UN chief calls for efforts to address root causes of maritime insecurity
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres stressed the need to intensify efforts to address the root causes of maritime insecurity.
"Threats to maritime security cannot be addressed without also addressing issues like poverty, a lack of alternative livelihoods, insecurity, and weak governance structures," he told a Security Council open debate.
"Across the United Nations family, we're working with impoverished coastal communities to develop new opportunities for decent and sustainable work. Collectively, we must do more to reduce the likelihood that desperate people will turn to crime and other activities that threaten maritime security and degrade our ocean environment," said Guterres.
He also highlighted the need to help developing countries build their capacity to deal with these threats through technology, training, capacity-building, judicial reforms, and modernised naval forces, marine police units, maritime surveillance and port security.
Guterres said respect for international law is the anchor of maritime security, Xinhua news agency reported.
The international legal regime for maritime security, with the UN Charter and the Convention on the Law of the Sea at its core, strikes a careful balance between states' sovereign rights, jurisdictions and freedoms, and their duties and obligations. And it provides a strong cooperative framework for addressing crimes at sea and ensuring accountability, he said.
But the UN chief warned that this framework is only as strong as states' commitment to full and effective implementation. "All states must live up to their obligations. And they must resolve any differences in relation to maritime security in accordance with the UN Charter," he said.
Guterres called for partnerships to enhance maritime security.
"We must involve everyone with a stake in maritime spaces," he said. "As threats to maritime security are becoming more complex and interconnected, enhanced coordination and stronger maritime governance are essential."
Without maritime security, there can be no global security. But maritime spaces are increasingly under strain from both traditional threats and emerging dangers: from challenges around contested boundaries, to the depletion of natural resources at sea, to escalating geopolitical tensions fanning the flames of competition, conflict and crime, he said.
No region is spared. And the problem is getting worse. After a modest global decrease in reported piracy and armed robbery incidents in 2024, the first quarter of 2025 saw a sharp upward reversal, warned Guterres.
Reported incidents rose by nearly half (47.5 per cent) compared with the same period in 2024, he said, citing figures from the International Maritime Organisation.
Incidents in Asia nearly doubled, especially in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore. In the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, attacks by the Houthis in Yemen on commercial vessels have disrupted global trade and increased tensions in an already volatile region, he noted.
The Gulf of Aden and the Mediterranean remain treacherously active routes for migrant smuggling and the trafficking of weapons and human beings. The Gulf of Guinea continues to grapple with piracy, kidnappings, armed robbery at sea, oil theft, illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and the illicit trafficking of drugs, weapons, and people.
Heroin from Afghanistan continues to reach East Africa through the Indian Ocean. Cocaine moves through the coasts of the Western Hemisphere and across the Atlantic to West Africa and European ports.
Cyber-attacks are a fast-emerging security threat for ports and shipping companies, he said.
Over the years, the Security Council has sought to address a range of threats that undermine maritime security and global peace, including piracy, armed robbery, trafficking and organised crime as well as terrorism in the maritime domain, said the UN chief.
The UN system stands ready to continue to support the Security Council and all UN member states in ensuring peaceful, secure and prosperous maritime spaces for generations to come, he said. "Let's take action to support and secure maritime spaces, and the communities and people counting on them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Israel's strike on Iran causing radioactive contamination: IAEA chief
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi told the United Nations Security Council on Friday that Israel's strike on an Iranian nuclear facility was causing "radioactive and chemical contamination.""Israel destroyed the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear facility. There are no indications of damage to the underground enrichment facilities at the site, but the power outage may have affected the centrifuges. There is radioactive and chemical contamination at the site," Grossi present, the Iranian authorities are informing us of attacks on two other facilities, namely the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan," the International Atomic Energy Agency's Grossi told the 15-member council. "At this moment we do not have enough information beyond indicating that military activity has been taking place around these facilities as well," he is enriching uranium up to 60% purity, close to weapons grade of 90%, at the Natanz pilot plant. But the Fordow site, which is dug into a mountain, produces more of the material, and military experts say it would be difficult for Israel to destroy through bombardment. Reuters launched blistering attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear and military structure on Friday, deploying warplanes and drones previously smuggled into the country to assault key facilities and kill top generals and scientists. Iran retaliated late Friday by unleashing scores of ballistic missiles on Israel, where explosions flared in the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv and shook the buildings Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi requested the Security Council meeting, saying Israel "has now crossed every red line, and the international community must not allow these crimes to go unpunished.""Iran reaffirms its inherent right to self-defense as enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter and will respond decisively and proportionately to these unlawful and cowardly acts," Araghchi wrote in a InMust Watch
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran strikes back 2nd time: Tehran responds to Israel's Operation Rising Lion; fires barrage of missiles
Image credit: AP Iran struck back at Israel with a second wave of missiles on Saturday in retaliation to the latter's Operation Rising Lion that killed over 78 people and left 320 injured, according to Iran's UN ambassador. In a stark warning to Israel, Iranian military shared a video of the strikes saying, "When the last sword strikes, we'll see who remains." Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a recorded address to the nation, said, "Do not assume that they attacked and it's finished. No, they initiated the actions and began the conflict. We will not permit them to evade consequences for this significant wrongdoing they have perpetrated". Israel's emergency medical services reported that 34 individuals were injured in the missile barrage targeting the Tel Aviv area. How it all started? The conflict was sparked by what has been described as Israel's largest military operation in history against Iran. Israeli warplanes and drones on Thursday night—some allegedly pre-positioned within Iranian territory—carried out a massive, coordinated assault deep inside the country. The attacks targeted critical sites, including components of Iran's nuclear program, ballistic missile facilities, and military command centers. Several high-ranking Iranian military officials and nuclear scientists were reportedly killed in the strike. In retaliation, Iran on Friday night launched a barrage of ballistic missiles at central Tel Aviv. How world leaders reacted? US President Donald Trump urged Iran to 'make a deal' saying, "Two months ago I gave Iran a 60 day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!" Meanwhile, Prime minister Narendra Modi called for restoration of peace in the region saying, "Received a phone call from PM @netanyahu of Israel. He briefed me on the evolving situation. I shared India's concerns and emphasized the need for early restoration of peace and stability in the region." In a pointed response, Iran rejected the call for restraint saying, "If you were silent during two years of Palestinian massacres and last night's attack on Iran, don't call for restraint now. Stay quiet."
Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
War upends the oil trade. How it could play out.
Israel's attack on Iran early Friday sent shock waves through the oil market, which relies on the region for one-third of global supplies. The reverberations won't go away soon. Oil prices spiked 14% in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, before giving back some of those gains. Brent crude, the international benchmark oil price, rose 7% on Friday to $74.23 per barrel. Based on recent history, oil's rise might seem fleeting. For most of the past three years—since the early days of the Russia-Ukraine war—geopolitical events haven't had a lasting impact on oil prices. The Israel-Hamas war and continuing violence in Ukraine have barely impacted the oil market, because they didn't dramatically affect supply and demand. But the price shock from the Israel-Iran conflict could last weeks because major oil infrastructure could be in the line of fire. 'It is something that seems like prices could remain elevated for some time," says Rob Haworth, who oversees investment strategy for U.S. Bank Asset Management Group. If the conflict grows substantially, analysts have predicted oil prices could surge over $100 per barrel, and perhaps as high as $120. The extent of the price-move depends on how the war escalates. Israel didn't directly strike Iran's oil infrastructure on Friday, but some analysts expect Israel to hit those facilities if the war continues. Iran, for its part, is in a position to disrupt oil shipments in the region, which could cause prices to spike even more. Iran produces about 3.2 million barrels of oil a day, and exports between 1.5 million and two million barrels of it. That is a significant piece of the 103 million barrels of global oil production, but not enough to completely disrupt the market. Israel isn't a major player, historically pumping less than 10,000 barrels a day. Israel could disrupt production if it hits Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf, which houses much of Iran's oil export infrastructure. Iran, in turn, has plenty of ways to respond that could affect the oil market even more. Iran and the military groups it supports, including the Houthis in Yemen, could create much wider disarray. After the Israel-Hamas war began in 2023, the Houthis attacked ships in the Red Sea—some of those carried energy products—causing a brief spike in the price of oil. But the Red Sea doesn't transport that much oil. The most important waterway is the Persian Gulf, which sits between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Iran and its proxies could block the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and which offers access to markets all over the world. Thirty percent of the world's seaborne oil trade flows through it. China, which buys more of Iran's oil than any other country, is particularly dependent on supplies that come through the strait. Financial firm Lazard thinks oil prices would surge above $120 if the strait is blocked, and the U.S. would probably have to get involved to unblock it. Lazard thinks a short disruption to the strait is possible but considers an extended blockade 'highly unlikely due to catastrophic internal and international consequences and the ability of the U.S. Navy to intervene to open up the strait." Given its location and military capabilities, Iran could impact the market in other ways. Two Saudi Arabian oil facilities were damaged in military strikes in 2019, severely curtailing oil production, and Iran was believed to be behind the attacks. Tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran have eased since then, but Iran could widen the conflict again by hitting Saudi facilities. J.P. Morgan analyst Natasha Kaneva thinks a wider Middle East conflict would cause an oil shock that could take prices over $120. Based on how oil traders reacted to the latest escalation of the war, she thinks the market is implying a 17% chance of a much more severe impact. Such a dramatic price spike feels like a long shot. The overall oil supply-demand picture is still bearish, with global oil supply set to outpace demand this year because of expected production hikes from members of OPEC. 'We expect, absent a wider war, today's rise in prices will likely prove to be a sell-the-news event," wrote Morningstar analyst Allen Good. The conflict, and its higher oil prices, isn't a reason for investors to pile into energy stocks, but it's a reminder of why they can be important pieces of a portfolio. Oil stocks jumped on Friday, even as the broader market and some Big Tech names fell. Exxon Mobil was up 2.2%, and Occidental Petroleum rose 3.8%. 'When tech stalls out, there's a natural rotation to energy companies," says Jay Hatfield, portfolio manager of the Infrastructure Capital Equity Income exchange-traded fund. 'They're actually pretty good hedges." Hatfield's fund owns Exxon and Chevron, which he thinks offer investors exposure to the industry without as much risk as smaller names. Oil's gains may well fizzle out eventually. But this war appears to be far from over, and oil is right in the middle of it. Write to Avi Salzman at
