I was banned from my father's funeral
As a child I was terrified of my dad dying. He was wild and filled with creative turbulence, but he was my rock. After my parents separated when I was 11, I lived with him in a household that was chaotic and exciting in ways you'd expect in the artistic London of the 1970s. There were lots of girlfriends and I didn't always know where he was or when he'd be home. But we played piano duets and cooked together, attempting the Russian émigré food of his childhood.
Peter Zinovieff was a pioneer in electronic and computer music, and his studio was in our Putney house – apparently the first home with a computer. He worked with rock stars like Pink Floyd, David Bowie, Ringo Starr and Kraftwerk, who used his EMS synthesisers. Contemporary composers like Harrison Birtwistle and Hans Werner Henze were family friends and concocted astonishing pieces using early versions of sampling. Whoever was in the studio that day was invited to lunch.
Later, things went downhill. Money problems and messy relationships were exacerbated by alcohol addiction. But we always remained close. I supported Peter through the worst times and was relieved when he finally settled down, stopped drinking, married for the fourth time, and restarted a creative life that had been dormant for decades. He and his wife came to stay; I went to stay with them. We spoke frequently on the phone. He became a grand old man of electronic music – a nicely unlikely oxymoron.
Then, when my father died in 2021 aged 88, I learnt that his home-made will excluded me, my siblings and anyone but his wife from attending his funeral. The ashes would go in her back garden.
The shock of this rejection was awful. Why would he ban his children? A lack of imagination for our feelings? Or was he protecting his widow from the line-up of ex-wives, lovers, friends and relations – some hurt, some angry – who had also played a part in a long life that was, to put it politely, 'complicated'?
I expected to feel grief for my beloved dad – but not to be devastated by the absence of a funeral. After all, who enjoys a crematorium? Yet I longed to go where his body was, to take part in a ceremony, to wear an item of his clothing, to be with others who mourned him. It was visceral. We are animals who congregate around the dead. Even elephants do it.
But I also realised I was far from the first, or only, person to suffer this way. 'Missing, presumed dead' provokes a hell worse than bereavement for those left waiting. And the Covid lockdowns robbed countless people of the chance to say goodbye. The sick died alone. Funerals became forlorn affairs where hugs were banned. Sterile screens replaced the warmth of drink and food that normally revive mourners after a burial or burning.
Who could forget the image of the tiny, stoic Queen sitting alone at Prince Philip's funeral, obeying the rules?
I asked the celebrated psychotherapist, author and podcaster Julia Samuel (Grief Works and This Too Shall Pass) why we need death rituals. 'Funerals allow people to grieve together and to mark and honour the person they love. But the task is also to face the reality of the loss. The funeral forces you to know that the person is dead, something that needs to be acknowledged by the five senses.
'You see the coffin or the open coffin, you smell the flowers and candles, you hear the music or sing, you taste the food and drink afterwards. You return to these memories later and they help you to root yourself in the reality. If you don't see the person and you have no funeral, it's like with missing soldiers in the First World War – there's a surreal sense that they haven't died. You know it but you don't feel it.'
'Death is the great exposer,' Samuel has written. 'It forces hidden fault lines and submerged secrets into the open.' I witnessed this firsthand.
My siblings and I didn't all grow up together, and each of us has a different story to tell. We'd rarely met as a group – there's only one photo of us all. It's 1992. Peter is roguishly sprawled across our laps. He's been drinking. We're grinning, though I can sense the anxiety beneath it.
I'm the oldest, with two younger brothers, then three sisters with a different mother, and our youngest half-brother, who would die of an overdose at 27 – six years before our dad.
The dramas of Peter's life didn't end with his death. They continued, shifting the tectonic plates.
Our stepmother was unequivocally committed to carrying out his wishes, so we didn't gather in Cambridge as we'd expected. Instead, we met on video calls. I was at home in Greece, the three sisters in Vancouver, New York and London, one brother in the Hebrides and another in Brighton. During the on-screen gatherings, our framed faces blurred from technical glitches and tears. A two-dimensional box set of grief and bewilderment, we wept and laughed and, over the next wretched weeks, we became family in a new way.
When the author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's father died, she wrote: 'Grief is a cruel kind of education. You learn how ungentle mourning can be, how full of anger.'
In our own conversations and reckonings, there was rage – especially about our dad's drinking and its terrible consequences, his lack of support, his ruthlessness towards his children, and his blinkered approach to romantic relationships, which could make him forget everyone else.
It was impossible not to talk about his marriage, in his 50s, to a girl of 18 – now the devastated mother of our dead brother. We also examined our dad's childhood traumas and the possible epigenetic impacts.
His own mother was largely absent – the Russian 'Red Princess' I later wrote a book about, a British communist tailed by MI5, who saved Jewish lives in France while interned by the Nazis.
When Peter was 18, his father was killed in a train crash and his stepmother banned him from the family home.
But we also acknowledged our dad's magic: his ability to draw people together and inspire incredible creations; the adventures up mountains or camping on deserted islands; his fascination with both the sciences and the arts, which fuelled his brilliant imagination.
He was a huge influence on my childhood and youth, encouraging me to read, write, play music and paint. It seemed entirely normal that, aged 12, I should sit beside him in his porch study on a remote Hebridean island, working on my own projects.
While he wrote an impossibly complex libretto (complete with an invented language) for Birtwistle's The Mask of Orpheus, I drew stage set plans in felt pen. One of these was later used for the opera's CD cover.
In the weeks before my father's cremation, I became increasingly distressed at being persona non grata around his death. There was no proper explanation – but we were to be kept even from his ashes.
Amid the outrage and humour of the Zinovieff siblings' video calls, someone joked about staging a heist to steal the ashes in Cambridge. 'Or get there first at the funeral home.'
I wrote notes every day; it helped, even when misery made reading peculiarly difficult. That writing eventually led to a novel. I imagined the escapade an unlikely group of resourceful siblings might undertake if banned from their father's funeral.
Unlike Peter, the eponymous hero of Stealing Dad is a London-based Greek sculptor, and his sixth wife is nothing like my stepmother. His many scattered offspring bear no resemblance to me or my siblings. We didn't 'steal Dad'. But sometimes, in dreamy magical thinking – as American writer Joan Didion describes in The Year of Magical Thinking – it feels as though we did. I enjoy the blurring.
At the time of the cremation, I was on a Greek island. There seemed little point in returning to England, although a few friends and family gathered for prayers in a Russian church in London.
Instead, I climbed a mountain with my husband and dog, sat outside a Byzantine chapel and sobbed over the double loss – of my father and his funeral.
Greeks found my situation hard to comprehend. Most follow centuries-old Orthodox traditions; funerals are a community matter and the ample memorials (at three, seven, nine and 40 days, then yearly if wanted) offer a continuing structure for powerful emotions. The bereaved congregate again and again, processing their loss, saying prayers and distributing kollyva – a 'food for the dead' that has been eaten at gravesides for millennia.
The anthropologist Kate Fox (Watching the English) was also kept from her elderly father's cremation last year. However, she believes his intentions were generous – to spare his family the 'chore' of travel to the US and the ordeal of a 'sterile Western-style ceremony'.
Robin Fox was not alone in requesting no funeral; perhaps David Bowie set a trend. Some don't want 'a fuss'. Eschewing ritual and religion might seem to 'keep things simple' in our increasingly secular society. Others donate their bodies to science. But these minimalists ignore the needs of the living.
Like me, Kate Fox felt a void. 'Why did you feel deprived?' I asked. 'Because I'm human! The earliest known Homo sapiens from 120,000 years ago buried their dead. Archaeologists look for this ritual as a characteristic of being a 'proper' human. Look at the controversy of whether Neanderthals put flowers on graves and whether the small-brained Homo naledi [200-300,000 years ago] held burials.' Robin Fox was an influential anthropologist who forgot about the 'fundamental biological human need to matter to people and them to matter to you'. But his daughter was helped some months later, by her (and my) old lecturer at Cambridge.
Emeritus prof of anthropology Alan Macfarlane hosted a day of ceremony, discussion and dinner at King's College, inviting family, colleagues and admirers. 'Did it work?' I probed. 'A hundred per cent. It was a social marking of my father 'mattering'.'
I'm still sad that Peter's friends, colleagues and relations weren't given the chance to come together and make it clear that he 'mattered.' Sometimes I've felt irrationally dejected for not doing the often tedious tasks that follow a death – what Rev Richard Coles calls 'sadmin' in The Madness of Grief. I even feel a sting of envy when friends complain about the arduous sorting through a deceased parent's belongings.
Caroline Lucas, former Green Party MP, says, 'We are rubbish at dealing with and talking about death… the last taboo.' We need to become 'grief-literate.' Yes! And talk about plans in advance. If we don't like the standard funerary fare, we can create our own death rituals – traditional or alternative; sacred, humanist or invented.
Plumed horses and marching bands, Buddhist sky burials or 'cryomation' machinery. Gatherings in woods, at riverside ghats, or in brutalist-designed crematoria. These processes help guide us along grief's painful, unpredictable road. Without them, we are unmoored and alone.
'No one ever told me that grief felt so like fear,' wrote CS Lewis after his wife died. 'I am not afraid, but the sensation is like being afraid. The same fluttering in the stomach…'
Eventually, after a very long year, our stepmother gave us some ashes. All six siblings congregated on the Hebridean island our dad had loved. My cabinet-maker nephew, Tom Zinovieff, crafted a handsome oak box, which we buried on a peaty hill with the world's best view. Peter used to point there when we were young, saying, 'That's where you should bury me.' We lugged river stones, fossils and flowers as decoration and, since then, I've discovered the heart-soothing process of 'tending a grave'.
We mourned the absence of our seventh member, our youngest brother, gone much too early. There followed a fierce conflagration on the beach with some remaining ashes and, by the time we'd eaten a picnic, slugged some whisky and drunk bonfire tea, I felt transformed – drained, but with a new sensation of peace. I don't believe in 'closure' but the rituals had worked. And they had a distinct flavour of the best aspects of my wild dad.
Stealing Dad, by Sofka Zinovieff (Corsair, £20), is out now
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
30 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
London-area conservation officials warn: Don't get burned by giant hogweed
With summer around the corner and more people heading outdoors, London-area conservation officials are warning the public to be wary of an invasive plant that poses serious health risks. The Upper Thames River Conservation Authority is urging residents to stay vigilant as it ramps up efforts to manage giant hogweed, a toxic plant commonly found along waterways, roadsides and ditches. In a public notice, the agency called it 'one of Ontario's most dangerous invasive species.' Native to southwest Asia and introduced as a garden ornamental, giant hogweed can grow up to five metres tall and is becoming more common across southern and central Ontario. Its caustic sap can cause severe, long-lasting, and sometimes irreversible harm. 'All parts of the plant – stem, roots, leaves, even flowers – hold phototoxic sap,' said Brandon Williamson, the conservation authority's land management coordinator. Severe burns can occur when sap on the skin is exposed to sunlight as UV rays activate harmful compounds. 'If you're one of the unlucky ones who has a severe reaction to hogweed sap . . . you can get extremely severe burns (and) blistering. You can get heavy purple blotching on your skin that can last for years,' Williamson added. Symptoms typically appear within 48 hours and may result in long-term sensitivity to sunlight. Williamson said giant hogweed's clear, watery sap can even cause 'temporary and even permanent blindness' if it comes into contact with the eyes. As of May 20, conservation staff had already logged more than 120 hours treating about 47 hectares of conservation authority-owned property along the Thames River, according to the public notice. The work also helps protect native species, which giant hogweed can easily outcompete. Although the plant is more prevalent in some places – such as in the northern part of the watershed – Williamson said it's hard to say whether the problem is growing. In the Killaly area of northeast London, for example, the presence of hogweed has remained steady over the past 15 years. However, Williamson noted giant hogweed's ability to spread and 'move around' if it isn't managed. 'Because of how giant hogweed distributes its seeds and pops up across the watershed, if one landowner does a lot of work on their property and gets ahead of it, but the adjacent landowners upstream do not, then those seeds will go downstream and start to germinate and populate that area,' he said. The Upper Thames River Conservation Authority stated that appropriate personal protective equipment must be worn while managing giant hogweed. bwilliams@ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Russia's Wagner Group planned arson attack on London business with links to Ukraine, court is told
LONDON — The trial has started of six men accused of arson at an east London business with links to Ukraine's war effort against Russia , with prosecutors saying Wednesday that the evidence against them was 'overwhelming.' At the start of the trial at London's Central Criminal Court, which is better known as the Old Bailey, prosecutors said the March 20, 2024 attack was planned by agents of Russia's Wagner mercenary group, which the British government has deemed a terrorist organization .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
On the brink: Why slashing spending on global health will make us all sicker
This week, the Chancellor received a letter from those who know the NHS inside out with a plea to think again about international aid. It was signed by Presidents of diaspora health associations from across the UK, representing thousands of overseas-born healthcare workers serving in our NHS. Their message was clear: if the UK retreats further from its global health commitments, we all lose. These are not lobbyists or idealists. They're doctors, nurses and specialists on the front line of British healthcare. They understand the hard economics of government budgets. But they also understand something the Treasury may be in danger of missing: global health isn't charity. It's a vital investment in our own safety, economy and NHS resilience. When the UK backs health partnerships abroad, it's not altruism. Helping others stay healthy is one of the smartest ways to protect ourselves. Programmes like the Commonwealth Partnerships for Antimicrobial Stewardships funded by DHSC's Fleming fund, link NHS teams with hospitals in low-and middle-income countries to tackle antimicrobial resistance. So far, more than 65,000 health workers have been trained. Prescribing has improved. Infection controls are stronger. Meanwhile, UK staff return with invaluable experience that strengthens our NHS, from leadership under pressure to a deeper understanding of infectious diseases. It's the kind of low cost, high impact intervention any sensible government should double down on. Before the 2021 cuts, a programme called the UK Partnerships for Health Systems was set to train 78,000 global healthcare workers and improve care for hundreds of thousands of patients. It was abruptly slashed by £48million. Programmes were halted. Partnerships paused. Opportunities for mutual learning lost. That was the last government. We did not expect to see the same thing happen under this government, with its distinguished track-record of supporting UK Aid over many decades. The letter from the Presidents of Diaspora Associations makes it clear what this means in real terms – not just for patients in low-income countries, but for UK health care workers whose knowledge and innovation stem from these international exchanges. One in five NHS workers is a non-UK national. Their expertise connects the UK to over 200 health systems worldwide. They help make the NHS one of the most internationally engaged healthcare systems on the planet. Many trained in countries with fragile systems. Many are already playing leadership roles in linking British institutions with their counterparts overseas. In Tanzania, a partnership led by Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust helped introduce laparoscopic surgery and set up a burns unit. In Ethiopia, Nottingham's NHS trust collaborated with Jimma University to improve trauma and diabetes care. The return on investment? More skilled, confident UK staff - and stronger UK healthcare at home. Health partnerships do far more than train workers. They help develop curricula, fortify health systems overseas and importantly, build Britain's global reputation at a time when influence is in short supply. The UK-Africa Health Summit earlier this year showed the power of collaboration, bringing together Ministers, health leaders and diaspora professionals to forge solutions on workforce mobility and pandemic preparedness. This diplomacy is with a scalpel, not a sword – and it works. The Chancellor faces tough choices. But cutting the global health budget and not mitigating the consequences, would be a false economy. It would weaken our defences against future pandemics, shrink the NHS's talent pipeline and damage our standing in the world. As the letter from diaspora leaders makes clear: this is not a plea for charity. It's a call for strategic investment. Let's not wait for the next global crisis to remind us that disease doesn't respect borders. Let's act now – to protect the NHS, promote economic stability and ensure Britain remains a trusted force for health and progress worldwide. Ben Simms is CEO of Global Health Partnerships (formerly THET) Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.