
Star heads accused in court over alleged failure to manage illicit cash risk at casinos as major trial begins
Former executives at embattled casino operator The Star put profit above risk when they failed to take action as junket operators potentially linked to crime gangs flaunted wads of cash and money in eskies, a judge has heard.
Lawyers for a slew of ex-heads from the embattled Star Entertainment Group appeared at the federal court as a lengthy hearing began on Monday.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission alleges they breached their obligations to manage the dangers of possible money laundering and other criminal activity in its Sydney, Brisbane and Gold Coast casinos.
'This is a case about casinos and risk,' Asic barrister Ruth Higgins SC said as she opened submissions on Monday.
'Not the risk involved when a player bets black instead of red in roulette or twists instead of sticking in blackjack.'
The Star executives and board behaved in 'so incurious and complacent a manner' by allowing unacceptable legal, regulatory, financial and reputational risks within the group between November 2016 and March 2022, Higgins said.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The firm maintained relationships with overseas junket operators, in particular one of the largest in Suncity, despite having evidence they were engaged in illicit activities and organised crime, she told Justice Michael Lee.
'Asic's case concerns the maintenance and escalation of these business relationships despite a slew of profoundly troubling, publicly available information about junkets.'
Junkets were ripe for exploitation because they obscured the origin of funds, she told the court.
They also led to vast sums of money with a higher risk of being associated with Chinese triads flowing into Australia after a prohibition on gambling in China, Higgins said.
In Suncity's dedicated space at The Star Sydney, known as Salon 95, bags of $50 notes were tied together with elastic bands, money was delivered to the service desk in blue esky bags and junket staff obscured the view of CCTV cameras by hiding under blankets, she said.
'These are acts uncluttered by subtlety and freighted with risk.'
Asic alleges that former chief executive Matthias Bekier, former company secretary and general counsel Paula Martin and former chief casino officer Greg Hawkins failed to promptly terminate or suspend the firm's relationship with Suncity or inform the board of the risks.
The three executives were aware of repeated suspicious conduct by Suncity personnel at the Sydney casino, Higgins told the court.
Former board members John O'Neill, Wallace Sheppard, Kathleen Lahey, Gerard Bradley, Sally Pitkin, Benjamin Heap and Zlatko Todorcevski are accused by Asic of failing to properly oversee The Star's relationships with junket operators.
'The directors of Star knew enough and more than enough about the risks that arose from junkets and red flags in relation to the junkets that were in fact operating at Star's casinos,' Higgins argued.
Former The Star executives have also been accused of providing misleading information to National Australia Bank about the use of China UnionPay debit cards in its casinos.
From 2016, China UnionPay had told The Star the use of its cards for gambling was prohibited, the court was told.
Higgins' opening submissions will take three days in what is expected to be a lengthy and closely watched trial.
Asic is seeking penalties as well as orders banning those sued from managing a corporation for a period to be set by the court.
The hearings come as The Star struggles to stay afloat, battling falling revenues and the ongoing fallout from prior regulatory breaches.
The firm agreed in February 2023 to pay $150m in penalties to Asic for its non-compliance with anti-money laundering laws.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Trump speaks with Xi amid stalled talks between the US and China over tariffs
The conversation was reported by Xinhua, a Chinese state media outlet. The White House did not immediately comment. Mr Trump had declared one day earlier that it was difficult to reach a deal with Mr Xi. President Donald Trump (Alex Brandon/AP) 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!,' Mr Trump posted on Wednesday on his social media site. Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a May 12 agreement between the two countries to reduce their tariff rates while talks played out. Behind the gridlock has been the continued competition for an economic edge.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump and China's Xi speak after president calls trade adversary ‘extremely hard to make deal with'
Donald Trump spoke with China 's President Xi Jinping on Thursday as trade talks between the two nations continue with little public progress, according to Chinese state media. The two leaders reportedly spoke in the early morning as the US president seeks to convince the American media and voting electorate that his tariff agenda is forcing America's trading partners to the table. So far, the Trump administration has failed to deliver on its promise of securing dozens of trade deals within the first six months of the president's term. White House readout was not immediately available. The Independent has reached out to the Trump administration for comment. Just a day earlier, Trump swiped at his Chinese counterpart on Truth Social. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!,' Trump wrote.

Rhyl Journal
38 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Wise latest to unveil plans to switch main listing from London to New York
The money transfer firm which listed in London in July 2021, said the move would 'help us accelerate our mission and bring substantial strategic and capital market benefits to Wise and our owners'. It wants to drive greater awareness of the brand in the US, which it said was the 'biggest market opportunity in the world for our products'. A primary listing on Wall Street would also give it 'better access to the world's deepest and most liquid capital market', it added. It said the change would benefit the group by 'expanding the pool of investors able to invest in Wise, in particular US domestic institutional and retail investors, the largest global constituent of investors, many of whom are currently unable to hold our shares'. Under the plans, the firm would be dual listed, with a secondary listing in London as part of its 'ongoing commitment to the UK'. Kristo Kaarmann, co-founder and chief executive of Wise, said: 'The UK is home to some of the best talent in the world in financial services and technology, and we will continue to invest in our presence here to fuel our UK and global growth.' It deals another blow to London's beleaguered stock market after a raft of companies have ditched their primary listing in London, including Paddy Power owner Flutter, mining group BHP, building materials group CRH and construction rental firm Ashtead, while a growing number of UK listed firms have also been bought out by foreign rivals or taken private. And on Wednesday, Glencore-backed metal investment firm Cobalt scrapped its plans to list in London, just two days after drugs company Indivior said it would cancel the secondary listing it had retained in London, having already switched its main listing to the US last year. Chinese fast fashion giant Shein has also reportedly ditched London for Hong Kong for its upcoming blockbuster initial public offering (IPO). Wise, which was launched in 2011 under original name TransferWise, said it was not turning its back on the UK. It said: 'Our confidence in UK talent and the tech ecosystem here remains undimmed. 'One-fifth of our employees are based in the UK and we plan to continue hiring and investing in our UK team.' The group said it would call a shareholder meeting in the coming weeks for investors to vote on the proposal.