Statewide single-use plastic bag ban moves forward in the Legislature
House Bill 392, the Single-Use Plastic Bag Act, proposes establishing a statewide ban on the bags, moving the entire state to join Carlsbad, Las Cruces, Silver City, Santa Fe and Taos in reducing plastic waste. (Photo by Leah Romero / Source NM)
New Mexicans use at least 330 million single-use plastic bags a year, according to the New Mexico Environment Department and the New Mexico Recycling Coalition. These bags are used for 12 minutes on average, but have a life expectancy of 1,000 years.
House Bill 392, the Single-Use Plastic Bag Act, proposes establishing a statewide ban on the bags, moving the entire state to join Carlsbad, Las Cruces, Silver City, Santa Fe and Taos in reducing plastic waste. The bill, carried by Rep. Tara Lujan (D-Santa Fe), passed through the House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee Thursday on a party line vote of 7-4. It will head to the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee next.
'This bill would drastically reduce the amount of litter in the Land of Enchantment by banning single-use plastic bags with some common sense exceptions,' Lujan said the first time the bill was discussed by the House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee on Feb. 20.
The bill would require stores to charge a 10-cent fee per paper bag, with 3 cents going to the store and the rest going to the municipality or county for litter reduction and outreach. Lujan explained to committee members that municipalities have the choice to 'opt into' the program and adopt an ordinance to do so. If they choose not to join, the seven cents per bag will go to the Environment Department for litter reduction programs.
Exceptions to the bag ban include ones used: for takeout food; separating produce for sanitary reasons; prescription drugs; drycleaning and several other situations. HB392 also allows municipalities or the Environment Department to collect fines from a retail establishment if they do not comply. If passed, the bill would go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026.
The fiscal impact report notes that in addition to creating microplastics, plastic bags are considered 'contaminants' by materials recovery facilities. They can shut down facility operations for hours if they get wrapped around sorting equipment and it can be dangerous for workers to remove the bags from machinery. The report estimates facilities could save $3.8 million a year if plastic bags were banned.
Rep. Jonathan Henry (R-Artesia) asked why the Legislature wouldn't allow municipalities or counties to take the time to make their own decision about adopting a plastic bag ban.
'This has been on the table for quite a while, if you will, and communities have had the opportunity to opt in,' Lujan responded. 'We're at a critical place where we need to take the action and that's what this bill delivers.'
Lujan co-sponsored a similar bill in 2023, Senate Bill 243, but it died in committee before it could be discussed on the Senate floor. Albuquerque also established a single-use plastic bag ban in 2020, but the City Council repealed the ban in March 2022, after overriding a veto from Mayor Tim Keller.
Danielle Prokop contributed to the reporting and writing of this article.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
44 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
BP Takeover Would Be a Longshot Due to Size and Complexity, Moelis Bankers Say
The chances that a rival oil company will take over BP Plc are slim right now, even as peers have been running the numbers, because of the firm's size and complexity, said bankers from Moelis & Co. 'We can't identify anybody in the US that would be a buyer,' Moelis Chairman and Global Head of Energy and Clean Technology Stephen Trauber said in an interview in London on Monday. 'We don't really see any others globally that are buyers that view the assets as must-have.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
House takes up DOGE cuts amid Trump-Musk feud fallout
House Republicans this week will vote on codifying billions of dollars of cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), days after the profound — and very public — breakup between President Trump and Elon Musk, the force behind the cost-cutting agency. The $9.4 billion package claws back funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports NPR and PBS, among other areas targeted by DOGE. Some Republicans have expressed reservations with various parts of the bill, raising questions about its fate in the House. Also this week, the House will vote on a bill to classify fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I. Across the Capitol, Senate Republicans are working to finalize changes to the 'big, beautiful bill,' as party leaders aim to send the package to President Trump by July 4. Some committees may begin to roll out text this week. Additionally, a flurry of cabinet secretaries will visit Capitol Hill this week to answer questions about the president's fiscal year 2026 budget request. House Republicans are plowing ahead with their first attempt at codifying DOGE cuts this week, planning a vote on the Rescissions Act of 2025, which would rescind $9.4 billion in federal funding. The House Rules Committee is scheduled to meet on the measure on Tuesday at 2 p.m., tee-ing up the legislation for the week. 'We're gonna codify the DOGE cuts, you'll see that in a series of actions here in the House,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told reporters on Friday. 'We got the first rescissions package this week, we'll be passing it early next week, that DOGE cuts, there'll be more of that to come.' Not all Republicans, however, are on board with the legislation: A handful of lawmakers have voiced concerns with different provisions in the measure, leaving leadership with some work to do before the bill hits the floor. Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), for example, has expressed opposition to clawing back funding for U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR, which was established during the George W. Bush administration. The congressman said leadership has assured him they are not gutting the entire program, but instead cutting 'weird appendages off.' 'I talked to the whip team, I'm on the whip team, I said if it's gonna be cutting all of PEPFAR, I'm a no,' Bacon told reporters on Friday. The effort comes days after the blistering feud between Trump and Musk, which began as a back-and-forth over the party's tax cuts and spending package before quickly turning into a personal fight — severing ties between the world's most powerful man and the richest person on the planet. 'I would assume so, yeah,' Trump told NBC News in an interview on Saturday when asked if he thought his relationship with the brainchild of DOGE was over. Senate Republicans this week are continuing work on the 'big, beautiful bill,' as party leaders push to meet their self-imposed deadline of enacting the package by July 4. Committees are expected to start rolling out text throughout the week as the chamber nears a vote on the sprawling legislation. There are still a number of key debates that must be adjudicated before the package can squeak through. Some conservatives are still pushing for steeper spending cuts, while a cadre of moderates are calling for a less aggressive rollback of green-energy tax credits Democrats approved in 2022. 'The spending cuts are not nearly enough,' Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told 'Fox News Sunday' of the bill. The Kentucky Republican has also expressed opposition to the $4 trillion debt limit increase included in the measure. Perhaps one of the most contentious questions is what to do about the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. Moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states negotiated with their leadership to include a $40,000 SALT deduction cap in the bill — up from the $10,000 deduction cap in current law — a provision they say must remain in-tact to earn their vote when the package returns to the House. Senate Republicans, however, are pushing to lower that number. With zero Republicans representing states that are impacted most by the SALT deduction cap — New York, New Jersey and California — the language is at risk of changing. 'No, and it shouldn't survive,' Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said on 'Fox News Sunday' when asked if he thinks the $40,000 SALT deduction cap survives in the Senate. 'We should not be subsidizing blue state governors' wasteful spending. That's exactly what, if that's in there, then Florida will be paying for…the state government of New York, and that's wrong.' House Republicans in the SALT Caucus are warning that if their deal is tampered with in the Senate, they will not support the package when it returns to the House. 'If the Senate changes the SALT deduction in any way, I will be a no, and I'm not going to buckle on that,' Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said on CNN's 'Inside Politics' on Sunday. 'And I know in speaking to my other colleagues, they will be a no as well.' The House this week is slated to vote on a bill that would permanently categorize fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I in the Controlled Substances Act, classifying the opioid as having high abuse potential that is not allowed to be used medically. The legislation — dubbed the HALT Fentanyl Act — passed the Senate on a bipartisan 84-16 vote in March, sending the measure to the House for consideration. The lower chamber is expected to approve the measure: In February, the House passed its own version of the bill in a bipartisan 312-108 vote. Consideration of the Senate-passed bill in the House this week marks the latest example of Republicans cracking down on the spread and use of fentanyl, which has been a key focus of the GOP-controlled Congress in addition to the Trump White House. 'House Republicans are doing everything in our power to stop fentanyl from claiming more American lives – everyone should support our efforts to halt this deadly crisis,' the office of House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) wrote in its floor lookout. A number of cabinet secretaries are scheduled to appear before committees on both sides of the Capitol this week, as they field questions about their agencies and the White House's budget request for fiscal year 2026. Other hot topics — including Trump deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles, the state of the economy, and the Trump-Musk feud — will likely come up during the hearings. Tuesday, June 10 9:30 a.m.: House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense oversight hearing Witnesses: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Dan Caine 10 a.m.: House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy hearing on the fiscal year 2026 Department of Energy budget 10 a.m.: House Appropriations Subcommittee on Departments of Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies budget hearing on Department of Housing and Urban Development Witness: HUD Secretary Scott Turner Wednesday, June 11 10 a.m.: House Ways and Means Committee hearing with Secretary Scott Bessent Witness: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent 10 a.m.: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Department of Defense hearing to examine proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Defense — Led by Subcommittee Chairman Mitch McConnell (R-Ky._ Witnesses: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Dan Caine 10 a.m.: House Agriculture Hearing for the purpose of receiving testimony from the Honorable Brooke L. Rollins Witness: Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins 10 a.m.: Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing to examine the president's proposed budget request for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of the Interior 3:30 p.m.: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies hearing to examine proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Housing and Urban Development Witness: HUD Secretary Scott Turner 4 p.m.: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government hearing to examine proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of the Treasury Witness: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Thursday, June 12 10 a.m.: House Natural Resources Committee: 'Examining the President's FY 2026 Budget Request for the Department of the Interior' Witness: Interior Secretary Doug Burgum 10 a.m.: House Armed Services Committee hearing on Department of Defense fiscal year 2026 budget request Witnesses: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Dan Caine 10 a.m.: Senate Finance Committee hearing to examine the president's proposed budget request for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Treasury and tax reform Witness: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What's a Medicaid cut? Senate GOP tiptoes around $800B question
When is a Medicaid cut not actually a cut? That's the $800 billion question facing Senate Republicans as they write their own version of the sweeping House-passed tax and spending bill. Administration officials and senators defending against attacks on the bill have coalesced around a message that there will be no cuts to benefits, and the only people who will lose coverage are the ones who never deserved it to begin with: namely immigrants without legal status and 'able-bodied' individuals who shouldn't be on Medicaid. 'This bill will preserve and protect the programs, the social safety net, but it will make it much more commonsense,' Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought said during a recent CNN interview. 'That's what this bill does. No one will lose coverage as a result.' Among many provisions, the House bill would require states to deny Medicaid to people who can't prove they are working, looking for work, in school or volunteering for 80 hours a month. It would prohibit states from using their own money to cover immigrants without legal status and would deny coverage to other lawfully present immigrants who are currently eligible. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the legislation will result in nearly 11 million people losing health insurance coverage over the next decade. The Medicaid provisions alone would result in 7.8 million people losing their insurance. Those coverage losses would equate to hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for the federal government. However, GOP lawmakers and administration officials insist the legislation will protect Medicaid for 'deserving' people such as the elderly and disabled, while forcing others to prove they aren't freeloading. 'It's important for us to provide a nudge to some Americans to remember that they have agency over their future,' Mehmet Oz, the administration's Medicare and Medicaid chief, told reporters on Wednesday, following a closed-door meeting with GOP senators. Later Wednesday in an interview on Fox Business, Oz elaborated. 'Go out there, do entry-level jobs, get into the workforce, prove that you matter. Get agency into your own life,' he said. Republicans are wary about being attacked over health care cuts, and they're eager to reframe the debate and try to go on offense. Voter backlash over the 2017 ObamaCare repeal effort led to widespread GOP losses and cost them control of the House in the 2018 midterms. 'Give me a break, This is just fear-mongering from Democrats,' Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said in a post on the social platform X. 'No one's losing health care—unless you count the 1.4 million illegal immigrants getting Medicaid on your dime.' Most immigrants without legal status can't qualify for Medicaid at the federal level, but some blue states have extended health care coverage to them. The legislation would penalize those states if they continued to offer coverage by lowering their federal matching rate. In a CNBC interview Thursday, Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said the people who lose Medicaid coverage will merely transition to employer-sponsored health care. 'It's not kicking people off Medicaid. It's transitioning from Medicaid to employer-provided health care. So yes, we've got 10 million people that are not going to be on Medicaid, but they then are going to be on employer-provided health care,' Lankford said. Yet according to the CBO, 'few of those disenrolled from Medicaid because of the policy would have access to and enroll in employment-based coverage.' A bloc of Republican senators has been raising concerns about some of the Medicaid provisions, and some have said they do not like the idea of anything that could be interpreted as a cut. But by and large, they've signaled the coverage losses aren't what's troubling. '[We need to] protect the program for the people that really deserve and need the help and need the program, you know, and that's children, disabled, seniors, on and on and on,' said Sen. Jim Justice ( 'That's what we got to do. You know, at the end of the day, we shouldn't be protecting the program for people that are abusing or people that shouldn't be eligible, or whatever.' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has said he worries about the bill's potential impact on rural hospitals and pledged to withhold support from any bill that cuts Medicaid benefits. But what is a benefit cut? 'If my state tells me that, because of legislative changes in the House bill, the Senate bill, we're going to have to cut benefits. That's a benefit cut,' Hawley told The Hill. Missouri has 1.3 million Medicaid beneficiaries, but Hawley said he thinks there would only be a small number impacted by the work requirements. 'I'm fine with people who are able-bodied and not working … I'm all for that. So you know what, cut benefits from illegal aliens. Yeah, I'm fine with that, but I'm concerned about people who are here legally, residents of my state, citizens of my state, who are working and would lose health care coverage,' he said. Hawley has said that President Trump reiterated his opposition against any Medicaid cuts during recent conversations about the 'big, beautiful bill,' though the president supported the House version. Health experts say the impact of the cuts will go far beyond the small slice of the population Republicans claim. Work requirements will likely add layers of red tape for people to prove they meet the threshold. 'The people losing coverage aren't people who aren't working … but they're actually people who should satisfy the work reporting or should qualify for an exemption, but they can't navigate the complex systems for either reporting one's hours for work or other activities,' said Edwin Park, a research professor at the Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy. The legislation includes some exemptions, like for caregiving, but it doesn't specify what would qualify or how beneficiaries would prove they qualify. There's no requirement that states exempt people automatically, Park said, so many people who would be eligible likely wouldn't be enrolled. No matter how Republicans spin it, Park said, 'these are huge Medicaid cuts. They're going to take away coverage from millions of low-income people.' 'And those cuts are going to affect everyone throughout the Medicaid program, not just the expansion group, but also kids, seniors and people with disabilities,' he added. 'And it's going to have big ripple effects throughout the health care system.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
