Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case appeal decision expected this morning
Australian special forces veteran Ben Roberts-Smith is today expected to learn if his appeal against a multi-million-dollar defamation loss is successful.
A decision in the Federal Court in Sydney is due this morning.
The appeal was heard in February last year after his defamation case against three Nine-owned newspapers was dismissed.
Mr Roberts-Smith sued over a series of articles five years earlier on allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying and domestic violence against a woman in Canberra.
The Federal Court found the publisher had proven four allegations of unlawful killings in Afghanistan were substantially true to the civil standard, along with allegations of bullying.
While the alleged domestic violence was found to be not sufficiently supported by evidence, the court found any reputational harm fell away in the context of the overall decision.
The defamation case was estimated to have cost upwards of $25 million and lasted more than 100 days.
In the appeal, Mr Roberts-Smith's legal team argued Justice Anthony Besanko made several legal errors, including incomplete fact finding, insufficient reasoning and arbitrary conclusions about witness reliability.
In a broad challenge to the judgement, they argued the evidence at trial fell short of the level of cogency required to support such serious allegations.
In late March, they began an eleventh-hour bid to add a further ground of appeal by arguing there was a miscarriage of justice in the original trial, after they were anonymously emailed a conversation recorded in secret of investigative journalist Nick McKenzie speaking to a witness in 2021.
Mr Roberts-Smith's counsel Arthur Moses SC told the court McKenzie had made a "series of damning and unambiguous admissions" during the conversation.
"It reflects a real-time understanding by Mr McKenzie that what he was doing — receiving and using information about the appellant's legal strategy from individuals who had unauthorised access to his private email account — was professionally improper and ethically indefensible," he said.
He alleged the journalist had received details of Mr Roberts-Smith's confidential legal strategy from the veteran's ex-wife and her friend, which McKenzie denied under cross-examination.
"Getting information about your opponent's confidential legal strategy would be a serious breach of your ethics as a journalist, correct?" the barrister asked.
McKenzie replied: "I accept that getting legally privileged information would be wrong. I do not accept I ever got legally privileged information."
A Nine spokesperson said the claims of miscarriage were "baseless" and were a "continuation of the sustained campaign of mistruths peddled" by Mr Roberts-Smith and his backers.
"Nine has full confidence in the reporting and actions of Nick McKenzie," they said in March.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
23 minutes ago
- News.com.au
NSW Premier Chris Minns tells business leaders Sydney ‘without a future' if new housing isn't delivered
NSW Premier Chris Minns has told business leaders Sydney will be left 'without a future' if the state government cannot deliver more housing, after a first-of-its-kind mini-city was voted down last month. The Australian Turf Club voted to reject a $5bn plan to redevelop the historic Rosehill racecourse, replete with 25,000 new homes and a metro station, which would have secured the racing club for '100 years'. Addressing more than 100 business leaders at the Shangri-La hotel on Tuesday, Mr Minns said despite the advancements made to the liveability of Sydney, 'we still lose twice as many people as we get'. 'Housing persistently is our biggest challenge, not just in the economy but in terms of intergenerational fairness and equity and giving young people an opportunity,' Mr Minns said. 'We are losing twice as many young people as we gain every single year, and that's even taking into consideration the fact that we are the largest city for inbound migration from any jurisdiction in the country. 'A city without young people is a city without a future, and the leading reason for that is we're not building enough houses.' On any 'Plan B' following the failed Rosehill vote, Mr Minns remained mum. 'But we we've got specific plans ahead,' he said. 'We're looking forward to talking them through when we're ready to talk about them.' He noted the need for more in-fill development, and housing along train lines. Mr Minns said NSW was 'not even building enough houses in comparison to other states on the eastern seaboard', and said the government was poised to address planning laws – but, with one key hitch. He said planning was 'next cab off the rank' after workers comp reforms are passed. The state government's workers compensation reforms faced a major hurdle last week when, despite pleas to have the legislation passed before June 30, the Opposition and the Greens teamed up to send it back for an inquiry. The Opposition, along with the unions and some industry leaders, claim the reforms, while badly needed, would leave many of the most vulnerable workers without help due to changes to the WPI threshold. The WPI, or whole person impairment, would be raised to 31 per cent for a psychological injury under the planned workers compensation bill, which detractors say will leave the most injured workers at risk. Mr Minns noted in his address the 'weird coalition between the Greens, the Liberal Party and the National Party' who had opposed the proposed reforms, and called for urgent action ahead of the state budget. 'It's not my style to make these speeches or events like this political … but, the decision of the Liberals and Nationals is not the right one. It was the wrong one,' Mr Minns said. 'We're not trying to smash the system into pieces. We believe we're trying to save the system. It's crucial for business in NSW and absolutely crucial for all of us. Business NSW president Joseph Carrozzi AM mirrored some of those sentiments. 'In recent times, we've seen reforms proposed by the government that business is badly needing. 'We need that categorically and it's a real shame that the Bill seems to, at the moment, be resisted by the Greens and by the Coalition … We hope that the Coalition will support and not frustrate this reform. 'The reform, which we believe is a bold but necessary reform ... must be supported.' Mr Carrozi urged for 'practical reform' that happens when 'officials meet in the middle and chart the way forward', and noted the continued impact business and the NSW community faced from natural disasters. Treasurer Daniel Moohkey said businesses were dealing with more disasters, and highlighted the need to address the Emergency Services levy and insurance premiums businesses were facing from disasters. With the budget on the horizon, Mr Moohkey on Tuesday made his pitch to the business community. 'This budget will be about growth,' he said. 'It will be about making sure we rebuild our essential services. It will be making sure that this government has the right settings in place for you to make decisions in your own businesses.' During his address, Mr Minns acknowledged the work of the previous Berejiklian government, specifically the 15 new Metro stations approved under the then-Coalition government, and said more were on the way.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
A third of cases involving use of force by ACT police were escalated by officers, ombudsman finds
A third of cases involving the use of force by police in the ACT involved situations being unnecessarily escalated by the "unprofessional behaviour" of officers, a report has found. The ACT Ombudsman analysed more than 6,200 use-of-force reports and 200 clips of body-worn camera vision and CCTV recorded between January 2019 and December 2023. Officers drew, aimed or discharged a taser more than 1,600 times during that period. A firearm was used in almost 320 incidents, and a baton was used almost 260 times. Ombudsman Iain Anderson said the investigation had uncovered cases where the police response had "unnecessarily inflamed situations", resulting in poor outcomes. "While we have seen some excellent conduct by officers, handling difficult interactions with care and respect, we are concerned at the unprofessional conduct, offensive and abusive language, and unnecessary aggression displayed by some officers, the seniority of whom does not appear to have been a determining factor," he said in the report. Mr Anderson said while force was sometimes necessary to uphold safety, misusing it eroded community trust. "It also has the potential to disproportionately impact vulnerable members of the ACT community, including young people, First Nations people and those experiencing mental health challenges," he said. About 17 per cent of use-of-force cases involved a mental health incident and 10 per cent involved an intoxicated person. Police officers reported experiencing injuries in 21 per cent of confrontations, ranging from minor injuries, like bruises or scratches, to major injuries including serious head knocks or broken bones. In one case highlighted by the ombudsman, police stopped a suspected drink driver, threw him to the ground, handcuffed him and left him face down in the gutter. The matter was heard in the ACT Magistrates Court in 2022, where Magistrate James Lawton took aim at the officers' unlawful use of force. "Removing the defendant from his car without giving him opportunity to comply and then throwing him to the ground were outrageous," he said. "The actions of these officers [were] deplorable and should be denounced. "A strong message must be sent that this behaviour will not be tolerated." In another case criticised by the ombudsman, police arrested a heavily intoxicated 16-year-old boy who had fallen off a bench with his pants tangled around his ankles. The teenager had sworn repeatedly at police but had not displayed physical aggression before he was grabbed, rolled over and handcuffed, the report found. As the situation escalated, the boy spat at police and was pepper sprayed. He was denied his request to have his eyes washed out, with an officer telling him "No! Don't f***ing spit at us, c***." The ombudsman made 13 recommendations to improve the use of force in the ACT. They include better equipping officers to engage with intoxicated people and those experiencing a mental health crisis. The Ombudsman has also called for extra safeguards around the way young people are handcuffed. Other recommendations relate to improving the use of body-worn cameras. "By not reliably collecting audio and visual [body-worn camera] evidence, ACT Policing is failing to comply with the law and undermining the legislative intent of promoting accountability and protecting the safety of both police officers and members of the community," the ombudsman's report said. ACT Policing has fully accepted two of the report's recommendations, partially accepted eight and not accepted three. In a letter of response to the ombudsman, ACT Chief Police Officer Scott Lee said the investigation overlooked the many times officers were able to de-escalate situations without needing to use force. He said in most cases, force is used reasonably and proportionately. "Where you identified officer conduct lacking and not appropriately dealt with, I would like to assure you that ACT Policing members are held to account." Deputy Commissioner Lee said behaviour in the report would be reviewed, noting several cases had already been referred to the Professional Standards Unit. Sanctions for officers found to have engaged in misconduct range from verbal counselling to criminal charges. In September 2024, ACT Policing announced the establishment of an Operations Safety Practices Committee, to "further enhance rigour around the use of force by members".
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Department of Justice investigation into public servant's hiring of 17yo relative deemed 'inadequate'
An investigation into allegations a senior public servant hired a family member and allowed them to skip the queue for government-funded housing was "wholly inadequate", according to the man tasked with overseeing WA's corruption watchdog. In an episode that raised questions about how serious corruption and misconduct allegations are handled in the state, the employee's teenage relative was given a three-bedroom home in regional WA, seemingly bypassing a waiting list. But, as outlined in the report tabled in parliament by the Parliamentary Inspector of the Corruption and Crime Commission Matthew Zilko, those allegations were "simply never investigated" and so no-one involved had been subject to a finding of serious misconduct. The report said the allegation of wrongdoing first came to light from an anonymous report in July 2023, which said a "very senior public servant on a regional placement" within Department of Justice, had appointed a 17-year-old family member "to an administrative position without declaring a conflict of interest". Neither the public servant nor their relative was identified in the report. That initial three-month appointment was extended twice before the recent high school graduate was made permanent, according to the report. The Corruption and Crime Commission (CCC) was notified and formed a "reasonable suspicion of serious misconduct", Mr Zilko said, but allowed the department to investigate the allegation itself because it said it had already begun its own investigation. But Mr Zilko said once that probe was completed, it was so substandard it suggested the Justice Department had "insufficient regard" for its legal obligations. In part that was because the department's investigation also uncovered that the public servant had allocated the relative a three-bedroom government-funded home which "was ordinarily reserved for families", seemingly skipping a waiting list for that housing, according to the report. Despite those allegations, Mr Zilko's report said the department's investigation was "limited" because it treated the issue as a "disciplinary matter" focused only on the public servant not declaring a conflict of interest. "Most damningly, whether through inexperience, incompetence or obtuseness, the department never addressed the allegation that [the public servant] had acted corruptly," he wrote. Shadow Corrective Services Minister Adam Hort said the department's actions did not pass the pub test. "These are such serious allegations that the community would expect that at the very least there would be a thorough investigation, if not significant consequences for the person at the end of that investigation," he said. The Justice department declined to comment on whether the senior employee was still employed by the department or if their relative remained in the government house. In response to the parliamentary inspector, Justice Director General Kylie Maj conceded "the investigation wasn't conducted as well as it might have been", according to the report, but declined to reopen the case because of the department's interpretation of public sector rules. Ms Maj said she was convinced improvements underway to the department's internal disciplinary process meant "if a similar situation were to arise in the future, the investigation would be handled in a much more satisfactory manner", the report notes. "That is reassuring, of course, but it does not address the current problem of [the senior employee's] behaviour not being properly investigated and [their relative] remaining in accommodation subsidised by the taxpayer which was intended for families on the housing waiting list." A Justice department spokesperson did not answer a question about what changes had been made, only saying it takes allegations of misconduct "seriously" and it was confident future investigations would be handled appropriately. A spokesperson for the Public Sector Commission, which is responsible for misconduct prevention and education, said the commission had accepted the inspector's recommendation to write to the heads of all government authorities "reminding them of their obligations … and the importance of ensuring allegations of misconduct are investigated properly". Corrective Services Minister Paul Papalia said he had "requested the department provide ongoing updates regarding implementation" of changes made to address the issues raised in the report. The situation also raised questions about how the CCC handled allegations which warranted investigation, but which it does not have capacity for. The parliamentary inspector said the issue had been a "longstanding concern" because the legislation only worked if government departments took their obligations "seriously". "Unfortunately, this is not always the case," he wrote. In this instance, he criticised the watchdog for not stepping in and overruling the department's decision. "The commissioner advised that, having weighed current investigative workloads, resourcing constraints and the strategic prioritisation of serious misconduct allegations, he had decided not to investigate this allegation," Mr Zilko wrote. "I accept that the commission's resources are not limitless, and it is generally entitled to determine its own priorities. "Nevertheless, the department's abject failure to investigate the allegation referred to it still troubled me." That failure also troubled the Shadow Attorney-General, Nick Goiran, who echoed the parliamentary inspector's recommendations. "If the CCC were doing the job the way that they should be, it wouldn't come to this," he said. "But in the absence of them doing that, in the absence of them then changing their approach after it's been drawn to their attention, what else can the parliamentary inspector do but publish a report like this and say we then need to beef up the legislation?" He called on Parliament's Joint Standing Committee on the CCC to consider Mr Zilko's recommendations as its first matter of business. It is understood that committee will meet for the first time next week. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tony Buti said he would "review the report and consider its findings". The Corruption and Crime Commission declined to comment.
