Boeing 737 MAX Tariffs Push Ryanair To Toy With Aircraft It Can't Fly
Ryanair's CEO, Michael O'Leary, has warned that the airline will reassess its orders for up to 329 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft due to the added costs of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. O'Leary toyed with the notion that the airline might acquire China's COMAC C919 planes, though these are neither certified for the airline to fly nor available in the quantities necessary.
Responding to O'Leary's speculative claim, U.S. representative Raja Krishnamoorthi warned that COMAC presents a security risk. Krishnamoorthi cited COMAC's close ties to the Chinese military and speculated the manufacturer may have acquired intellectual property illegally to build its aircraft.
Ryanair's CEO responded to Krishnamoorthi in a letter on Thursday, Ryanair pointing the finger directly at the cost-impact of President Donald Trump's trade war.
'If the US government proceeds with its ill-judged plan to impose tariffs and if these tariffs materially affect the price of Boeing aircraft exports to Europe, then we would certainly reassess [Ryanair orders]
Ryanair operates an all-Boeing fleet of Boeing 737s, including 205 Boeing 737-800s and 119 Boeing 737 MAX 8s. The airline has ordered additional aircraft, including 29 737 MAX 8s, with the last delivery scheduled for March next year. Ryanair has also ordered 150 737 MAX 10s, with options for an additional 150 and deliveries planned over the next decade.
COMAC's planes have not yet passed the European Union Aviation Safety Agency certification. While the manufacturer has been attempting to win over carriers in Southeast Asia, its current production rate is too low for COMAC to pose any serious threat to the Airbus and Boeing duopoly. Even if China can follow through on its promise to help COMAC reach a production rate of 150 aircraft per year by 2028, it will still lag far behind.
However, Boeing's 737 MAX 10 is still pending FAA certification, so Ryanair could face delayed deliveries of its future aircraft regardless.
Ryanair's main issue is to avoid an unsustainable price increase on the 737 MAX 8s it is due to take delivery of over the coming year. In the letter to the Congressman, O'Leary said keeping these costs low 'is vital to our business model.'
Boeing delivered 105 737s during the first quarter of this year, representing a significant share of its 130 aircraft delivered in total and an improvement over the 67 units delivered in the first quarter of last year. The company is on the path to recovery from numerous complications and delays that followed the Alaska Airlines 737 MAX mid-exit door plug blowout last year. In its first quarter results, Boeing said it still plans to reach a 737 production rate of 38 units per month this year.
The U.S. manufacturer's commercial aircraft division is still operating at a loss of $537 million for the quarter. However, this is better than the $1.14 billion loss reported through March of last year. Its current commercial aircraft order backlog is $460 billion.
A postponement of deliveries while the tariff dispute plays out would affect the airline's capacity and Boeing's revenue but might prove inevitable unless the Trump administration rethinks its current strategy to remove tariffs on new aircraft.
'It is up to Boeing and the U.S. government to ensure that its great aircraft are competitively priced,' O'Leary said.
These tariffs are impacting airlines and aircraft manufacturers on both sides of the pond, with U.S. airlines looking for creative ways to avoid the added costs and Airbus blankly stating it will not take on the burden.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 NBA Finals: The incredible Paul George trades that turned the Pacers and Thunder into title contenders
As it turns out, all you needed to do to reach the 2025 NBA Finals was trade Paul George. Remarkably, this year's Eastern Conference champion Indiana Pacers and Western Conference champion Oklahoma City Thunder were both built from assets each team received in exchange for dealing George. How the Pacers built from trading Paul George Indiana selected George with the 10th overall pick in the 2010 NBA Draft. He made four All-Star teams for the Pacers, leading them to a pair of conference finals appearances, before informing the franchise in 2017 that he was planning to sign elsewhere — preferably with the Los Angeles Lakers — in free agency. Advertisement Not wanting to lose George for nothing, Indiana dealt him to the Thunder on July 6, 2017, in exchange for a 25-year-old Victor Oladipo and a 21-year-old Domantas Sabonis. Both Oladipo and Sabonis developed into All-Stars under Indiana's watch, though as a tandem they peaked in a pair of first-round playoff exits. (Taylor Wilhelm/Yahoo Sports Illustration) By 2020, Oladipo had begun to experience the right knee problems that would ultimately end his career, so the Pacers flipped him to the Houston Rockets as part of the four-team trade that sent James Harden to the Brooklyn Nets. In return, Indiana received Caris LeVert and a pair of second-round draft picks. One of those second-rounders became the 32nd overall pick in the 2023 draft, which the Pacers packaged, along with the No. 29 overall pick in the same draft, for a 2024 first-round draft pick from ... the Thunder. That selection was one of two first-round draft picks that Indiana dealt to the Toronto Raptors in January 2024 in exchange for Pascal Siakam, this year's Eastern Conference finals MVP. Advertisement Meanwhile, the Pacers flipped LeVert to the Cleveland Cavaliers for a 2022 second-round draft pick, a 2023 first-round draft pick and a 2027 second-round draft pick. The first two of those picks became Andrew Nembhard and Ben Sheppard, a pair of rotation players for this year's conference champions. Sabonis played for the Pacers until February 2022, when at the deadline they dealt him and some ancillary assets to the Sacramento Kings for Tyrese Haliburton, Buddy Hield and Tristan Thompson. Haliburton, of course, has developed into an All-NBA point guard for the Pacers and their best player. Finally, Indiana flipped Hield to the Philadelphia 76ers at the 2024 trade deadline for a pair of second-round draft picks — the first of which they traded again, turning that selection into Johnny Furphy. Advertisement In one way or another, the Pacers turned George into Haliburton, Siakam, Nembhard, Sheppard and Furphy. That is roughly a third of Indiana's entire roster, half of its rotation and both of its leaders. How the Thunder built from trading Paul George George played two seasons for the Thunder — both first-round playoff exits. In July 2019, though, the Los Angeles Clippers came calling with an offer Oklahoma City could not refuse. The Clippers were trying to sign Kawhi Leonard in free agency, but the two-time Finals MVP wanted a star partner in L.A., so the organization went about the business of trying to pry George from the Thunder. Advertisement OKC executive Sam Presti squeezed the Clippers for everything he could, acquiring Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Danilo Gallinari and the rights to a handful of first-round draft picks in exchange for George. As if recouping Gilgeous-Alexander, this year's MVP, were not enough, one of those picks — the No. 12 selection in 2022 — became Jalen Williams, who has developed into an All-Star for Oklahoma City. Much of the rest of the package from the Clippers is tied up in this year's draft, as the Thunder own pick Nos. 15, 24 and 44 in June, all from assets they received in the George deal. Oklahoma City can use those selections to replenish whomever they lose from their rising salary costs over the next couple of years. Between Gilgeous-Alexander, Williams and whoever is still to come, the Thunder have built from George a budding dynasty. First, though, they must get through what they traded to acquire George from Indiana.
Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Rare Earth Magnet Shortage Threatens Shutdown of U.S. Car Factories
Auto executives across the globe have raised urgent concerns that an impending shortage of rare earth magnets from China used in an extensive number of car parts threatens to upend vehicle production in weeks. Earlier this month, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing Volkswagen, Hyundai, and General Motors, expressed unease regarding the impending shortage in a letter to President Trump. The letter listed automatic transmissions, throttle bodies, alternators, various motors, sensors, seat belts, speakers, lights, power steering, and cameras as among the many components affected by a rare earth magnet supply shortage, Reuters reports. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation and The Vehicle Suppliers Association cited reduced production volumes and complete shutdowns of assembly lines as severe outcomes of the scarcity. The Chinese government halted exports of rare earth magnets on April 4 during its trade war with the United States, but American officials anticipated China's mid-May trade war truce with the United States would reopen rare earth magnet access. However, United States trade representative Jamieson Greer said Friday that American officials: "haven't seen the flow of some of those critical minerals, like they're [China] supposed to be doing," according to The New York Times. China's embassy in Washington responded, saying the United States was abusing export controls in the semiconductor sector. An American official familiar with the United States and China's trade talks earlier this month in Geneva said discussions didn't involve export controls, Reuters reports. This same official claimed Beijing was moving slowly on promises to resume rare earth export licenses. India also hasn't received the licenses, putting the country on pace to pause auto production in early June. Europe has received some license approvals, but its Union Chamber of Commerce in China, Jens Eskelund, said the amount is insufficient. A rare earth mineral shortage would most impact United States automakers, and a separate New York Times report notes that some Chinese rare earth magnet makers have stopped production while waiting for permission to resume exports. China controls over 90% of global processing capacity for the magnets used in industries like auto manufacturing, fighter jet production, and home appliances, according to Reuters. The United States makes essentially no high-performance rare earth magnets, but small factories are scheduled to begin production this year in South Carolina and Texas. One operational mine in Oklahoma relies on China for processing. Small sales and profit margins have reduced many countries' desire to produce the magnets, with worldwide sales being a small fraction of larger industries like copper mining. While the United States auto industry will be most affected by a rare earth magnet shortage, the issue is global. To make matters worse, permit applications to China can require hundreds of pages of documents. German auto parts manufacturer Bosch said its suppliers are experiencing difficulty dealing with China's export license procedures. Despite receiving some licenses, Europe is still facing significant supply chain disruptions, and India could halt all auto production early this month. In response, the European Union is fast-tracking its mining and mineral initiatives to reduce its dependency on China. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
China negotiations are 'high priority' for the Trump admin.
Tensions are rising as the US and China's trade accusations over trade practices and access to critical minerals mount. Timothy Brightbill, partner at Wiley Rein, joins Catalysts to explain what's driving the latest tariff standoff and where negotiations could head next. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Talk to me about this tit-for-tat between the US and China both accusing each other of the same thing. Is there any merit to that? Is this just negotiation in the art of the deal? Where does this sit with you? Uh, thanks for having me this morning, Madison. There, I think, uh, there's, uh, there are things going on on both sides here. Uh, the United States and China, uh, both are have some accurate statements that they've made. The Trump administration is clearly frustrated with China, uh, that it's not living up to the May 12th agreement, and in particular, that it's slowing down access to rare earth magnets and other critical minerals, which are needed for so many different segments of manufacturing. Uh, now MOFCOM, of course, has pushed back and said that it's the United States that is escalating the situation, uh, first with restrictions on the sale of chip design software to China, and then also some of the other issues, such as the announcement to revoke visas of Chinese students. So, I think, uh, both sides make some valid claims. It's mostly negotiations, but we do want to see these discussions move forward, um, given the size of the tariffs that have been suspended between the two countries. And talk to me about what that looks like. What would be the impetus to make these negotiations move forward? Are you seeing any signals of further discussions happening? I think both sides are very interested. So, uh, yes, I think there are signals of more discussions. Uh, there will be other opportunities going on. There is an OECD meeting this week. Uh, this is a high priority for the administration, for Ambassador Greer, um, but there's a lot of ground to cover and a lot of very hot button issues between the two countries. So, not clear how how quickly it will be resolved.
