Expert unsure if signatures were Najib's
PUTRAJAYA: There were dissimilarities between the signatures of Datuk Seri Najib Razak and those that appeared in photocopied government documents relating to 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), the High Court was told.
Forensic document examiner Tay Eue Kam, 59, testified that she had observed both the similarities and the differences of the specimens but her findings were inconclusive as she did not have the original documents.
'My opinion is inconclusive due to the existence of both similarities and differences.
'A conclusive determination would necessitate further assessments of the original document,' she said.
Tay, who was under examination-in-chief by lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, is the 25th defence witness testifying in the former prime minister's RM2.28bil graft trial involving 1MDB here yesterday.
The expert had analysed 31 specimen documents – including numerous bank cheques and government letters and memos – to identify whether Najib had indeed penned the signatures and notes in seven impugned documents in relation to the 1MDB trial.
All the documents, however, were reproductions, not the originals.
'It has been established that examination can be conducted on good quality reproductions but poor quality reproductions present challenges in identifying some critical handwriting figures.
'While specific details such as connection, line quality, and variations in pen pressure within the signatures in the reproductions were not explicitly deciphered, their structural formation, key features, and orientation were subject to examination and analysis,' said Tay on her findings.
Muhammad Shafee: Because it's a reproduction, from your experience, can the signature (in the impugned documents) be lifted and pasted?
Tay: When we deal with reproductions, we cannot exclude that probability.
Muhammad Shafee: How do you prove if they are lifted or not?
Tay: It's not an easy answer. It's the way they do it. If they photocopy it... there will be lines erased. I have to compare it with the original.
According to the witness, it was not easy to identify fabrication without original documents to compare it against.
On Oct 30 last year, Najib was ordered by the High Court to enter his defence on four counts of using his position to obtain RM2.28bil gratification from 1MDB's funds and 21 counts of money laundering involving the same amount.
The hearing continues before Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Court to hear Najib's bid for committal proceedings against ex-A-G on Aug 19
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court will hear Datuk Seri Najib Razak's leave application to initiate committal proceedings against former Attorney-General Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh. Judge K. Muniandy made the decision after ruling that the committal application was not subject to an earlier High Court order that stayed all proceedings related to Najib's judicial review over his house arrest claim. On April 28, judge Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz, who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal, granted a stay order pending Najib's final attempt to reinstate his judicial review application at the Federal Court. The court has fixed Aug 19 to hear the leave application. The former prime minister filed the application against Terrirudin, now a Federal Court judge, alleging that he misled the court during proceedings involving an alleged addendum order by the former Yang di-Pertuan Agong, which purportedly allowed Najib to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest. Earlier, senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan submitted that the committal application should not proceed, arguing that the stay order applied to all related applications. However, Najib's lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, contended that the committal proceedings were clearly separate and independent, and that the stay applied only to the original applications that remained pending in court. He said the judge had specifically referred to "all proceedings before the court", whereas the committal leave application had not yet been brought before the court at the time the stay was issued. Najib is currently serving a six-year sentence after being convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. The High Court had initially sentenced him to 12 years in prison and fined him RM210 million, a decision upheld by both the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. However, following a petition for royal clemency on Sept 2, 2022, his sentence was commuted to six years and the fine was reduced to RM50 million.
Sinar Daily
6 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Yusoff Rawther acquitted and discharged of drug trafficking, possession of imitation pistols
The judge said that based on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused had control, custody and possession of the two pistols and the drugs. 12 Jun 2025 02:39pm Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin made the order after finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against Muhammed Yusoff, 32, at the end of the prosecution's case. - Bernama photo KUALA LUMPUR - A former research assistant to a politician, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, was today acquitted and discharged by the High Court here on charges of drug trafficking and possession of imitation firearms. Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin made the order after finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against Muhammed Yusoff, 32, at the end of the prosecution's case. Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin made the order after finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against Muhammed Yusoff, 32, at the end of the prosecution's case. - Bernama photo The judge said that based on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused had control, custody and possession of the two pistols and the drugs. "Based on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses as well, the court found that it was not safe for this court to convict the accused of the offences charged against him. "Therefore, the accused is acquitted and discharged of the charges without having to be called to enter his defence,' said the judge. Muhammed Yusoff was charged with trafficking 305 grams of cannabis in a vehicle he was riding in front of the Kuala Lumpur Police Contingent Headquarters (IPK) surau at 10.15 am on Sept 6 last year. The charge was framed under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which provides for life imprisonment and whipping of not less than 12 strokes if convicted. He was also charged with possessing two imitation pistols on the roadside near a condominium in Jalan Bukit Kiara here at 9.25 am on the same day. The charge, under Section 36(1) of the Arms Act 1960, provides a maximum imprisonment of one year or a fine not exceeding RM5,000 or both, if convicted. Judge Muhammad Jamil, in his summary judgment, said it was not disputed that during the inspection of Muhammed Yusoff's Nissan Teana car, the first prosecution witness (SP1), Insp Wan Muhammad Wan Ali, found a black bag containing two pistols in the front seat of the vehicle. The judge said further inspection of the vehicle at the Kuala Lumpur police station by SP6, Corporal Amirul Azwa Zahari, found a black plastic package containing drugs in the back seat of the car. "It is true that the car was registered in the accused's name and belonged to the accused, and the car keys and remote control were in the accused's possession. It is also undeniable that the accused was near the car and opened the car door during the operation. "However, the evidence does not allow a reasonable conclusion to be drawn that the accused had exclusive control over the car and had custody or control over the two pistols and drugs," he said. According to the judge, there was no evidence from the prosecution witnesses that there were other individuals who had access to the vehicle and placed the drugs and two pistols in the car. He said there was no evidence to show that the accused was in a suspicious state when the pistol and drugs were found. On the contrary, the accused denied that the black bag containing the pistol and the black plastic package containing the drugs found in the car belonged to him, he added. Today's proceedings were attended by Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Sabri Othman, for the prosecution, while lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali represented Muhammed Yusoff. - BERNAMA More Like This
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
MR says High Court ruling is a relief after lengthy trial
KUALA LUMPUR: Former Malaysia Rugby (MR) staff member Murni Azlina Yurdeksi has been ordered by the High Court to pay RM4.9 million in damages to the national body. In its ruling on March 4, the court found Murni Azlina liable for breach of trust, fraud and conversion, and ordered her to pay RM4,923,468.07 within 14 days. An annual interest of five per cent was to apply from March 13, 2023, until the full amount is paid. The court also dismissed a counterclaim filed by Murni Azlina and ordered her to pay RM30,000 in legal costs. MR honorary secretary Fahmy Jalil said the decision brought relief after a lengthy trial and that the union could now focus on its administrative affairs. "The civil suit is over, but the criminal suit is still ongoing. We are glad the civil case is settled and hope to recover the funds, though it will be tough if she is declared bankrupt," said Fahmy. "The new MR executive committee has moved on from the missing funds. It was tough to run programmes without the money, but we have managed to raise funds and continued with what we had." In 2022, MR discovered that a substantial sum of money was allegedly siphoned from its bank account by an administrative staff member. It is alleged that the staff member, who handled MR's accounts, had forged the signatures of both the MR president and treasurer to make cash withdrawals dating back to 2019. Fahmy said MR had since strengthened its financial procedures to prevent similar incidents. "We used to have four bank accounts, but we've closed three and now only maintain one. We've also reduced cheque usage and switched to online banking, which allows for better monitoring of our funds," he said.
