Kashmir: Modi tells Trump won't accept 'third-party mediation'
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has told US President Donald Trump that Delhi will never accept third-party mediation with Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir, India's senior-most diplomat said.Foreign secretary Vikram Misri said that Modi "strongly" conveyed India's long-held stand to Trump during a phone call between the two leaders on Tuesday.Trump has repeatedly offered to mediate between India and Pakistan to solve the "Kashmir issue" since a four-day conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May.The White House has not commented on India's statement.
Mr Misri also said that Modi told Trump "clearly" that during the duration of the conflict, "no talks were held at any level on the India-America trade deal or on the mediation between India and Pakistan by America".Trump has repeatedly claimed that India and Pakistan ended the conflict after a ceasefire brokered by the US and also that he used trade as a lever to make them agree. Pakistan has backed US claims of brokering the ceasefire but India has denied it."The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries," Mr Misri said.Last month, Trump told reporters: "I said, 'Come on, we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let's stop it. Let's stop it. If you stop it, we'll do a trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade.'"Delhi is rushing to negotiate a trade deal with the Trump administration before a 90-day pause on higher tariffs ends on 9 July.Trump's mediation offer on Kashmir puts India in a tight spotHow India and Pakistan share one of the world's most dangerous bordersKashmir is a contentious issue for both India and and Pakistan, who claim the region in whole, but administer it only in part. Bilateral talks over several decades have not led to any resolution.India treats Kashmir as an integral part of its territory and rules out any negotiation, particularly through a third party.Tensions escalated between the South Asian neighbours after India blamed Pakistan for a 22 April attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir in which 26 people, mainly tourists, were killed. Islamabad denied the charge.In May, India carried out air strikes on what it called terrorist infrastructure inside Pakistan, leading to four days of intense military action from both sides of the border.Both countries accused each other of targeting airbases and other military sites.As the conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations threatened to escalate further, Trump announced on 10 May that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate ceasefire", brokered by the US.Later, in a post on Truth Social, he said: "I will work with you both to see if, after a thousand years, a solution can be arrived at, concerning Kashmir." (The Kashmir issue only dates back to 1947).A statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio the same day said that the two countries had also agreed "to start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site".On 11 May, Trump repeated praise for India and Pakistan's leaders for understanding it was "time to stop the current aggression", adding that he was proud the US "was able to help you arrive at this historic and heroic decision".After Trump's statement on the ceasefire, Pakistan's foreign minister said the agreement had been reached by the two countries, adding that "three dozen countries" were involved in the diplomacy.India has, however, consistently denied any intervention by the US. Analysts say Trump's very public statements on offers of mediation over Kashmir have tested Delhi's red lines on the issue.Delhi has always encouraged its Western partners not to treat India and Pakistan as equals. It also discourages western leaders from undertaking visits to India and Pakistan at the same time.But Trump's tweets often hold India and Pakistan as equals. This has caused some discomfort in Delhi's diplomatic circles but analysts believe it's too early to say whether this will affect ongoing trade deal talks between Washington and Delhi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
30 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Iran's leader rejects Trump's call to surrender
The remarks from Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has only been seen once since the strikes began, came after US president Donald Trump demanded 'Unconditional surrender' in a social media post and warned Mr Khamenei that the US knows where he is but has no plans to kill him, 'at least not for now'. Mr Trump initially distanced himself from Israel's surprise attack on Friday that triggered the conflict, but in recent days has hinted at greater American involvement, saying he wants something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire. US President Donald Trump (Suzanne Plunkett/Pool Photo via AP) The US has also sent more warplanes to the region. The 86-year-old Iranian leader said: 'Any military involvement by the US in this field will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage for them.' Mr Khamenei also urged officials to 'continue their work with strength and trust in God'. 'God will certainly and surely make the Iranian nation … victorious,' he said. An Iranian official had earlier warned that US intervention would risk 'all-out war.' Foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei did not elaborate, but thousands of American troops are based in nearby countries within range of Iran's weapons. The US has threatened a massive response to any attack. Another Iranian official said the country would keep enriching uranium for peaceful purposes, apparently ruling out Mr Trump's demands that Iran give up its disputed nuclear programme.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Iran's leader rejects Trump's call to surrender
The remarks from Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has only been seen once since the strikes began, came after US president Donald Trump demanded 'Unconditional surrender' in a social media post and warned Mr Khamenei that the US knows where he is but has no plans to kill him, 'at least not for now'. Mr Trump initially distanced himself from Israel's surprise attack on Friday that triggered the conflict, but in recent days has hinted at greater American involvement, saying he wants something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire. US President Donald Trump (Suzanne Plunkett/Pool Photo via AP) The US has also sent more warplanes to the region. The 86-year-old Iranian leader said: 'Any military involvement by the US in this field will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage for them.' Mr Khamenei also urged officials to 'continue their work with strength and trust in God'. 'God will certainly and surely make the Iranian nation … victorious,' he said. An Iranian official had earlier warned that US intervention would risk 'all-out war.' Foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei did not elaborate, but thousands of American troops are based in nearby countries within range of Iran's weapons. The US has threatened a massive response to any attack. Another Iranian official said the country would keep enriching uranium for peaceful purposes, apparently ruling out Mr Trump's demands that Iran give up its disputed nuclear programme.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
2,000 more National Guard troops on duty in L.A. as legal battle over deployment continues
The United States government will activate an extra 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles, the military confirmed in a statement Tuesday night, as a legal battle continues over the deployment. Protests against federal immigration policies that exploded in Los Angeles and across the country in recent weeks have since died down, and a nighttime curfew has been lifted as businesses return to normality. Nevertheless, the U.S. Northern Command said the reinforcements were needed to "support the protection of federal functions, personnel, and property in the greater Los Angeles area." The 2,000 troops are deployed at the direction of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, using Title 10, which allows the president to call in the National Guard when the country is at risk of invasion or rebellion. That means at least 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have been deployed to the streets of L.A. after 2,100 were sent there on June 9. Tuesday's statement confirms a statement from last Monday on the troop increase. The soldiers cannot participate in civilian policing, leading city leaders to attack the deployments as political theater. "The soldiers are completing training on de-escalation, crowd control, and use of the standing rules for the use of force in advance of joining the federal protection mission," the military statement said. Gov. Gavin Newsom condemned the move and said the troops would be "twiddling their thumbs." "This isn't a new deployment — it's the same group of soldiers who have been diverted from critical wildfire work and work at the border, now twiddling their thumbs for Donald Trump's political theater," Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson from Newsom's office, said. Newsom said last week that the deployment of an extra 2,000 personnel would be "reckless, pointless and disrespectful to our troops." L.A. Mayor Karen Bass has called the deployment a "chaotic escalation." The confirmation of the extra personnel came hours after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments on whether the federal government can deploy troops to American cities, or should turn over their command to Californian officials. The court heard an appeal and ruled last week that President Donald Trump can retain command of the troops, pausing a ruling from District Court Judge Charles Breyer that said the deployment was unlawful. Tuesday's hearing considered whether the most recent order can stand as the case proceeds through the courts. The three-judge panel seemed unlikely to be interested in lifting the pause that was imposed by the Appeals Court. That court is expected to make a decision in the coming days, ahead of a Friday hearing before Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco federal court. The Appeals Court's decision — and any potential Supreme Court involvement — could have huge ramifications for the political executive's powers and activities in Washington and whether troops can be sent to other cities.
