Why not let Hongkongers pay medical fees with MPF, like in Singapore?
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at
[email protected] or filling in
this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification
Advertisement
Such a move is prudent as our public hospitals are heavily subsidised. If the subsidies are not financially sustainable, medical service provision will be affected. But apart from adjusting medical fees, Hong Kong must also explore other avenues to alleviate the fiscal burden.
In
his article 'Fee increases won't solve Hong Kong's healthcare financing crisis', Professor Wilson Wong gave some constructive suggestions. In particular, he mentioned using mandatory health insurance schemes or health savings accounts to supplement public funding. Indeed, why not allow Hongkongers to use part of their Mandatory Provident Fund to pay for their medical expenses? Such an arrangement could be a responsible way to alleviate the fiscal burden.
Reform could go even further. Our health authorities often criticise people for misusing
accident and emergency services . However, has the Hospital Authority provided enough clinics at the district level as an alternative?
Advertisement
Picture yourself in this situation. If there are not enough clinics providing services at night, patients will go to the regional hospital almost immediately, increasing the A&E's workload. If enough round-the-clock service was provided at the district level, it would reduce A&E workload at the hospitals, which could focus on handling the truly serious cases. The clinics could decide whether patients needed to be sent to the hospital.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Symbol of hope': LGBTQ Singaporeans to seal stories of love inside time capsule
When healthcare worker V first met his partner E, a researcher, in 2000 they instantly clicked and began their relationship that spanned a little over 20 years. At the time, homosexuality was still an offence in Singapore but V, who is now in his late 40s and spoke on condition of anonymity, told This Week in Asia they were happy enjoying food, travel and what he described as 'quiet activism' in the city state. To commemorate the second year of their relationship, he gifted E matching wedding bands but soon after, E lost his ring while he was at the gym. They later celebrated their fifth, 10th and 15th anniversaries with different rings. E was diagnosed with chest cancer in 2017 and died in 2020. The colonial law criminalising gay sex between men in Singapore would be struck off the books only in 2023. V has decided to submit his second anniversary ring to LGBTQ non-profit Pink Dot, which will mark its annual pride event on June 28 with a time capsule containing objects from the community that will be opened in 2050. 'I hope whoever reads this in 25 years' time will know that love is love and has and will last for years to come,' V said.
South China Morning Post
4 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Rethink measures against e-cigarettes for a smoke-free Hong Kong
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification I refer to '70% of Hongkongers under 25 have tried e-cigarettes: university poll' ( May 23 ). While some support a complete ban on alternative smoking products (ASPs), their widespread use is crystal clear evidence that the current ban on selling ASPs is not working. This ban was imposed in 2022 and the tax on tobacco was increased twice, in 2023 and 2024. But between 2021 and 2023, the number of smokers only dropped by 9,200, a decline similar to previous years. With nearly 600,000 smokers remaining, is banning ASPs truly the best way to accelerate the drop in the smoking population and achieve a smoke-free Hong Kong? Around the world, there are more countries that regulate ASPs (more than 80) than ban them. The United Kingdom's 'swap to stop' programme and the United States Food and Drug Administration's authorisation to sell some products as 'modified risk tobacco products' are important examples of a global shift towards pragmatic, science-based solutions.
South China Morning Post
4 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Rethink measures against e-cigarettes for a smoke-free Hong Kong
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification I refer to '70% of Hongkongers under 25 have tried e-cigarettes: university poll' ( May 23 ). While some support a complete ban on alternative smoking products (ASPs), their widespread use is crystal clear evidence that the current ban on selling ASPs is not working. This ban was imposed in 2022 and the tax on tobacco was increased twice, in 2023 and 2024. But between 2021 and 2023, the number of smokers only dropped by 9,200, a decline similar to previous years. With nearly 600,000 smokers remaining, is banning ASPs truly the best way to accelerate the drop in the smoking population and achieve a smoke-free Hong Kong? Around the world, there are more countries that regulate ASPs (more than 80) than ban them. The United Kingdom's 'swap to stop' programme and the United States Food and Drug Administration's authorisation to sell some products as 'modified risk tobacco products' are important examples of a global shift towards pragmatic, science-based solutions.
