Democratic Senator Berated by Newspaper From His Own State for Missing Votes, Avoiding His Colleagues: 'Serve or Step Away'
Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) is facing blistering criticism from one of the major newspapers in his home state, which accused him of neglecting his Senate duties and called on him to "serve or step away."
In an editorial, The Philadelphia Inquirer slammed Fetterman for missing more votes than almost any other senator over the last two years and for isolating himself from colleagues and the public. Multiple former staffers have raised red flags about his disengagement and mental fitness, citing erratic behavior, a string of senior staff resignations and minimal in-person interaction on Capitol Hill.
While Fetterman has defended his absences as time spent with family and criticized the scrutiny as an attack on his mental health, the newspaper emphasized that public service comes with accountability—especially during a time of political volatility.
Fetterman, who was elected to the Senate in 2022, previously suffered a stroke while on the campaign trail, and has discussed his battles with clinical depression.
The senator now faces mounting pressure not only from media outlets but also from within political circles to either step up his level of engagement or resign. The editorial called out his international travel and TV appearances as signs that he is selectively prioritizing visibility over governance.
"Other senators travel overseas but also show up for work in Washington and meet with constituents in their home state. Public service is not about serving yourself," the Inquirer's editorial board wrote. "It's time for Fetterman to serve Pennsylvanians, or step away."
Fetterman's continued resistance to holding town halls or engaging directly with constituents is fueling public frustration. As the 2026 midterms approach, questions around Fetterman's ability and willingness to perform the full scope of his role could become a flashpoint in Pennsylvania politics.
Originally published on Latin Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Admin Rejected Elon Musk's Friend for Top NASA Position Before His Anti-'Big, Beautiful Bill' Rant: Report
Elon Musk's denunciation of President Donald Trump's signature spending bill as a "disgusting abomination" reportedly followed a string of personal and political frustrations, including the Trump administration's decision to drop Musk's friend from consideration for a top NASA position. Musk and Trump have maintained a complicated alliance marked by shared influence and mutual benefit, but recent tensions surfaced after Musk failed to secure certain policy wins from the administration, Axios reported. Among them were efforts to protect electric vehicle tax credits, extend Musk's unpaid White House advisory role beyond the legal limit and promote his Starlink satellites for air traffic control. On Tuesday, Musk lashed out at the so-called "big, beautiful bill," a major Trump-backed legislative package. The post stunned Trump's team, given Musk's previously measured tone and their personal rapport. According to sources close to both men, the tipping point came just days earlier when Trump suddenly withdrew the nomination of Isaacman—an ally of Musk—for NASA administrator. While insiders cited Senate concerns about Isaacman's political donations, others within the administration believed the move stemmed from internal friction, specifically with personnel director Sergio Gor. Musk interpreted the decision as a targeted slight. Trump, though still in contact with Musk, was reportedly annoyed by the public blowback. "Perception is reality, though, and I'm pretty sure Elon thought the NASA situation was a last insult," one White House official told the outlet. "So here we are." Originally published on Latin Times NASA Donald trump Elon musk
Int'l Business Times
21 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Marjorie Taylor Greene Vows to 'Not Vote' for Spending Bill Without 'Stripping' AI Ban Despite Already Voting for It
Georgia Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene shared a long message to social media vowing to "not vote" for Republicans' massive spending bill she just voted for unless her colleagues strip the included AI ban she said she "did not know about." In the X post shared Tuesday, Greene said she was unaware of a section on part of the "one big, beautiful bill" supported by President Donald Trump which she said "strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years." "I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there," Green wrote. "We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous." The Republican lawmaker urged senators to have the section "stripped out" before their vote later this summer. "When the [one big, beautiful bill] comes back to the House for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for it with this in it," Green continued. "We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around." The federal spending bill narrowly passed the House in late May, 215-214. At the time, Greene voted in favor of the bill, along with most of her Republican colleagues. Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie and Maryland Rep. Andy Harris were the only two to break from the Republican Party. Since Greene voted in favor of the bill, the lawmaker's revelation and change in opinion sparked ridicule online, with many users accusing Greene of voting for a bill she didn't read. "Why did you vote 'yes' in the first place if you didn't know what was in it???" one user questioned. "Might be a good idea to read a bill before you vote," another wrote. "If only you were put in a position to oppose these things that you tweet about," another user sarcastically commented. "I mean I agree with you.... But you voted yes. You guys get paid to do this?" another wrote. The spending bill now heads to the Senate, where Republicans hold a slight lead. However, several Republican lawmakers have already spoken up against parts of the bill. Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul have urged changes be made to the bill so that it does not drastically raise the debt ceiling, which the bill would currently do. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
GOP Senator Mocks Constituents' Concerns of Medicaid Cuts Killing People in Sarcastic Apology Video
Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst is facing backlash after posting a sarcastic video from a cemetery in response to criticism over her dismissive remarks about Medicaid cuts potentially leading to deaths. On May 30, during a town hall in Parkersburg, Iowa, Ernst was confronted by a concerned constituent about proposed Medicaid cuts in Republicans' spending bill. The legislation is projected to slash federal Medicaid funding by $723 billion over ten years and leave 7.6 million more Americans uninsured, according to the Congressional Budget Office. When the audience member shouted "people will die," Ernst responded with, "We all are going to die," leading to immediate outrage from critics and Democrats. In the days following the town hall, Ernst doubled down with a sarcastic Instagram story filmed in a cemetery. Last month France confirmed it would withdraw its contingent of hundreds of troops stationed in Burkina Faso AFP "I made an incorrect assumption that everyone understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth," she said. She then mocked critics by referencing the tooth fairy and invoking Christianity, adding, "For those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my lord and savior, Jesus Christ." Ernst later blamed the backlash on "hysteria... from the left," while defending the tax bill as focused on protecting only eligible Medicaid recipients, the Des Moines Register reported. The video sparked additional criticism from health care advocates and Democrats who said Ernst's tone trivialized the real human cost of Medicaid cuts. Protesters have organized outside her Iowa offices, while several advocacy organizations have launched digital campaigns urging constituents to pressure lawmakers to oppose the bill. The Senate is expected to vote on the spending bill later this summer. Originally published on Latin Times
