Trump Condemns Putin's Killings in Ukraine, But Doesn't Make Him Pay a Price
'I don't know what the hell happened to Putin,'' President Trump told reporters on Sunday afternoon, just before boarding Air Force One for a short trip from his golf club in New Jersey to Washington. Hours later, he posted about the Russian leader, saying, 'He has gone absolutely CRAZY.'
Mr. Trump's rare criticism of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia came after a weekend of the largest bombardment of Ukrainian cities over the past three years, mostly aimed at civilian targets, from residential areas in Kyiv to university dormitories. The Russian attacks also happened only days after Mr. Trump had what he described publicly as an 'excellent' two-hour phone call with Mr. Putin that Mr. Trump promised would immediately lead to direct peace negotiations.
Mr. Trump has long said he enjoys a 'good relationship' with Mr. Putin, and it was not the first time he expressed shock that the Russian president was unleashing attacks on Ukrainian civilians. A month ago Mr. Trump wrote 'Vladimir, STOP' as a barrage of missiles and drones hit Ukraine, including crowded playgrounds. But Mr. Trump has never linked the attacks with his own decision, reaffirmed last week, to refuse to join the Europeans in new financial sanctions on Russia, or to offer new arms and help to the Ukrainians.
The result is a strategic void in which Mr. Trump complains about Russian's continued killing but so far has been unwilling to make Mr. Putin pay even a modest price.
The pattern is a familiar one, several outside experts and former government officials said. Mr. Trump signals he is pulling back from a conflict he often describes as Europe's war, then expresses shock that Mr. Putin responds with a familiar list of demands that amount to a Ukrainian surrender, followed by accelerating attacks. Mr. Trump episodically insists he is 'absolutely' considering sanctions, including on Sunday.
Yet each time when he is forced to make a decision about joining Europe in new economic penalties, he has pulled back.
'Russia said no cease-fire and Trump is increasingly washing his hands of it,'' Ian Bremmer, the president of Eurasia Group, a geopolitical consulting firm, wrote on Monday. The result is that 'support for Ukraine continues to recede in importance for the Americans,'' he added. Mr. Bremmer predicted that 'what comes next is more fighting — expanded Russian attacks across Ukraine, fewer restraints on Ukraine targeting inside Russia.'
The latest cycle of this odd interaction between the American and Russian leaders happened just last week. Mr. Trump, who has made no secret of his desire for a summit meeting soon with Mr. Putin, declared that only he and the Russian leader had the power and influence to end the war. Yet by the time they were done talking in their call last week, Mr. Trump had changed his position, saying it was now up to Ukraine and Russia to end the war in direct negotiations.
In a subsequent conversation with the leaders of Germany, France, Italy and Finland, along with the European Commission, Mr. Trump had yet another view: Mr. Putin thought he was winning the war and would press his advantage. According to several officials briefed on the conversation, Mr. Trump made it clear he had no intention on putting pressure, much less harsh economic sanctions, on Russia.
'He said, essentially, 'I'm out,''' said one of the officials, who declined to be named because he was not authorized to describe the conversation.
Mr. Trump, the official said, clearly meant that he was disengaging from the conflict in an echo of Vice President JD Vance's public statement that 'we're more than open to walking away.' Mr. Trump also made clear that he was pulling back from a commitment he made just a few weeks earlier to the leaders of France, Germany and Britain to join an economic crackdown on Russia if it refused a cease-fire.
Mr. Trump is usually eager to threaten economic penalties, whether they are tariffs or sanctions, to influence the decisions of other nations. But he has repeatedly carved an exception for Russia.
When he announced his 'Liberation Day' sanctions on trading partners around the world in early April, Russia was largely exempt. After Mr. Trump's phone call with Mr. Putin last week, White House officials said that sanctions on Russia had a poor track record and would not be in U.S. interests.
Mr. Trump's withdrawal of pressure on Russia goes beyond economics: He has dismantled the Justice Department effort to collect evidence of Russian war crimes in Ukraine, for eventual prosecution in international courts. On the third anniversary of the war, the United States refused to vote for a United Nations declaration that identified Russia as the aggressor in the invasion, putting Washington against the position taken by its NATO allies but on the side of North Korea.
President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, who has not wanted to repeat the Oval Office blowup with Mr. Trump in February, has been careful not to criticize Mr. Trump, as he has veered between pleas to Mr. Putin to stop and refusals to pressure Russia. But in his own social media post on Monday, Mr. Zelensky pressed for more economic sanctions, writing that 'only a feeling of total impunity can allow Russia to launch such strikes.'
Mr. Trump himself has clearly hoped to get beyond the conflict, and just last week was musing about the possibilities for a normalization of relations with Moscow. 'Russia wants to do large scale TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic 'blood bath' is over, and I agree,' he wrote after talking with Mr. Putin.
Missing from Mr. Trump's zigzags is any explanation of why he has been unable to use his relationship with Mr. Putin to persuade him to halt the violence, even for a 30-day cease-fire. When he was running for president, Mr. Trump often argued that Mr. Putin ignored Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Barack Obama during their presidencies because he didn't 'respect' them. Things would be different when he got into office, Mr. Trump said, arguing that he would end the war in '24 hours.' (He has since said the comment was sarcastic.)
On Sunday Mr. Trump's tone was different. 'I'm not happy with what Putin is doing. He's killing a lot of people,'' he said. 'I don't know what the hell happened to Putin. I've known him a long time. Always gotten along with him, but he's sending rockets into cities and killing people, and I don't like it at all.'
Later he wrote that Mr. Putin's ambitions were to retake all of Ukraine, contradicting what his chief negotiator, Steve Witkoff, said two months ago in an interview with Tucker Carlson.
'Why would they want to absorb Ukraine?' Mr. Witkoff asked Mr. Carlson in late March. 'For what purpose, exactly? They don't need to absorb Ukraine.'
But on Sunday Mr. Trump wrote of Mr. Putin: 'If he does, it will lead to the downfall of Russia!'
Dmitry Peskov, Mr. Putin's spokesman, dismissed Mr. Trump's statements about the Russian leader. He termed them an 'emotional reaction.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
32 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive
President Donald Trump's former Secretary of Commerce doesn't think the trade deal between the US and China is close to being "done." "It looks as though they made a fairly modest deal, mostly focusing on export controls on both the US side and the China side," Wilbur Ross, who was part of the first Trump administration, told Business Insider. "So it's far from a comprehensive deal." On Wednesday morning, Trump said on Truth Social that the deal with China is now "done." "It seems more or less to be reiterating the deal they thought they had set a few weeks ago," Ross said of the deal. China and the US reached a trade framework agreement on Tuesday, after their respective negotiation teams held two-day talks in London. The current Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, is part of the US trade talk team. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China," Trump added in all caps in the post. "Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Ross said that the deal has not addressed many important issues, including intellectual property, so it may be too soon to call this a victory. "The Chinese side has been very careful to say it still needs to be approved by President Xi," said Ross. "When we negotiated with the China side last time, it wasn't unusual for the trade negotiators to agree to something, and then they would go back to Xi, and he would not go along with it." This year in duties on imports from China reached up to 245% on some goods. On May 14, many of the tariffs on China were reduced to 30% for 90 days, with a deadline of August 12. A 10% baseline tariff is still in place on the rest of the world, while additional higher tariffs on 75 countries have been paused until July 9. Ross said that it would be important to complete at least a few deals with key trading partners before the tariff pause on 75 countries expires. "I think that will help clear the air for the stock market because it'll start to show a direction and that there is a way to get all these things resolved," he said. "It's very important from a bond market point of view and from an equity market point of view."
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that Donald Trump is again intending to move the goalposts for his global tariff policy. The United States is fast approaching the end of the president's 90-day pause on his sweeping global tariffs on July 9, but while testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Bessent said that 'Liberation Day' Part 2 may not come to pass so soon. 'I would say, as I have repeatedly said, that there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those. And it is highly likely that those countries that are negoti—or trading blocs, in the case of the EU—who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue good-faith negotiations,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not,' he added. The Trump administration has not even vaguely approached its initial promise to crack 90 deals in 90 days, only announcing two unfinished deals, with the U.K. and China. Crucially, Trump's paltry set of terms with China isn't even a deal. China referred to it as merely a 'framework,' while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said it was a 'handshake for a framework' that both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping need to approve. Trump seems intent on running the country's economic policy in 90-day increments, prolonging economic uncertainty that has roiled the markets and sent prices rising. But the president's failure should hardly come as a surprise, as the stated purpose of his tariffs—not to ensure economic prosperity but to bring U.S. trading partners to their knees—defies all logic and reason. With only two half-deals made, and a suddenly unclear horizon, it's not clear how TACO Trump will ever reach the goal of 200 trade deals he'd claimed to have made in April. Especially considering that there aren't even that many countries.
Bloomberg
36 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Group of Seven Tries to Avoid Trump Conflict by Scrapping Joint Communique
Group of Seven nations won't try to reach consensus on a joint communique at next week's leaders summit in Canada, people familiar with the matter said, an acknowledgment of the wide gulf that separates the US from the other members on Ukraine, climate change and other issues. In place of a single document, G-7 leaders are likely to release standalone joint leaders' statements on various topics, according to the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations.
