Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case appeal decision expected this morning
Australian special forces veteran Ben Roberts-Smith is today expected to learn if his appeal against a multi-million-dollar defamation loss is successful.
A decision in the Federal Court in Sydney is due this morning.
The appeal was heard in February last year after his defamation case against three Nine-owned newspapers was dismissed.
Mr Roberts-Smith sued over a series of articles five years earlier on allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying and domestic violence against a woman in Canberra.
The Federal Court found the publisher had proven four allegations of unlawful killings in Afghanistan were substantially true to the civil standard, along with allegations of bullying.
While the alleged domestic violence was found to be not sufficiently supported by evidence, the court found any reputational harm fell away in the context of the overall decision.
The defamation case was estimated to have cost upwards of $25 million and lasted more than 100 days.
In the appeal, Mr Roberts-Smith's legal team argued Justice Anthony Besanko made several legal errors, including incomplete fact finding, insufficient reasoning and arbitrary conclusions about witness reliability.
In a broad challenge to the judgement, they argued the evidence at trial fell short of the level of cogency required to support such serious allegations.
In late March, they began an eleventh-hour bid to add a further ground of appeal by arguing there was a miscarriage of justice in the original trial, after they were anonymously emailed a conversation recorded in secret of investigative journalist Nick McKenzie speaking to a witness in 2021.
Mr Roberts-Smith's counsel Arthur Moses SC told the court McKenzie had made a "series of damning and unambiguous admissions" during the conversation.
"It reflects a real-time understanding by Mr McKenzie that what he was doing — receiving and using information about the appellant's legal strategy from individuals who had unauthorised access to his private email account — was professionally improper and ethically indefensible," he said.
He alleged the journalist had received details of Mr Roberts-Smith's confidential legal strategy from the veteran's ex-wife and her friend, which McKenzie denied under cross-examination.
"Getting information about your opponent's confidential legal strategy would be a serious breach of your ethics as a journalist, correct?" the barrister asked.
McKenzie replied: "I accept that getting legally privileged information would be wrong. I do not accept I ever got legally privileged information."
A Nine spokesperson said the claims of miscarriage were "baseless" and were a "continuation of the sustained campaign of mistruths peddled" by Mr Roberts-Smith and his backers.
"Nine has full confidence in the reporting and actions of Nick McKenzie," they said in March.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
Father and son takes on Ironman Australia in Cairns after surviving cycling crash
Six years ago, Brayden and his father Travis McKenzie took his new bike out for its first spin. The pair took their usual 10-kilometre route around West Beach in Adelaide's western suburbs, but their ride took a tragic turn when an out-of-control van headed towards them. The driver of the van had experienced a medical episode, causing him to lose control. The van hit a pedestrian first, 44-year-old Muhammad Iqbal, who later died from the impact. Moments later, the van swerved to the other side of the road and collided with Brayden and his father, whose quick thinking saved his life. Travis also recalled the moment his fatherly instincts took over to care for his son, despite multiple broken bones in his body. "It all sort of happened in slowmo, so I can still see it as clear as day," Travis said. "Just heard the thud of the other pedestrian getting hit and the van coming towards us. "Then that thud of it hitting it and then sort of trying to pull yourself up to see what's going on and where Brayden was and getting myself across to him and evaluating sort of your own injuries, but I couldn't feel anything until I knew the sort of care for him." While they survived the crash, they sustained serious injuries. Brayden took six months off school with a fractured pelvis, concussion and extensive abrasions on the right side of his body. Travis took the brunt of the impact, requiring him to take 12 months off work. He underwent four operations on his back and his leg which was broken in four places. Brayden is grateful for his father's protection. "It changes your perspective, even just sitting in the car as you drive, riding on the road now six years on, it still crosses your mind." The accident marked the start of a journey of sorts for the pair. On the day they were both released from separate hospitals, Travis and Brayden made a secret pact — as soon as Brayden was old enough, they would take on the mammoth challenge of a full Ironman triathlon. "It's a commitment we made together to see through to the end," Travis said. "It gave us steps and challenges that we needed to get us where we need to. "It's given us a good six years to get to where we are, I guess to get through the trauma, the emotion, and just the physical strength to get to that start line together." Six years on from the accident and just 30 days after his 18th birthday, Brayden is now eligible to compete, making him the youngest participant for this weekend's Ironman Australia Triathlon in Cairns. The pair feel confident they can take on the challenge consisting of a 3.8 kilometre swim, 180km bike course and a complete 42.2km marathon. Travis had previously competed in eight Ironman events, but this will be his first since the accident. Preparations for the competition have intertwined with their recovery to overcome significant emotional and physical trauma, a process Brayden said has brought him closer to his dad. "Our relationship is really close, but this will definitely bring us even closer, the solid blocks of training we've put in together, long hours together has definitely brought us even closer," he said. Becoming Ironmen has been no small feat, with the extent of their injuries and the emotional toll taking 12 months before Brayden got back on the saddle and for Travis 18. For the father and son, it was never a question of if but when they would get back on the bike. "It's a passion of mine, it's a passion of dad's. I live and breathe it now. So it means the world to me," Brayden said. But it didn't come without its challenges. The pair hope their story will inspire others and spread a strong message on road safety. Brayden will take a week off school to travel to Cairns with his dad and their family, marking a very special milestone for a long road to recovery. "This is a goal in the distance that we've finally made it to so, it's nothing is too far on the horizon it's just taking it one day at a time and embracing the journey we're on," Brayden said. Travis agrees: "Anything is possible if you put your mind to it."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Man accused of killing GP Ashley Gordon pleads not guilty to murder
A beloved Box Hill GP who was allegedly murdered after four boys broke into his Doncaster home died from a 10.8 centimetre stab wound through his chest, a jury in the murder trial has heard. Ashley Gordon, 33, was asleep in his home in January last year, when a group of boys broke in twice. They had been at a party nearby. The first time, two of them broke in. According to the first witness to give evidence in a Victorian Supreme Court trial on Thursday, who cannot be named, four of them took off their shoes and pulled on masks and balaclavas before returning to Dr Gordon's townhouse. The witness told the court they slid under the garage door before creeping into the house, looking for keys to the young doctor's Mercedes. In the dark, they heard him say "hello boys" and ran. Dr Gordon chased them on foot, before returning for his black Mercedes AMG. After alerting his flatmate, Dr Gordon drove his car through nearby streets until he found them. The prosecution alleges Dr Gordon tried to restrain a boy, who was a child at the time, when the boy stabbed him six times and slashed him five. The court heard a 10.8cm stab wound through Dr Gordon's chest punctured his aorta, heart and lung, which killed him. The prosecution alleges the boy was carrying a brown and silver flick knife with a blade as long as a pen. The boy accused of the stabbing and the other boys involved can not be named because they were children at the time. In her opening statement, Prosecutor Kristie Churchill told the court the boys fled, leaving him lying lifeless on the ground. Ms Churchill told jurors they would hear evidence about what the accused boy allegedly said to his friends in the hours after. "Shit, just killed a guy, like he's dead bro," Ms Churchill said. "The first two times I stabbed him, I didn't really realise that it was actually going in and I was killing him, but after the next two or three times is when I realised what's actually going on." The court heard the boys then returned to the house where most of the party guests were asleep. "I fully yinged him bro like five times, like he's dead, full dead bro, ying," the accused boy allegedly told a friend. The court heard the term "ying" was slang for stab. Ms Churchill told the jury the prosecution alleged the boys had taken the clothes they had been wearing during the incident to an underpass, burnt them and filmed the act. The court heard it would be alleged that in the days after, they hid in an apartment in Windsor and discussed fleeing the country before being arrested. The boy who allegedly stabbed Dr Gordon has pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated burglary and not guilty to murder. Defence barrister Amelia Beech told the jury to keep a "genuinely open mind", acknowledging community sentiment surrounding youth crime, labelling it as "political fodder". "Your task here is an intellectual one, it's not about sympathy or prejudice, it's a task of the mind, not a task of the heart," Ms Beech said. "This case is not about youth crime generally, this is not about law reform. "You cannot right the wrongs of the youths of Victoria here in this room, in this case. "You can't send a message to the attorney-general or the premier here in this courtroom. "This case is what happened between Ashley Gordon and [the accused] at 5.27am on 13 January last year. "Nothing more, nothing less." The trial continues.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Prisoner takes fight to freeze her eggs to Queensland's highest court
A Queensland prisoner has taken her fight to have her eggs frozen while in custody to the state's highest court. Rachel Smith is currently serving a 10-year sentence after being convicted of drug trafficking and will be eligible for parole in 2029. In 2024, when Smith was aged 33, she attempted to apply to the chief executive of Queensland Corrective Services (QCS) to undergo a privately funded Oocyte cryopreservation procedure. Her application was unable to be considered based on QCS legislation which bans prisoners from applying for access to medical treatments involving "assisted reproductive technology". Last year, Smith tried and failed to have that decision overturned in the Supreme Court and has now brought her challenge before the Court of Appeal. This week, lawyers for Smith argued the Supreme Court judge who upheld the chief executive's decision had made an error in law when interpreting the QCS legislation. Paula Morreau told the court egg freezing does not fall under the "ordinary meaning" of "assisted reproductive technology" because the procedure alone cannot cause reproduction. Although pregnancy is Smith's "ultimate aim", as she intends to have her frozen eggs fertilised and implanted after she leaves prison, Ms Morreau said this is only "a possibility". In a judicial review decision published in November, Smith submitted egg freezing was merely a "preparatory" activity, which could later lead to other processes "which involve conception". "[Smith] submitted the ordinary meaning of the phrase is the application of technology at a point where reproduction can occur by its implementation, such as in vitro fertilisation or artificial insemination", the judgement said. "On Ms Smith's case, it is only those later processes which constitute 'assisted reproductive technology'." However, Justice Tom Sullivan rejected this argument, and determined the process involved the use of various technology "solely for the purpose of assisting in reproduction". He said this was because it includes multiple drug administrations, daily medical examinations, blood tests, ultrasounds, and the egg extraction, which is performed under sedation. "[Egg freezing procedures] are one in a series of sequential, technological steps required for the potential birth of a child," he said in the judgement. Smith also tried to argue her human rights were being breached. She submitted the section of the Human Rights Act — which states "all statutory provisions must, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, be interpreted in a way that is compatible with human rights" — was not considered by the chief executive. This included her right to have access to health services "without discrimination" and to be "treated with humanity and respect for the inherent dignity of the human process" while incarcerated. Justice Sullivan also rejected this argument, finding a consideration of this part of the legislation "does not lead to a different result". "The decision of the chief executive was correct in law and the application should be dismissed," he said in the judgement. The Court of Appeal decision on whether Justice Sullivan's ruling was lawful has been reserved.
