Buckinghamshire cancer survivor says finally going to cervical screening 'saved' her life
ITV News Meridian's Wesley Smith spoke to a woman who says her life was saved by a cervical screening.
Home testing kits are to be offered to women who've consistently missed opportunities for cervical screening.
The news is welcomed by a mother from Buckinghamshire, who put off cervical screening and had to undergo life-saving treatment.
Toyah Myall, who's 33, had to live with the fear of not knowing what the future might hold for her family.She's backing an NHS campaign getting underway in the Thames Valley called, "Love Your Cervix" to encourage younger women to get checked as under 35s are the most vulnerable age group for a positive diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Family is everything to Toyah Myall from Aylesbury. So the thought that she might not be there to see her children grow up, because she'd put off cervical screening, was a wake-up call.
Ms Myall says her diagnosis would have been worse if she had left it any longer.
Toyah Myall said: "I didn't have a single symptom. Had I not gone, it could have been so much worse.
"Please, please go. I can't stress how important it is. It's uncomfortable, it's only two minutes, but it's going to save your life. It saved mine.
"I put it off for an awful long time, in actual fact, it was eight years, but now I sit here and think, gosh, I'm so lucky that it was just laser that was needed, there was no chemotherapy or anything and it could have been so much worse had I left it even longer.
"It was really difficult because having to explain to the children that actually something wasn't quite right with Mum and Mum needs to be seen by the doctors.
"Young people think, with cancer, death automatically and it was just reassuring them that wasn't the case. I was in good hands."
Toyah's condition was caught in the nick of time, but hundreds of other women, whose lives could potentially have been saved, die from the disease annually.
Athena Lamnisos from gynaecological cancer charity The Eve Appeal said: "It's theoretically an eliminable disease.
"Now, you can't say that about any other cancer type and we know how to detect cancer before it even starts with cell changes and that's part of the national cervical screening programme.
"If you do have symptoms, don't wait for a screening appointment, that's not what you need, you need to go and see a medical professional."
Cervical screenings are a preventative procedure and were formerly known as smear tests.
They involve collecting cells from the cervix to see if there's evidence of HPV, human papillomavirus, which can lead to cervical cancer.
Women aged between 25 and 64 are invited for regular screenings and trans men and non-binary people with a cervix are also eligible.
A third of those invited, do not book an appointment. The disease still kills 800 people a year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
13 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Welsh NHS will only help terminally ill end their life if Senedd agrees first
Welsh NHS will only help terminally ill end their life if Senedd agrees first The Senedd will get a say in whether the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will include the Welsh NHS Assisted dying bill protestors gather outside the House of Commons (Image: Ian Vogler / Daily Mirror ) The Welsh NHS will only will assist terminally ill people to die if the Senedd agrees to it, the Welsh Parliament has been told. Last week MPs in the House of Commons agreed to legalise an assisted dying bill for terminally ill people in England and Wales. However, the Welsh Parliament has been told today - Wednesday, June 25 - that Senedd members will have a vote on whether assisted dying services will be available in the public sector via the Welsh NHS. As healthcare is devolved in Wales, questions have arisen as to how the new law will work here. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Senedd will get a say on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in Wales (Image: Senedd Cymru ) In October 2024, the Senedd voted against a law allowing assisted dying to be introduced in Wales. But, last week, a suggestion of allowing the Senedd to have a veto over all the important parts of the law was taken out by MPs. Article continues below Today, Counsel General Julie James was asked by MS Tom Giffard whether the Senedd will have a say in the decision regarding the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. He asked: "Can you outline what discussions you have had with the UK Government to stand up for the voice of this Senedd, to ensure that we do have a say? "And do you have an assurance from the UK Government that, if this LCM in this Senedd produces a different outcome to the vote in Parliament, our decision will be respected by the UK Government?" Article continues below Ms James, the Welsh Government's most senior legal adviser, confirmed: "Just to reassure the member, and, indeed, all Members of the Senedd, the Bill still contains the key provisions that mean that the NHS or any public body in Wales will not be able to provide voluntary assisted dying services until regulations have been laid by Ministers and there has been an affirmative vote in the Senedd to that effect." A vote is expected to take place in the Senedd this autumn regarding the bill and whether it agrees to the legislation applying in areas controlled by the Senedd.
ITV News
28 minutes ago
- ITV News
Dudley mum of sons with autism hospitalised due to fears of losing disability PIP funding
A mother with two sons with autism has said the government's planned welfare changes would devastate her family's future. Lorraine Griffin, from Dudley, relies on the Disability Living Allowance for her boys, Sam and Ben, aged 12 and 13. Lorraine faces constant costs - medicine, nappies for Ben, who has more severe autism, and replacing TVs he has broken. When they reach 16, they will need to apply for Personal Independence Payment (PIP). But news that their benefits could be at risk led to her being hospitalised from stress. Ms Griffin said: "If they attack these benefits, these payments that are our life, where on Earth will we be? "I ended up in A&E because of my heartbeat going absolutely crazy. This is everything to me, this is our life, I'm repsonsible for these boys, I'm responsible for everything they have in life." The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is set to be voted on by MPs next Tuesday. It would make it harder for disabled people with less severe conditions to claim PIP. "Isn't life hard enough? We have got that much to process and to put up with in our daily lives, it just makes life impossible, what they're taking away from us," Ms Griffin said. She added: "Why are they rushing into this, to do it now? Do it properly. Find out what families need. Come and take a look, just slow down. Please don't, don't cut off our livelihood." A survey of 1,000 disabled people by the national disability charity SENSE found that nearly a quarter fear they will no longer be able to afford essentials like energy and food if the welfare reforms are voted in. 2 in 5 fear they'll struggle to cope financially if the changes go ahead. One in five warned that losing this support would lead them to depend more heavily on the NHS. Steven Morris, from SENSE, said: "The PIP is there to support with the additional costs of being disabled. "It may be she needs more electricity to power a ventilator or charge wheelchairs. These changes, these additional costs are not going to disappear when somebody loses their PIP. Instead, it's going to push more people into poverty." How PIP works and what's changing Those applying have to declare how complex their needs are in a list of 10 daily activities: preparing food eating and drinking managing treatments washing going to toilet getting dressed speaking reading engaging with others making decisions about money They get points for each category, the higher the number, the more restricted the person is. Under the current system, you need to score at least 8 points in total to receive the 'standard rate' of funding for the 'daily living' component. Under the new system, from November 2026, you will still need to get at least 8 points - but 4 of those need to come from at least one daily living activity. The other part of PIP - the funding for 'mobility' - will not be affected. The welfare reforms also include changes to Universal Credit, and more face-to-face assessments. There is a growing rebellion in Parliament with Labour MPs challenging the planned reforms. More than a 100 Labour MPs a publicly backing a move to block the legislation. But Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said: 'We have got to make the reforms to our system. It isn't working as it is. 'It doesn't work as it stands for people who desperately need help to get into work or for people who need protection. It is broken. 'We were elected in to change that which is broken, and that's what we will do, and that's why we will press ahead with reforms.' The rebels argue disabled people have not been properly consulted about the plan and say further analysis is required before making any changes.
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Fat jabs are changing the world. It's time to embrace them
At a recent business conference in London (Chatham House rules apply, so I have to keep it vague), an executive from a major American clothes retailer dropped this extraordinary statistic: the average item of women's clothing sold by her company in the US has gone down by a size in the past year. Just one year! The nation that practically invented obesity, and then exported it around the world, is now shrinking so fast that clothing companies can't keep up. Retailers which based their manufacturing orders on 2024 sizes stand to lose millions in unsold stock. I used to think the idea of solving the obesity crisis through drugs was borderline dystopian. It's the modern food system that has made us fat, after all: the sheer abundance of cheap, sugary, mass-produced junk that has flooded the consumer landscape, and which our hungry caveman appetites are predisposed to crave. Shouldn't we be trying to fix the broken system, rather than medicalising its victims? For decades, politicians and food companies have prevaricated, mumbling about personal responsibility and the importance of willpower, while a tidal wave of sickness rolled in. Diet-related disease now costs the UK around £98 billion a year – almost twice the current defence budget – in NHS treatments, lost productivity and welfare costs. Appetite-suppressing drugs seemed, at first, like an admission of defeat: we can't work out how to improve the food system, so you'll just have to inject your way out of it. But now it seems the drugs themselves might be about to fix the system, from the bottom up. Within the space of four years, a fifth of American adults have been prescribed GLP-1 medications. (In the UK, the figure is around one in ten, although we are catching up fast.) This is a long way off market saturation, given that three quarters of Americans are overweight, but enough to create significant changes in consumer behaviour. A study by Cornell University has found that in US households where one person is on GLP-1 drugs, spending on snacks fell by between 6.7 and 11.1 per cent. If that doesn't sound like much, remember, this is the weekly shop for the entire household, not just the person on the jabs. Savoury snacks and sweet baked goods saw the biggest reductions, while spending on yoghurt, fresh meat and fruit and veg ticked upwards. In other words, the profits are on the move. Sales of snacks and ultra-processed foods will keep falling as the drugs become cheaper and more widely available. Within families, this may have unforeseen benefits. Children who grow up eating healthily are likely to maintain good habits into adulthood. It's not impossible, as one economist suggested to me, that this first wave of GLP-1 prescriptions will transform the food landscape so dramatically that our children's generation will no longer need drugs to survive it. Junk food manufacturers have always defended their business model on the grounds that they are merely giving consumers what they want. They may now find themselves at the sharp end of that argument. It turns out that consumers don't actually want to be fat and ill. We have been caught in a toxic feedback loop between our evolved appetites and the profitability of cheap, ultra-processed food. GLP-1 drugs have, for the first time, given us a tool strong enough to jemmy open that trap.
