
Longer flight delays without compensation? EU plan divides
Representatives for the bloc's 27 countries discussed the idea, which proponents say will result in fewer flight cancellations, on Wednesday in Brussels.
Carriers currently must pay air travellers in Europe up to 600 euros ($682) for delays of more than three hours, or if a flight is cancelled less than 14 days before departure.
Supporters see the rules dating back to 2004 as an example of the European Union's prowess in defending consumer rights.
But airlines say they face a hefty bill, which "perversely" often leads them to cancel flights rather than run them with a long delay -- due to knock-on effect on flight schedules.
"Extending the so-called delay thresholds will give airlines more time to move planes and crews across Europe to save flight schedules," said Airlines for Europe (A4E), an industry group.
Poland, which currently holds the EU's rotating presidency, has picked up plans for reform that have languished since a 2013 commission proposal failed to bear fruit.
Warsaw initially introduced upping the maximum non-sanctioned delay to five hours, according to several people familiar with the discussion.
But some member states, including Germany, oppose the idea.
Even a compromise backed by 15 states to increase the threshold to four hours for flights of up to 3,500 kilometres and six hours for longer ones failed to find enough support to pass Wednesday, several European diplomats told AFP.
"Long flight delays are a real nuisance. They ruin the start of well-deserved holidays. They disrupt important plans. They cost valuable lifetime," said Stefanie Hubig, Germany's consumer rights minister.
Berlin could not agree to any changes "unilaterally aligned" with airlines' interests "just before the holiday season", she added.
It is pushing to keep the three-hour threshold but lower compensation to a flat rate of 300 euros, according to diplomatic sources.
More flights less money
The original plan to allow a five-hour delay could have saved almost 50 percent of flights that are currently cancelled, according to A4E, which represents Air France-KLM, Lufthansa and other companies accounting for more than 80 percent of European air traffic.
It would also have stripped about 75 percent of passengers of the right to compensation, said Europe's BEUC umbrella consumer rights group.
"This is an unacceptable step back from the current level of protection," it said in a joint statement with consumer associations.
Delays and cancellations could cost airlines up to 8.1 billion euros this year, according to the European Commission.
Yet, agencies that help passengers get money in exchange for a fee note that of the millions of passengers eligible for compensation, only a fraction each year file a claim.
"For European customers this is a disastrous change," Tomasz Pawliszyn, the head of one such firm, Airhelp, told AFP of the planned reform.
Since the three-hours threshold has been adopted in other jurisdictions, such as Canada, Turkey and Britain, the changes would generate "confusion" and potentially lead to some European carriers being allowed longer delays than their non-European rivals on some of the same routes, he added.
'Blackmail'
The proposed changes are part of a broader package of reforms.
This includes some clearly passenger-friendly moves, such as barring airlines from charging for hand-luggage of a standard size and weight.
It has nevertheless enraged some European lawmakers, for the Polish presidency of the European Council is seeking to push it through with a rarely-used expedited procedure that limits parliament's say.
"The first word that comes to my mind about the council's behaviour is blackmail," Andrey Novakov, a lawmaker with the centre-right EPP and the parliament's rapporteur on the issue told AFP.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Cambodia says to file complaint with ICJ over Thai border dispute
"Cambodia hopes that the Thai side will agree with Cambodia to jointly bring these issues to the International Court of Justice... to prevent armed confrontation again over border uncertainty," Hun Manet said during a meeting between MPs and senators. Military clashes between the Southeast Asian neighbours erupted in 2008 and have led to several years of sporadic violence, resulting in at least 28 deaths. The most recent occurred Wednesday, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a location known as the Emerald Triangle -- a joint border area between Cambodia, Thailand and Laos. The day after, Cambodia's foreign ministry sent a letter to the Thai embassy in Phnom Penh demanding "an immediate and thorough investigation" into the "unprovoked attack". Describing the incident as "a violation of Cambodian sovereignty", Phnom Penh said it remained committed to resolving the issue through "peaceful and diplomatic avenues". Prime Minister Hun Manet said that even if the Thai side did not agree on bringing the issue to the ICJ, Cambodia would still file the complaint. He added that the border dispute was being "incited by small extremist groups in both countries", which could lead to further clashes. Thailand's ministry of foreign affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment from AFP. Cambodia's military had said they were attacked first in Wednesday's incident, while the Thai side said their soldiers were responding to gunshots. The Thai and Cambodian militaries met the following day, agreeing to ease tensions. Thailand says a Joint Boundary Committee will meet in the next two weeks to resolve the issue. The Emerald Triangle is among the areas that will be named in the ICJ complaint, Hun Manet said. Another is Ta Moan Thom Temple, the backdrop for a video posted on social media earlier this year showing a woman singing a patriotic Khmer song which led to Bangkok lodging a formal protest to Phnom Penh. Cambodia and Thailand have long been at odds over their more than 800-kilometre-long (500-mile) border, which was largely drawn during the French occupation of Indochina. The 2008 military clashes erupted over a patch of land next to Preah Vihear Temple, a 900-year-old structure near their shared border.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
South Korean voters weigh political divide in partisan heartlands
The election was triggered by ex-leader Yoon Suk Yeol's disastrous declaration of martial law last year. All major polls suggest victory for Lee Jae-myung of the liberal Democratic Party, with Kim Moon-soo of the right-wing People Power Party (PPP) trailing far behind. From the city of Daegu, for decades synonymous with conservatism, to Gwangju, the spiritual heartland of the left, AFP spoke to voters about where they stand and how the country's divide can be healed. - Switching sides - Lee Woo-hyun, an entertainment professional from Daegu and long-time conservative voter, told AFP the martial law fiasco "really shook" him. "When I talk to my parents and other senior citizens, I can see they are turning away from the red," the 45-year-old said, referring to the symbolic colour of the PPP. "Some might wonder how one incident could completely change my stance," Lee said. "But for me, it did. A lot of people in their mid-40s feel the same way. They don't think what happened was right." Generational divide Ko Seung-ju, an electrical engineering major, sees growing cracks in Daegu's traditional conservative support base. "Younger voters are no longer likely to blindly support the conservatives," Ko said. The Yoon administration's decision to cut the national research and development budget has hit science and engineering students hard, he said. "I really hope that gets reinstated." 'Balance is important' Kim Sung-gyun, 60, a former automotive industry worker, said he is undecided. He disagreed with Yoon's attempt to impose martial law, which he described as creating "extreme chaos". "People's lives are already difficult enough." But he expressed reservations about one side gaining unchecked power -- pointing to the opposition's near two-thirds majority in parliament. "Balance is important," he said. He said he plans to vote for whoever he believes "puts the people first", regardless of traditional regional loyalties. The unshaken Shopowner Kim remains unfazed by the martial law bid. "Declaring martial law was wrong, but nothing actually happened afterwards so they should just move on," said Kim, who declined to share his full name over privacy concerns. For the 69-year-old, the local economy is the primary concern. He said it was "wiped out" by the Covid-19 pandemic and has never recovered. "It's impossible to keep a business afloat -- there's rent to pay, wages to cover and constant stress piling on." A vote for democracy Lee Gwi-nye, 79, a lifelong resident of Gwangju, voiced firm support for the Democratic Party and its candidate Lee. "Democracy lets us live freely and comfortably," she said. "But parties like the PPP, honestly, don't feel democratic at all." To her, democracy means "being able to live and act freely, with peace of mind". 'History matters' Jung Se-yoon, 65, a retired teacher, said she doesn't believe in voting solely along party lines. But she vividly recalled a bloody 1980 crackdown in Gwangju by South Korea's former military regime which left hundreds dead or missing. "Those experiences still resonate. That's why I believe history matters," she said. The upcoming election must serve as a "turning point". "It will take far too long for the country to get back on its feet if we miss this chance -- and by then, we might fall too far behind," Jung said. Beyond party lines Haylee Lee, an English teacher, urged fellow Gwangju residents to "make a decision based on their own convictions" rather than fall into habitual partisan voting. What matters most to her is how much effort presidential hopefuls make to listen to the concerns of ordinary people. "Many politicians come from privileged backgrounds," she said. "I wonder how well they actually listen to the voices of the middle class." Pressure as a centrist Park Yeon-ok, 64, who works at a social enterprise in Gwangju, told AFP she often faces pressure when she identifies as a centrist. "Many people immediately ask: 'So you're not supporting the Democratic Party? Then are you backing the People Power Party?' That kind of reaction is pretty common," she said. In this election, Park sees PPP candidate Kim as someone capable of bringing about unity. "The divisions run deep," she said. © 2025 AFP


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Is Trump deterring European tourists to US? Not so fast
The number of visitors to the United States from Western Europe in March fell by 17 percent from the same month a year earlier, but then picked up 12 percent in April, according to the US tourism office. The German Travel Association (DRV) said the number of Germans going to the United States dropped 28 percent in March, but then bounced back by 14 percent in April. The association's spokesperson, Torsten Schaefer, said that Easter holidays fell later this year than in 2024, which might have impacted the figures. "There're practically no requests in recent months to change or cancel reservations," Schaefer said. However, he noted "a rise in queries about entry requirements into the United States". At the end of March, several European countries urged their nationals to review their travel documents for the United States, following several mediatised cases of Europeans being held on arrival then deported. Anecdotally, there are signs of Europeans opting not to visit Trump's America. "The country I knew no longer exists," said Raphael Gruber, a 60-year-old German doctor who has been taking his family to Cape Cod in Massachusetts every summer since 2018. "Before, when you told the immigration officer you were there for whale-watching, that was a good reason to come. But now, they are afraid of everything that comes from outside," he told AFP. Referring to invasive electronic checks at the US borders, he added: "I don't want to buy a 'burner' phone just to keep my privacy". In Britain, Matt Reay, a 35-year-old history teacher from Northamptonshire, said he had scratched the United States off his list, preferring to go to South America, where his "money would probably be better spent". "It feels like, to be honest, that there's a culture that's built in the US in the last kind of 12 months, where as a foreign visitor, I don't really feel like I'm that welcome anyway," he said. Reay said he felt "insulted" by both Trump's tariffs on British exports to the United States and comments by Trump's vice president, JD Vance, about Britain as "a random country". Trump's public belittling of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a White House visit in February was also "outrageous", he said. According to the US tourism office, however, the number of British visitors to the United States in April rose 15 percent year-on-year, after a 14 percent drop in March. Oxford Economics, an economics monitoring firm, attributed the March decline partly to the Easter dates this year, along with a stronger US dollar at the time that made the United States a more costly destination. But it mainly pointed to "polarising rhetoric and policy actions by the Trump administration, as well as concerns around tighter border and immigration policies". Cheaper flights Didier Arino, head of the French travel consultancy Protourisme, said April traffic to the United States might have picked up because European airlines were offering discounted flights. "You can find flights, especially for New York, at 600 euros ($680)," he said. In Germany, Muriel Wagner, 34, said she was not putting off a summer trip to Boston to see a friend at Harvard -- a US university in a legal and ideological struggle with Trump's administration. "I've been asked if the political situation and trade war with the US has affected our trip," the PhD student said in Frankfurt. But "you can't let yourself be intimidated", she said, adding that she was keen to discuss the tensions with Americans on their home turf. Protourisme's Arino said that, as "the mood has sunk" regarding the United States, potential tourists were rethinking a visit. On top of the "the financial outlay, being insulted by the US administration for being European, that really robs you of the desire" to go there, he said. He estimated that the "Trump effect" would cut the number of French tourists going to the United States this year by a quarter. A body representing much of the French travel sector, Entreprises du Voyage, said the number of French visitors to America dropped eight percent in March, and a further 12 percent in April. It estimated that summer departures to the United States would drop by 11 percent. According to the World Travel and Tourism Council, covering major tourism operators, the US tourism sector -- already reeling from Canadians and Mexicans staying away -- could lose $12.5 billion in spending by foreign visitors this year. kap-lep-ajb-zap/jbo/rmb/js © 2025 AFP