Prisons set to run out of spaces again within a year despite early release scheme, MPs warn
Overcrowded prisons will face 'total gridlock in a matter of months' and run out of space in 2026 despite emergency measures to release prisoners early, MPs have warned.
A damning report from the Public Accounts Committee found a 'system in crisis' was leaving many prisoners living in 'inhumane conditions', adding the previous government's plans to create 20,000 more prison places by the mid 2020s were 'completely unrealistic'.
Thousands of outstanding spaces are expected to be delivered five years late with costs spiralling to £4.2 billion – 80 per cent more than originally planned.
MPs also said the HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is operating "hand to mouth", which is detrimental to rehabilitation efforts to cut reoffending.
Chairman of the committee Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said: "Lives are being put at increasing risk by the government's historic failures to increase capacity.
'Despite the recent emergency release of thousands of prisoners, the system still faces total gridlock in a matter of months."
He added that the inquiry found severely overcrowded prisons are in danger of becoming "pressure cookers" and that vital rehabilitative work is being sidelined as staff are forced to focus on controlling unsafe environments.
"Many prisoners themselves are living in simply inhumane conditions, with their health needs often overlooked,' Sir Geoffrey said.
"It is now for the government to act on the recommendations in our report if disaster is to be averted.'
The report said the adult male prison estate was at 98 to 99.7 per cent occupancy between October 2022 and August 2024, and remains "alarmingly full".
It found a quarter of prisons are doubled up in cells meant for one person and overcrowding is linked to higher rates of violence and self-harm which "increased significantly" in the year to September 2024.
The committee said fights between prisoners were up 14 per cent and attacks on staff jumped by 19 per cent in that period.
The committee also warned HMPPS was "entirely reliant" on uncertain future measures which it hopes will come from the independent sentencing review, led by David Gauke, which is expected to be published in the spring.
The MPs made similar findings of the approach taken in tackling the courts backlog earlier this month, warning the Ministry of Justice is "over-reliant" on the upcoming findings from the Leveson Review also expected in late spring.
Sir Geoffrey added: "As with our recent inquiry into court backlogs, we find a department grappling with the fallout of problems it should have predicted while awaiting the judgment of an external review before taking any truly radical corrective action."
The report said one of reasons for the shortfall of new places was that the MoJ and HMPPS assumed they could gain planning permission for new prisons in 26 weeks.
Plans to deliver the remaining 14,000 places by 2031 are "still fraught with risk and uncertainty", the committee warned.
They also said current maintenance funding of £520 million was a fraction of the £2.8 billion needed to bring the prison estate into fair condition.
Reacting to the report, prison experts warned the government cannot build its way out of the crisis.
Andrea Coomber KC from the Howard League for Penal Reform said: 'It is no coincidence that violence and self-harm are at endemic levels.
"The Government has acknowledged that it cannot build our way out of this crisis. Ultimately, they must reduce demand on a system that has been asked to do too much, with too little, for too long."
She added that billions of pounds earmarked for building new prisons would be better spent on securing an "effective and responsive" probation service, working to cut crime in the community.
Richard Garside, director of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, said successive governments have tried – and failed – to build their way out of the prison capacity crisis.
'Rather than repeating all the mistakes of the past, the government should develop a long-term plan to contain and then reduce the prison population,' he added.
'This would allow it to close the gap between the money allocated and the costs of building, running and maintaining prisons.'
Minister for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, Lord Timpson said: 'This report exposes the catalogue of failures we inherited which almost collapsed our entire prison system. This not only risked public safety but added billions in extra costs to taxpayers.
'We have already taken immediate action to end the overcrowding chaos engulfing our jails and are now delivering on our Plan for Change to ensure prisons work, cut crime and make streets safer.
'This includes delivering 14,000 new, modern prison places by 2031 and reviewing sentencing so we never run out of space again. We'll carefully consider the Committee's recommendations as part of this work.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On April 15, 2010, the UK held its first-ever televised general election debate, pitting Labour's Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, against David Cameron of the Conservatives, with Nick Clegg expected to do little more than make up the numbers. However, if that was the anticipated script, no one told Clegg, who spoke so persuasively that the catchphrase of the night was 'I agree with Nick' as both Cameron and Brown sought to side with him. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In a snap YouGov poll after the contest, 51 per cent declared the Liberal Democrat leader to be the winner, with Cameron on 29 and Brown on 19. While 'Cleggmania' proved short-lived, the clear lesson was that agreeing with a political opponent tends to benefit them. Delegates at the Conservative party conference in 2023 pose for a photograph with Nigel Farage (Picture: Oli Scarff) | AFP via Getty Images A political cataclysm looms Fifteen years later, and the Conservatives' current strategy to defeat Reform UK, by echoing its rhetoric, is backfiring even more badly. While the 2010 debate was a one-off event, the Tories have effectively been campaigning for Reform for years. In Thursday's Hamilton by-election, the Conservative candidate received just 1,621 votes, down from 6,332 at the last Scottish Parliament election, while Reform got 7,088, not far behind the winner, Labour's Davy Russell, and the SNP in second. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As the Scottish Tories prepare for their party conference this week, a major topic of discussion must be about finding ways to disagree with Reform, if they wish to survive what threatens to become a political event as cataclysmic as the collapse of the old Liberal party after the First World War. Farage is out to destroy the Tories, and they must be as determined and ruthless. There is much to go at. Many of Reform's policies are patently ridiculous and some are downright dangerous. Keir Starmer's claim that Farage would 'crash the economy' like Liz Truss was a good line, and the Conservatives need to find similarly resonant ways of highlighting the very real dangers of voting for Reform.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
New Red Book reveals how distant Labour have become
Its cover is a photograph of the Upper Clyde Shipbuilders (UCS) 'work-in' of 1971-1972, led by Jimmy Reid. Five thousand copies of the book were printed by its publisher, Edinburgh University Students' Publications Board. Contributions were wide and varied from the likes of Jim Sillars, Robin Cook and Tom Nairn and 25 others – including no women. To say that Brown edited The Red Paper is a misnomer because he pretty much accepted all the contributions in their states of first draft. But when all is said and done, The Red Paper was the public political highpoint of post-war 'Scottish socialism', defined as social democracy through a form of labourism, meaning unions would deliver what they called 'socialism' through the parliamentary road – and not revolutionary road – and via the Labour Party. It was a time when, to mix metaphors, Brown was Red. READ MORE: 'Joy, celebration and warmth' of Palestinian art to be showcased at Edinburgh Fringe Such was the emphasis on socialism as social democracy in Scotland, it almost seemed to offer a version of 'socialism in one country'. And, though seldom read because of the tiny type, it was a book that 'lit up the murky Scottish political scene like a lightning-flash' according to Neal Ascherson in The Observer in 2000. This indicates the book had a profound psychological and political but not intellectual or practical impact. Brown introduced the chapters by saying: 'Scottish socialists cannot support a strategy for independence which postpones the meeting of urgent social and economic needs until the day after independence. But neither can they give unconditional support to maintaining the integrity of the United Kingdom – and all that that entails – without any guarantee of radical social change.' So, the argument was constitutional change via devolution could lead to social justice. For Labour in 1975, this was heretical because the Unionist Labour left was mesmerised by the party's pledge in its 1974 General Election manifestos to 'bring about a fundamental and irreversible shift in the balance of power and wealth in favour of working people and their families'. And Brown's perspective was not the 'devolution will kill nationalism stone dead' argument of right-wing Labour MP and Scottish Secretary George Robertson, 20 years later in 1995. At the time, Brown was more reflective and reasoned. With the SNP Westminster breakthrough in the October 1974 General Election with 11 seats, he did not regard nationalism as a cancer that needed to be cut out as many of his fellow Labour members did. He wrote: 'What this Red Paper seeks to do is to transcend that false and sterile antithesis which has been manufactured between the nationalism of the SNP and the anti-nationalism of the Unionist parties.' But, nonetheless, the attainment of social justice of the Blair-Brown 1997-2010 Labour governments and the Labour-LibDem coalition Scottish governments of 1999-2007 was not much in evidence. It certainly was not advanced by the Brown-initiated cross-party pledge of 'The Vow' promising further devolution on September 16 ,2014. Indeed, Brown not only junked his beliefs of using the state to ameliorate the outcomes of the market but then advocated using the state to make the market more efficient. Long gone were any ideas of workers' self-management and public ownership, including the oil industry. One of the organisers of a University of Aberdeen conference to assess The Red Paper in 2000 commented: 'It is surprising how many people have forgotten about it, including, perhaps, Gordon Brown himself. Unlike many of the other contributors to the Red Paper, he seems reluctant to recall the time when he advocated public ownership and community democracy.' Not everybody gave up on the ideas of this type of Scottish socialism, though. Within Scottish Labour, the Campaign for Socialism group was established in 1994 to fight against the removal of Clause IV on public ownership by Blair and Brown from Labour's constitution. The group has counted a handful of MPs in Scotland and MSPs among its members. READ MORE: Owen Jones: The UK media has ignored this hugely revealing scandal in Israel More significantly, those around the group worked with others on the left to produce a new version of The Red Paper on Scotland in 2005 for the 30th anniversary. This same formula was used by The Red Paper Collective to produce a further edition the year before the referendum in 2014 called Class, Nation And Socialism: The Red Paper On Scotland 2014. The Red Paper Collective was established in 2012. Now in 2025, we have a fourth iteration produced by it called Keep Left: Red Paper On Scotland 2025. Every Red Paper after the first has been more readable than the last. But the tide has gone out for its ideas: not in terms of their credibility or coherence but in terms of their traction inside Scottish Labour. This is the story of Thatcherism creating the creature that is 'New' Labour, in which Brown was a leading light. When asked in 2002 what her greatest achievement was, Thatcher replied: 'Tony Blair and New Labour. We forced our opponents to change their minds.' North and south of the Border, we are still living with that legacy. Professor Gregor Gall is a research associate at the University of Glasgow and editor of A New Scotland: Building An Equal, Fair And Sustainable Society (Pluto Press, 2022)
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lord Sainsbury: Give Glasgow greater devolved powers
"A major challenge which government faces if it wants to increase Scotland's rate of growth is a way to find and support such clusters," he said. "All the evidence from other countries suggests that the only way to effectively support clusters is to do so at a city region level. Read more: "I appreciate in Scotland, unlike in England, metro mayors have not yet been introduced, but if you want to support high-tech clusters, this is something I think you should seriously consider, with Greater Glasgow being given powers similar to those devolved to Greater Manchester and the West Midlands." Lord Sainsbury was speaking at the Creating the Jobs of Tomorrow conference organised by Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, where he was introduced to the stage by former Labour chancellor and prime minister Gordon Brown. Mr Brown said growth and productivity have been perennial problems in the UK and Scotland, with innovation the key to boosting performance. A new study by economist Dan Turner, head of research at the Centre for Progressive Policy, has suggested this could unlock the creation of hundreds of thousands of high-value jobs. "There are huge sources of innovation and inventiveness in Scotland, just as has been traditional in our history," he said. "The question is can we turn that into scalable companies that stay in Scotland, invest in Scotland, create jobs in Scotland, and Dan's study suggests we could create 300,000 jobs in the next 10 years. "That's 300,000 well-paying jobs, 120,000 in the new industries, the spin-offs in terms of the service sector another 180,000 - that is a possibility if we invest in the infrastructure, the skills, and the development necessary to achieve that." Lord David Sainsbury (Image: Nate Cleary) Lord Sainsbury is a Labour peer and served as minister for science and innovation under Mr Brown and his prime ministerial predecessor, Tony Blair, between 1998 and 2006. He was appointed a life peer in 1997. Lord Sainsbury said there are new opportunities for employment and growth in sectors such as quantum computing, artificial intelligence and biotechnology. "There are economists that will argue that it is investment that is the engine of economic growth, but we have to realise today that capital flows easily around the world, and it flows as it has always done, to where the best investment opportunities are created by innovation," Lord Sainsbury said. "You can sit in London today and you can invest in Silicon Valley, you can invest in practically any country - until recently you could even invest in Chinese venture capital - because that is what modern communication enables you to do. That is why investment is not the real driver of the economy, it's innovation." Among the other speakers was Michael Spence, who won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2001 for his work in the analysis of markets with information imbalances. Read more: "There are two things that [people] associate with Adam Smith correctly," Mr Spence said. "One the 'invisible hand', which is the market system is a reasonably efficient tool for decentralising and allocating resources. "That actually is not the most important thing that Adam Smith said, but it's the one that neo-conservatives remember because they elevate market systems to the status of a religion, rather than a way of accomplishing economic and social goals. The most important one for our purposes is specialisation. "Adam Smith meant specialisation within an economy, when of course everything that David Sainsbury talked about in the global economy is just the Adam Smith insight writ large, and of course it is the ultimate source of growth. "Without specialisation you don't get scale of spread your activity over too much territory, and you don't get innovation. You get nothing if everybody has to do everything. "The fundamental message I want to deliver today is that's still true, and that growth is fundamentally about specialisation and structural change."
