FEMA staff baffled after head says he is unaware of US hurricane season, sources say
By Leah Douglas, Ted Hesson and Nathan Layne for Reuters
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) building in Washington, DC.
Photo:
AFP / KAYLA BARTKOWSKI
Staff of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) were left baffled after the head of the US disaster agency said he had not been aware the country has a hurricane season, according to four sources familiar with the situation.
The remark was made during a briefing by David Richardson, who has led FEMA since early May. It was not clear to staff whether he meant it literally, as a joke, or in some other context.
The US hurricane season officially began on Sunday and lasts through November. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecast last week that this year's season is expected to bring as many as 10 hurricanes.
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA's parent agency, said the comment was a joke and that FEMA is prepared for hurricane season.
The spokesperson said under Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Richardson "FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens".
Richardson said during the briefing that there would be no changes to the agency's disaster response plans despite having told staff to expect a new plan in May, the sources told Reuters.
Richardson's comments come amid widespread concern that the departures of a raft of top FEMA officials, staff cuts and reductions in hurricane preparations will leave the agency ill-prepared for a storm season forecast to be above normal.
Democrats criticised Richardson following the Reuters report.
Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer posted the Reuters headline about Richardson on X and said he was "unaware of why he hasn't been fired yet".
Representative Bennie Thompson, the senior Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee with oversight of FEMA, issued a statement to Reuters that read:
"Suffice to say, disaster response is no joke. If you don't know what or when hurricane season is, you're not qualified to run FEMA. Get someone knowledgeable in there."
Hurricanes kill dozens of people and cost hundreds of millions of dollars annually across a swath of U.S. states every year. The storms have become increasingly more destructive and costly due to the effects of climate change.
Richardson's comment purporting ignorance about hurricane season spread among agency staff, spurring confusion and reigniting concern about his lack of familiarity with FEMA's operations, said three sources.
Richardson, who has no disaster response experience, said during Monday's briefing, a daily all-hands meeting held by phone and videoconference, that he will not be issuing a new disaster plan because he does not want to make changes that might counter the FEMA Review Council, the sources said.
President Donald Trump created the council to evaluate FEMA. Its members include DHS head Noem, governors and other officials.
In a 15 May staff town hall, Richardson said a disaster plan, including tabletop exercises, would be ready for review by 23 May.
The back-and-forth on updating the disaster plan and a lack of clear strategic guidance have created confusion for FEMA staff, said one source.
Richardson has evoked his military experience as a former Marine artillery officer in conversations with staff.
Before joining FEMA, he was assistant secretary at DHS' office for countering weapons of mass destruction, which he has told staff he will continue to lead.
Richardson was appointed as the new chief of FEMA last month after his predecessor, Cameron Hamilton, was abruptly fired.
Hamilton had publicly broken with Trump over the future of the agency, but sources told Reuters that Trump allies had already been maneuvering to oust him because they were unhappy with what they saw as Hamilton's slow-moving effort to restructure FEMA.
Trump has said FEMA should be shrunk or even eliminated, arguing states can take on many of its functions, as part of a wider downsizing of the federal government. About 2000 full-time FEMA staff, one-third of its total, have been terminated or voluntarily left the agency since the start of the Trump administration in January.
Despite Noem's prior comments that she plans to eliminate FEMA, in May she approved Richardson's request to retain more than 2600 short-term disaster response and recovery employees whose terms were set to expire this year, one of the sources said, confirming an earlier report by NBC News.
Those short-term staff make up the highest proportion of FEMA employees, about 40 percent, and are a pillar of the agency's on-the-ground response efforts.
FEMA recently sharply reduced hurricane training and workshops for state and local emergency managers due to travel and speaking restrictions imposed on staff, according to prior Reuters reporting.
- Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
What is Trump's Big Beautiful Bill and why does Elon Musk hate it?
President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 26 March. Photo: Francis Chung/Politico/Getty Images via CNN Newsource A rift is brewing within the US Republican Party as President Donald Trump attempts to muscle his Big, Beautiful Bill through Congress. Billionaire ally and former Department of Government Efficiency spearhead Elon Musk on Tuesday made headlines for his criticism of the proposed act, calling it an "abomination". Here's a look at what is in the bill, and why not all Republicans are backing it. Its full name is the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but it's also shorted to the OBBBA or BBB. In essence, it is a budget reconciliation bill - a tool to fast-track policy around spending, revenue and the debt ceiling. The 1038-page bill rolls together hundreds of proposed changes from tax cuts to changes to social benefits programs. Here's an overview of some of the key changes put forward in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Court restrictions Experts have warned a single sentence in the bill would weaken the powers of federal judges to enforce contempt when the government defies the court. "No court of the United States may enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued," the provision says. According to Reuters, "security" in this case refers to monetary bonds that can be used when injunctions are issued. If the injunction is later reversed, the bond helps cover the defendant's losses. The Trump administration argues the provision would deter frivolous lawsuits, but Democrats argue it would leave judges powerless to rein in defiance. Golden Dome On social media, Trump has claimed the bill would secure funding to develop a network of missile defence systems. The BBB would provide a US$25 billion ($38 billion) initial investment to develop the "golden dome". The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the cost of developing a sophisticated missile defence system could exceed US$500 billion. The bill would also commit US$21 billion to restock the US ammunitions arsenal and US$34 billion to expand its naval fleet. Immigration Trump would revive construction of the wall along the US-Mexico border, which he began during his first term, with a US$46.5 billion injection. The bill would also set aside US$4 billion to hire thousands more Border Patrol and customs officers, and a further US$2.1 billion for signing and retention bonuses. Asylum seekers would be required to pay at least US$1000 on filing an application for asylum. While it would be a first for the US, other nations charge a fee for asylum applications, but the costs are significantly lower - $45 in Australia's case. The debt ceiling The debt ceiling is a limit on the amount of money the federal government can borrow. The BBB would raise it by US$4 trillion to US$40 trillion. Medicaid The bill would introduce additional restrictions on Medicaid, a joint federal and state program that helps cover medical costs for millions of elderly, disabled and low-income earning Americans. That would include a requirement for able-bodied adults with no dependents to work at least 80 hours a month to qualify for benefits, starting December 2026. Recipients would also need to reapply for benefits every six months, rather than every year. Republicans also hope to strip Planned Parenthood of funding from Medicaid. As well as providing abortion care, the organisation offers cancer screenings, pap smears and birth control. No tax on tips, overtime One of Trump's key campaign promises - to end taxes on tips and overtime pay - would be ticked off by the BBB. The bill would also temporarily increase the Social Security income tax deduction of up to US$4000 for recipients aged 65 and over. Snap benefits The One Big Beautiful Bill Act would introduce work requirements to able-bodied recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) who do not have dependents. More than 40 million low-income earners rely on SNAP to boost their grocery budgets and access nutritious food options. The bill would also require states to contribute more to the program, which is partly funded by the federal government. Student loans All existing student loan repayment plans would be replaced with just two classifications: a fixed rate monthly repayment plan over the course of 10 to 25 years, or an income-based "repayment assistance" program. It would scrap current rules that allow borrowers to temporarily defer their loan repayments due to financial hardship or unemployment. Tax cuts for higher earners On average in its first year the BBB would deliver the nation's wealthiest an extra US$389,280 through tax breaks. At the other end of the scale, the lowest income earners will take a US$1035 pay cut. The White House has confirmed that Elon Musk has left President Donald Trump's administration. Photo: AFP Musk has been an outspoken critic of the bill in the past. He argues the bill's spending would increase the "already gigantic budget deficit" and "burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt". The South Africa-born tech investor worked as a consultant for the administration's Department of Government Efficiency until recently , working to slash government spending. He's often noted the US pays more interest on its debts than it spends on defence. Independent analyses have found it will add between US$2.5 trillion and US$3.1 trillion debt to the US budget. Government debt is already roughly 121 per cent of the nation's GDP and has grown exponentially in recent years to exceed US$35 trillion. Government debt is already roughly 121 per cent of the nation's GDP and has grown exponentially in recent years to exceed $US35 trillion. Photo: US Dept of Treasury "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk wrote on social media on Tuesday. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt According to the New York Times, others close to the congressional negotiations have suggested Musk was unhappy with a measure in the bill that would scrap electric vehicle subsidies. House Speaker Mike Johnson acknowledged the change would negatively affect Tesla, but said he did not believe the government should subsidise a transition to electric vehicles. "I know that has an effect on his business, and I lament that," Johnson said. The bill narrowly passed the House of Representatives in May, by a vote of 215-214. It's now with the Senate, where the bill is likely to be held up further, despite the Republican majority. Some senators have already indicated they intend to make changes to the bill, which would send it back to the House of Representatives for another vote. Rand Paul, a GOP senator for Kentucky, said he is "just not open to supporting $5 trillion … debt ceiling increase", which the bill currently includes. If Congress can't even cut $9 billion in foreign aid welfare — a rounding error — the country is doomed. Voters deserve to know who refuses to cut anything while we drown in $1 trillion annual interest payments. In response, Trump took to social media on Tuesday to voice his disapproval of the senator, telling his Truth Social followers Paul "never has any practical or constructive ideas". "His ideas are actually crazy (losers!). The people of Kentucky can't stand him," Trump wrote. In other social media posts, he has urged senators to pass the bill "AS SOON AS POSSIBLE". "There is no time to waste," he posted on May 22. Both the House of Representatives and the Senate will need to sign off on the bill if it gets enough senatorial support. Trump will then have 10 days to sign or veto it. House Speaker Mike Johnson has predicted the bill will be signed by July 4. Given the bill was only passed in the House of Representatives with the finest possible margin of support, even a small loss of support could hold it up indefinitely or kill the bill entirely. Even if Republicans who back the bill manage to get it through the Senate without changes, it's highly possible it won't be signed off. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Photo: AFP / Getty Since the House vote, representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has voiced her regret for supporting the bill, and indicated she would not vote in favour if it returns to the House for approval without changes. In a post on X, the outspoken GOP politician said she was not aware the bill would block states from regulating artificial intelligence industries for a decade. Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years. I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in… "I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there," she said. "This needs to be stripped out in the Senate." - ABC
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Donald Trump bans travel to US from 12 countries, citing security concerns
Trump has signed a proclamation banning travel from 12 countries. Photo: AFP / Andrew Caballero-Reynolds US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday banning the nationals of 12 countries from entering the United States, saying the move was needed to protect against "foreign terrorists" and other security threats. The countries affected are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, will be partially restricted. The travel restrictions were first reported by CBS News. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," Trump said in a video posted on X. He said the list could be revised and new countries could be added. The proclamation is effective on 9 June, 2025 at 12:01am EDT (0401 GMT). Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security and have an inability to verify travelers' identities, inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. "We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States," Trump said. Somalia immediately pledged to work with the US to address security issues. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement. During his first term in office, Trump announced a ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience". Trump's directive is part of an immigration crackdown that he launched at the start of his second term. He previewed his plan in an October 2023 speech, pledging to restrict people from the Gaza Strip, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and "anywhere else that threatens our security". Trump issued an executive order on 20 January requiring intensified security vetting of any foreigners seeking admission to the US to detect national security threats. That order directed several cabinet members to submit a list of countries from which travel should be partly or fully suspended because their "vetting and screening information is so deficient". In March, Reuters reported that the Trump administration was considering travel restrictions on dozens of countries. - Reuters
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Elon Musk's online war with Republicans leaves Donald Trump to wonder if he's created a monster
By Brad Ryan, ABC in Washington Elon Musk has left his position at DOGE, but remains a political player. Photo: AFP / Allison Robbert Analysis -The anger is taking many forms on Elon Musk's X account. Multiple graphs illustrating the growing national debt. A meme showing a microscopic pair of scissors with the words: "Republicans getting ready to reduce the size of government." Even a sword-wielding Uma Thurman from the movie Kill Bill. (Geddit?) It all represents a stunning tburst over Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" just days after Musk's departure from his government cost-cutting gig . But the tweet that Musk has chosen to pin to the top of his feed might be the one that most troubles Trump. It's a repost of another X user's collection of reader comments from the Fox News website. It shows a lot of support for Musk among the network's MAGA-loving audience. One article has attracted almost 8000 comments at time of writing, and it takes a lot of scrolling to find many that don't back Musk. A lot of them purport to be from Trump supporters who have taken Musk's side of this argument. It's by no means a perfect poll, but it could give Trump pause for thought. Musk's anger doesn't just manifest in tweets. His time as Trump's "first buddy" earned him a massive MAGA following. He now has sizeable influence over the Americans that Trump needs most: the Republican voters who didn't just put him back into power, but also handed him vital, and vulnerable, Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Musk justified his controversial work at DOGE with arguments about the need to bring down the national debt. He often pointed to the fact the US pays more interest on its debt than it spends on defence. But he lamented that he couldn't do more to deal with it. DOGE's cruelling and culling of government jobs and departments achieved about $US180 billion in savings, according to its own estimates. That would equate to 9 percent of his early target of $US2 trillion. And those numbers are rubbery and widely viewed with scepticism. Outside fact-checks of DOGE's online "wall of receipts" resulted in reductions to its posted savings claims, and there are disputes over others that remain uncorrected. And a lot of the cuts could still be reversed by the courts, shrinking the savings figure further. Musk insists DOGE's ongoing work, in his absence, means the savings figure will continue to grow. But he recently argued that DOGE was an advisory board rather than "the dictators of the government", so the savings achieved were "proportionate to the support we get from Congress, and from the executive branch of the government in general". Now Congress - at the behest of the executive, i.e. Trump - is considering legislating spending and tax cuts which would undermine all those money-saving efforts. The most recent analysis, from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, found the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would increase budget deficits by $US2.4 trillion over the next decade. It would also increase the debt ceiling, allowing the US to borrow trillions of dollars more than it currently can. Elon Musk in the Oval Office with his son X Æ A-Xii as President Donald Trump signs executive orders in March 2025. Photo: AFP / Jim Watson Trump's support for the bill - which is full of all sorts of MAGA priorities - has been absolute. He's described it as "arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed in the history of our country". His demand that Republicans support it means some apparently did without even reading it. Hard-right Republican and hardcore Trump fan Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted she didn't know what was in it when she voted for it, and voiced regret after discovering it would curb states' power to regulate AI. "Full transparency," she said, "I did not know about this section … I would have voted NO." Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years. I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in… Some of Trump's Republican foot soldiers have been running the line that Musk's anger is just business. House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested it was all about the bill's termination of tax breaks for buyers of electric vehicles. But the angry noise on Musk's X platform has so far not been matched on Trump's Truth Social. At time of writing, he's limited his online response to a somewhat cryptic repost of Musk's tweet announcing his departure from DOGE. He knows a public brawl with Musk is what Democrats have been dreaming about. But he also knows all about the power of money in politics. Musk, the world's richest man, sank hundreds of millions of dollars into getting Trump re-elected. He's threatened in the past to fund challengers to sitting Republicans, including from within the party, if they displease him. He recently said he was looking to rein in his political spending, but added: "If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it." The midterm elections are only 18 months away. All members of the House of Representatives, and a third of the Senate, will face an election battle. Trump wants not only to retain the slim Republican majorities in the House and Senate but also to make sure those Republicans are cooperative with his MAGA agenda. Musk's been pumping up those who aren't - retweeting Republicans who are voting against the Big Beautiful Bill. He could now see a reason to restart political spending, and try to get more of them into Congress and in Trump's way. And even if he doesn't dig into his billions, the Musk-Trump bromance helped build Musk's influence in the MAGA world. It's something Trump may come to regret. - ABC
