National park layoffs assailed by off-duty rangers and community members in SoCal protests
Hundreds of people gathered at national park sites in Southern California on Saturday to protest the Trump administration's mass firing of federal employees and to voice fears about the future of America's public lands.
"I don't want a McDonald's popping up in Yosemite," said Marla Stultz, 59, of Victorville as she waved an American flag near the entrance to Joshua Tree National Park, where a crowd of about 200 people had gathered by mid-morning. "I don't want condos with a view looking into Sequoia National Park."
Passing drivers leaned on their horns to show support.
At King Gillette Ranch in the Santa Monica Mountains, Los Angeles filmmaker Cris Graves led a group of more than 100 protesters in chants and then asked the crowd to gather in small groups to share why public lands mattered to them. Attendees shared both memories and fears, including whether public lands will be opened up for oil and gas drilling and other industrial uses.
Omar Pichardo, a field organizer with Council of Mexican Federations in North America, attended the protest to raise awareness of the group's fear that undocumented residents could be threatened by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers while trying to visit federal parks.
'People are not going to be feeling safe in the parks anymore, and so that's our biggest concern, right? People are not feeling welcome in these spaces anymore when people used to feel welcome and safe,' Pichardo said.
Some protesters moved outside the park to a nearby street corner, where one attendee booed as a Tesla Cybertruck rolled past. Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk is leading the Department of Government Efficiency initiative that is spearheading attempts to cut federal spending and downsize the federal government.
The Southern California protests were among those staged at roughly 140 national park sites around the country Saturday by Resistance Rangers, a group of about 700 off-duty park rangers with a stated mission to save public lands and protect civil servants. About 15 protests were planned at California public lands, with another planned Wednesday at Ventura Harbor to support Channel Islands National Park.
'This is just the beginning,' said an organizer with Resistance Rangers who helped stage the Joshua Tree protest. 'We're trying to get the word out, trying to make some sort of movement and change.'
"One of the things park rangers do best is organizing and spreading education, and that's what we've been doing," added the organizer, who asked to remain anonymous over concerns of retaliation.
Heather Felix was clad in a butterfly cape as she jogged between intersections with her 3 year-old goldendoodle Hazelnut, who sported matching wings and a pink mohawk.
The 42-year-old engineer, who lives in the San Bernardino Mountains, said she believes federal workers were fired illegally and wanted to show them they have the community's support.
"It's important to be vocal," she said. "You can't just sit behind and let the billionaires, the oligarchs take over."
The protests come after many federal agencies fired nearly all their probationary employees last month as part of a broader push by the Trump administration to dramatically shrink the federal workforce. Those probationary employees included both workers who were relatively new to federal employment, as well as some longer-tenured employees who had recently changed jobs.
Roughly 1,000 National Park Service workers were fired. Among them were six employees of Joshua Tree National Park, which is now operating at a 30% vacancy rate because it had many job openings to begin with, said Chance Wilcox, California desert program manager at the National Parks Conservation Assn. Those lost included fee collectors who also help direct traffic and respond to incidents, he said.
'My understanding is that the fire station is currently vacant, which is a huge concern considering the fuel load in the park,' he added.
Officials also fired about eight staffers from the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, including workers focused on archaeology, wildlife research and emergency medical response, according to Deanna Armbruster, executive director of the Santa Monica Mountains Fund.
Several of those workers attended the protest at King Gillette Ranch, including Katie Preston, a park ranger who until Feb. 14 worked as an archaeological technician, surveying the land for natural and cultural resources.
Preston grew up in Thousand Oaks, so the Santa Monica Mountains were her backyard. She came frequently with her family and, once an employee, realized she was surveying areas she'd visited as a child.
'I really, really loved being a park ranger,' Preston said.
Preston's colleague Kallie Martinez, a park ranger who worked in special park use and park safety, was also at the protest.
Martinez had been working in the Santa Monica Mountains since 2020, but started with the park service in March. She was considered probationary because her most recent position started in June.
Martinez learned she'd been fired in the last four minutes of her shift on Feb. 14. She had spent the day in an EMT class, paid for by the park service so that she could take over emergency medical services at the park. She got home from the class and found the email telling her she'd been terminated 'based on performance.' Martinez's supervisors, she said, had told her she was doing great work and well above her pay grade.
Martinez lived in park service housing and now has 60 days to move out. She loses her health insurance 30 days from her firing date.
Martinez was one of only two federal workers at Santa Monica Mountains responding to emergencies, like lost hikers and injured climbers. Although L.A. County emergency workers or sheriff's deputies can respond, they do not know the park like Martinez and her supervisor, she said. Plus, they don't have keys to open gates.
'I know this park better than I know my hometown,' said Martinez, who is originally from Twentynine Palms. 'I just want to be able to help people. I care about this park, and I care about the visitors that visit this park and the experience that they have, and I just really wanted to enhance that experience for people.'
Both Preston and Martinez said it meant a lot to see so many protesters at the park.
That included L.A. resident Noemi Arias, 12, who made her own sign for the protest, which read 'Protect public lands' and included a drawing of Smokey Bear. 'Rehire Smokey and friends,' the sign demanded.
'So many kids have magical experiences at national parks, and we need to protect them for future generations,' she said.
A federal judge in San Francisco on Thursday found that the mass firings of probationary government employees were likely unlawful, ruling that the Office of Personnel Management had no authority to order other agencies to fire employees. U.S. District Judge William Alsup granted temporary relief to a coalition of labor unions and advocacy groups that had sued to stop the terminations and ordered the OPM to notify federal agencies of his ruling.
But the decision did not immediately reinstate fired employees or guarantee that more terminations won't take place in the future.
The National Park Service didn't respond to questions about the implications of the ruling, but said in a statement that it is hiring seasonal workers 'as we embrace new opportunities for optimization and innovation in workforce management.' The agency last week received approval to hire 7,700 seasonal employees in a reversal of an earlier plan to eliminate thousands of those workers.
The White House and Office of Personnel Management didn't respond to messages seeking comment on the judge's ruling and the rationale behind the firings. President Trump has previously said the cuts were needed to rein in the federal deficit, which hit $1.8 trillion in the 2024 fiscal year.
'We're cutting down the size of government. We have to,' Trump said this week during his first Cabinet meeting. 'We're bloated. We're sloppy. We have a lot of people that aren't doing their job.'
More terminations are expected in the weeks ahead, per a Feb. 11 executive order from Trump that instructed agency heads to undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force. A memo from the federal budget and personnel offices providing additional guidance on the order directed agencies to develop reorganization plans by March 13.
Already, some national parks have been forced to cut hours or curtail services. Yosemite National Park suspended the sale of summer online reservations for its most popular campgrounds. Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument in Colorado announced it would close Mondays and Tuesdays. Saguaro National Park in Arizona and Hot Springs National Park in Arkansas said their visitor centers would be shuttered one to two days a week.
The city of Twentynine Palms on Tuesday took a precautionary step to avoid similar impacts to the Joshua Tree National Park visitor's center near the park's north entrance. Its City Council voted to amend the center's lease to transfer some of its obligations from the Park Service to the Joshua Tree National Park Assn. the park's main nonprofit partner. That will ensure the center stays open in the event that the Park Service is forced to suspend visitor's center operations more broadly, said city manager Stone James.
'The center's closure would harm our downtown,' James said. 'It would also prevent visitors from receiving important information on where to go within the national park and, most importantly, on how to stay safe.'
At the Joshua Tree rally, multiple community members noted the national park's importance as a tourism draw that helps sustain the local economy.
"Just look at the businesses, the farmer's market," said Jim Fitzsimmons, 71. "That thing's packed every Saturday."
Others pointed to the need for protected natural areas to provide clean water and fresh air.
"When we ruin the lands, then we suffer as a species," said Mary Mackley, 62, as she perched on a lawn chair beside her sister Michelle Mackley, 59.
"I never go out and protest anything — I sit at home in front of my TV, watch it all on the news," Michelle added. "Today, I could not sit inside. It's gone too far. I could not stay home and watch our nation go down the toilet."
Wigglesworth reported from Joshua Tree, Cosgrove from Calabasas. Times staff writer Jack Dolan contributed to this report.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Paramount Global Are in 'Active Settlement Discussions' Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit
President Trump and Paramount Global are in 'active settlement discussions' amid a lawsuit that Trump filed against the company over an interview that CBS' 60 Minutes aired last year with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. The revelation came in a motion filed Friday by Trump's attorneys asking for an extension in the deadlines in his lawsuit against Paramount Global, parent company of CBS. More from The Hollywood Reporter Mark Ruffalo, Jimmy Kimmel, Gracie Abrams, Kerry Washington and More Stars Participating in "No Kings" Protests Paramount to Cut Another 3.5 Percent of U.S. Staff As It Awaits Word On Skydance Deal Close Naveen Chopra Exits as Paramount Global CFO The motion states that both sides 'respectively submit that good cause to extend the deadlines set forth in the table below exists because the Parties are engaged in active settlement discussions, including continued mediation.' Trump alleges in the lawsuit that CBS News aired a 'heavily tampered interview' with Harris to help her in the election by editing certain answers in a way that misled viewers. Trump's team alleges that this constitutes a violation of Texas' consumer protection law covering deceptive advertising and the unfair competition prong of the Lanham Act, a trademark law. As previously reported, the two sides are currently in mediation talks to try and resolve the suit. Paramount reportedly previously offered $15 million to resolve the suit, which it also sought to dismiss earlier this year. Meanwhile, the FCC is reviewing the interview via its 'news distortion' filing comes two weeks after Paramount Global added three new board directors as it deals not only with the lawsuit, but also the proposed merger of Skydance Media and Paramount Global. Earlier this month, Paramount chair Shari Redstone revealed she had been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire


Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
MAGA Splitting Over Israel's Strikes on Iran Poses 'Dilemma' for Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The United States will back Israel's strikes against Iran, according to President Donald Trump, who faces criticism from his supporters that this stance opposes his "America First" policy. Trump's comments on Sunday came as he rebuffed criticism from conservative TV host Tucker Carlson about his support for Israel, a sentiment expressed by MAGA (Make America Great Again) Republicans. Trump supporter Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, posted on social media that those pushing for the U.S. to become fully involved in the escalating conflict in the Middle East cannot also say they back MAGA or any policy of America First. U.S. foreign policy expert Jonathan Monten told Newsweek that Trump faces a "dilemma" in balancing his desire to appear strong on the world stage with his constituency's reluctance to engage in foreign conflicts. "He's trying to have it both ways," he said. Newsweek reached out to the White House, Greene, and Carlson for comment. Why It Matters Israel launched strikes on Iran as part of "Operation Rising Lion" in response to intelligence it said showed Tehran could produce up to 15 nuclear bombs. But Trump's backing for Israel's actions has raised concerns that the U.S. could be pulled into the war via attacks by Iran or its proxy forces on U.S. personnel in the region. This is causing a rift between the president's advisers and political base over the prospect of yet further American engagement in foreign wars, possibly mirroring the splits in the Democratic Party over the previous administration's response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. The spat comes as Trump rejected Israel's proposal to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to U.S. officials, cited by the Associated Press and Reuters, which noted how such a plan could destabilize the region. President Donald Trump speaks on the South Lawn of the White House on June 15, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks on the South Lawn of the White House on June 15, 2025. Tasos Katopodis What To Know While leaving for the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada, Trump told reporters Sunday that the U.S. would keep supporting Israel's airstrikes on Iran. He also batted away a question over whether he had called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop the attacks, but praised their relationship. During an interview with ABC News, Trump had raised the possibility of U.S. involvement in the conflict, a position which has been criticized by some of his biggest supporters. Greene posted on X (formerly Twitter) that "we are sick and tired of foreign wars and that "Real America First/MAGA wants world peace for all people." Her post did not mention Trump by name but also said "everyone is finding out who are real America First/MAGA and who were fake." Carlson, a Trump ally, wrote in a newsletter to subscribers, "politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it." He accused Trump of being "complicit" in Israel's "act of war," although the U.S. president has denied that the U.S. had any involvement in the attack on Iran. When asked about the comments by the former Fox News anchor, Trump told The Atlantic that "America First" means whatever he says it does and that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear bomb. Monten, director of the International Public Policy Program at University College London (UCL), told Newsweek that Trump "wants to be seen as a player on the world stage." However, he has "cultivated a constituency of support around non-involvement in foreign conflicts." "The dilemma he faces is that he's trying to play both roles at the same time," he said. This is the same dilemma he has faced in other foreign policy issues involving the potential use of force, such as his pronouncements on acquiring Greenland, the Panama Canal, and Canada, Monten said. Avi Melamed, a former Israeli intelligence official, told Newsweek that from Trump's perspective, as long as the U.S. is not directly militarily involved, there is an advantage to Israel's military action aimed at forcing Tehran back to negotiations over its nuclear program from a significantly weaker position. Dialogue between the U.S. and Iran over Tehran's nuclear program was shelved following Israel's attacks. But Melamed added that Trump acts according to considerations that do not necessarily align with those of the Israeli government. The U.S. president's declarations and policy can change quickly, like the sudden halt of the American offensive against the Houthis in Yemen, he said. Smoke billows for the second day from the Shahran oil depot, northwest of Tehran, on June 16, 2025. Smoke billows for the second day from the Shahran oil depot, northwest of Tehran, on June 16, an analysis published Sunday, Trita Parsi, co-founder of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said Israel's seeking Trump's approval is easier than requesting direct American involvement. But Parsi also said Trump likes winners, and by asking him to intervene, Israel is signaling that it's losing, having as of the weekend, not eliminated Iran's regime or cripple its nuclear program "Why would Trump risk American lives, endanger his presidency, and join a war he didn't start?" Parsi wrote. "Trump prefers to take credit for victories, not inherit blame for someone else's potential fiasco." What People Are Saying Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, on X: "Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA." Tucker Carlson, to newsletter subscribers: "Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep." President Donald Trump told The Atlantic: "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, very simple. Regardless—Israel or not Israel—Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb." What Happens Next Iranian missiles again penetrated Israel's Iron Dome defense system overnight Sunday, and Iran's state media reported there were new Israeli strikes in the west of the country on Monday. Hamidreza Azizi, an expert on Iran and visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told Newsweek that Tehran is trying to influence Israel's calculations by demonstrating that it will not hesitate to escalate and will go as far as necessary. Much depends on Iran's actual capabilities—what it has already destroyed and what it may target, but Tehran's regime views Israel's strikes as existential, which is why it appears willing to use whatever resources it has, he added.