
'I tried to help him,' girlfriend testifies at Brandon manslaughter trial for alleged drug dealer
The girlfriend of a 30-year-old Brandon man who died in 2020 told a court Tuesday about the last moments of his life, as a manslaughter trial began for the woman accused of selling the drugs he took before his death.
Witness Chrissy Nepinak, 33, told the court hours after she and her boyfriend, Michael Crede, split a gram of MDMA, or ecstasy, on July 25, 2020, he began to shake and foam at the mouth before he ultimately became unresponsive.
"I tried to help him.… I grabbed a sweater from my trunk and then I went back in [the car], and I wiped his mouth," Nepinak told Crown attorney Rich Lonstrup during questioning at Court of King's Bench in Brandon, Man.
"Right after that, he just … stopped shaking and everything, and was just still."
She told the court at the judge-only trial before Justice Elliot Leven that the drugs were purchased from Hailey Lepine, 35.
Lepine, who has pleaded not guilty, is charged with manslaughter, criminal negligence and unlawfully trafficking a controlled substance, with prosecutors alleging she provided the MDMA knowing it to be a dangerous substance, causing Crede's death.
Charges were laid after a year-long investigation, and Lepine's trial has been delayed twice.
'He was already gone'
Court heard Nepinak had known Crede for about a decade. At the time of his death they had been dating for about a year, and it was the second time they had been in a relationship.
Nepinak said they planned to hang out on July 25, 2020, and were looking to use recreational drugs. She testified she messaged Lepine on a social media app and they agreed to meet at a Brandon hotel.
She told court once she secured the MDMA, she went to Crede's home at the Brentwood Trailer Park. They split a gram of the MDMA, as they had done in the past, she said.
After a couple of hours, she decided to get cigarettes and helped Crede walk through his home to her car, because he was unsteady on his feet, she testified.
As soon as they left the trailer park, Crede began having seizures and foaming at the mouth, so she pulled over into the parking lot of a local bowling alley, she said.
"I tried to check for a pulse or something," after stopping, she said.
"I put my head on his chest to see if I could hear anything. But I didn't."
Defence lawyer Andrew Synyshyn asked why Nepinak didn't call 911 or go to the hospital when Crede was clearly having a medical emergency. Nepinak said she never thought of it, and didn't do anything because she believed he was already dead.
"I didn't want to believe it, but I knew he was already gone," Nepinak said.
Cross-examination casts doubt on drug source
During cross-examination, Synyshyn argued it seemed unlikely the drugs had come from Lepine, suggesting instead she got them from her brother.
When Synyshyn asked if he had provided the drugs that killed Crede, denied he had.
The defence lawyer also said no one could place Nepinak with Lepine on the day Crede died, and that the messages Nepinak alleged Lepine sent about selling her drugs were also deleted from Nepinak's phone that morning.
Synyshyn also pointed out that Nepinak didn't immediately provide Lepine's name to the police. She testified she didn't initially want to give police a name, but changed her mind when they told her she could help prevent more deaths by telling them where the drugs came from.
He argued Nepinak supplied Lepine's name to police because she knew either she or the person who sold her the drugs would be in trouble.
"You didn't want to tell police where you got those drugs," Synyshyn said. "You picked a name out of thin air because you didn't want to give them the name of your brother."
Nepinak denied that.
The trial continues Wednesday with testimony from a pathologist, a toxicologist and a police officer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
5 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Don't believe players' cooked-up, ‘parroted' story, Crown says in closing arguments at Hockey Canada trial
LONDON, Ont.—In making her final pitch for convictions at the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial, a Crown attorney repeated the same words the prosecution used in its opening statement nearly eight weeks ago: 'This case may not look the way one anticipates a sexual assault to look.' The central issue in the case is whether the complainant, whose identity is covered by a standard publication ban, consented to sexual activity with Alex Formenton, Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote, all members of the 2018 Canadian world junior championship team, in a room at the Delta Armouries hotel in the early hours of June 19, 2018, when she was 20 years old.


Calgary Herald
10 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Edmonton police officer who repeatedly struck arrestee with baton found not guilty
An Edmonton police officer caught on video hitting a man with his baton has been acquitted of assault. Article content Jurors on Wednesday returned to the courtroom after nine hours of deliberation and found Const. Alexander Doduk not guilty of two counts of assault for his arrest of construction worker Justin LaFrance near the Edmonton courthouse on a snowy morning in 2019. Article content Article content Article content LaFrance claimed Doduk attacked him as he tried to talk to a man suspected of breaking a window, while Doduk said LaFrance resisted arrest, including by grabbing at his duty belt. Article content Article content The chaotic arrest — during which Doduk hit and punched LaFrance before striking him repeatedly with his baton — was captured on security cameras at the nearby Royal Alberta Museum. The cameras did not record sound, leading to competing claims from Crown and defence about what LaFrance and Doduk said before and during the arrest. Article content As a rule, jurors do not explain how they arrived at their verdict, but the outcome indicates they believed the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Doduk used excessive force. Article content Jurors did not hear other details about Doduk's career — including his role in the death of Steven Nguyen, an unarmed man who died after Doduk shot him four times in 2021. The shooting was investigated by the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT), which concluded there were grounds to believe Doduk committed a 'culpable homicide.' The Alberta Crown Prosecution Service, however, declined to proceed with charges, saying it could not prove Doduk's actions were 'unreasonable' under the Criminal Code's police use-of-force provisions. Article content Article content Article content The arrest at the centre of Doduk's trial happened Nov. 26, 2019. LaFrance was part of a crew renovating a building across the street from the Edmonton courthouse and told court he heard glass break during his morning site check. He walked out onto 97 Street, flagged down a passerby and asked if he had seen someone break a window. The passerby pointed to a man in dark clothing on the opposite street corner by the museum, LaFrance testified. Article content Article content LaFrance said he waved to Doduk as the officer drove by in his cruiser, and crossed 97 Street diagonally after Doduk flashed his lights to control traffic. He said he caught up with the alleged vandal and calmly asked him to stop until police arrived. Article content Doduk described a different scene. Driving by on his way to the courthouse, Doduk claimed he heard LaFrance screaming threats at the vandalism suspect, then saw him cross the busy road during rush hour. Doduk said he parked his cruiser and went after the two men, worried they would come to blows.

Winnipeg Free Press
11 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Charges stayed in sextortion case against Winnipeg man
Prosecutors have stayed charges against a Winnipeg man accused of blackmailing men and boys in several provinces in a so-called 'sextortion' scheme after the alleged victims said they couldn't bring themselves to testify. Tongun Justin Tongun, who was 21 when he was charged by Winnipeg police with 10 counts of extortion in 2023, was accused of soliciting images from males on the internet, then threatening to post them online unless the victims sent him money. All 10 counts against Tongun were stayed in May, court records show. 'In preparation for this matter, the Crown contacted a number of victims,' a provincial government spokesman wrote in an email. 'After reviewing the matter and taking into consideration the impact to the victims, their unwillingness to relive the experience by testifying, the Crown determined not to proceed but did seek restitution for all the victims as per their wishes.' The Winnipeg Police Service began investigating Tongun after a man in his 20s came forward with allegations of extortion in February 2023. The victim told investigators he had shared intimate photos with someone online who pretended to be a young woman, before the person demanded cash and threatened to release the pictures. The victim transferred the scammer money, police said at the time. City sex crimes detectives charged Tongun with four counts of extortion that February after locating three more victims in Winnipeg, before later finding another six victims across Canada and filing more charges in June 2023. Police and cybersafety experts call the scams 'sextortion.' The scam typically involves a suspect threatening to distribute intimate or sexual images of a victim after they've gained their trust through 'sexually charged' conversations online, typically through social-media platforms such as Instagram and Snapchat, officials have said. The suspect will usually demand payment. Victims are often male teenagers or young adults who believe they are communicating with a woman. Erik PinderaReporter Erik Pindera is a reporter for the Free Press, mostly focusing on crime and justice. The born-and-bred Winnipegger attended Red River College Polytechnic, wrote for the community newspaper in Kenora, Ont. and reported on television and radio in Winnipeg before joining the Free Press in 2020. Read more about Erik. Every piece of reporting Erik produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.