Nesbitt to implement GP contract already rejected by doctors
Mr Nesbitt told the Northern Ireland Assembly he is not 'looking for a fight', but said he will not make promises he cannot keep or 'agree to demands that the budget cannot possibly satisfy'.
Dr Frances O'Hagan, chairwoman of the British Medical Association (BMA) Northern Ireland GP committee, said it is an 'understatement' to say members are 'shocked and angry' by the move.
She said they will now consult on next steps.
The minister has offered a package of £9.5 million in additional core funding for services for GPs.
But last week the BMA said 99.6% of GPs who took part in a referendum voted to reject the 2025/26 General Medical Services (GMS) contract offered by the Department of Health.
Delivering a statement to the Northern Ireland Assembly on Monday, Mr Nesbitt said he questioned the 'wisdom of tabling unachievable demands, at a time when the budgetary pressures are at an all-time high'.
He added: 'I also have to respectfully wonder what they hope to achieve by treating an ally of primary care as an adversary.
'All, of course, is fair in love, war and funding bids. But these tactics make absolutely no sense to me.'
Mr Nesbitt said the BMA has asked for an extra £80 million, but told MLAs this would be used to deliver 'more of the same'.
The minister said he wants to see 'concrete proposals' from the BMA around access to GP surgeries.
'Of course, we still have many exceptional GP practices, but, from the messages we receive directly from patients, I can see that some are still having to phone hundreds of times in the hope of securing an appointment to see their GP,' he said.
'That's not sustainable.'
Mr Nesbitt said he remains '100% committed' to dialogue with the BMA.
But he added: 'There is nothing to be gained from further contract negotiations, which would only offer false hope that a better offer might be forthcoming. It will not.
'We are at the end point for this year.
'I have therefore taken the decision to go ahead and implement the contract on offer.
'I do so mindful of the pressure GPs are facing in relation to national insurance bills and the long-standing concerns about indemnity cover.
'I want the funding I have been able to earmark for these areas to be released and to provide immediate assistance.
'Further delay will help no-one.
'Of course, as always, I will continue to engage closely with the BMA and GPs moving forward.
'My door is always open for genuine engagement and discussions.'
We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity.
Please review your details and accept them to load the content
Dr O'Hagan said: 'This is the first time a sitting health minister in Northern Ireland has chosen to impose the GMS contract on GPs, so to say we are shocked and angry at this decision would be an understatement.
'We have been warning for well over a decade now that general practice cannot continue in the way it has been – trying to meet increasing demand with fewer GPs and insufficient resource, leading to collapse by contract hand-backs and closure.
'Rather than trying to address this imbalance, the minister seems content with the status quo to continue.
'All GPs want to do is deliver a service to their patients that meets their needs.
'The funding we require would not only do that, but it would also provide the level of access they deserve and we want to give.
'The contract being imposed by the minister will not allow us to do that.'
She added: 'The results of our referendum were extremely clear – 99.6% of GPs do not think the contract offer that is now being imposed is enough to stabilise or save general practice in Northern Ireland.
'We will now consult with our members to decide the next steps.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Warning of mass exodus of Northern Ireland GPs to private sector
A GP who wrote a scathing letter to Northern Ireland's health minister accusing him of "complete disrespect" for general practice has said those working in the sector are at their "wits' end".Dr John Diamond, who has served his community in Magherafelt for 25 years, says GPs are angry about chronic underfunding and unsafe his letter to Health Minister Mike Nesbitt, he warned of an exodus from the NHS to private Department of Health said the minister "remains open to discussion as to how best to secure the future of general practice so that it can remain a central part of primary care services now and in the future". Two weeks ago Nesbitt imposed a disputed funding package that was overwhelmingly rejected by said a package of £9.5m additional funding was offered to GPs and said he was "disappointed" the BMA negotiators recommended to their members that they reject the offer.A total of 99.6% of GPs who took part in the referendum voted to reject the Diamond, who is based at Garden Street Surgery in Magherafelt and Bellaghy Medical Centre, said "when general practice goes, the NHS goes"."There are now three tiers of patients in Northern Ireland: the people who have plenty of money who can afford to pay, the people who have insurance and everybody else. "Most people fit into the everybody else category."Every day in life I am saying to people I will send them off and they will be seen in six, seven, eight years, in some cases, and sometimes never."I know I will be looking after them for years on end while they never get their treatment."I appreciate that waiting lists are a problem, but they are a symptom of a system of a failing system."He said decisions "that haven't been made properly by our politicians" are to blame. GP taking 4,000 phone calls a week Dr Diamond said GPs do more than 90% of all consultations on the NHS. "Up to two years ago, it was 5.4% of the budget, it's probably less than 5% of the budget [now]."He added: "I would argue that if you compare the funding that we get in our region compared to others in these islands, we are very much the poor relation by a long way."Most developed countries would say you should be spending at least 10% of your budget within general practice within primary care and we are far, far from that."Dr Diamond said there are between 3,500 and 4,000 phone calls to and from his surgery on an average week, before they even see a doctor said he is in the latter years of his career within general practice and had envisaged he would see it out in the NHS."But the youngsters coming through are not accepting that," he said. "They don't want 20 years of a constant battle to get anything done. They want a system that works better for them and better for their patients."For sure, they are plotting what we can do next."He said he would like the minister to "sit down properly with our representatives and have a discussion about the needs that general practice has and respect those needs rather than just dismiss us". 'Matter of regret' In a statement, the department said it was "a matter of regret" it had not been able to reach agreement in relation to the 2025/26 GMS (General Medical Services) contract. It said the minister stated on 19 May that "he remains open to discussion as to how best to secure the future of general practice."The £9.5m associated with the 2025/26 GMS contract represents additional investment in core GP services, with no 'strings' attached in terms of additional workload, or no requirement for additional patient consultations," it said."Total investment in GP services this year will be more than £414m. "Given the extreme budgetary challenges facing the department, however, the minister has made clear to the BMA that the £9.5m contract offer, which will provide support directly to GP practices in Northern Ireland, was the best and final offer for 2025/26."It added: "The department and minister remain committed to the principle that GP services should remain free to all patients at the point of access and do not agree that the privatisation is the way forward for GPs."
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Physician associates to be renamed
Physician associates are to be renamed by the NHS to clarify their role as doctors' assistants following widespread public confusion. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, ordered a review into the role following a series of patient safety incidents involving physician associates (PAs), which included the deaths of people who thought they had been treated by a doctor. Prof Gillian Leng, the president of the Royal Society of Medicine, is yet to write her report but it is understood changing the PA title will be a key recommendation when it is finalised later this month. Doctors have been raising concerns about the growing number of PAs in the workforce for a number of years with around 3,500 currently employed and the NHS planning to treble this within the decade. Unlike doctors, PAs have no medical degree and must only undergo a two-year postgraduate course following a non-medical undergraduate degree. They are paid more than resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – at the beginning of their careers, which has been a key argument from the British Medical Association (BMA) as they reballot members on strike action over pay. Mr Streeting is expected to accept Prof Leng's recommendation for a title change, with it likely to revert to a 'physician assistant', which is what the role was called when it first emerged more than 20 years ago and more accurately describes the job of assisting doctors. Mistaken identity The Telegraph has revealed a series of scandals involving PAs either causing patient harm, acting beyond what they are qualified to do or being used in place of doctors. Earlier this year, a dossier of more than 600 incidents compiled by the BMA revealed egregious examples of PAs and anaesthetist associates (AAs) misdiagnosing cancer, impersonating doctors and illegally prescribing medication and ordering scans. PAs have also been implicated in several high-profile patient deaths. Emily Chesterton, a 30-year-old actress, died in 2022 after she was misdiagnosed twice by a PA whom she thought was a GP. She was told she had an ankle sprain when she had a blood clot that later travelled from her leg to her lung and killed her. Her parents recently began a legal challenge against the General Medical Council, which regulates doctors and now associates, alongside a group called Anaesthetists United. Earlier this year, a coroner said the PA who diagnosed Pamela Marking with a nosebleed, before she died aged 77 at East Surrey Hospital in 2024, 'had a lack of understanding of the significance of abdominal pain and vomiting, and had undertaken an incomplete abdominal examination'. A Department of Health and Social Care source told the Guardian: 'It's clear there's a legitimate problem of patients not knowing who they are seen by, which is their basic right. It is likely the review will make recommendations to address this problem, including changing the titles of PAs.' A spokesman for the department said: 'The Secretary of State asked Professor Gillian Leng to produce an independent review into PAs and AAs that will provide certainty to patients and staff across the NHS. 'We will consider its findings in full once it has been completed.'
Telegraph
5 days ago
- Telegraph
The militant ‘crabs' threatening to bring the NHS to a standstill
A militant group of doctors who use social media to recruit is driving forward strike action by resident doctors. The current co-chairs of the British Medical Association's (BMA) resident doctors' committee are members of DoctorsVote, which professes to be 'a grassroots organisation committed to advocating for the full pay restoration of UK doctors'. The group is prolific on social media, where disgruntled medics unite, often behind pseudonyms, seeking to forge ahead with more strikes designed to further boost their salaries. In spring, junior doctors – now referred to formally as resident doctors – were offered the biggest pay rise in the public sector in a bid to end years-long disruption to the NHS. The average full-time salary for a resident doctor will now be more than £54,000, the Department of Health and Social Care said – but the BMA wants another set of strikes to force another 30 per cent pay hike. The slogan: 'Be a crab, not a scab' is used to enforce picket lines, and now crustaceans can be seen on the social media accounts of advocates. The humble crab is now shorthand for strike approval. Reddit, TikTok, Instagram and X are awash with the group, which makes use of Gen Z memes and trends to promote its message. This, in tandem with a traditional TV and PR campaign, creates a potent propaganda machine. In recent years, the group has come to dominate the BMA. The co-chairs of the BMA resident doctors' committee in 2022-2024 both had roots in DoctorsVote. Their successors, Dr Melissa Ryan, a 45-year-old paediatrician from Nottingham, and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, a 29-year-old surgical trainee from Merseyside, were also elected under the same banner. DoctorsVote won 70 out of 75 seats on regional junior doctor committees across England in 2023. The fresh 30 per cent demand comes on the back of a 22 per cent pay rise that Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, and Sir Keir Starmer prioritised after Labour's landslide election win last year. Now, the Government appears to be paying the price for it negotiation tactics. As one Tory MP told The Telegraph: 'If you roll over so easily then, why would they stop now?' Or, as one anonymous doctor online put it: 'We have them by the balls. Let's squeeze.' Dr Nieuwoudt confessed earlier this week that Mr Streeting's latest offer was 'generous' – but, he said, not generous enough. The BMA sent out a leaflet to the 50,000 members who will vote on whether they are prepared to take strike action and to further the pay dispute. Half need to reply for it to progress. In the leaflet, a section of frequently asked questions includes one in which junior doctors raise concerns that they are now perceived as greedy by their registrars and consultants. They are now cognisant of the reality that they profited the most in recent years compared to other public sector professions, and are worried about how fresh action would look. And, it seems, the public shares their stance and has a diminishing perception of the strike advocates. Gone is the majority support for them to be paid more, replaced by a sense of fatigue that strikes and withdrawal of care are being used to wring out more money from the taxpayer. More people now oppose strikes than support them, a YouGov poll has found – a profound shift from last year, when more than half of people said they supported the strikes. Now, the resident doctors of DoctorsVote want to strike again. Coordination of industrial action with more senior doctors and specialists could hobble the NHS at skeleton staffing akin to Christmas Day levels. The cost to the NHS of 44 days of strike action last year was around £3 billion, according to the NHS Confederation, and this enormous cost is now also being weaponised by the movement. Dr Ryan told The Sunday Times: 'We know how much the strikes last time were disruptive to patient care and the waiting list, but we also know exactly how much they cost the government, and it was more than what it would cost to get to full pay restoration. 'Last time we ended up coordinating some action and it was immensely disruptive for patient care, and we can see that on the horizon for this Government too.'
