What 'Touch Starvation' Does to Boys—And How Parents Can Help
Reviewed by Charissa Chamorro, PhDTouch is fundamental to human development, but gendered expectations around masculinity tend to strip positive touch out of some boys' lives.
Touch starvation has been linked to loneliness, depression, and other negative health outcomes that can impact individuals well into adulthood.
It's impossible for boys to avoid unhealthy messages about masculinity, but parents can help incorporate and encourage positive touch in their families to help protect boys against the impact of these messages.To watch the end of the World Series—or any major championship played by men—is to glimpse a rare phenomenon in American culture: men publicly, joyfully, and unabashedly holding each other in prolonged full-body embraces, men heartily grabbing and slapping each other's bottoms, and men piling on top of each other in a wriggling, jubilant haze.
This is one of the only settings where this level of physical contact between men is culturally accepted—and it highlights a larger void: Some boys aren't getting enough touch, and that lack can have long-term consequences for their development and mental health.
We spoke to experts about why this is happening, and how parents can use positive touch to enhance their sons' social and emotional wellbeing.
Touch starvation, also known as 'skin hunger' or 'touch deprivation,' happens when a person doesn't receive enough physical affection. People who experience touch starvation are more likely to report loneliness, depression, stress, mood and anxiety disorders, secondary immune disorders, and a fearful-avoidant attachment style. By contrast, a 2016 study of undergraduate college students found that significant physical contact, especially in early childhood, was related to lower levels of depression and greater satisfaction in romantic relationships later in life.
'The bottom line: touch keeps you alive. It's crucial,' Michael Thompson, PhD, a clinical psychologist specializing in children and families, tells Parents. That's one reason why skin-to-skin contact after birth has become a standard practice—it helps infants feel safe, secure, and connected.
Despite the clear benefits of physical affection, Thompson says that American culture as a whole is touch starved. For boys, this issue is compounded by rigid ideas about masculinity that discourage emotional and physical closeness. The result is that some boys may not be getting enough touch from caregivers, teachers, friends, and other loved ones.
'What is the American icon? It's the lonely cowboy,' Thompson says. 'Human beings want to touch each other pretty much all the time. But once you indicate to boys that's not masculine, they're going to follow the rules absolutely. We are unwittingly training our boys to be the lone cowboy.'"Human beings want to touch each other pretty much all the time. But once you indicate to boys that's not masculine, they're going to follow the rules absolutely."This socialization starts early, and is almost impossible for parents to avoid. 'Boys are already being socialized whether parents know it or not,' says Matt Englar-Carlson, a men's mental health researcher and Chair of the Department of Counseling at California State University Fullerton. 'It's happening everywhere around them from the moment boys are exposed to the world, but particularly when they are exposed to media.'
While parents can't always prevent these cultural messages from reaching their sons, they can provide a powerful counterbalance at home.
When boys don't receive the essential human touch they need for healthy development, Thompson and Englar-Carlson say they may seek it in less appropriate—and sometimes more aggressive—ways. This might look like punching a friend in the arm or groin 'for fun,' but it can also show up as irritability, anxiety, social withdrawal, or difficulty calming down.
'For a lot of boys, the world isn't safe,' Englar-Carlson says. 'So touch becomes a pause, a safe harbor.' He also shares an easy rule of thumb: there is no limit to the amount of positive touch a parent can provide their son. He and Thompson share ways parents can help boys thrive through the power of positive touch.
Address your own discomfort first. If boys sense their parents are uncomfortable with physical affection, they are more likely to develop a negative association with it.
Use touch to calm and connect. A gentle touch can help calm kids' nervous systems, and can sometimes be more effective than trying to talk through or solve a problem.
Find the touch your son prefers. It can be a hug, holding hands, putting your arm around him, rubbing the nape of his neck, rubbing the top of his head, or something else that he enjoys.
Research other cultures together. In countries like China and Israel, boys and men in platonic relationships freely touch and embrace in public. Learning about these cultures can help boys question harmful gender norms.
Incorporate touch into other routine activities. If you read together every night, for example, you can also turn it into a cuddle session.
Model affectionate friendships. If you feel comfortable, ask if it's okay to give the host parent and child a hug at playdate drop off—your child is watching how affection works between adults.
Distinguish between discomfort and fear. Some boys don't enjoy a certain kinds of touch. Others are afraid of being teased. Having a conversation helps to clarify boundaries and normalize healthy physical affection.
Negotiate positive touch with older boys. If your son is self-conscious about public displays of affection, find a compromise. A goodbye hug can happen at home or a block away. You might say, 'I need to hug you. Is there a place I can do it where you'd feel comfortable?'
Consider an all-boys summer camp. Being in a single-sex environment can allow boys to feel safe from gender policing. Thompson says he has met many men who described all-boys summer camp experiences as 'life changing."
Craft a family counter narrative. The best way to protect against unhealthy messages about masculinity is for parents to be prepared with a counter narrative for their family. This could sound like, 'I realize that your friends may not hug their parents. But in our family it's really important that we show that we love each other, and one of the ways we do that is by hugging.'
American culture often trains boys to be stoic, stripping them of one of the most basic human needs: touch. While trying to combat this on a societal level can feel daunting, our homes are one place where change is attainable. Whatever ways parents and caregivers choose to incorporate positive touch in boys' lives, it will only help them flourish in the future.
And maybe one day, seeing a group of men embrace each other after a big win—or any other milestone—won't feel rare at all. It will simply reflect the full humanity that lives inside every man.
Read the original article on Parents

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FEMA head said he didn't know about hurricane season; DHS said he was joking
The head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency said Monday he didn't know about the nation's hurricane season, raising major concerns with some about the agency. The Department of Homeland Security issued a statement saying that the comment was a joke. Reuters reported that during a Monday briefing, Acting FEMA Administrator David Richardson said that he was not aware the U.S. has a hurricane season, leaving staffers confused. The report, which said it was unclear whether he was serious or joking, had four unnamed sources familiar with the situation. Richardson joined the agency in May; he previously served in the Marines and worked in the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office of the DHS. After he joined FEMA, some staff 'expressed concern about his lack of experience in emergency management,' according to The New York Times. The agency head's comment, which was made on the second day of hurricane season, could deepen these concerns as the dangerous season begins. 'Despite meanspirited attempts to falsely frame a joke as policy, there is no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this hurricane season. FEMA is laser focused on disaster response, and protecting the American people,' a spokesperson for DHS said, according to NBC. FEMA, which is housed within DHS, is the federal agency responsible for coordinating government emergency response to people and areas impacted by natural disasters. 'FEMA is laser focused on disaster response, and protecting the American people,' the spokesperson said, according to The Hill. The spokesperson added that FEMA, under Richardson, is 'activated in preparation for Hurricane Season.' The United States' Atlantic hurricane season officially began on June 1 and goes through Nov. 30, The Hill reported. This year's hurricane season could be unusually heavy, with a total of six to 10 hurricanes, including three to five major ones, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has predicted. Hurricane season in the U.S. is considered FEMA's most challenging period, 'during which the country is the most vulnerable to large-scale devastating disasters that can overwhelm state and local disaster managers,' according to The New York Times. According to NBC, President Donald Trump and his allies have been throwing around the idea of terminating FEMA. In January, while he was visiting North Carolina to survey damage from Hurricane Helene, Trump suggested overhauling or completely getting rid of the agency, which he called 'very bureaucratic' and 'very slow.' Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Secretary, also suggested eliminating FEMA. But, NBC reported that without an alternative plan as hurricane season begins, Noem has made quiet efforts to keep the agency afloat. Though the agency is still running, major cuts have been made to FEMA over the last few months. Since Trump's inauguration in January, FEMA has lost around a quarter of its full-time staff, including one-fifth of its coordinating officers who manage large-scale disaster responses, according to The New York Times. It seems that reforming the agency will continue as DHS has reiterated its intent to upgrade a 'bloated, DC-centric dead weight' agency to a 'lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens.' 'The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades,' the DHS spokesperson wrote in the statement, per The Hill. After Reuters reported what Richardson said about hurricane season, Democratic leaders took to social media to comment on Richardson's capability to do his job. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., referenced the Reuters report in a post on X, saying, 'And I'm unaware of why he hasn't been fired yet.' Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., also took to social media to make her own comment, writing, 'Bare minimum requirement for the leader of FEMA: know when hurricane season is.' Another response to the report came from Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., who wrote on X, 'Trump's FEMA chief is incompetent. People will die.' Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, took to X and wrote, 'Wait WHAT?! People are bracing for storms and this man just found out the weather exists?!'
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'More is more': Hakeem Jeffries pushes Democrats to flood the zone in opposition to Trump
WASHINGTON — In the chaotic opening weeks of President Donald Trump's second administration, Democrats debated whether to push back on every norm-shattering executive action, or pick and choose their spots and hope Trump would prove to be his own worst enemy. That debate has been settled, with Democrats aggressively taking on Trump in the courts, in the streets and on social media. At the center of that messaging strategy is House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., who privately has been urging his members to be more visible in their districts and on digital media, and has stepped up his own activity in recent weeks. Rather than his regular, once-a-week news conference in the Capitol, Jeffries now holds as many as three press briefings with reporters each week in Washington. He is also making weekly appearances on popular podcasts outside the traditional political media circuit, including those hosted by Stephen A. Smith, Tony Kornheiser, Jon Stewart, Katie Couric and Scott Galloway. Marking the opening months of the Trump administration, Jeffries delivered a scathing 30-minute rebuke of Trump's '100 days of chaos, 100 days of cruelty and 100 days of corrupt behavior.' He also joined Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., for a 12-hour sit-in on the Capitol steps as they protested Medicaid cuts in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We are in a 'more is more' environment. These aren't ordinary times, and they require an extraordinary response,' Jeffries said in a phone interview with NBC News on Tuesday, one of roughly two dozen digitalmedia interviews he has participated in since February. 'House Democrats are rising to the occasion to meet the moment,' he said, 'but more from all of us will continue to be required until we can definitively end this national nightmare that Donald Trump and House Republicans are visiting on the American people.' After suffering a bruising defeat in the last presidential election and still years out from the next one, Democrats are without a clear national leader. And the party's base has displayed a hunger for a new and younger generation of voices to take charge. That has opened the door for Jeffries, 54, to assume an even bigger role in the party, even as he is still coming into national prominence and — less than three years removed from succeeding Nancy Pelosi as House Democrats' leader — not yet a household name. The flood-the-zone strategy is a marked change for a politician with a reputation for being cautious and calculated. But if that game plan pays off and Democrats manage to win control of the House in next year's midterm elections, Jeffries would be the favorite to become speaker — and the party's most powerful member in Washington. 'Hakeem Jeffries gets it. As he says, we're in an environment where more is more. We need to be flooding the zone. And not only is he doing that, he's encouraging every member of Congress to do that,' Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., an influential progressive in the party, told NBC News in an interview. 'He's meeting the moment,' Khanna added, 'and that's why I say he's, right now, the leader of the Democratic Party.' Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Pa., also praised Jeffries, saying that 'he is out there as much as he possibly can be, while still running a caucus and trying to block horrible legislation that this administration is putting forward.' Jeffries' more aggressive approach comes as the Democratic base has demanded party leaders do more to oppose Trump amid federal layoffs, mass deportations of undocumented immigrants and scores of executive actions that have tested the balance of powers. But it's not clear to what degree Democrats' throw-everything-at-the-wall strategy is breaking through in a cacophonous political environment — one almost exclusively driven and dominated by Trump. And there are still lingering questions about whether the party's current crop of leaders and their tactics are meeting the moment. 'The strategy of quarter one and quarter two was 'let Trump implode.' But you don't win elections, saying how bad that guy is — you have to win on substance,' said one Democratic strategist, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. Still, Jeffries has notched some key symbolic wins. In March, Jeffries unified House Democrats against a Republican-led government funding bill that included a hike to military spending and cuts to domestic spending. Only a single Democrat voted yes. By comparison, Jeffries' counterpart in the Senate, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., faced significant blowback when he and a band of Democrats in the chamber allowed the bill to pass to avert a shutdown. As House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., tried to push through the sweeping domestic policy package before Memorial Day, Jeffries and the Democrats threw up roadblocks to make it as politically painful as possible for Republicans. More than 100 Democrats testified against the Trump bill in the Rules Committee, dragging out the meeting for nearly 22 hours and delaying the process. As they stalled, Jeffries' leadership team urged members to record videos and join livestreams to speak out against the bill, which could boot millions of Americans from Medicaid rolls and off food stamps. Jeffries said he believes Democrats' messaging is breaking through, pointing to polls showing that most Americans disapprove of the way Trump is handling the presidency and a special election victory in Wisconsin in April that allowed liberals to hold their majority on the state Supreme Court. If 'Democrats as a party are truly on the run,' Jeffries said, 'then we'd be losing special elections, not winning them in the way that we are, including most decisively in Wisconsin.' In the wake of Trump's inauguration in January, some Democrats privately grumbled that perhaps Jeffries wasn't the right man for the job. Some pined for Pelosi, who famously clashed with Trump during his first term, lecturing the president in a 2019 White House meeting and ripping up a copy of his State of the Union speech the next year. While not pointing fingers at Jeffries, other Democrats have said the party needs to clearly state what it is for — not just say it's against Trump. 'Voters are turned off by Trump, but they want to know Democrats' affirmative agenda as well,' one Democratic official said. But few Democrats have chosen to directly challenge Jeffries. Ashley Etienne, who served as a top adviser to both Pelosi and Vice President Kamala Harris, has been the exception. Etienne, appearing on a Politico podcast last month, said Trump has given Democrats a tremendous political gift and that Jeffries and other leaders were 'squandering' it. She faulted him for failing to coordinate with outside groups and other elected officials around the country. 'If you don't have coordination, you've just got words on a paper that you're calling talking points,' Etienne told Politico. 'It's meaningless. And I think that's where we are right now.' Jeffries said in his 100-day address that Democrats in the coming months would lay out a 'vision for this country's future that isn't about Donald Trump.' But on Tuesday, he declined to offer any details. Internal discussions on that blueprint are getting underway now, following the House's passage of the massive bill for Trump's agenda. 'There are a variety of issues that distinguish Democrats from Republicans. And as we emerge from the debate around the one big, ugly bill that Donald Trump and his sycophants in Congress are trying to jam down the throat of the American people,' Jeffries said Tuesday, 'we will have the opportunity to draw a clear contrast between our values-based vision for making life better for all Americans and the Republican vision that is designed to benefit their billionaire donors like Elon Musk.' And a Jeffries aide pushed back on Etienne, saying their office holds a weekly meeting with between 60 and 100 surrogates, advocates and grassroots activists, in addition to pushing out regular talking points. On Sunday, Schumer said he and Jeffries had spoken 'about ways our caucuses can fight back together' against the Trump package as the Senate considers it. In March, leaders, working closely with House Democrats' messaging arm, also set up space in the Capitol for social media influencers and advocates to rebut a speech Trump gave to a joint session of Congress. 'We need to be messaging on all mediums, for people to see what we're about,' said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., a 35-year-old progressive star. 'As a millennial, I obviously lean on social media. I tend to participate in the mediums that I myself use,' she continued. 'I don't think that's necessarily about what is best for everybody. … I think it makes us better messengers when we are engaging on the platforms that we use ourselves.' Dean, the Pennsylvania congresswoman who served as one of the Democratic prosecutors in Trump's second impeachment trial, said each lawmaker is figuring out their own unique way to fight back against Trump. A member of the House Judiciary Committee, Dean has held seven town halls this year and said she has focused her messaging on the president's potential ethics violations, including accepting a $400 million jet from Qatar. 'The way I've said it, instead of more is more, is we can't normalize any of this stuff. … This is not normal. I don't want anybody to think that what is going on here is actually normal,' Dean said in an interview. 'The American people are really busy, but they have to be aware of these threats.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump attacks BBC over Gaza misreporting
The White House has launched an attack on the BBC and its coverage of a chaotic aid mission in Gaza, accusing the broadcaster of taking Hamas's account as 'total truth'. On Tuesday, Karoline Leavitt, Donald Trump's press secretary, was asked about reports that Israeli security forces had shot Palestinians dead as they waited for food distribution. Ms Leavitt said US officials were trying to confirm what had happened before pivoting to criticise the BBC. 'Unfortunately, unlike some in the media, we don't take the word of Hamas with total truth,' she said. 'We like to look into it when they speak … unlike the BBC.' She brandished a printout of stories published on the BBC website a day earlier, and described how the headlines changed from claiming an Israeli tank had killed 26 people, to 21 people, to that gunfire had killed 31. 'And then, oh, wait, they had to correct and take down their entire story, saying we reviewed the footage and couldn't find any evidence of anything,' she said. 'So we're going to look into reports before we confirm them from this podium or before we take action. And I suggest that journalists who actually care about truth do the same to reduce the amount of misinformation that's going around the globe.' The BBC later issued a clarification on the story: A US and Israeli-backed group began distributing aid in Gaza last week, but its distribution point descended into chaos after it was overrun by thousands of Palestinians. Health officials in Hamas-run Gaza say at least 27 Palestinians were killed and dozens wounded at a food distribution site on Tuesday. Israel's international reputation stands on a knife-edge due to its expanded military offensive in Gaza and the new controversial aid distribution system. Israel insists that by setting up purpose-built distribution hubs in the largely flattened southern area city of Rafah, it is both fulfilling its humanitarian commitments and preventing Hamas from stealing the aid. However, the UN and other NGOs are distancing themselves from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the American company set up to distribute the aid, because they say it violates humanitarian principles by forcing civilians to walk long and dangerous journeys to receive it. They also allege that it 'politicises' aid by forcing the population into the south and thus making it easier for the IDF to conduct its new 'seize, hold and demolish' strategy elsewhere. Some have even suggested it sets the condition for the realisation of Mr Trump's controversial Gaza 'riviera' vision, which envisages the forcible displacement of the Palestinians from the territory. There have now been three shooting events which implicate the IDF. They have resulted in the deaths of more than 50 civilians. Witnesses have alleged sniper fire and shelling, with corpses lining the road to the new aid hubs. The next few days are seen as crucial in saving the credibility of the project – for which the US is Israel's only major backer – and by extension the Jewish state's continued war against Hamas. The BBC has been approached for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.