‘They're Not Asking For A Seat At The Table. They're Rebuilding It Entirely' – Meet The Black Women Rewriting The Future Of AI
Artificial Intelligence is reshaping the fabric of society whether we like it or not. It goes beyond the friendly tone given to the Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI) that we use when planning a trip, or even the type of text message to send to that emotionally unavailable guy who just won't act right.
AI is in fact informing decisions about who gets access to healthcare, employment, housing, and ever importantly, freedom. Yet, as the field expands (albeit in an unregulated and exponential rate), so does the urgent need to interrogate who is building these systems and whose values are embedded in the algorithms. In a landscape historically dominated by white and male perspectives, Black women have emerged as critical voices pushing for equity, transparency, and justice in AI. Their presence is not simply symbolic; it is transformative and necessary.
Black women in AI are not only contributing technical expertise but also grounding the work in lived experience, historical analysis, and a politics of care that is often missing from the mainstream tech industry. Due to centuries of Anti-blackness coupled with sexism, Black women continue to be at the mercy of oversights in various fields, which can prove detrimental and sometimes fatal. Healthcare is a glaring example of this; in the UK Black women are almost three times more likely to die during or within six weeks of pregnancy compared to white women. The interventions of Black women in AI force us to confront the uncomfortable truth: AI is not neutral. Behind every dataset is a legacy of power, exclusion, and bias.
Perhaps no one exemplifies this better throughout my research, than Joy Buolamwini, founder of the Algorithmic Justice League. Her MIT Media Lab research revealed how commercial facial recognition systems failed to accurately detect darker-skinned faces (particularly Black women) forcing major tech companies to reckon with the ethical failures of their software. Buolamwini didn't just diagnose a problem; she sparked a global reckoning. A question that I keep asking is 'how do these companies keep getting it wrong over and over again?' When does the lack of inclusivity in AI stop being a silly faux pas and instead seen as a strategised attempt at erasure.
As someone who has built their platform on saying their mind, I am always enamoured by other women speaking up courageously in their field of expertise. That is how I cam across Dr. Timnit Gebru, co-founder of Black in AI, who has fearlessly taken on Big Tech. After being ousted from Google for raising concerns about the risks of large language models, she founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) —an independent organisation centering community-rooted, anti-colonial AI research. Why this is important to me personally is because I am regularly chastised by trolls online for 'making everything about race.' What Gebru's work confirmed to me is that without the influence of Black women in tech, more impenetrable racist systems would be built, which could take decades to rectify. Her fearlessness not only exposed systemic racism in Silicon Valley but also offered a blueprint for doing tech differently.
Other trailblazers like Mutale Nkonde, founder of AI For the People, and Dr. Safiya Umoja Noble, author of Algorithms of Oppression, are using policy, media, and academia to reveal how AI reinforces existing power structures, and doesn't modernise them. Whether through legislation, books, or public education, they are ensuring that conversations about AI include, and centre Black voices, especially those of Black women.
Crucially, these women are not asking for a seat at the table. They are rebuilding the table entirely. In other words, they didn't wait to be invited to do the meaningful work, they got to work regardless. They should be our reminder that the future is not preordained by machines and coded binaries; it's designed by people. And when Black women are included in the creation of that design, the result is not just smarter tech, but fairer, more human systems.
I am inspired by these women, not just for what they do, but for how they do it: with integrity, radical imagination, and refusal to be co-opted by the very systems they critique. It is not always easy to raise one's head above the parapet for fear of being seen as an Angry Black Woman. This same spirit fuels my own work, albeit from a different angle. As a writer and cultural commentator, I've chosen to explore similar questions through the lens of science fiction.
In my upcoming novel, Awakened, we follow a young Black woman in London who discovers ancient, dormant powers within herself just as Black children begin mysteriously dying, their bodies found by rivers and lakes. A journalist by profession, she begins investigating these tragedies, only to uncover a supernatural conspiracy entangled with real-world systems of neglect and violence.
Writing speculative fiction allows me to interrogate reality by bending it. Like one of my favourite authors, Octavia Butler, I'm using genre to ask questions that mainstream narratives often sideline. What does liberation look like in a world that wasn't built with us in mind? How do we reclaim our spiritual and ancestral knowledge in an age of algorithmic erasure? And can we, as Black women, wholly embody the identity of architects of not just resistance—but re-imagination?
The parallels between speculative fiction and AI are striking, because both involve world-building. Both carry the power to shape perceptions, define truths, and govern futures. But unlike the opaque algorithms written for the benefit of corporate boardrooms, fiction can make the invisible visible. It can expose the hidden logics that underlie our systems and reframe what's possible—especially when told through the eyes of those most often written out of the future.
Black women in AI are shifting the culture from within. I'm doing it through story. We are not anomalies; we are archetypes of a new era. And we are not asking permission. There is an ancient blueprint and it's about time that we remember our place and power within it.
Awakened by Kelechi Okafor is out now (Trapeze, £18.99).
ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
20 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Waymo's Self-Driving Future Is Here
Buy a copy of the TIME100 Companies issue here Mawakana believes that Waymo is threading the needle on all fronts, and that the company's gradual, safety-first, city-by-city approach (Phoenix in 2020, San Francisco and Los Angeles in 2024, Austin and Atlanta this year, and Washington D.C. in 2026) is exactly why it will emerge victorious in the automated rideshare race. Cruise shut down in 2024 after its headline-making accident; Tesla faces multiple lawsuits related to its autopilot technology. 'Trust is hard to build and easy to lose,' Mawakana says. 'Not just Tesla, but there have been other companies that have come and gone that have had very, very audacious claims. We've learned the amount of humility needed: Ultimately, it's the riders who are going to decide.' __________________________________________ While Waymo is the first company to deploy a self-driving fleet, they're far from the only company to try. In the early 2010s, Uber spent hundreds of millions of dollars on autonomous vehicles, which executives believed were essential to profitability. Raffi Krikorian, former director of Uber's Advanced Technologies Center, who led those efforts from 2015 to 2017, said that the mechanical aspect of teaching cars to drive was one challenge, but unspoken social norms were another entirely. 'When you follow all the rules of the road to the letter, you're actually a dangerous driver,' Krikorian says. 'You actually need to know when to speed, when to roll through a yellow. When we first deployed, we would slam on the brakes at red lights.' Around the same time, Google was ramping up its own self-driving project, operating buggy-like Firefly prototypes with plastic windshields around the company's Bay Area-campuses. Being within Google's massive corporate umbrella gave engineers the time and resources to experiment without rushing to market. In 2016, Google spun this project, called Waymo, into its own company within Alphabet. Dmitri Dolgov, an engineer who worked on the Firefly and is now Waymo's co-CEO, says those days were characterized both by technological breakthroughs and painstaking cautiousness. 'We would build something with goals for what the Waymo driver would be capable of, and then run it through our rigorous safety framework—and see that it fell short of where we set the bar,' he says. 'And we would not deploy.' Mawakana joined the company in 2017, initially as vice president of public policy and government affairs, ultimately moving into running business operations. Waymo's road safety mission was personal to her: Her uncle, a longhaul trucker, had died in his vehicle from a heart attack. She relates to customers' stories of family members killed by drunk driving or other accidents. 'People don't think they need a safer alternative. But the status quo is not acceptable,' Mawakana says. After several years of testing and iterating, Waymo first began offering fully autonomous rides to the public in October 2020 in Phoenix, Arizona. (The city has attracted several driverless companies due to its wide lanes, separated pedestrian walkways, and mostly snow-less weather.) At first, many community members reacted with skepticism or outright anger. Reports of strange but harmless incidents piled up, including Waymos stopping unexpectedly in the middle of the road. But gradually, Waymo's technology improved, and the community grew accustomed to their presence on the streets. Converts included Mayor Kate Gallego, who tells TIME that the city has seen lower tailpipe emissions and more drivers following the speed limits since Waymo arrived. Wamyo's staff has now grown to 2,500 employees, and its fleet to over 1,500 cars. In San Francisco, Waymo cars have become tourist attractions, with visitors taking the cars up the iconic winding Lombard Street. The prices of individual rides are variable, but often competitive with that of Uber or Lyft. While social media users have laughed at cringeworthy moments—like a flock honking at each other in a parking lot—those incidents were ultimately just that: laughable, but not dangerous. __________________________________________ Driverless cars sound terrifying at first blush. But there are several reasons why they make theoretically safer drivers than humans. While humans have blind spots and fallible attention, Waymos ingest visual and spatial information through a slew of cameras and sensors. Radar allows the vehicle to see clearly through fog or snow. LIDAR, 360-degree laser-based spatial sensors, detect other cars in the dead of night and outside of the reach of a car's headlights. Whenever Waymo enters a city, it begins a detailed custom mapping process, ingesting data like lane markers and curb heights. Each car on the road then provides real-time updates about new construction zones or road closures. All of this information is held on a powerful computer in the car's trunk—the contents of which are uploaded and used to improve the Waymo driver. In January, I took Waymos around Austin, closely watching a screen on each console that showed real-time digital representations of buildings, trees, pedestrians and even dogs passing by. One afternoon, I tested a car's reflexes jumping out in front of it on an empty street (do not try this at home, kids); It immediately ground to a halt. While in the car, I tested the 'assistance' button, which refers passengers to a support team—and someone picked up immediately. Once the novelty wore off, riding around in Waymos felt shockingly uninteresting. The cars drove cautiously but competently; though their tendency to drive just above the speed limit sometimes created long lines behind them. Still, the cars occasionally showed welcome spurts of defensive driving. One Waymo, while navigating a one-lane cramped downtown street, sped up in order to seize a gap in parked cars before an oncoming car could beat it to the spot. Another, when needing to take a left-hand turn, cranked the wheel hard and flew through the intersection before a rush of cars arrived; I would have waited for the next light. Even some professional drivers grudgingly admit that Waymo cars drive pretty well. 'I love the way they drive: I think they drive better than me,' says Sergio Avedian, a Los Angeles-based Uber driver and a senior contributor for the blog The Rideshare Guy. 'People have seen it evolve and now overwhelmingly love it,' says Ryan Johnson, a Tempe-based real estate developer. 'Other drivers even think that Waymo makes other drivers drive safer.' While Waymo earns money every ride, perhaps even more valuable is the data it ingests—about handling merging, entering crowded parking lots, or avoiding road closures—all of which train the system to make it more robust. (A spokesperson said that the data is not shared with Google Maps.) 'We're driving two million miles a week, which is more than most humans will drive in their lifetime,' says Matthew Schwall, Waymo's director of safety and incident management. Whenever unusual or dangerous situations occur, his team studies them closely, running simulations and tweaking variables so all Waymo cars can better navigate future crises. Waymos also avoid many of humanity's worst traits when it comes to driving. We tire; we check our phones; we fly into road rage; we drive drunk. These flaws contribute to 40,000 U.S. roadway deaths every year—a number that most of society has come to ignore or sweep aside. 'There have been many situations where I have been intentionally harassed or carelessly mistreated by human drivers with emotions and entitlements,' says Andre Rouhani, a PhD student in Tempe, who often rides to class on his bicycle. He says he feels much safer with more Waymos on the road.
Fast Company
24 minutes ago
- Fast Company
2025's college graduates are facing one of the toughest job markets in over a decade. Here's why
While completing a master's degree in data analysis, Palwasha Zahid moved from Dallas to a town near Silicon Valley. The location made it easy to visit the campuses of tech stalwarts such as Google, Apple, and Nvidia. Zahid, 25, completed her studies in December, but so far she hasn't found a job in the industry that surrounds her. 'It stings a little bit,' she said. 'I never imagined it would be this difficult just to get a foot in the door.' Young people graduating from college this spring and summer are facing one of the toughest job markets in more than a decade. The unemployment rate for degree holders ages 22 to 27 has reached its highest level in a dozen years, excluding the coronavirus pandemic. Joblessness among that group is now higher than the overall unemployment rate, and the gap is larger than it has been in more than three decades. The rise in unemployment has worried many economists as well as officials at the Federal Reserve because it could be an early sign of trouble for the economy. It suggests businesses are holding off on hiring new workers because of rampant uncertainty stemming from the Trump administration's tariff increases, which could slow growth. 'Young people are bearing the brunt of a lot of economic uncertainty,' Brad Hersbein, senior economist at the Upjohn Institute, a labor-focused think tank, said. 'The people that you often are most hesitant in hiring when economic conditions are uncertain are entry-level positions.' The growth of artifical intelligence may be playing an additional role by eating away at positions for beginners in white-collar professions such as information technology, finance, and law. Higher unemployment for younger graduates has also renewed concerns about the value of a college degree. More workers than ever have a four-year degree, which makes it less of a distinguishing factor in job applications. Murat Tasci, an economist at JPMorgan, calculates that 45% of workers have a four-year degree, up from 26% in 1992. While the difficulty of finding work has demoralized young people like Zahid, most economists argue that holding a college degree still offers clear lifetime benefits. Graduates earn higher pay and experience much less unemployment over their lifetimes. The overall U.S. unemployment rate is a still-low 4.2%, and the government's monthly jobs reports show the economy is generating modest job gains. But the additional jobs are concentrated in health care, government, and restaurants and hotels. Job gains in professions with more college grads, such as information technology, legal services, and accounting have languished in the past 12 months. The unemployment rate has stayed low mostly because layoffs are still relatively rare. The actual hiring rate—new hires as a percentage of all jobs—has fallen to 2014 levels, when the unemployment rate was much higher, at 6.2%. Economists call it a no-hire, no-fire economy. For college graduates 22 to 27 years old, the unemployment rate was 5.8% in March—the highest, excluding the pandemic, since 2012, and far above the nationwide rate. Lexie Lindo, 23, saw how reluctant companies were to hire while applying for more than 100 jobs last summer and fall after graduating from Clark Atlanta University with a business degree and 3.8 GPA. She had several summer internships in fields such as logistics and real estate while getting her degree, but no offer came. 'Nobody was taking interviews or responding back to any applications that I filled out,' Lindo, who is from Auburn, Georgia, said. 'My résumé is full, there's no gaps or anything. Every summer I'm doing something. It's just, 'OK, so what else are you looking for?'' She has returned to Clark for a master's program in supply chain studies and has an internship this summer at a Fortune 500 company in Austin, Texas. She's hopeful it will lead to a job next year. Artificial intelligence could be a culprit, particularly in IT. Matthew Martin, senior U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, has calculated that employment for college graduates 28 and above in computer science and mathematical occupations has increased a slight 0.8% since 2022. For those ages 22 to 27, it has fallen 8%, according to Martin. Company announcements have further fueled concerns. Tobi Lutke, CEO of online commerce software company Shopify, said in an April memo that before requesting new hires, 'teams must demonstrate why they cannot get what they want done using AI.' Last week, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said AI would likely reduce the company's corporate work force over the next few years. 'We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' Jassy said in a message to employees. 'We expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Zahid worries that AI is hurting her chances. She remembers seeing big billboard ads for AI at the San Francisco airport that asked, 'Why hire a human when you could use AI?' Still, many economists argue that blaming AI is premature. Most companies are in the early stages of adopting the technology. Professional networking platform LinkedIn categorized occupations based on their exposure to AI and did not see big hiring differences between professions where AI was more prevalent and where it wasn't, said Kory Kantenga, the firm's head of economics for the Americas. 'We don't see any broad-based evidence that AI is having a disproportionate impact in the labor market or even a disproportionate impact on younger workers versus older workers,' Kantenga said. He added that the Federal Reserve's interest rate hikes have also slowed hiring in tech. Many IT firms expanded when the Fed pinned its short-term rate at nearly zero after the pandemic. In 2022, the Fed began cranking up rates to combat inflation, which made it harder to borrow and grow. In fact, IT's hiring spree when rates were low—fueled by millions of Americans ramping up their online shopping and video conferencing—left many firms with too many workers, economists say. Cory Stahle, an economist at the job-listings website Indeed, says postings for software development jobs, for example, have fallen 40% compared with four years ago. It's a sharp shift for students who began studying computer science when hiring was near its peak. Zahid, who lives in Dublin, California, has experienced this whiplash firsthand. When she entered college in 2019, her father, who is a network engineer, encouraged her to study IT and said it would be easy for her to get a job in the field. She initially studied psychology but decided she wanted something more hands-on and gravitated to data analysis. Her husband, 33, has a software development job, and friends of hers in IT received immediate job offers upon graduation a few years ago. Such rapid hiring seems to have disappeared now, she said. She has her college diploma, but hasn't hung it up yet.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple Inc. (AAPL): I'm Going To Keep Defending It, Says Jim Cramer
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the . Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has been one of Cramer's top stocks this year. Despite the fact that the firm's shares have struggled in the first half of 2025 due to slow momentum on AI and US trade tensions with China, Cramer has maintained that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the greatest companies in the world. In his latest comments, the CNBC host remarked on acquisitions, the firm's deal with Google, and its trade war woes: 'Look, their policy, and I remember when suggested Tim Cook to buy Netflix, um, I've suggested to buy a lot of things. . .I thought that Apple had a lot of good things [at WWDC] I don't think that people realize that Apple has such an aversion to buying companies, and a great proclivity to say, look, you want our billion, 1.3 billion? We'll take you as our sole-source. Now the problem is that Google one of the things that Google's going to be in trouble for . . . .Google wrote a check, for 20 billion to Apple in 2022. And this is what the government hates that they did that. So I would pivot if I were Apple instead of saying to Perplexity, you know what, I think you should pay us, I think they should say, we pay you. Now that's not what you ever want to hear, right. In his previous comments, Cramer discusses Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s trade war woes in detail: 'Finally, let's understand something. Apple is not a company that stands still… Can we stipulate that in the last year, it's reasonable to believe that Tim Cook, the CEO, might have been a little distracted? Here's a man… who's been trying to do everything he's supposed to do in order to meet the demands of the president of the United States. The president wanted investment in the U.S. What does he do? He announces that Apple's going to spend $500 billion in the US over four years… A wide view of an Apple store, showing the range of products the company offers. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
