejudice is one of many fine fertilizers. And the White House has insured that an abundance of it is raining down. Robin Givhan is senior critic-at-large writing about politics, race and the arts. A 2006 Pulitzer Prize winner for criticism, Givhan has also worked at Newsweek/Daily Beast, Vogue magazine and the Detroit Free Press.
The South African
14 hours ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Wednesday, 11 June 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Wednesday, 11 June 2025. The New York Times front page reported on an incident that occurred beneath the heart of a hospital. The Wall Street Journal front page reported that California is seeking to block the deployment of troops in Los Angeles. The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that a preliminary vote to disperse the Knesset is expected today. China Daily's front page reported that Xi called for deepening ties with the ROK. Daily Mail's front page reported that a jobs slump has hit Rachel Reeves as she prepares to take a gamble on the nation's finances with a giant spending spree. The Guardian front page reported that sanctions were imposed on Israeli ministers for inciting violence. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
