What's in City Press: Mbeki accused of being selfish
Dead constables: 'Foul play cannot be ruled out'
A highway patrol officer has questioned why there was not a single call about the accident or any noticeable objects indicating a serious impact in line with the damage to the vehicle.
ANC parliamentary caucus expresses strong anti-DA sentiment
The party summoned all its deployees in Parliament to a meeting to discuss several issues ahead of their return after the recess.
'Exclude the rich and foreign nationals from RAF claims' – RAF CEO
One of Collins Letsoalo's last wishes before he leaves his job as CEO of the Road Accident Fund (RAF) in October is to convince legislators to amend the RAF Agency Act to prevent foreign nationals and people who are "well off" from claiming from the fund.
Mbeki slammed as 'selfish' in opposing a lawsuit seeking justice for apartheid-era crimes.
Survivors and families of victims of apartheid-era atrocities have argued that former president Thabo Mbeki 's objection to their lawsuit was motivated by his quest to protect his legacy.
SA's conflict zone foot soldiers see a small slice of the pie
South African soldiers who had to fight on the frontlines in the Democratic Republic of Congo earned considerably less in special allowances than their countrymen who served in comfortable office positions.
'Parliament is our last hope to save Safa from going down' – White
As the troubled Safa prepares to appear before the parliamentary portfolio committee on sports on Monday, a former vice president of the football association is hopeful that the committee will not spare the leadership any blushes.
Rebecca Malope demands R1 m from P&G for 'unlawfully' using her image
The legendary award-winning gospel singer-turned-designer, Rebecca Malope, is demanding more than R1 million from Procter and Gamble SA (P&G).
Following a potpourri of results this season, Kaizer Chiefs' Nedbank Cup final clash against arch-rivals Orlando Pirates will answer the question: Is Nabi still the best man for the job?
Jazz maestro Selaelo Selota faces SIU probe over Lotto cash
South African jazz maestro Selaelo Selota is being investigated by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) for allegedly using funds from a National Lotteries Commission (NLC) grant to buy a luxury car.
The 20-year-old was quieter in some parts of the game against Kaizer Chiefs, but he popped up just at the right moment to hand Bucs the winning goal that completed a league double over Amakhosi.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says Show Caption Hide Caption Anti-ICE raid demonstrators protest into fourth night Anti-immigration raid protests are continuing into the fourth night as the Pentagon deployed active-duty U.S. Marines. President Donald Trump mulled invoking the Insurrection Act, which would give him more leeway to use the military for domestic purposes, as he deploys troops to Los Angeles in response to protests prompted by ICE raids in the region. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said June 10 during an event in the White House. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a lawsuit from the state. Marines were also sent to help the guard after protests erupted over his immigration enforcement efforts. The troops are limited to protecting federal property and law enforcement officers. The Insurrection Act would give Trump authority to use them more broadly. More: 'High-stakes game': Trump-Newsom clash pits two political heavyweights Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." Newsom described Trump's actions as "the acts of a dictator" and accused the president of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' Legal experts say invoking the Insurrection Act is an extreme step. It has been done 30 times in U.S. history. "The invocation of it would be viewed as a pretty dramatic act," said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Powell said the law is "dangerously broad." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in May 1992, by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California's governor, to quell rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Do Americans support or oppose ICE? Here's what a poll found amid LA protests
Public opinion is hotly divided over Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency responsible for handling deportations, according to new polling. In the latest YouGov/Economist poll, roughly equal shares of respondents expressed support for and opposition to ICE. And, while there is little appetite for abolishing the agency, most respondents think ICE agents should be required to adhere to certain practices. Here is a breakdown of the results from the poll, which comes after anti-ICE protests erupted in Los Angeles, California, leading President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops to the area. Favorability of ICE In the poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6 to 9 — a slim plurality of respondents, 45%, said they held a favorable view of ICE. Meanwhile, 43% said they had an unfavorable view. On this question, there was a yawning partisan divide, with 81% of Republicans holding a positive view and 79% of Democrats holding a negative view. Independents were about evenly split — 41% unfavorable vs. 40% favorable. Abolishing ICE? Despite this fierce divide, a sizable plurality of respondents, 45%, said they oppose abolishing ICE and replacing it with a different agency. Less than a third of respondents, 27%, said they would favor shutting down ICE. But, again, there were significant differences based on partisanship. Most Republicans, 69%, said they oppose abolishing ICE, while a plurality of Republicans, 47%, said they are in favor of this idea. A plurality of independents, 39%, oppose this. Uniforms and masks By and large, Americans favor requiring ICE agents to clearly identify themselves and refrain from hiding their identities, according to the poll, which has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More than two-thirds of respondents, 68%, said ICE officers should be required to wear uniforms when conducting operations. Just 18% opposed this. Further, a plurality of respondents, 47%, opposed allowing ICE officers to wear masks to conceal their identities during arrests. Thirty-nine percent said this should be allowed. In recent weeks, ICE agents have been documented carrying out operations in plain clothes and equipped with masks, according to the Houston Chronicle and Reuters. Anti-ICE protests A separate YouGov poll — conducted on June 9 with 4,231 U.S. adults — asked respondents about the anti-ICE protests that sprang up in Los Angeles during the first weekend of June, resulting in more than 50 arrests. Following the outbreak of demonstrations, Trump dispatched around 2,000 National Guard troops to the area. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now,' the president wrote on Truth Social on June 10. Trump also threatened to arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom for obstructing the federal government's immigration enforcement policies. Newsom responded by suing the Trump administration, arguing that the president has illegally federalized the California National Guard. 'This is a manufactured crisis,' Newsom wrote on X. '(Trump) is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' In the poll, a plurality of respondents, 45%, said they disapprove of the anti-ICE protests, while 36% said they approve of them. Most Republicans, 73%, and a plurality of independents, 41%, oppose them, while most Democrats, 58%, are in favor. That said, most respondents, 56%, believe state and local authorities should take the lead in responding to the protests. Just 25% said the federal government should organize the response. Most Democrats and independents — 72% and 56%, respectively — favor a state- and local-led response, while a plurality of Republicans, 46%, want the Trump administration to spearhead the response. Further, respondents were about evenly divided when it came to the nature of the Los Angeles protests, according to the poll, which has a margin of error of 2 percentage points. A slim plurality, 38%, said they are mostly peaceful, while 36% said they are mostly violent. Most Democrats, 64%, labeled the protests as mostly peaceful, while most Republicans, 66%, described them as mostly violent. Independents were about evenly split — 35% mostly peaceful vs. 33% mostly violent.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
National Guard, Marine deployment in Los Angeles costs $134 million: Pentagon
National Guard, Marine deployment in Los Angeles costs $134 million: Pentagon The revelation before a congressional committee came as Democratic officials in California have criticized President Donald Trump deploying the military over the wishes of the state's governor. Show Caption Hide Caption Anti-ICE raid demonstrators protest into fourth night Anti-immigration raid protests are continuing into the fourth night as the Pentagon deployed active-duty U.S. Marines. Bryn MacDonnell, a special assistant to the defense secretary, said the 60-day deployment is estimated to cost $134 million. Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-California, voiced his 'severe concern' with the deployment without consulting with Gov. Gavin Newsom. WASHINGTON – Defense officials said the Pentagon is spending $134 million to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to respond to protests against federal immigration enforcement in Los Angeles. Bryn MacDonnell, a special assistant to the secretary of Defense, said the cost for the 60-day deployment for travel, housing and food is coming out of operations and maintenance accounts. More: Amid LA deployment, Hegseth falsely attacks Tim Walz over 2020 George Floyd riots 'What's the justification for using the military for civilian law enforcement purposes in LA?' Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-California, asked at a House Appropriations subcommittee on the Defense Department's budget. 'Why are you sending warfighters to cities to interact with civilians?' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said President Donald Trump 'believes in law and order.' 'Every American citizen deserves to live in a city that's safe,' Hegseth said. 'We're proud to do it.' Aguilar said troops were seen sleeping on floors and not provided food, fuel or water from the Defense Department, reflecting a lack of preparation for the deployment. 'I want to express my severe concern with the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles without consultation with the state of California,' Aguilar said. 'Why were we unprepared to provide them basic necessities?' Hegseth called the criticism 'disingenuous' for a hasty deployment and said he was personally monitoring the mission. 'There are moments when you make do as best you can temporarily,' Hegseth said. 'We are ensuring they are housed, fed, water capabilities in real time – from my office because I care that much about the California Guard and the Marines.'
