
Deported migrant detainees are holding at a US Naval base in Djibouti amid court fight, officials say
Eight migrant detainees who were on a US flight destined for South Sudan are currently at a US military base in Djibouti, awaiting next steps as details over their case are hammered out in court, two US officials told CNN.
It's unclear when or how the detainees — who have criminal records and come almost entirely from countries other than South Sudan — will move on from the US Navy base in Djibouti, Camp Lemonnier, one official said. The US officials added that that the situation has angered Djiboutian government officials, and that the US military in Djibouti has messaged back to Washington 'significant concerns' over keeping the detainees there and the possible impact on military relations.
The deportation flight was described on Wednesday at a Department of Homeland Security press conference as a 'diplomatic and military security operation,' which the US official said floored some military officials who did not see it as a military operation.
'I still don't fully understand how this happened,' the US official said.
White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that the detainees will have to be in Djibouti 'for over two weeks.'
'Every single one of these individuals I will add had final orders of removal from our country, and now (federal Judge Brian Murphy) is forcing federal officials to remain in Djibouti for over two weeks, threatening our US-diplomatic relationships with countries around the world, and putting these agents' lives in danger by having to be with these illegal, murderous criminals and rapists,' Leavitt said.
The flight, which took off with eight immigrant detainees Tuesday morning, set off a chain of events, culminating in a scramble at DHS to determine how officials could comply with an anticipated order from a federal judge in Massachusetts.
Murphy held a hearing Tuesday afternoon on the heels of an emergency motion filed by attorneys who said their clients — of varying nationalities and, according to DHS, all with criminal records — were being flown to war-torn South Sudan. The plane ultimately landed in Djibouti, according to a flight tracker, where it remained as legal proceedings were ongoing.
In an hours-long court hearing Wednesday, a Homeland Security official called in and out, at the judge's direction, to gather more information and share what was doable to provide additional due process to those who the department tried to transfer to South Sudan.
During the hearing, Murphy asked the official whether DHS could conduct what's known as a 'reasonable fear interview' — the first step toward raising a fear-based claim against being deported to a particular country — where the migrants currently were.
'I would have to call over and find out, your honor. Currently, they're sitting on a plane,' the official said.
As the proceeding continued Wednesday, the official periodically chimed in to provide updates while officials raced to figure out what they could or couldn't do.
Hours later, the answer: It was possible to do the interview where the migrants were, the official told the judge. One of the US officials confirmed the Department of Homeland Security has asked to be able to do the reasonable fear interviews for the detainees at the base, though they said it was unclear if it would actually happen.
As of Thursday morning, attorneys for the clients had not yet received instructions on how to reach the detainees and how or when the interviews would be conducted.
One of the US officials said it remains unclear what comes next, but that military officials are 'waiting for others to figure those things out' as the court proceedings continue.
'The full impact of this is definitely stressful,' the official said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump's move to use military for immigration enforcement was months in the making
When President Donald Trump put 2,000 National Guard troops under his control on Saturday night and ordered them into Los Angeles, it was billed as an urgent response to quell protests. But it was also a move long in the making. Behind the scenes, the White House and Department of Homeland Security had been working for months to find ways to use the National Guard and the military more broadly to bolster the administration's aggressive immigration enforcement agenda, multiple people familiar with the internal deliberations told CNN. The discussions have stemmed from a desire to dramatically ramp up nationwide immigration operations and arrest more migrants than ever before — a strategy that has put intense strain on the government's existing enforcement apparatus. The administration has tried to augment Immigration and Customs Enforcement's capacity by pulling personnel from multiple agencies. 'It's certainly an expansion, but it's a needed expansion,' White House border czar Tom Homan told CNN, when asked about the involvement of National Guard in ICE operations in Los Angeles. 'We're trying to use all available resources. That's why we're bringing all these other different agencies — ATF, FBI, US Marshals. We got a hell of a job ahead of us.' Homan stressed that members of the National Guard are not enforcing immigration law and are focused on serving as protection for federal property and agents who the administration says have been assaulted. Even with thousands of federal agents fanning out nationwide to arrest migrants, the results have up until recently fallen well short of White House expectations, the sources said, leading to leadership shakeups at ICE and tense calls and meetings with Stephen Miller — Trump's top aide and architect of the administration's demands for increased arrests and deportations. ICE is now averaging around 2,000 arrests daily, up from around 1,000. Miller has been in the White House Situation Room as Homeland Security and Pentagon officials have provided updates on the situation in Los Angeles in recent days. The message from him has been clear: The administration is not backing down, and they are to proceed with operations. The internal discussions about leveraging the military to support immigration enforcement inside the US, rather than just on the southern border, began as early as February, when the White House and DHS started planning how to mobilize active-duty troops from consenting states as force protection for federal agents. There have also been discussions within the administration, including at the Department of Homeland Security and the Defense Department, exploring whether National Guard units from Republican-led states could be used in non-consenting states since they have more latitude under state orders than when they're federalized, according to four other sources familiar with the talks. 'They are clearly inclined to repeat the LA playbook elsewhere,' said one of the sources familiar with the matter. CNN reached out to the White House for comment. Trump mobilized the California National Guard against the will of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, but the troops were taken from within California, rather than deployed from another state. But the deployment of active-duty Marines to Los Angeles to help with crowd and riot control was also an escalation that left many officials at DoD scratching their heads, people familiar with the matter said. One official said the use of the Marines was intended more as a show of force than out of necessity to control the situation on the ground. The administration is also looking to expand its use of military facilities to hold migrants. Defense Department personnel have conducted tours with Customs and Border Protection at military bases including Travis Air Force Base in California; Camp Atterbury in Indiana; JB McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey; Dover Air Force Base in Delaware; Camp Parks in California; and Fort Walker in Virginia. 'Military bases are an option. They were an option under every president I ever worked for, so it's no different now,' Homan said, stressing the need for more congressional funding. Trump's massive tax and spending cuts package would provide billions in funding for immigration enforcement. The urgency: ICE detention space is almost maxed out. As of Monday, there were about 55,000 people in ICE custody, according to federal data obtained by CNN. ICE, which relies in part on cooperation with local jails, is only funded for 41,500 beds. 'We're close,' Homan told CNN when asked when capacity would max out. 'We're probably 95% or above.' The first public sign that the administration was planning to use the guard to help with immigration enforcement came last month, when DHS requested 20,000 guard troops from the Pentagon to help support its operations. DHS asked for troops to help with processing, transportation support, detention support including perimeter security and emergency response inside centers, as well as helping with night operations and rural interdiction, according to the request, obtained by CNN. The Pentagon is still deciding how many National Guard troops it will provide to DHS, a defense official said. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth suggested in testimony on Wednesday that the order Trump signed on Saturday activating the guard troops could apply to other states, in addition to California, and other National Guard units. 'Part of it was about getting ahead of the problem, so that if in other places, if there are other riots, in places where law enforcement officers are threatened, we would have the capability to surge National Guard there, if necessary,' Hegseth said on Wednesday. Trump's order on Saturday night putting 'at least' 2,000 National Guard troops under his control did not name a specific location and was very broad — it said that the troops would be deployed 'in locations where protests against (federal) functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations.' Hegseth said that 'thankfully, in most of those states, you'd have a governor that recognizes the need for it, supports it and mobilizes it, him or herself. In California, unfortunately, the governor wants to play politics with it.' Newsom, for his part, has accused the Trump administration of employing authoritarian tactics. 'California may be first – but it clearly won't end here. Other states are next. Democracy is next,' he said in an address Tuesday evening. Immigration agents are also expected to get help from National Guard units in states where governors have provided permissions and deputized the troops to serve as a force multiplier, a defense official told CNN. In Texas, for example, Gov. Greg Abbott, a staunch Trump supporter, said on Wednesday that his state's National Guard was ready to respond if protests emerged there. Without Trump invoking the Insurrection Act, which allows for the military to carry out law enforcement functions to quell a rebellion or foreign invasion, the guard cannot make arrests, though they can detain people temporarily until police arrive and provide force protection to federal personnel. ICE posted images on X on Tuesday of guard troops forming a security perimeter around ICE agents as they arrested a man in California. 'Military troops are providing protection for federal law enforcement officers as they continue operations to remove the worst of the worst from Los Angeles,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement to CNN. 'If any rioters attack ICE law enforcement officers, military personnel have the authority to temporarily detain them until law enforcement makes the arrest.'


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump's move to use military for immigration enforcement was months in the making
When President Donald Trump put 2,000 National Guard troops under his control on Saturday night and ordered them into Los Angeles, it was billed as an urgent response to quell protests. But it was also a move long in the making. Behind the scenes, the White House and Department of Homeland Security had been working for months to find ways to use the National Guard and the military more broadly to bolster the administration's aggressive immigration enforcement agenda, multiple people familiar with the internal deliberations told CNN. The discussions have stemmed from a desire to dramatically ramp up nationwide immigration operations and arrest more migrants than ever before — a strategy that has put intense strain on the government's existing enforcement apparatus. The administration has tried to augment Immigration and Customs Enforcement's capacity by pulling personnel from multiple agencies. 'It's certainly an expansion, but it's a needed expansion,' White House border czar Tom Homan told CNN, when asked about the involvement of National Guard in ICE operations in Los Angeles. 'We're trying to use all available resources. That's why we're bringing all these other different agencies — ATF, FBI, US Marshals. We got a hell of a job ahead of us.' Homan stressed that members of the National Guard are not enforcing immigration law and are focused on serving as protection for federal property and agents who the administration says have been assaulted. Even with thousands of federal agents fanning out nationwide to arrest migrants, the results have up until recently fallen well short of White House expectations, the sources said, leading to leadership shakeups at ICE and tense calls and meetings with Stephen Miller — Trump's top aide and architect of the administration's demands for increased arrests and deportations. ICE is now averaging around 2,000 arrests daily, up from around 1,000. Miller has been in the White House Situation Room as Homeland Security and Pentagon officials have provided updates on the situation in Los Angeles in recent days. The message from him has been clear: The administration is not backing down, and they are to proceed with operations. The internal discussions about leveraging the military to support immigration enforcement inside the US, rather than just on the southern border, began as early as February, when the White House and DHS started planning how to mobilize active-duty troops from consenting states as force protection for federal agents. There have also been discussions within the administration, including at the Department of Homeland Security and the Defense Department, exploring whether National Guard units from Republican-led states could be used in non-consenting states since they have more latitude under state orders than when they're federalized, according to four other sources familiar with the talks. 'They are clearly inclined to repeat the LA playbook elsewhere,' said one of the sources familiar with the matter. CNN reached out to the White House for comment. Trump mobilized the California National Guard against the will of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, but the troops were taken from within California, rather than deployed from another state. But the deployment of active-duty Marines to Los Angeles to help with crowd and riot control was also an escalation that left many officials at DoD scratching their heads, people familiar with the matter said. One official said the use of the Marines was intended more as a show of force than out of necessity to control the situation on the ground. The administration is also looking to expand its use of military facilities to hold migrants. Defense Department personnel have conducted tours with Customs and Border Protection at military bases including Travis Air Force Base in California; Camp Atterbury in Indiana; JB McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey; Dover Air Force Base in Delaware; Camp Parks in California; and Fort Walker in Virginia. 'Military bases are an option. They were an option under every president I ever worked for, so it's no different now,' Homan said, stressing the need for more congressional funding. Trump's massive tax and spending cuts package would provide billions in funding for immigration enforcement. The urgency: ICE detention space is almost maxed out. As of Monday, there were about 55,000 people in ICE custody, according to federal data obtained by CNN. ICE, which relies in part on cooperation with local jails, is only funded for 41,500 beds. 'We're close,' Homan told CNN when asked when capacity would max out. 'We're probably 95% or above.' The first public sign that the administration was planning to use the guard to help with immigration enforcement came last month, when DHS requested 20,000 guard troops from the Pentagon to help support its operations. DHS asked for troops to help with processing, transportation support, detention support including perimeter security and emergency response inside centers, as well as helping with night operations and rural interdiction, according to the request, obtained by CNN. The Pentagon is still deciding how many National Guard troops it will provide to DHS, a defense official said. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth suggested in testimony on Wednesday that the order Trump signed on Saturday activating the guard troops could apply to other states, in addition to California, and other National Guard units. 'Part of it was about getting ahead of the problem, so that if in other places, if there are other riots, in places where law enforcement officers are threatened, we would have the capability to surge National Guard there, if necessary,' Hegseth said on Wednesday. Trump's order on Saturday night putting 'at least' 2,000 National Guard troops under his control did not name a specific location and was very broad — it said that the troops would be deployed 'in locations where protests against (federal) functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations.' Hegseth said that 'thankfully, in most of those states, you'd have a governor that recognizes the need for it, supports it and mobilizes it, him or herself. In California, unfortunately, the governor wants to play politics with it.' Newsom, for his part, has accused the Trump administration of employing authoritarian tactics. 'California may be first – but it clearly won't end here. Other states are next. Democracy is next,' he said in an address Tuesday evening. Immigration agents are also expected to get help from National Guard units in states where governors have provided permissions and deputized the troops to serve as a force multiplier, a defense official told CNN. In Texas, for example, Gov. Greg Abbott, a staunch Trump supporter, said on Wednesday that his state's National Guard was ready to respond if protests emerged there. Without Trump invoking the Insurrection Act, which allows for the military to carry out law enforcement functions to quell a rebellion or foreign invasion, the guard cannot make arrests, though they can detain people temporarily until police arrive and provide force protection to federal personnel. ICE posted images on X on Tuesday of guard troops forming a security perimeter around ICE agents as they arrested a man in California. 'Military troops are providing protection for federal law enforcement officers as they continue operations to remove the worst of the worst from Los Angeles,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement to CNN. 'If any rioters attack ICE law enforcement officers, military personnel have the authority to temporarily detain them until law enforcement makes the arrest.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The White House Wants the Megabill by July 4. For Real.
House and Senate Republicans spent Thursday at each other's throats over President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The sparring between the two chambers reached a point where members were openly scoffing at the GOP's self-imposed July 4 deadline for passing the bill. Down Pennsylvania Avenue, meanwhile, the White House isn't sweating. In fact, Trump's aides are downright bullish about getting the megabill wrapped up in a bow for a presidential signature by Independence Day. 'We are targeting the week of July 4 for final passage,' said one of two Trump administration officials I spoke to Wednesday and granted anonymity to candidly describe the private talks. Let's be clear: The timeline is extraordinarily fast. Not only does Senate Majority Leader John Thune have to find a way to bridge competing demands inside his conference and weather a grueling amendment 'vote-a-rama,' but he also has to work with Speaker Mike Johnson, who is already groaning at every change being entertained for the bill that barely passed his chamber last month. Traditionally, getting the two chambers aligned on a single piece of complicated legislation means weeks of 'conferencing' — that's what happened in 2017, the last time Republicans pursued a party-line tax bill. This time, the legislation is even more complicated and the margins even thinner. But White House officials are adamant that GOP leaders skip that step. Nor do they want the House making more changes after the Senate, requiring another 'pingpong' back across the Rotunda. They expect the Senate to clear a bill that the House can simply plop on the floor, pass and send to Trump's desk. 'There's not going to be a pingpong or a conference,' the official told me yesterday. Can they really do that in just three weeks? Some Republicans are skeptical, to say the least. Sen. John Curtis of Utah said 'a lot of us would be surprised' if the July 4 deadline holds at the POLITICO Energy Summit Tuesday. And during a Punchbowl News event Wednesday, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas said that while the Senate might be able to finish on time, it could take another month to negotiate with the House. 'The Senate is going to do what it damn well wants to do,' he said. OK, senator: Go tell that to Donald Trump. Some of the president's allies on the Hill are already dreaming up a snazzy Rose Garden celebration to ring in both Independence Day and the enactment of the 'big, beautiful bill.' (At least that's what one well-placed GOP congressional aide predicted to me this week.) The recent history of the megabill is fueling the administration's confidence. Political prognosticators scoffed at Johnson's self-imposed Memorial Day target for House passage, predicting the warring factions in his conference would make that deadline an impossibility. But Trump swooped in and muscled the bill through by sheer force, strong-arming moderate holdouts and bringing conservatives to heel. And White House officials are sure he can do it again. Administration aides are well aware of the work left to be done. Senate Republicans are already moving to throw a major wrench in the negotiations by upending two key provisions that were essential to winning the support of rival blocs in the House. Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo told his colleagues Wednesday he plans to deliver on a personal priority that's highly desired by members of his panel: making key business tax breaks permanent. To do it, he's ready to scale back the House's $40,000 cap on the state-and-local-tax deduction — a key factor in winning the support of blue-state GOP holdouts. And to manage desires elsewhere in the Senate GOP, Crapo also hinted he'll elongate the phase-out time for some clean-energy tax breaks enacted under former President Joe Biden — a huge no-no for House Freedom Caucus members, who made their quick repeal a must in exchange for their votes. That means Trump is about to find himself in a familiar spot — playing referee between the chambers — and his team knows it. He could start blowing the whistle as soon as Thursday, when he meets with Thune and Crapo at the White House. There's good reason to think that Trump will ultimately be able to impose his will on the unruly GOP lawmakers. There were signs he was already doing so this week, after rumblings emerged about some Senate Republicans wanting to scale back Trump's tax priorities in order to pay for the business tax provisions. Trump's campaign pledges to exempt tips, overtime pay and Social Security from income taxes made it into the House bill at a cost of $230 billion, according to a Joint Committee on Taxation score. Scrapping or scaling back any of those provisions could have been a huge boon to Senate tax writers. But the White House made clear behind the scenes that would be a no-go: 'We're not willing to entertain any scaling back of our signature promises,' a second Trump administration official said. 'You're not going to rock the president's commitments to the voters to pay for [business] expensing in the out years.' On Tuesday, Thune made it clear to reporters that Trump's priorities would stay — words the White House welcomed. So don't expect much stomach inside the GOP for bucking Trump's wishes over the coming weeks. It's telling that, as I was told, none of the Senate Finance Republicans who met with Trump last week raised the issue of shrinking his tax wish list during their White House skull session. That just underscores how no one — not even senators who get six-year terms and have historically relished their independence — wants to tell the most powerful man in the world: Please, Mr. President, we'd like to water down your campaign promises to substitute one of our own. 'I think ultimately a lot of members are wish-casting different structures to permit more of their own priorities, and certainly that's something that senators are welcome to do,' the first official said. But 'the president's priorities are not negotiable in this process.'