
2025 Mazda CX-70 G50e Azami review
Mazda CX-70 Pros
Mazda CX-70 Cons
Mazda's SUV lineup has certainly ballooned in the last year or so, and the latest additions round out its more upmarket model based on the Japanese automaker's rear/all-wheel drive Large Product Group platform architecture.
The Mazda CX-70 large SUV is a North American-focused vehicle that's essentially a five-seat version of the 'wide-body' CX-90 seven-seater, which has been on sale locally now for two years.
The two SUVs share their external footprints, and even their interiors are similar. The main difference is that the CX-70 doesn't have a third row of seating and naturally has a larger boot with all the seats upright.
Slotting above the mid-size CX-60 five-seater, which forms the basis of the 'narrow-body' CX-80 seven-seater, the CX-70 is Mazda Australia's flagship two-row SUV.
WATCH: Paul's video review of the 2025 Mazda CX-70 G50eAzami
The Australian market is unique in getting all four of Mazda 'Large Architecture' SUVs – the CX-60, CX-70, CX-80, and CX-90. In fact, we're the only right-hand drive market to get the CX-70. It's not even available in New Zealand or Japan, where the car is made.
Currently, the CX-70 is only offered in two trim levels – GT and Azami. On test here is the top-spec Azami trim with the optional SP Package and the G50e inline six-cylinder petrol engine.
With four luxurious SUVs now on sale in Australia, does the Mazda CX-70 firm as the pick? Read along to find out.
On test here is the flagship petrol-powered CX-70 Azami variant with optional SP Package, which costs an additional $3500. As tested, this car costs $98,075 drive-away for Victorian buyers.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
There's no denying this car is properly plush inside, especially with the optional SP Package. It rivals the likes of many German luxury brands in terms of presence, equipment and fit and finish.
This car feels distinctly American, however, as evidenced by the wide centre tunnel and split centre armrest. As a result, it feels like the front passenger is in a different post code.
The suede sections on the dashboard in particular feel special. You're able to do that thing where you rub it in the opposite direction, and it looks different. What can I say? I'm a child at heart.
There's also a bucket-load of soft-touch finishes, which further makes the car look and feel more premium, but while you need to look hard to find harder plastics, they do exist.
It's easy to hop into this car due to its raised ride height, which is synonymous with crossover SUVs. Once you're in, the driving position is commanding, yet sunken into the car rather than feeling perched within it as with some rivals.
The seats are deliciously clad in tan Nappa leather upholstery, though the driver's seat feels a little firm and flat. You can tell it's oriented at the US market, where they typically have larger waistlines.
As standard, the seat offers 10 ways of electric adjustment, which is very generous and allows people of all different sizes and statures to dial in their desired seating position. In fact, you can even set up a profile in the car and input your height, and it'll automatically adjust the seat and steering wheel position.
I particularly like how much under-thigh support you can dial in. This is great for those with longer legs, like myself.
Ahead of the driver, the two-tone steering wheel is beautiful to look at and to hold. The electric steering column adjustment feels fancy for a premium-pushing mainstream car.
All the buttons on the steering wheel are logically placed and have a delightfully clicky action that makes them fun to interact with. They also have a satin finish that doesn't attract fingerprints like the ones with glossy piano black buttons.
Behind this is a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, which is large and bright. However, the user interface is rather dark, and there's lots of unoccupied space, which feels wasteful. It's also a little disappointing that there's minimal configurability. The Germans do instrument clusters much better.
On top of the dashboard, there's a bright and clear head-up display that tells you all you need to know at a quick glance. Unlike some head-up displays from other brands, it shows upcoming giveway and stop signs, as well as signposted speed limits.
Moving across, there's a large 12.3-inch infotainment system that runs the same Mazda Connect software as other current Mazda models. It's fine, but like the digital instrument cluster, the user interface is dark, and there's heaps of dark space. It just feels like a missed opportunity.
To navigate the native user interface, you're forced to use the rotary dial on the centre console. It feels old-school in 2025, but it can allow you to keep a closer eye on the road while navigating menus. However, it does get frustrating while scrolling through lists, for example.
As standard, there are wired and wireless forms of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. With my iPhone 15 Pro Max connected wirelessly, I didn't experience any dropouts whatsoever.
You're able to tick an option box on the infotainment system that allows you to utilise touch functionality during smartphone mirroring. It would be great if this was on by default, as navigating CarPlay with the rotary dial can be a big pain.
Complementing the wireless smartphone mirroring is a wireless phone charger at the front of the centre console. It's tucked away nicely, though there aren't any bumpers to secure your phone in a specific spot. As a result, my phone would sometimes get hot as the charging coils weren't aligned.
I appreciate the physical climate control cluster as it's very easy to change things like the temperature, fan speed, and where the air is blowing. It's a minor thing, but I also liked the fact there are no blank buttons in this flagship Azami model.
Up-front storage is adequate, which feels a little like a letdown because this car is big. Highlights include two cupholders, as well as a decently sized centre console box and glovebox.
Moving to the second row, the CX-70 continues to shine. Like many Mazda SUVs, the rear doors open to almost 90 degrees, which makes loading kids and stuff in much easier.
Once you're in, there is so much space. At a leggy 182cm, I had oodles of room behind my own driving position, plus you can slide and recline the second-row bench to further improve comfort.
You could easily go three abreast in this car due to how wide it is, however, middle-seat passengers have to contend with a big transmission hump.
Second-row amenities include heated outboard seats, rear air vents with a separate climate zone, USB-C ports, and a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders.
Around the back, there's a power tailgate that, naturally, has a hands-free function. This is handy if you need to open the boot with your hands full. I do wish the tailgate itself would open just a tad higher, however, because I almost hit my head on it a few times.
Once the tailgate is open, you see the boot is ginormous. The main boot area itself is very large, and underneath the floor panels there are additional underfloor storage cavities. This is handy if you're needing to stow something out of view.
Something you'll note in the boot in the third-row cupholders haven't been removed, which means this car really is a CX-90 without the third row. Of course this was easier for Mazda than creating a new cargo compartment design, but on the other hand it seems a bit lazy.
Boot-related amenities include a retractable cargo cover, light, 12V socket, and a 150W AC power outlet. There are also bag hooks and buttons to fold down the second-row seats in a 60:40 configuration.
This car has a space-saver spare wheel, which is surprising given it is a mild-hybrid. Typically, these kinds of cars have a high-voltage battery pack where the spare wheel normally resides. It's not as good as a full-size spare, but it's still great peace of mind if you frequently do long-distance travel and experience a puncture along the way.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The CX-70 G50e is powered by a 3.3-litre turbocharged inline six-cylinder petrol engine with 48V mild-hybrid assistance. It's the same tune the CX-90 G50e gets.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Pressing the starter button on the dash sees the straight-six petrol engine roar to life. Like many Mazdas, it flares the revs up to 2000rpm when cold, then settles into a gruff idle that doesn't go away until the engine warms up. It's something that you learn to love about Mazdas.
Setting off, you need to acquaint yourself with the gear selector. It's fairly self-explanatory, but you need to push it across to the left before shifting into drive or reverse.
This turbo-petrol inline-six is a sweet unit that's willing to rev to get this circa-2.2-tonne beast moving. In this respect, it reminds me of BMW's architecturally similar B58 engine.
There's also plenty of power and torque on tap. Peak torque comes on tap from just 2000rpm, which is handy as the car doesn't need to downshift as often when more acceleration is called upon.
There were many moments where I was cruising at around 50km/h, and the car was revving just above idle (~1000rpm) in a high gear, and I could accelerate away without dropping a gear. This is something you'd typically only experience in a torquey diesel-powered car.
While this CX-70 is already pretty swift in its default normal mode, flicking into Sport mode makes it a formidable big beast. You'll easily be keeping up or even pulling ahead of traffic at the lights. It just leans back and pulls.
Assisting with this effortless urge is a 48V mild-hybrid system. It can help contribute some additional oomph during acceleration and take some load off the engine in other situations.
Additionally, the mild-hybrid system allows for a more active engine idle stop/start system. It's seamless for the most part and allows the engine to be switched off for longer, though during our testing the engine would switch back on after 15-20 seconds of being stationary. In all fairness, we did have the air-conditioner cranking.
The start/stop system can also activate while you're coasting to a halt or when you've let off the throttle for periods of time. In fact, it will often shut the engine off around 50-60km/h when coasting, especially downhill, but when you accelerate again it can be jerky and take a second to deliver quicker progress.
It doesn't help that the eight-speed automatic transmission can sometimes be a little stuttery. Mazda has clearly been working away with the calibration as it worked better than in previous CX-60s I've driven, though you still need to learn how to drive it.
Despite the mild-hybrid intervention, urban fuel consumption in this vehicle still sits around 10L/100km. That's a lot, but you also need to keep in mind that this is a large SUV with a six-cylinder engine.
Around town, the CX-70 feels like a big American car. It seems like there is little space left between it and your lane markings either side, and parking can sometimes be a hassle as the long bonnet may hang out of small parking spots.
Thankfully, there are front and rear parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera. The latter is a godsend in a vehicle like this, so it's great that it's standard across the entire CX-70 range.
While the CX-70 does feel distinctly American, its chassis isn't overly soft. In fact, it's the opposite. The steering is rather firm, like in many Mazdas, making three-point turns and even driving in tight spaces somewhat of an arm workout, which could become tiresome.
The suspension is also on the firmer side, but lumps and bumps are well isolated and not transmitted into the cabin. It's much more serene and comfortable than previous CX-60s I've driven.
Out on the open road, this car settles beautifully into high-speed cruising. The car slots into top gear and won't budge unless you want to do a brisk overtake or meet a steep hill.
The ride remains compliant and doesn't get too busy or choppy, and the steering makes piloting this large SUV almost smile-inducing.
If you solely drive on the highway, the inline-six diesel option might be the better option for you as it has more torque and feels even more effortless at speed, but it's not as sweet as the petrol six when revved out. Horses for courses.
Although this car drinks petrol like there's no tomorrow around town, it achieves almost diesel-like fuel economy at higher speeds. There were many times during my time in it that I saw instant fuel consumption readouts of 5.0L/100km at 100-110km/h.
On the safety front, the CX-70 Azami is fully loaded. The adaptive cruise control is good at managing a safe distance between you and the car ahead, while not getting overwhelmed and slamming on the brakes when a car travelling slightly slower than you cuts in front.
The lane-keep assist is generally good and sometimes gets a bit of a workout in such a wide car. On freeway offramps, however, the system can get confused and try to steer you into a lane that doesn't exist. Many cars struggle with this, even on roads with clearly marked lanes.
Then there's the lane centring function, which works in conjunction with adaptive cruise control but is best left for well-marked highways and freeways as the steering inputs were sometimes a little too hands-on for my liking.
Lastly, the adaptive LED headlights are bright and great for rural driving, as you can keep your high-beams on for as long as possible. This means you'll be able to spot any obstacles quicker than you would with dipped lights.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Unlike the CX-90, there are just two trim CX-70 levels available – GT and Azami – though the latter can be had with an optional SP package.
Mazda CX-70 GT equipment highlights:
Azami adds:
SP Package ($3500, Azami) adds:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 hasn't been crash-tested by ANCAP yet.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Azami adds:
All CX-70 vehicles come with Mazda Connected Services, which allow you to use the MyMazda app to remotely control the locks and lights. Other features in this suite include:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
The fourth service, in particular, is expensive at $1349. Ouch…
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is a beautiful car that truly elevates the Japanese brand in its premium push. It's a proper Audi Q8, BMW X5, Mercedes-Benz GLE, and even Volkswagen Touareg rival on a (relative) budget.
This big, plush SUV is likely all the car that anyone will ever need, and then some. The interior in this Azami spec with the optional SP Package, in particular, looks and feels properly special.
Minor transmission quibbles aside, the inline petrol six is a gem and so torquey. I'd personally opt for the diesel six as it's even more effortless to drive, but both find a comfortable groove out on the open road.
I give Mazda credit for still developing big six-cylinder engines, which are rare now as most automakers downsize to meet stricter emissions targets.
But while the CX-70 is great, it also begs the question: Why not just get the CX-90 instead?
The boot space is pretty much identical with the first and second row of seats upright, and you also get the added flexibility of having third-row seats.
One of the main benefits is that the CX-70 is cheaper than the equivalent CX-90, but the reality is the price difference is only around $3000. It's also worth noting that this car, as tested, costs almost $100,000 drive-away, so it's far from what you'd call cheap.
Additionally, at this end of the SUV market, value is arguably less of a factor for many customers, and brand cachet means much more. This is why the German brands have such a strong hold here, even though some of their cars aren't great packages.
If you're willing to give a Mazda luxury SUV a try, this one won't disappoint. If you need seven seats, the more expensive CX-90 could be for you. If not, take a CX-70 for a spin and you might be surprised at how European it feels, even if it is aimed at Americans.
Interested in buying a Mazda CX-70? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mazda CX-70
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.auMazda CX-70 Pros
Mazda CX-70 Cons
Mazda's SUV lineup has certainly ballooned in the last year or so, and the latest additions round out its more upmarket model based on the Japanese automaker's rear/all-wheel drive Large Product Group platform architecture.
The Mazda CX-70 large SUV is a North American-focused vehicle that's essentially a five-seat version of the 'wide-body' CX-90 seven-seater, which has been on sale locally now for two years.
The two SUVs share their external footprints, and even their interiors are similar. The main difference is that the CX-70 doesn't have a third row of seating and naturally has a larger boot with all the seats upright.
Slotting above the mid-size CX-60 five-seater, which forms the basis of the 'narrow-body' CX-80 seven-seater, the CX-70 is Mazda Australia's flagship two-row SUV.
WATCH: Paul's video review of the 2025 Mazda CX-70 G50eAzami
The Australian market is unique in getting all four of Mazda 'Large Architecture' SUVs – the CX-60, CX-70, CX-80, and CX-90. In fact, we're the only right-hand drive market to get the CX-70. It's not even available in New Zealand or Japan, where the car is made.
Currently, the CX-70 is only offered in two trim levels – GT and Azami. On test here is the top-spec Azami trim with the optional SP Package and the G50e inline six-cylinder petrol engine.
With four luxurious SUVs now on sale in Australia, does the Mazda CX-70 firm as the pick? Read along to find out.
On test here is the flagship petrol-powered CX-70 Azami variant with optional SP Package, which costs an additional $3500. As tested, this car costs $98,075 drive-away for Victorian buyers.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
There's no denying this car is properly plush inside, especially with the optional SP Package. It rivals the likes of many German luxury brands in terms of presence, equipment and fit and finish.
This car feels distinctly American, however, as evidenced by the wide centre tunnel and split centre armrest. As a result, it feels like the front passenger is in a different post code.
The suede sections on the dashboard in particular feel special. You're able to do that thing where you rub it in the opposite direction, and it looks different. What can I say? I'm a child at heart.
There's also a bucket-load of soft-touch finishes, which further makes the car look and feel more premium, but while you need to look hard to find harder plastics, they do exist.
It's easy to hop into this car due to its raised ride height, which is synonymous with crossover SUVs. Once you're in, the driving position is commanding, yet sunken into the car rather than feeling perched within it as with some rivals.
The seats are deliciously clad in tan Nappa leather upholstery, though the driver's seat feels a little firm and flat. You can tell it's oriented at the US market, where they typically have larger waistlines.
As standard, the seat offers 10 ways of electric adjustment, which is very generous and allows people of all different sizes and statures to dial in their desired seating position. In fact, you can even set up a profile in the car and input your height, and it'll automatically adjust the seat and steering wheel position.
I particularly like how much under-thigh support you can dial in. This is great for those with longer legs, like myself.
Ahead of the driver, the two-tone steering wheel is beautiful to look at and to hold. The electric steering column adjustment feels fancy for a premium-pushing mainstream car.
All the buttons on the steering wheel are logically placed and have a delightfully clicky action that makes them fun to interact with. They also have a satin finish that doesn't attract fingerprints like the ones with glossy piano black buttons.
Behind this is a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, which is large and bright. However, the user interface is rather dark, and there's lots of unoccupied space, which feels wasteful. It's also a little disappointing that there's minimal configurability. The Germans do instrument clusters much better.
On top of the dashboard, there's a bright and clear head-up display that tells you all you need to know at a quick glance. Unlike some head-up displays from other brands, it shows upcoming giveway and stop signs, as well as signposted speed limits.
Moving across, there's a large 12.3-inch infotainment system that runs the same Mazda Connect software as other current Mazda models. It's fine, but like the digital instrument cluster, the user interface is dark, and there's heaps of dark space. It just feels like a missed opportunity.
To navigate the native user interface, you're forced to use the rotary dial on the centre console. It feels old-school in 2025, but it can allow you to keep a closer eye on the road while navigating menus. However, it does get frustrating while scrolling through lists, for example.
As standard, there are wired and wireless forms of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. With my iPhone 15 Pro Max connected wirelessly, I didn't experience any dropouts whatsoever.
You're able to tick an option box on the infotainment system that allows you to utilise touch functionality during smartphone mirroring. It would be great if this was on by default, as navigating CarPlay with the rotary dial can be a big pain.
Complementing the wireless smartphone mirroring is a wireless phone charger at the front of the centre console. It's tucked away nicely, though there aren't any bumpers to secure your phone in a specific spot. As a result, my phone would sometimes get hot as the charging coils weren't aligned.
I appreciate the physical climate control cluster as it's very easy to change things like the temperature, fan speed, and where the air is blowing. It's a minor thing, but I also liked the fact there are no blank buttons in this flagship Azami model.
Up-front storage is adequate, which feels a little like a letdown because this car is big. Highlights include two cupholders, as well as a decently sized centre console box and glovebox.
Moving to the second row, the CX-70 continues to shine. Like many Mazda SUVs, the rear doors open to almost 90 degrees, which makes loading kids and stuff in much easier.
Once you're in, there is so much space. At a leggy 182cm, I had oodles of room behind my own driving position, plus you can slide and recline the second-row bench to further improve comfort.
You could easily go three abreast in this car due to how wide it is, however, middle-seat passengers have to contend with a big transmission hump.
Second-row amenities include heated outboard seats, rear air vents with a separate climate zone, USB-C ports, and a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders.
Around the back, there's a power tailgate that, naturally, has a hands-free function. This is handy if you need to open the boot with your hands full. I do wish the tailgate itself would open just a tad higher, however, because I almost hit my head on it a few times.
Once the tailgate is open, you see the boot is ginormous. The main boot area itself is very large, and underneath the floor panels there are additional underfloor storage cavities. This is handy if you're needing to stow something out of view.
Something you'll note in the boot in the third-row cupholders haven't been removed, which means this car really is a CX-90 without the third row. Of course this was easier for Mazda than creating a new cargo compartment design, but on the other hand it seems a bit lazy.
Boot-related amenities include a retractable cargo cover, light, 12V socket, and a 150W AC power outlet. There are also bag hooks and buttons to fold down the second-row seats in a 60:40 configuration.
This car has a space-saver spare wheel, which is surprising given it is a mild-hybrid. Typically, these kinds of cars have a high-voltage battery pack where the spare wheel normally resides. It's not as good as a full-size spare, but it's still great peace of mind if you frequently do long-distance travel and experience a puncture along the way.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The CX-70 G50e is powered by a 3.3-litre turbocharged inline six-cylinder petrol engine with 48V mild-hybrid assistance. It's the same tune the CX-90 G50e gets.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Pressing the starter button on the dash sees the straight-six petrol engine roar to life. Like many Mazdas, it flares the revs up to 2000rpm when cold, then settles into a gruff idle that doesn't go away until the engine warms up. It's something that you learn to love about Mazdas.
Setting off, you need to acquaint yourself with the gear selector. It's fairly self-explanatory, but you need to push it across to the left before shifting into drive or reverse.
This turbo-petrol inline-six is a sweet unit that's willing to rev to get this circa-2.2-tonne beast moving. In this respect, it reminds me of BMW's architecturally similar B58 engine.
There's also plenty of power and torque on tap. Peak torque comes on tap from just 2000rpm, which is handy as the car doesn't need to downshift as often when more acceleration is called upon.
There were many moments where I was cruising at around 50km/h, and the car was revving just above idle (~1000rpm) in a high gear, and I could accelerate away without dropping a gear. This is something you'd typically only experience in a torquey diesel-powered car.
While this CX-70 is already pretty swift in its default normal mode, flicking into Sport mode makes it a formidable big beast. You'll easily be keeping up or even pulling ahead of traffic at the lights. It just leans back and pulls.
Assisting with this effortless urge is a 48V mild-hybrid system. It can help contribute some additional oomph during acceleration and take some load off the engine in other situations.
Additionally, the mild-hybrid system allows for a more active engine idle stop/start system. It's seamless for the most part and allows the engine to be switched off for longer, though during our testing the engine would switch back on after 15-20 seconds of being stationary. In all fairness, we did have the air-conditioner cranking.
The start/stop system can also activate while you're coasting to a halt or when you've let off the throttle for periods of time. In fact, it will often shut the engine off around 50-60km/h when coasting, especially downhill, but when you accelerate again it can be jerky and take a second to deliver quicker progress.
It doesn't help that the eight-speed automatic transmission can sometimes be a little stuttery. Mazda has clearly been working away with the calibration as it worked better than in previous CX-60s I've driven, though you still need to learn how to drive it.
Despite the mild-hybrid intervention, urban fuel consumption in this vehicle still sits around 10L/100km. That's a lot, but you also need to keep in mind that this is a large SUV with a six-cylinder engine.
Around town, the CX-70 feels like a big American car. It seems like there is little space left between it and your lane markings either side, and parking can sometimes be a hassle as the long bonnet may hang out of small parking spots.
Thankfully, there are front and rear parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera. The latter is a godsend in a vehicle like this, so it's great that it's standard across the entire CX-70 range.
While the CX-70 does feel distinctly American, its chassis isn't overly soft. In fact, it's the opposite. The steering is rather firm, like in many Mazdas, making three-point turns and even driving in tight spaces somewhat of an arm workout, which could become tiresome.
The suspension is also on the firmer side, but lumps and bumps are well isolated and not transmitted into the cabin. It's much more serene and comfortable than previous CX-60s I've driven.
Out on the open road, this car settles beautifully into high-speed cruising. The car slots into top gear and won't budge unless you want to do a brisk overtake or meet a steep hill.
The ride remains compliant and doesn't get too busy or choppy, and the steering makes piloting this large SUV almost smile-inducing.
If you solely drive on the highway, the inline-six diesel option might be the better option for you as it has more torque and feels even more effortless at speed, but it's not as sweet as the petrol six when revved out. Horses for courses.
Although this car drinks petrol like there's no tomorrow around town, it achieves almost diesel-like fuel economy at higher speeds. There were many times during my time in it that I saw instant fuel consumption readouts of 5.0L/100km at 100-110km/h.
On the safety front, the CX-70 Azami is fully loaded. The adaptive cruise control is good at managing a safe distance between you and the car ahead, while not getting overwhelmed and slamming on the brakes when a car travelling slightly slower than you cuts in front.
The lane-keep assist is generally good and sometimes gets a bit of a workout in such a wide car. On freeway offramps, however, the system can get confused and try to steer you into a lane that doesn't exist. Many cars struggle with this, even on roads with clearly marked lanes.
Then there's the lane centring function, which works in conjunction with adaptive cruise control but is best left for well-marked highways and freeways as the steering inputs were sometimes a little too hands-on for my liking.
Lastly, the adaptive LED headlights are bright and great for rural driving, as you can keep your high-beams on for as long as possible. This means you'll be able to spot any obstacles quicker than you would with dipped lights.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Unlike the CX-90, there are just two trim CX-70 levels available – GT and Azami – though the latter can be had with an optional SP package.
Mazda CX-70 GT equipment highlights:
Azami adds:
SP Package ($3500, Azami) adds:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 hasn't been crash-tested by ANCAP yet.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Azami adds:
All CX-70 vehicles come with Mazda Connected Services, which allow you to use the MyMazda app to remotely control the locks and lights. Other features in this suite include:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
The fourth service, in particular, is expensive at $1349. Ouch…
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is a beautiful car that truly elevates the Japanese brand in its premium push. It's a proper Audi Q8, BMW X5, Mercedes-Benz GLE, and even Volkswagen Touareg rival on a (relative) budget.
This big, plush SUV is likely all the car that anyone will ever need, and then some. The interior in this Azami spec with the optional SP Package, in particular, looks and feels properly special.
Minor transmission quibbles aside, the inline petrol six is a gem and so torquey. I'd personally opt for the diesel six as it's even more effortless to drive, but both find a comfortable groove out on the open road.
I give Mazda credit for still developing big six-cylinder engines, which are rare now as most automakers downsize to meet stricter emissions targets.
But while the CX-70 is great, it also begs the question: Why not just get the CX-90 instead?
The boot space is pretty much identical with the first and second row of seats upright, and you also get the added flexibility of having third-row seats.
One of the main benefits is that the CX-70 is cheaper than the equivalent CX-90, but the reality is the price difference is only around $3000. It's also worth noting that this car, as tested, costs almost $100,000 drive-away, so it's far from what you'd call cheap.
Additionally, at this end of the SUV market, value is arguably less of a factor for many customers, and brand cachet means much more. This is why the German brands have such a strong hold here, even though some of their cars aren't great packages.
If you're willing to give a Mazda luxury SUV a try, this one won't disappoint. If you need seven seats, the more expensive CX-90 could be for you. If not, take a CX-70 for a spin and you might be surprised at how European it feels, even if it is aimed at Americans.
Interested in buying a Mazda CX-70? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mazda CX-70
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.auMazda CX-70 Pros
Mazda CX-70 Cons
Mazda's SUV lineup has certainly ballooned in the last year or so, and the latest additions round out its more upmarket model based on the Japanese automaker's rear/all-wheel drive Large Product Group platform architecture.
The Mazda CX-70 large SUV is a North American-focused vehicle that's essentially a five-seat version of the 'wide-body' CX-90 seven-seater, which has been on sale locally now for two years.
The two SUVs share their external footprints, and even their interiors are similar. The main difference is that the CX-70 doesn't have a third row of seating and naturally has a larger boot with all the seats upright.
Slotting above the mid-size CX-60 five-seater, which forms the basis of the 'narrow-body' CX-80 seven-seater, the CX-70 is Mazda Australia's flagship two-row SUV.
WATCH: Paul's video review of the 2025 Mazda CX-70 G50eAzami
The Australian market is unique in getting all four of Mazda 'Large Architecture' SUVs – the CX-60, CX-70, CX-80, and CX-90. In fact, we're the only right-hand drive market to get the CX-70. It's not even available in New Zealand or Japan, where the car is made.
Currently, the CX-70 is only offered in two trim levels – GT and Azami. On test here is the top-spec Azami trim with the optional SP Package and the G50e inline six-cylinder petrol engine.
With four luxurious SUVs now on sale in Australia, does the Mazda CX-70 firm as the pick? Read along to find out.
On test here is the flagship petrol-powered CX-70 Azami variant with optional SP Package, which costs an additional $3500. As tested, this car costs $98,075 drive-away for Victorian buyers.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
There's no denying this car is properly plush inside, especially with the optional SP Package. It rivals the likes of many German luxury brands in terms of presence, equipment and fit and finish.
This car feels distinctly American, however, as evidenced by the wide centre tunnel and split centre armrest. As a result, it feels like the front passenger is in a different post code.
The suede sections on the dashboard in particular feel special. You're able to do that thing where you rub it in the opposite direction, and it looks different. What can I say? I'm a child at heart.
There's also a bucket-load of soft-touch finishes, which further makes the car look and feel more premium, but while you need to look hard to find harder plastics, they do exist.
It's easy to hop into this car due to its raised ride height, which is synonymous with crossover SUVs. Once you're in, the driving position is commanding, yet sunken into the car rather than feeling perched within it as with some rivals.
The seats are deliciously clad in tan Nappa leather upholstery, though the driver's seat feels a little firm and flat. You can tell it's oriented at the US market, where they typically have larger waistlines.
As standard, the seat offers 10 ways of electric adjustment, which is very generous and allows people of all different sizes and statures to dial in their desired seating position. In fact, you can even set up a profile in the car and input your height, and it'll automatically adjust the seat and steering wheel position.
I particularly like how much under-thigh support you can dial in. This is great for those with longer legs, like myself.
Ahead of the driver, the two-tone steering wheel is beautiful to look at and to hold. The electric steering column adjustment feels fancy for a premium-pushing mainstream car.
All the buttons on the steering wheel are logically placed and have a delightfully clicky action that makes them fun to interact with. They also have a satin finish that doesn't attract fingerprints like the ones with glossy piano black buttons.
Behind this is a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, which is large and bright. However, the user interface is rather dark, and there's lots of unoccupied space, which feels wasteful. It's also a little disappointing that there's minimal configurability. The Germans do instrument clusters much better.
On top of the dashboard, there's a bright and clear head-up display that tells you all you need to know at a quick glance. Unlike some head-up displays from other brands, it shows upcoming giveway and stop signs, as well as signposted speed limits.
Moving across, there's a large 12.3-inch infotainment system that runs the same Mazda Connect software as other current Mazda models. It's fine, but like the digital instrument cluster, the user interface is dark, and there's heaps of dark space. It just feels like a missed opportunity.
To navigate the native user interface, you're forced to use the rotary dial on the centre console. It feels old-school in 2025, but it can allow you to keep a closer eye on the road while navigating menus. However, it does get frustrating while scrolling through lists, for example.
As standard, there are wired and wireless forms of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. With my iPhone 15 Pro Max connected wirelessly, I didn't experience any dropouts whatsoever.
You're able to tick an option box on the infotainment system that allows you to utilise touch functionality during smartphone mirroring. It would be great if this was on by default, as navigating CarPlay with the rotary dial can be a big pain.
Complementing the wireless smartphone mirroring is a wireless phone charger at the front of the centre console. It's tucked away nicely, though there aren't any bumpers to secure your phone in a specific spot. As a result, my phone would sometimes get hot as the charging coils weren't aligned.
I appreciate the physical climate control cluster as it's very easy to change things like the temperature, fan speed, and where the air is blowing. It's a minor thing, but I also liked the fact there are no blank buttons in this flagship Azami model.
Up-front storage is adequate, which feels a little like a letdown because this car is big. Highlights include two cupholders, as well as a decently sized centre console box and glovebox.
Moving to the second row, the CX-70 continues to shine. Like many Mazda SUVs, the rear doors open to almost 90 degrees, which makes loading kids and stuff in much easier.
Once you're in, there is so much space. At a leggy 182cm, I had oodles of room behind my own driving position, plus you can slide and recline the second-row bench to further improve comfort.
You could easily go three abreast in this car due to how wide it is, however, middle-seat passengers have to contend with a big transmission hump.
Second-row amenities include heated outboard seats, rear air vents with a separate climate zone, USB-C ports, and a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders.
Around the back, there's a power tailgate that, naturally, has a hands-free function. This is handy if you need to open the boot with your hands full. I do wish the tailgate itself would open just a tad higher, however, because I almost hit my head on it a few times.
Once the tailgate is open, you see the boot is ginormous. The main boot area itself is very large, and underneath the floor panels there are additional underfloor storage cavities. This is handy if you're needing to stow something out of view.
Something you'll note in the boot in the third-row cupholders haven't been removed, which means this car really is a CX-90 without the third row. Of course this was easier for Mazda than creating a new cargo compartment design, but on the other hand it seems a bit lazy.
Boot-related amenities include a retractable cargo cover, light, 12V socket, and a 150W AC power outlet. There are also bag hooks and buttons to fold down the second-row seats in a 60:40 configuration.
This car has a space-saver spare wheel, which is surprising given it is a mild-hybrid. Typically, these kinds of cars have a high-voltage battery pack where the spare wheel normally resides. It's not as good as a full-size spare, but it's still great peace of mind if you frequently do long-distance travel and experience a puncture along the way.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The CX-70 G50e is powered by a 3.3-litre turbocharged inline six-cylinder petrol engine with 48V mild-hybrid assistance. It's the same tune the CX-90 G50e gets.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Pressing the starter button on the dash sees the straight-six petrol engine roar to life. Like many Mazdas, it flares the revs up to 2000rpm when cold, then settles into a gruff idle that doesn't go away until the engine warms up. It's something that you learn to love about Mazdas.
Setting off, you need to acquaint yourself with the gear selector. It's fairly self-explanatory, but you need to push it across to the left before shifting into drive or reverse.
This turbo-petrol inline-six is a sweet unit that's willing to rev to get this circa-2.2-tonne beast moving. In this respect, it reminds me of BMW's architecturally similar B58 engine.
There's also plenty of power and torque on tap. Peak torque comes on tap from just 2000rpm, which is handy as the car doesn't need to downshift as often when more acceleration is called upon.
There were many moments where I was cruising at around 50km/h, and the car was revving just above idle (~1000rpm) in a high gear, and I could accelerate away without dropping a gear. This is something you'd typically only experience in a torquey diesel-powered car.
While this CX-70 is already pretty swift in its default normal mode, flicking into Sport mode makes it a formidable big beast. You'll easily be keeping up or even pulling ahead of traffic at the lights. It just leans back and pulls.
Assisting with this effortless urge is a 48V mild-hybrid system. It can help contribute some additional oomph during acceleration and take some load off the engine in other situations.
Additionally, the mild-hybrid system allows for a more active engine idle stop/start system. It's seamless for the most part and allows the engine to be switched off for longer, though during our testing the engine would switch back on after 15-20 seconds of being stationary. In all fairness, we did have the air-conditioner cranking.
The start/stop system can also activate while you're coasting to a halt or when you've let off the throttle for periods of time. In fact, it will often shut the engine off around 50-60km/h when coasting, especially downhill, but when you accelerate again it can be jerky and take a second to deliver quicker progress.
It doesn't help that the eight-speed automatic transmission can sometimes be a little stuttery. Mazda has clearly been working away with the calibration as it worked better than in previous CX-60s I've driven, though you still need to learn how to drive it.
Despite the mild-hybrid intervention, urban fuel consumption in this vehicle still sits around 10L/100km. That's a lot, but you also need to keep in mind that this is a large SUV with a six-cylinder engine.
Around town, the CX-70 feels like a big American car. It seems like there is little space left between it and your lane markings either side, and parking can sometimes be a hassle as the long bonnet may hang out of small parking spots.
Thankfully, there are front and rear parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera. The latter is a godsend in a vehicle like this, so it's great that it's standard across the entire CX-70 range.
While the CX-70 does feel distinctly American, its chassis isn't overly soft. In fact, it's the opposite. The steering is rather firm, like in many Mazdas, making three-point turns and even driving in tight spaces somewhat of an arm workout, which could become tiresome.
The suspension is also on the firmer side, but lumps and bumps are well isolated and not transmitted into the cabin. It's much more serene and comfortable than previous CX-60s I've driven.
Out on the open road, this car settles beautifully into high-speed cruising. The car slots into top gear and won't budge unless you want to do a brisk overtake or meet a steep hill.
The ride remains compliant and doesn't get too busy or choppy, and the steering makes piloting this large SUV almost smile-inducing.
If you solely drive on the highway, the inline-six diesel option might be the better option for you as it has more torque and feels even more effortless at speed, but it's not as sweet as the petrol six when revved out. Horses for courses.
Although this car drinks petrol like there's no tomorrow around town, it achieves almost diesel-like fuel economy at higher speeds. There were many times during my time in it that I saw instant fuel consumption readouts of 5.0L/100km at 100-110km/h.
On the safety front, the CX-70 Azami is fully loaded. The adaptive cruise control is good at managing a safe distance between you and the car ahead, while not getting overwhelmed and slamming on the brakes when a car travelling slightly slower than you cuts in front.
The lane-keep assist is generally good and sometimes gets a bit of a workout in such a wide car. On freeway offramps, however, the system can get confused and try to steer you into a lane that doesn't exist. Many cars struggle with this, even on roads with clearly marked lanes.
Then there's the lane centring function, which works in conjunction with adaptive cruise control but is best left for well-marked highways and freeways as the steering inputs were sometimes a little too hands-on for my liking.
Lastly, the adaptive LED headlights are bright and great for rural driving, as you can keep your high-beams on for as long as possible. This means you'll be able to spot any obstacles quicker than you would with dipped lights.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Unlike the CX-90, there are just two trim CX-70 levels available – GT and Azami – though the latter can be had with an optional SP package.
Mazda CX-70 GT equipment highlights:
Azami adds:
SP Package ($3500, Azami) adds:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 hasn't been crash-tested by ANCAP yet.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Azami adds:
All CX-70 vehicles come with Mazda Connected Services, which allow you to use the MyMazda app to remotely control the locks and lights. Other features in this suite include:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
The fourth service, in particular, is expensive at $1349. Ouch…
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is a beautiful car that truly elevates the Japanese brand in its premium push. It's a proper Audi Q8, BMW X5, Mercedes-Benz GLE, and even Volkswagen Touareg rival on a (relative) budget.
This big, plush SUV is likely all the car that anyone will ever need, and then some. The interior in this Azami spec with the optional SP Package, in particular, looks and feels properly special.
Minor transmission quibbles aside, the inline petrol six is a gem and so torquey. I'd personally opt for the diesel six as it's even more effortless to drive, but both find a comfortable groove out on the open road.
I give Mazda credit for still developing big six-cylinder engines, which are rare now as most automakers downsize to meet stricter emissions targets.
But while the CX-70 is great, it also begs the question: Why not just get the CX-90 instead?
The boot space is pretty much identical with the first and second row of seats upright, and you also get the added flexibility of having third-row seats.
One of the main benefits is that the CX-70 is cheaper than the equivalent CX-90, but the reality is the price difference is only around $3000. It's also worth noting that this car, as tested, costs almost $100,000 drive-away, so it's far from what you'd call cheap.
Additionally, at this end of the SUV market, value is arguably less of a factor for many customers, and brand cachet means much more. This is why the German brands have such a strong hold here, even though some of their cars aren't great packages.
If you're willing to give a Mazda luxury SUV a try, this one won't disappoint. If you need seven seats, the more expensive CX-90 could be for you. If not, take a CX-70 for a spin and you might be surprised at how European it feels, even if it is aimed at Americans.
Interested in buying a Mazda CX-70? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mazda CX-70
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.auMazda CX-70 Pros
Mazda CX-70 Cons
Mazda's SUV lineup has certainly ballooned in the last year or so, and the latest additions round out its more upmarket model based on the Japanese automaker's rear/all-wheel drive Large Product Group platform architecture.
The Mazda CX-70 large SUV is a North American-focused vehicle that's essentially a five-seat version of the 'wide-body' CX-90 seven-seater, which has been on sale locally now for two years.
The two SUVs share their external footprints, and even their interiors are similar. The main difference is that the CX-70 doesn't have a third row of seating and naturally has a larger boot with all the seats upright.
Slotting above the mid-size CX-60 five-seater, which forms the basis of the 'narrow-body' CX-80 seven-seater, the CX-70 is Mazda Australia's flagship two-row SUV.
WATCH: Paul's video review of the 2025 Mazda CX-70 G50eAzami
The Australian market is unique in getting all four of Mazda 'Large Architecture' SUVs – the CX-60, CX-70, CX-80, and CX-90. In fact, we're the only right-hand drive market to get the CX-70. It's not even available in New Zealand or Japan, where the car is made.
Currently, the CX-70 is only offered in two trim levels – GT and Azami. On test here is the top-spec Azami trim with the optional SP Package and the G50e inline six-cylinder petrol engine.
With four luxurious SUVs now on sale in Australia, does the Mazda CX-70 firm as the pick? Read along to find out.
On test here is the flagship petrol-powered CX-70 Azami variant with optional SP Package, which costs an additional $3500. As tested, this car costs $98,075 drive-away for Victorian buyers.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
There's no denying this car is properly plush inside, especially with the optional SP Package. It rivals the likes of many German luxury brands in terms of presence, equipment and fit and finish.
This car feels distinctly American, however, as evidenced by the wide centre tunnel and split centre armrest. As a result, it feels like the front passenger is in a different post code.
The suede sections on the dashboard in particular feel special. You're able to do that thing where you rub it in the opposite direction, and it looks different. What can I say? I'm a child at heart.
There's also a bucket-load of soft-touch finishes, which further makes the car look and feel more premium, but while you need to look hard to find harder plastics, they do exist.
It's easy to hop into this car due to its raised ride height, which is synonymous with crossover SUVs. Once you're in, the driving position is commanding, yet sunken into the car rather than feeling perched within it as with some rivals.
The seats are deliciously clad in tan Nappa leather upholstery, though the driver's seat feels a little firm and flat. You can tell it's oriented at the US market, where they typically have larger waistlines.
As standard, the seat offers 10 ways of electric adjustment, which is very generous and allows people of all different sizes and statures to dial in their desired seating position. In fact, you can even set up a profile in the car and input your height, and it'll automatically adjust the seat and steering wheel position.
I particularly like how much under-thigh support you can dial in. This is great for those with longer legs, like myself.
Ahead of the driver, the two-tone steering wheel is beautiful to look at and to hold. The electric steering column adjustment feels fancy for a premium-pushing mainstream car.
All the buttons on the steering wheel are logically placed and have a delightfully clicky action that makes them fun to interact with. They also have a satin finish that doesn't attract fingerprints like the ones with glossy piano black buttons.
Behind this is a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, which is large and bright. However, the user interface is rather dark, and there's lots of unoccupied space, which feels wasteful. It's also a little disappointing that there's minimal configurability. The Germans do instrument clusters much better.
On top of the dashboard, there's a bright and clear head-up display that tells you all you need to know at a quick glance. Unlike some head-up displays from other brands, it shows upcoming giveway and stop signs, as well as signposted speed limits.
Moving across, there's a large 12.3-inch infotainment system that runs the same Mazda Connect software as other current Mazda models. It's fine, but like the digital instrument cluster, the user interface is dark, and there's heaps of dark space. It just feels like a missed opportunity.
To navigate the native user interface, you're forced to use the rotary dial on the centre console. It feels old-school in 2025, but it can allow you to keep a closer eye on the road while navigating menus. However, it does get frustrating while scrolling through lists, for example.
As standard, there are wired and wireless forms of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. With my iPhone 15 Pro Max connected wirelessly, I didn't experience any dropouts whatsoever.
You're able to tick an option box on the infotainment system that allows you to utilise touch functionality during smartphone mirroring. It would be great if this was on by default, as navigating CarPlay with the rotary dial can be a big pain.
Complementing the wireless smartphone mirroring is a wireless phone charger at the front of the centre console. It's tucked away nicely, though there aren't any bumpers to secure your phone in a specific spot. As a result, my phone would sometimes get hot as the charging coils weren't aligned.
I appreciate the physical climate control cluster as it's very easy to change things like the temperature, fan speed, and where the air is blowing. It's a minor thing, but I also liked the fact there are no blank buttons in this flagship Azami model.
Up-front storage is adequate, which feels a little like a letdown because this car is big. Highlights include two cupholders, as well as a decently sized centre console box and glovebox.
Moving to the second row, the CX-70 continues to shine. Like many Mazda SUVs, the rear doors open to almost 90 degrees, which makes loading kids and stuff in much easier.
Once you're in, there is so much space. At a leggy 182cm, I had oodles of room behind my own driving position, plus you can slide and recline the second-row bench to further improve comfort.
You could easily go three abreast in this car due to how wide it is, however, middle-seat passengers have to contend with a big transmission hump.
Second-row amenities include heated outboard seats, rear air vents with a separate climate zone, USB-C ports, and a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders.
Around the back, there's a power tailgate that, naturally, has a hands-free function. This is handy if you need to open the boot with your hands full. I do wish the tailgate itself would open just a tad higher, however, because I almost hit my head on it a few times.
Once the tailgate is open, you see the boot is ginormous. The main boot area itself is very large, and underneath the floor panels there are additional underfloor storage cavities. This is handy if you're needing to stow something out of view.
Something you'll note in the boot in the third-row cupholders haven't been removed, which means this car really is a CX-90 without the third row. Of course this was easier for Mazda than creating a new cargo compartment design, but on the other hand it seems a bit lazy.
Boot-related amenities include a retractable cargo cover, light, 12V socket, and a 150W AC power outlet. There are also bag hooks and buttons to fold down the second-row seats in a 60:40 configuration.
This car has a space-saver spare wheel, which is surprising given it is a mild-hybrid. Typically, these kinds of cars have a high-voltage battery pack where the spare wheel normally resides. It's not as good as a full-size spare, but it's still great peace of mind if you frequently do long-distance travel and experience a puncture along the way.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The CX-70 G50e is powered by a 3.3-litre turbocharged inline six-cylinder petrol engine with 48V mild-hybrid assistance. It's the same tune the CX-90 G50e gets.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Pressing the starter button on the dash sees the straight-six petrol engine roar to life. Like many Mazdas, it flares the revs up to 2000rpm when cold, then settles into a gruff idle that doesn't go away until the engine warms up. It's something that you learn to love about Mazdas.
Setting off, you need to acquaint yourself with the gear selector. It's fairly self-explanatory, but you need to push it across to the left before shifting into drive or reverse.
This turbo-petrol inline-six is a sweet unit that's willing to rev to get this circa-2.2-tonne beast moving. In this respect, it reminds me of BMW's architecturally similar B58 engine.
There's also plenty of power and torque on tap. Peak torque comes on tap from just 2000rpm, which is handy as the car doesn't need to downshift as often when more acceleration is called upon.
There were many moments where I was cruising at around 50km/h, and the car was revving just above idle (~1000rpm) in a high gear, and I could accelerate away without dropping a gear. This is something you'd typically only experience in a torquey diesel-powered car.
While this CX-70 is already pretty swift in its default normal mode, flicking into Sport mode makes it a formidable big beast. You'll easily be keeping up or even pulling ahead of traffic at the lights. It just leans back and pulls.
Assisting with this effortless urge is a 48V mild-hybrid system. It can help contribute some additional oomph during acceleration and take some load off the engine in other situations.
Additionally, the mild-hybrid system allows for a more active engine idle stop/start system. It's seamless for the most part and allows the engine to be switched off for longer, though during our testing the engine would switch back on after 15-20 seconds of being stationary. In all fairness, we did have the air-conditioner cranking.
The start/stop system can also activate while you're coasting to a halt or when you've let off the throttle for periods of time. In fact, it will often shut the engine off around 50-60km/h when coasting, especially downhill, but when you accelerate again it can be jerky and take a second to deliver quicker progress.
It doesn't help that the eight-speed automatic transmission can sometimes be a little stuttery. Mazda has clearly been working away with the calibration as it worked better than in previous CX-60s I've driven, though you still need to learn how to drive it.
Despite the mild-hybrid intervention, urban fuel consumption in this vehicle still sits around 10L/100km. That's a lot, but you also need to keep in mind that this is a large SUV with a six-cylinder engine.
Around town, the CX-70 feels like a big American car. It seems like there is little space left between it and your lane markings either side, and parking can sometimes be a hassle as the long bonnet may hang out of small parking spots.
Thankfully, there are front and rear parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera. The latter is a godsend in a vehicle like this, so it's great that it's standard across the entire CX-70 range.
While the CX-70 does feel distinctly American, its chassis isn't overly soft. In fact, it's the opposite. The steering is rather firm, like in many Mazdas, making three-point turns and even driving in tight spaces somewhat of an arm workout, which could become tiresome.
The suspension is also on the firmer side, but lumps and bumps are well isolated and not transmitted into the cabin. It's much more serene and comfortable than previous CX-60s I've driven.
Out on the open road, this car settles beautifully into high-speed cruising. The car slots into top gear and won't budge unless you want to do a brisk overtake or meet a steep hill.
The ride remains compliant and doesn't get too busy or choppy, and the steering makes piloting this large SUV almost smile-inducing.
If you solely drive on the highway, the inline-six diesel option might be the better option for you as it has more torque and feels even more effortless at speed, but it's not as sweet as the petrol six when revved out. Horses for courses.
Although this car drinks petrol like there's no tomorrow around town, it achieves almost diesel-like fuel economy at higher speeds. There were many times during my time in it that I saw instant fuel consumption readouts of 5.0L/100km at 100-110km/h.
On the safety front, the CX-70 Azami is fully loaded. The adaptive cruise control is good at managing a safe distance between you and the car ahead, while not getting overwhelmed and slamming on the brakes when a car travelling slightly slower than you cuts in front.
The lane-keep assist is generally good and sometimes gets a bit of a workout in such a wide car. On freeway offramps, however, the system can get confused and try to steer you into a lane that doesn't exist. Many cars struggle with this, even on roads with clearly marked lanes.
Then there's the lane centring function, which works in conjunction with adaptive cruise control but is best left for well-marked highways and freeways as the steering inputs were sometimes a little too hands-on for my liking.
Lastly, the adaptive LED headlights are bright and great for rural driving, as you can keep your high-beams on for as long as possible. This means you'll be able to spot any obstacles quicker than you would with dipped lights.
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
Unlike the CX-90, there are just two trim CX-70 levels available – GT and Azami – though the latter can be had with an optional SP package.
Mazda CX-70 GT equipment highlights:
Azami adds:
SP Package ($3500, Azami) adds:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 hasn't been crash-tested by ANCAP yet.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Azami adds:
All CX-70 vehicles come with Mazda Connected Services, which allow you to use the MyMazda app to remotely control the locks and lights. Other features in this suite include:
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
The fourth service, in particular, is expensive at $1349. Ouch…
To see how the Mazda CX-70 lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool
The Mazda CX-70 is a beautiful car that truly elevates the Japanese brand in its premium push. It's a proper Audi Q8, BMW X5, Mercedes-Benz GLE, and even Volkswagen Touareg rival on a (relative) budget.
This big, plush SUV is likely all the car that anyone will ever need, and then some. The interior in this Azami spec with the optional SP Package, in particular, looks and feels properly special.
Minor transmission quibbles aside, the inline petrol six is a gem and so torquey. I'd personally opt for the diesel six as it's even more effortless to drive, but both find a comfortable groove out on the open road.
I give Mazda credit for still developing big six-cylinder engines, which are rare now as most automakers downsize to meet stricter emissions targets.
But while the CX-70 is great, it also begs the question: Why not just get the CX-90 instead?
The boot space is pretty much identical with the first and second row of seats upright, and you also get the added flexibility of having third-row seats.
One of the main benefits is that the CX-70 is cheaper than the equivalent CX-90, but the reality is the price difference is only around $3000. It's also worth noting that this car, as tested, costs almost $100,000 drive-away, so it's far from what you'd call cheap.
Additionally, at this end of the SUV market, value is arguably less of a factor for many customers, and brand cachet means much more. This is why the German brands have such a strong hold here, even though some of their cars aren't great packages.
If you're willing to give a Mazda luxury SUV a try, this one won't disappoint. If you need seven seats, the more expensive CX-90 could be for you. If not, take a CX-70 for a spin and you might be surprised at how European it feels, even if it is aimed at Americans.
Interested in buying a Mazda CX-70? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mazda CX-70
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
4 days ago
- The Advertiser
2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV review
GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons China's GWM is going Shark and Ranger hunting with an electrifying new plug-in hybrid (PHEV) ute. Okay, silly puns aside, the 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV dual-cab is a big deal for the Chinese brand, and on paper it shapes as a compelling alternative to the already popular BYD Shark 6 and incoming Ford Ranger PHEV. Priced from $59,990 before on-road costs, the PHEV version of GWM's flagship ute is within swiping distance of the Shark 6 while claiming a longer electric-only driving range as well as greater towing and off-road capability. It's also substantially cheaper than Ford's first plug-in version of the Ranger, Australia's most popular new model, while also offering a long warranty and capped price servicing. While Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) incentives for PHEVs purchased via novated leases have ended, the Cannon Alpha PHEV arrives at a pivotal time for the Australian automotive industry. WATCH: Paul's video review of the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype Punitive emissions regulations loom for auto brands from next month, and big, heavy and high-CO2 commercial vehicles including utilities will be the hardest hit. With dual-cab utes continuing to dominate the local market, brands are scrambling for cleaner and more efficient options to bring down their fleet CO2 emissions. Consider the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 39g/km CO2 claim versus the 234g and 225g/km figures of the diesel and hybrid versions, and you can see why GWM is going hard with the positioning of its new plug-in ute. So, is it any good? We spent some extended time living with it in and away from the city to find out. As noted above, the Cannon Alpha PHEV range starts from $59,990 plus on-road costs, or around $61,500 drive-away depending on state or territory – see the table below for more. For reference, the BYD Shark 6 is priced from $57,900 plus on-roads and is currently being advertised with sharp 1.9 per cent p/a finance, while the Ford Ranger PHEV kicks off from a much dearer $71,990 plus on-roads. The Cannon Alpha PHEV is more than $10,000 dearer than the equivalent Cannon Alpha Diesel in base spec, while the Hybrid (HEV) is about $3000 more affordable in flagship Ultra guise. In the scheme of things, it's not that big a gap. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool Just like any other Cannon Alpha grade, which itself is quite similar to the GWM Tank 500 with which it shares its underpinnings. This flagship Ultra grade offers all the fruit, from leather-accented seat upholstery and woodgrain-effect trim to big and bright displays for the touchscreen infotainment system and digital instrument cluster. You also get soft-touch leather-effect accents for the door tops and dashboard, which feel suitably luxe, and the smooth leatherette-clad steering wheel with cartoonish centre hub shaped as the Cannon badge all adds to the more upmarket and SUV-like ambience. Hell, there are even felt-lined door pockets like in a Volkswagen Golf! Perceived build quality is very positive, particularly for the ute segment. It feels plusher and more luxurious than more workhorse-style dual-cabs, and the array of luxury touches make it feel more car-like than a commercial vehicle. The cushy front seats in this spec are electrically adjustable as well as heated and ventilated, and you even get a massage function. The steering wheel is heated too, so you can see why these new-age Chinese vehicles have a lot of appeal on the showroom floor. I appreciate the fact the heated and ventilated seat controls are hard buttons on the centre console, but functions like memory positions and seat massaging are buried in the touchscreen, which is a little fiddly and annoying. The 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster offers a couple of main views, one with a central driver assistance display and the other with mapping. Annoyingly, there's no option to have a conventional power meter and speedometer; instead you get simple digital readouts which don't always communicate everything effectively. Meanwhile, the 12.3-inch tablet-style touchscreen also looks cool but has its quirks. The clarity and processing speed is good, and it's fully featured with native navigation and wireless smartphone mirroring, but I'm not a huge fan of the layered menu structure and the persistence with having the climate controls embedded in the display. Some of the menus also aren't properly translated from Chinese to English, meaning explainers for certain settings and functions aren't immediately clear. Still, the hybrid menus and various display graphics are quite neat to play with and observe – but really, GWM and other Chinese brands need to make their touchscreens a little less confusing. For example, you can swipe down from the top of the screen for some quick-access shortcuts, but you can't do this from the smartphone mirroring screen, as I found it. The rear seat in this Ultra specification is another standout, with both heating and ventilation for the outboard pews in addition to electric adjustment for recline and lower cushion extension. Where else do you see this? You do get rear vents but no additional zone of climate control like in the Tank 500, although there are amenities like a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders, as well as map pockets behind the front seats and your requisite child seat anchor points. Behind the cab and its electrically opening rear window, there's a 1500x1520mm tray accessed via a split tailgate that can either open conventionally or barn-door style. Due to the size and placement of the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 37.1kWh NMC battery, the full-size spare wheel has been relocated to the tub in an unconventional dune buggy or safari-style arrangement. The locally-led solution sees the wheel bolted to the side of the tub, though it can be removed if you need to utilise the full tub. GWM also fits a tyre repair kit as standard in the event you get a puncture without access to the spare. While it's not pictured here, there is a cover for the spare wheel that clips into the tub bracket, and there are magnets to stick it to the metal base. However, my colleague Max Davies saw the cover fly nearly completely off while driving at 110km/h on Victoria's Hume Highway on a windy day, which is why the vehicle is pictured here without it – it was an effort to reinstall too. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The PHEV is the most powerful Cannon Alpha variant on sale, as well as the most efficient. The PHEV can be fast-charged at up to 50kW using DC power, and boasts vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability with a 3.3kW discharge rate. It can also run on EV power, even when in high-range four-wheel drive mode. GWM has maintained the Cannon Alpha lineup's 3500kg towing capacity for the PHEV, bettering the BYD Shark 6 and matching the Ranger PHEV. Payload, meanwhile, is 50kg lower than the HEV's and up to 130kg down on the diesel's. As for fuel consumption, we travelled nearly 900km in the Cannon Alpha PHEV over a two-week loan, charging as regularly as we could but also spending plenty of extended stints behind the wheel. We saw an indicated return of 6.6L/100km over that period, which isn't bad considering there were plenty of cold days with only a partially charged battery, as well as the aforementioned long drives well beyond the battery's EV range. That real-world figure is also well under the lab claims for the Cannon Alpha diesel and hybrid variants. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool My testing was all done on-road and generally unladen, unlike Paul Maric's video review of a pre-production prototype, and we'll revisit the Cannon Alpha PHEV to fully test its off-road and towing prowess. Above: Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype I did a lot of general commuting to and from the office as well as a longer road trip down to the Mornington Peninsula, and while I'm in no way your typical ute guy, I found the Cannon Alpha PHEV surprisingly good to live with. With a full charge this ute hums along nicely in EV mode, both in town and on the freeway, where it doesn't feel much slower than the diesel version while being much quieter – the electric motor's 120kW/400Nm outputs aren't far off the diesel's 130kW/480Nm, anyway. That said, it feels heavier than its GWM siblings, which is unsurprising given the 300kg-plus weight penalty from the massive battery. While this lends a very planted and sure-footed feel on the move, it also means you can feel its mass shift more when cornering and braking. GWM's approach to plug-in hybrid tech is also a more mechanical system, sandwiching the e-motor between the transmission and petrol, meaning you can feel it shift through its nine cogs even in EV mode. WATCH: Paul puts the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype through a payload and GVM stress test While this means it lacks the EV driving style of the BYD Shark, it has allowed the Chinese manufacturer to retain a mechanical four-wheel drive system with low-range (4L) mode, as well as the Alpha's heavy-duty capabilities. Paul had no issues towing a 3.5-tonne caravan at GVM, though the dedicated Towing mode negates the ability to use cruise control and the prototype-spec Cannon Alpha couldn't be locked in EV mode when hooked up to the trailer. He also noted that the 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine did make a bit of noise under load when towing, even if the PHEV's overall performance felt "confident" and "punchy". Additionally, the Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype tested by Paul had tow bar that was quite low, reducing the departure angle for off-roading. Our production-spec vehicle is claimed to have a towbar that sits 70mm higher than the pre-production vehicle, though it's still mounted lower than most others. I grew quite fond of the Cannon Alpha's touring abilities on the open road, where it impressed with a reasonably quiet cabin at cruising speed and plenty of punch in reserve for relatively brisk overtakes – just make sure you're in the right drive mode. Every now and then when trying to set off quickly, or when giving it a quick squirt while rolling, I could feel the PHEV system take a moment or two before gearing down, activating both power sources and finally outputting what I was asking of it. Road and wind noise is generally kept to an impressive minimum for a dual-cab ute, and while the ride is a bit firm on its coil-sprung front- and rear-ends, in general it still rides more like an unladen SUV than a leaf-sprung alternative. The petrol engine can sound a little coarse when it's being revved out, but the transition between EV and ICE power is generally pretty seamless apart from the odd elastic feel in the lower gears. GWM's EV range figure of 115km is based on the NEDC cycle, so I decided to do a rough range test to see how close I could get to the claim. After fully charging using a 50kW DC fast-charger at the Portsea Hotel, I attempted to get home to Melbourne's eastern suburbs in EV mode. In theory I should have been able to get there, given the trip is 103.9km. My partner wanted to catch the sunset at Arthur's Seat on the way home, meaning a quick detour to Franklin's lookout, which is up a pretty steep hillclimb. Still, the total trip would only be 106km. Keeping the Cannon Alpha PHEV in Normal and EV modes, I made it to just after the Wellington Rd overpass on Melbourne's M3 Eastlink Freeway – roughly 85km from my starting point. Not bad given the uphill trip home and the skew toward 100km/h freeway speeds, but something to note if you spend a lot of time on the highway. Above: GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV takes on Beer O'clock Hill Paul did some off-road testing in the prototype we drove before the Cannon Alpha PHEV's official launch, and he was quite impressed with the Cannon's four-wheel drive capability, especially when compared back-to-back with the Shark 6, which infamously struggled with our rutted hillclimb at the Lang Lang providing ground. Key GWM additions over its BYD rival include front and rear diff locks in this Ultra spec (the Lux gets only a rear locker), as well as a low-range transfer case. Paul said the Cannon Alpha easily climbed our hill and demonstrated better tractability over obstacles and rough terrain – it also did the same hillclimb in both HEV and EV modes, which is impressive. Over the offset moguls Cannon Alpha PHEV also barely broke a sweat, with the traction control shuffling torque to the correct wheel(s) without requiring the diff locks to be engaged. Paul did note the stability control was a little intrusive in off-road situations, at least in pre-production spec, and the 70mm-lower tow bar had a habit of scraping things due to its shallower departure angle. As mentioned, GWM says the raised unit on production vehicles should help reduce that. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool There are Lux and Ultra trim levels, though depending on the powertrain chosen you might get slightly differing spec levels in the Ultra – the variant on test here. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha Lux equipment highlights: Cannon Alpha Ultra Diesel adds: Cannon Alpha Ultra HEV + PHEV add: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha was awarded a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on 2024 tests, and this rating applies to all variants including the new plug-in hybrid. Standard safety equipment includes: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool As with the wider Cannon Alpha range, the PHEV is covered by a seven year, unlimited-kilometre warranty plus seven years of roadside assistance and capped-price servicing. The high-voltage PHEV battery is covered by a separate eight-year, unlimited-km warranty. Worth noting is the first service is due within 12 months or 15,000km, after which intervals are 12 months/15,000km. GWM outpunches the warranties of both the Shark 6 and Ranger PHEV, though servicing costs add up quickly – even if it's cheaper to maintain than the Cannon Alpha HEV. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV shapes up as a proper Ranger PHEV alternative, for those on a budget who want proper ute capability with an electrified drivetrain. While the BYD Shark 6 has been the subject of much hype before and after its Australian launch, if you want a ute to do ute things while also saving money at the pump and reducing your CO2 emissions, I think the GWM is the better bet – especially after recent price adjustments put it within a whisker of the BYD. It looks tough, offers more size and space (if you excuse the tray-mounted spare), has a pretty plush cabin with heaps of luxury features, and can happily tow 3.5 tonnes and tackle some serious off-road trails. The Shark is an excellent lifestyle utility vehicle in its own right, but isn't as rugged or capable as the GWM in terms of off-roading and towing. The Cannon Alpha PHEV also drives pretty well, with its EV-capable drivetrain allowing for incredibly refined and quiet commuting in everyday scenarios, which is in stark contrast to rattly diesel engines or rev-happy petrol engines that power many rival dual-cabs. GWM has largely addressed previous complaints about its driver safety aids, which is a plus, though I can do without the naggy audible prompts when you switch adaptive cruise control on or off, and the system is incredibly conservative with gaps around the vehicle, which is frustrating. I'd also like to see a more sophisticated digital instrument cluster with the option of a virtual power meter or tachometer, and some off-road menus. With all that digital real estate, it seems like an oversight not to have it. The sheer size of this near-5.5-metre-long ute makes it difficult to park as well, even if you account for the litany of cameras and sensors dotted throughout the vehicle. I found the added size over a Shark 6 or Ranger a bit of a challenge in suburban shopping centre carparks, so I imagine driving it in the city – as a lot of ute drivers will – could prove to be a bit of a pain. Finally, the unusual placement of the spare wheel will be a problem for some. Sure, it can be removed or relocated (perhaps to a roof basket, which is hardly ideal either), but when the whole point of a ute is to have a tray it seems counterproductive for a decent proportion of that tub space to be occupied by the spare wheel. I think the entry-level Lux is the one to get, given it's actually cheaper than the most affordable 48V hybrid version. Given the gains it delivers in terms of electric driving and efficiency (as well as general driveability) compared to the HEV powertrain, my advice would be to save a few bucks and opt for the base PHEV rather than the Ultra-spec HEV. Interested in buying a GWM Cannon Alpha? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything GWM Cannon Alpha Content originally sourced from: GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons China's GWM is going Shark and Ranger hunting with an electrifying new plug-in hybrid (PHEV) ute. Okay, silly puns aside, the 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV dual-cab is a big deal for the Chinese brand, and on paper it shapes as a compelling alternative to the already popular BYD Shark 6 and incoming Ford Ranger PHEV. Priced from $59,990 before on-road costs, the PHEV version of GWM's flagship ute is within swiping distance of the Shark 6 while claiming a longer electric-only driving range as well as greater towing and off-road capability. It's also substantially cheaper than Ford's first plug-in version of the Ranger, Australia's most popular new model, while also offering a long warranty and capped price servicing. While Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) incentives for PHEVs purchased via novated leases have ended, the Cannon Alpha PHEV arrives at a pivotal time for the Australian automotive industry. WATCH: Paul's video review of the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype Punitive emissions regulations loom for auto brands from next month, and big, heavy and high-CO2 commercial vehicles including utilities will be the hardest hit. With dual-cab utes continuing to dominate the local market, brands are scrambling for cleaner and more efficient options to bring down their fleet CO2 emissions. Consider the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 39g/km CO2 claim versus the 234g and 225g/km figures of the diesel and hybrid versions, and you can see why GWM is going hard with the positioning of its new plug-in ute. So, is it any good? We spent some extended time living with it in and away from the city to find out. As noted above, the Cannon Alpha PHEV range starts from $59,990 plus on-road costs, or around $61,500 drive-away depending on state or territory – see the table below for more. For reference, the BYD Shark 6 is priced from $57,900 plus on-roads and is currently being advertised with sharp 1.9 per cent p/a finance, while the Ford Ranger PHEV kicks off from a much dearer $71,990 plus on-roads. The Cannon Alpha PHEV is more than $10,000 dearer than the equivalent Cannon Alpha Diesel in base spec, while the Hybrid (HEV) is about $3000 more affordable in flagship Ultra guise. In the scheme of things, it's not that big a gap. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool Just like any other Cannon Alpha grade, which itself is quite similar to the GWM Tank 500 with which it shares its underpinnings. This flagship Ultra grade offers all the fruit, from leather-accented seat upholstery and woodgrain-effect trim to big and bright displays for the touchscreen infotainment system and digital instrument cluster. You also get soft-touch leather-effect accents for the door tops and dashboard, which feel suitably luxe, and the smooth leatherette-clad steering wheel with cartoonish centre hub shaped as the Cannon badge all adds to the more upmarket and SUV-like ambience. Hell, there are even felt-lined door pockets like in a Volkswagen Golf! Perceived build quality is very positive, particularly for the ute segment. It feels plusher and more luxurious than more workhorse-style dual-cabs, and the array of luxury touches make it feel more car-like than a commercial vehicle. The cushy front seats in this spec are electrically adjustable as well as heated and ventilated, and you even get a massage function. The steering wheel is heated too, so you can see why these new-age Chinese vehicles have a lot of appeal on the showroom floor. I appreciate the fact the heated and ventilated seat controls are hard buttons on the centre console, but functions like memory positions and seat massaging are buried in the touchscreen, which is a little fiddly and annoying. The 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster offers a couple of main views, one with a central driver assistance display and the other with mapping. Annoyingly, there's no option to have a conventional power meter and speedometer; instead you get simple digital readouts which don't always communicate everything effectively. Meanwhile, the 12.3-inch tablet-style touchscreen also looks cool but has its quirks. The clarity and processing speed is good, and it's fully featured with native navigation and wireless smartphone mirroring, but I'm not a huge fan of the layered menu structure and the persistence with having the climate controls embedded in the display. Some of the menus also aren't properly translated from Chinese to English, meaning explainers for certain settings and functions aren't immediately clear. Still, the hybrid menus and various display graphics are quite neat to play with and observe – but really, GWM and other Chinese brands need to make their touchscreens a little less confusing. For example, you can swipe down from the top of the screen for some quick-access shortcuts, but you can't do this from the smartphone mirroring screen, as I found it. The rear seat in this Ultra specification is another standout, with both heating and ventilation for the outboard pews in addition to electric adjustment for recline and lower cushion extension. Where else do you see this? You do get rear vents but no additional zone of climate control like in the Tank 500, although there are amenities like a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders, as well as map pockets behind the front seats and your requisite child seat anchor points. Behind the cab and its electrically opening rear window, there's a 1500x1520mm tray accessed via a split tailgate that can either open conventionally or barn-door style. Due to the size and placement of the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 37.1kWh NMC battery, the full-size spare wheel has been relocated to the tub in an unconventional dune buggy or safari-style arrangement. The locally-led solution sees the wheel bolted to the side of the tub, though it can be removed if you need to utilise the full tub. GWM also fits a tyre repair kit as standard in the event you get a puncture without access to the spare. While it's not pictured here, there is a cover for the spare wheel that clips into the tub bracket, and there are magnets to stick it to the metal base. However, my colleague Max Davies saw the cover fly nearly completely off while driving at 110km/h on Victoria's Hume Highway on a windy day, which is why the vehicle is pictured here without it – it was an effort to reinstall too. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The PHEV is the most powerful Cannon Alpha variant on sale, as well as the most efficient. The PHEV can be fast-charged at up to 50kW using DC power, and boasts vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability with a 3.3kW discharge rate. It can also run on EV power, even when in high-range four-wheel drive mode. GWM has maintained the Cannon Alpha lineup's 3500kg towing capacity for the PHEV, bettering the BYD Shark 6 and matching the Ranger PHEV. Payload, meanwhile, is 50kg lower than the HEV's and up to 130kg down on the diesel's. As for fuel consumption, we travelled nearly 900km in the Cannon Alpha PHEV over a two-week loan, charging as regularly as we could but also spending plenty of extended stints behind the wheel. We saw an indicated return of 6.6L/100km over that period, which isn't bad considering there were plenty of cold days with only a partially charged battery, as well as the aforementioned long drives well beyond the battery's EV range. That real-world figure is also well under the lab claims for the Cannon Alpha diesel and hybrid variants. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool My testing was all done on-road and generally unladen, unlike Paul Maric's video review of a pre-production prototype, and we'll revisit the Cannon Alpha PHEV to fully test its off-road and towing prowess. Above: Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype I did a lot of general commuting to and from the office as well as a longer road trip down to the Mornington Peninsula, and while I'm in no way your typical ute guy, I found the Cannon Alpha PHEV surprisingly good to live with. With a full charge this ute hums along nicely in EV mode, both in town and on the freeway, where it doesn't feel much slower than the diesel version while being much quieter – the electric motor's 120kW/400Nm outputs aren't far off the diesel's 130kW/480Nm, anyway. That said, it feels heavier than its GWM siblings, which is unsurprising given the 300kg-plus weight penalty from the massive battery. While this lends a very planted and sure-footed feel on the move, it also means you can feel its mass shift more when cornering and braking. GWM's approach to plug-in hybrid tech is also a more mechanical system, sandwiching the e-motor between the transmission and petrol, meaning you can feel it shift through its nine cogs even in EV mode. WATCH: Paul puts the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype through a payload and GVM stress test While this means it lacks the EV driving style of the BYD Shark, it has allowed the Chinese manufacturer to retain a mechanical four-wheel drive system with low-range (4L) mode, as well as the Alpha's heavy-duty capabilities. Paul had no issues towing a 3.5-tonne caravan at GVM, though the dedicated Towing mode negates the ability to use cruise control and the prototype-spec Cannon Alpha couldn't be locked in EV mode when hooked up to the trailer. He also noted that the 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine did make a bit of noise under load when towing, even if the PHEV's overall performance felt "confident" and "punchy". Additionally, the Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype tested by Paul had tow bar that was quite low, reducing the departure angle for off-roading. Our production-spec vehicle is claimed to have a towbar that sits 70mm higher than the pre-production vehicle, though it's still mounted lower than most others. I grew quite fond of the Cannon Alpha's touring abilities on the open road, where it impressed with a reasonably quiet cabin at cruising speed and plenty of punch in reserve for relatively brisk overtakes – just make sure you're in the right drive mode. Every now and then when trying to set off quickly, or when giving it a quick squirt while rolling, I could feel the PHEV system take a moment or two before gearing down, activating both power sources and finally outputting what I was asking of it. Road and wind noise is generally kept to an impressive minimum for a dual-cab ute, and while the ride is a bit firm on its coil-sprung front- and rear-ends, in general it still rides more like an unladen SUV than a leaf-sprung alternative. The petrol engine can sound a little coarse when it's being revved out, but the transition between EV and ICE power is generally pretty seamless apart from the odd elastic feel in the lower gears. GWM's EV range figure of 115km is based on the NEDC cycle, so I decided to do a rough range test to see how close I could get to the claim. After fully charging using a 50kW DC fast-charger at the Portsea Hotel, I attempted to get home to Melbourne's eastern suburbs in EV mode. In theory I should have been able to get there, given the trip is 103.9km. My partner wanted to catch the sunset at Arthur's Seat on the way home, meaning a quick detour to Franklin's lookout, which is up a pretty steep hillclimb. Still, the total trip would only be 106km. Keeping the Cannon Alpha PHEV in Normal and EV modes, I made it to just after the Wellington Rd overpass on Melbourne's M3 Eastlink Freeway – roughly 85km from my starting point. Not bad given the uphill trip home and the skew toward 100km/h freeway speeds, but something to note if you spend a lot of time on the highway. Above: GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV takes on Beer O'clock Hill Paul did some off-road testing in the prototype we drove before the Cannon Alpha PHEV's official launch, and he was quite impressed with the Cannon's four-wheel drive capability, especially when compared back-to-back with the Shark 6, which infamously struggled with our rutted hillclimb at the Lang Lang providing ground. Key GWM additions over its BYD rival include front and rear diff locks in this Ultra spec (the Lux gets only a rear locker), as well as a low-range transfer case. Paul said the Cannon Alpha easily climbed our hill and demonstrated better tractability over obstacles and rough terrain – it also did the same hillclimb in both HEV and EV modes, which is impressive. Over the offset moguls Cannon Alpha PHEV also barely broke a sweat, with the traction control shuffling torque to the correct wheel(s) without requiring the diff locks to be engaged. Paul did note the stability control was a little intrusive in off-road situations, at least in pre-production spec, and the 70mm-lower tow bar had a habit of scraping things due to its shallower departure angle. As mentioned, GWM says the raised unit on production vehicles should help reduce that. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool There are Lux and Ultra trim levels, though depending on the powertrain chosen you might get slightly differing spec levels in the Ultra – the variant on test here. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha Lux equipment highlights: Cannon Alpha Ultra Diesel adds: Cannon Alpha Ultra HEV + PHEV add: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha was awarded a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on 2024 tests, and this rating applies to all variants including the new plug-in hybrid. Standard safety equipment includes: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool As with the wider Cannon Alpha range, the PHEV is covered by a seven year, unlimited-kilometre warranty plus seven years of roadside assistance and capped-price servicing. The high-voltage PHEV battery is covered by a separate eight-year, unlimited-km warranty. Worth noting is the first service is due within 12 months or 15,000km, after which intervals are 12 months/15,000km. GWM outpunches the warranties of both the Shark 6 and Ranger PHEV, though servicing costs add up quickly – even if it's cheaper to maintain than the Cannon Alpha HEV. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV shapes up as a proper Ranger PHEV alternative, for those on a budget who want proper ute capability with an electrified drivetrain. While the BYD Shark 6 has been the subject of much hype before and after its Australian launch, if you want a ute to do ute things while also saving money at the pump and reducing your CO2 emissions, I think the GWM is the better bet – especially after recent price adjustments put it within a whisker of the BYD. It looks tough, offers more size and space (if you excuse the tray-mounted spare), has a pretty plush cabin with heaps of luxury features, and can happily tow 3.5 tonnes and tackle some serious off-road trails. The Shark is an excellent lifestyle utility vehicle in its own right, but isn't as rugged or capable as the GWM in terms of off-roading and towing. The Cannon Alpha PHEV also drives pretty well, with its EV-capable drivetrain allowing for incredibly refined and quiet commuting in everyday scenarios, which is in stark contrast to rattly diesel engines or rev-happy petrol engines that power many rival dual-cabs. GWM has largely addressed previous complaints about its driver safety aids, which is a plus, though I can do without the naggy audible prompts when you switch adaptive cruise control on or off, and the system is incredibly conservative with gaps around the vehicle, which is frustrating. I'd also like to see a more sophisticated digital instrument cluster with the option of a virtual power meter or tachometer, and some off-road menus. With all that digital real estate, it seems like an oversight not to have it. The sheer size of this near-5.5-metre-long ute makes it difficult to park as well, even if you account for the litany of cameras and sensors dotted throughout the vehicle. I found the added size over a Shark 6 or Ranger a bit of a challenge in suburban shopping centre carparks, so I imagine driving it in the city – as a lot of ute drivers will – could prove to be a bit of a pain. Finally, the unusual placement of the spare wheel will be a problem for some. Sure, it can be removed or relocated (perhaps to a roof basket, which is hardly ideal either), but when the whole point of a ute is to have a tray it seems counterproductive for a decent proportion of that tub space to be occupied by the spare wheel. I think the entry-level Lux is the one to get, given it's actually cheaper than the most affordable 48V hybrid version. Given the gains it delivers in terms of electric driving and efficiency (as well as general driveability) compared to the HEV powertrain, my advice would be to save a few bucks and opt for the base PHEV rather than the Ultra-spec HEV. Interested in buying a GWM Cannon Alpha? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything GWM Cannon Alpha Content originally sourced from: GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons China's GWM is going Shark and Ranger hunting with an electrifying new plug-in hybrid (PHEV) ute. Okay, silly puns aside, the 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV dual-cab is a big deal for the Chinese brand, and on paper it shapes as a compelling alternative to the already popular BYD Shark 6 and incoming Ford Ranger PHEV. Priced from $59,990 before on-road costs, the PHEV version of GWM's flagship ute is within swiping distance of the Shark 6 while claiming a longer electric-only driving range as well as greater towing and off-road capability. It's also substantially cheaper than Ford's first plug-in version of the Ranger, Australia's most popular new model, while also offering a long warranty and capped price servicing. While Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) incentives for PHEVs purchased via novated leases have ended, the Cannon Alpha PHEV arrives at a pivotal time for the Australian automotive industry. WATCH: Paul's video review of the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype Punitive emissions regulations loom for auto brands from next month, and big, heavy and high-CO2 commercial vehicles including utilities will be the hardest hit. With dual-cab utes continuing to dominate the local market, brands are scrambling for cleaner and more efficient options to bring down their fleet CO2 emissions. Consider the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 39g/km CO2 claim versus the 234g and 225g/km figures of the diesel and hybrid versions, and you can see why GWM is going hard with the positioning of its new plug-in ute. So, is it any good? We spent some extended time living with it in and away from the city to find out. As noted above, the Cannon Alpha PHEV range starts from $59,990 plus on-road costs, or around $61,500 drive-away depending on state or territory – see the table below for more. For reference, the BYD Shark 6 is priced from $57,900 plus on-roads and is currently being advertised with sharp 1.9 per cent p/a finance, while the Ford Ranger PHEV kicks off from a much dearer $71,990 plus on-roads. The Cannon Alpha PHEV is more than $10,000 dearer than the equivalent Cannon Alpha Diesel in base spec, while the Hybrid (HEV) is about $3000 more affordable in flagship Ultra guise. In the scheme of things, it's not that big a gap. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool Just like any other Cannon Alpha grade, which itself is quite similar to the GWM Tank 500 with which it shares its underpinnings. This flagship Ultra grade offers all the fruit, from leather-accented seat upholstery and woodgrain-effect trim to big and bright displays for the touchscreen infotainment system and digital instrument cluster. You also get soft-touch leather-effect accents for the door tops and dashboard, which feel suitably luxe, and the smooth leatherette-clad steering wheel with cartoonish centre hub shaped as the Cannon badge all adds to the more upmarket and SUV-like ambience. Hell, there are even felt-lined door pockets like in a Volkswagen Golf! Perceived build quality is very positive, particularly for the ute segment. It feels plusher and more luxurious than more workhorse-style dual-cabs, and the array of luxury touches make it feel more car-like than a commercial vehicle. The cushy front seats in this spec are electrically adjustable as well as heated and ventilated, and you even get a massage function. The steering wheel is heated too, so you can see why these new-age Chinese vehicles have a lot of appeal on the showroom floor. I appreciate the fact the heated and ventilated seat controls are hard buttons on the centre console, but functions like memory positions and seat massaging are buried in the touchscreen, which is a little fiddly and annoying. The 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster offers a couple of main views, one with a central driver assistance display and the other with mapping. Annoyingly, there's no option to have a conventional power meter and speedometer; instead you get simple digital readouts which don't always communicate everything effectively. Meanwhile, the 12.3-inch tablet-style touchscreen also looks cool but has its quirks. The clarity and processing speed is good, and it's fully featured with native navigation and wireless smartphone mirroring, but I'm not a huge fan of the layered menu structure and the persistence with having the climate controls embedded in the display. Some of the menus also aren't properly translated from Chinese to English, meaning explainers for certain settings and functions aren't immediately clear. Still, the hybrid menus and various display graphics are quite neat to play with and observe – but really, GWM and other Chinese brands need to make their touchscreens a little less confusing. For example, you can swipe down from the top of the screen for some quick-access shortcuts, but you can't do this from the smartphone mirroring screen, as I found it. The rear seat in this Ultra specification is another standout, with both heating and ventilation for the outboard pews in addition to electric adjustment for recline and lower cushion extension. Where else do you see this? You do get rear vents but no additional zone of climate control like in the Tank 500, although there are amenities like a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders, as well as map pockets behind the front seats and your requisite child seat anchor points. Behind the cab and its electrically opening rear window, there's a 1500x1520mm tray accessed via a split tailgate that can either open conventionally or barn-door style. Due to the size and placement of the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 37.1kWh NMC battery, the full-size spare wheel has been relocated to the tub in an unconventional dune buggy or safari-style arrangement. The locally-led solution sees the wheel bolted to the side of the tub, though it can be removed if you need to utilise the full tub. GWM also fits a tyre repair kit as standard in the event you get a puncture without access to the spare. While it's not pictured here, there is a cover for the spare wheel that clips into the tub bracket, and there are magnets to stick it to the metal base. However, my colleague Max Davies saw the cover fly nearly completely off while driving at 110km/h on Victoria's Hume Highway on a windy day, which is why the vehicle is pictured here without it – it was an effort to reinstall too. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The PHEV is the most powerful Cannon Alpha variant on sale, as well as the most efficient. The PHEV can be fast-charged at up to 50kW using DC power, and boasts vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability with a 3.3kW discharge rate. It can also run on EV power, even when in high-range four-wheel drive mode. GWM has maintained the Cannon Alpha lineup's 3500kg towing capacity for the PHEV, bettering the BYD Shark 6 and matching the Ranger PHEV. Payload, meanwhile, is 50kg lower than the HEV's and up to 130kg down on the diesel's. As for fuel consumption, we travelled nearly 900km in the Cannon Alpha PHEV over a two-week loan, charging as regularly as we could but also spending plenty of extended stints behind the wheel. We saw an indicated return of 6.6L/100km over that period, which isn't bad considering there were plenty of cold days with only a partially charged battery, as well as the aforementioned long drives well beyond the battery's EV range. That real-world figure is also well under the lab claims for the Cannon Alpha diesel and hybrid variants. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool My testing was all done on-road and generally unladen, unlike Paul Maric's video review of a pre-production prototype, and we'll revisit the Cannon Alpha PHEV to fully test its off-road and towing prowess. Above: Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype I did a lot of general commuting to and from the office as well as a longer road trip down to the Mornington Peninsula, and while I'm in no way your typical ute guy, I found the Cannon Alpha PHEV surprisingly good to live with. With a full charge this ute hums along nicely in EV mode, both in town and on the freeway, where it doesn't feel much slower than the diesel version while being much quieter – the electric motor's 120kW/400Nm outputs aren't far off the diesel's 130kW/480Nm, anyway. That said, it feels heavier than its GWM siblings, which is unsurprising given the 300kg-plus weight penalty from the massive battery. While this lends a very planted and sure-footed feel on the move, it also means you can feel its mass shift more when cornering and braking. GWM's approach to plug-in hybrid tech is also a more mechanical system, sandwiching the e-motor between the transmission and petrol, meaning you can feel it shift through its nine cogs even in EV mode. WATCH: Paul puts the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype through a payload and GVM stress test While this means it lacks the EV driving style of the BYD Shark, it has allowed the Chinese manufacturer to retain a mechanical four-wheel drive system with low-range (4L) mode, as well as the Alpha's heavy-duty capabilities. Paul had no issues towing a 3.5-tonne caravan at GVM, though the dedicated Towing mode negates the ability to use cruise control and the prototype-spec Cannon Alpha couldn't be locked in EV mode when hooked up to the trailer. He also noted that the 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine did make a bit of noise under load when towing, even if the PHEV's overall performance felt "confident" and "punchy". Additionally, the Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype tested by Paul had tow bar that was quite low, reducing the departure angle for off-roading. Our production-spec vehicle is claimed to have a towbar that sits 70mm higher than the pre-production vehicle, though it's still mounted lower than most others. I grew quite fond of the Cannon Alpha's touring abilities on the open road, where it impressed with a reasonably quiet cabin at cruising speed and plenty of punch in reserve for relatively brisk overtakes – just make sure you're in the right drive mode. Every now and then when trying to set off quickly, or when giving it a quick squirt while rolling, I could feel the PHEV system take a moment or two before gearing down, activating both power sources and finally outputting what I was asking of it. Road and wind noise is generally kept to an impressive minimum for a dual-cab ute, and while the ride is a bit firm on its coil-sprung front- and rear-ends, in general it still rides more like an unladen SUV than a leaf-sprung alternative. The petrol engine can sound a little coarse when it's being revved out, but the transition between EV and ICE power is generally pretty seamless apart from the odd elastic feel in the lower gears. GWM's EV range figure of 115km is based on the NEDC cycle, so I decided to do a rough range test to see how close I could get to the claim. After fully charging using a 50kW DC fast-charger at the Portsea Hotel, I attempted to get home to Melbourne's eastern suburbs in EV mode. In theory I should have been able to get there, given the trip is 103.9km. My partner wanted to catch the sunset at Arthur's Seat on the way home, meaning a quick detour to Franklin's lookout, which is up a pretty steep hillclimb. Still, the total trip would only be 106km. Keeping the Cannon Alpha PHEV in Normal and EV modes, I made it to just after the Wellington Rd overpass on Melbourne's M3 Eastlink Freeway – roughly 85km from my starting point. Not bad given the uphill trip home and the skew toward 100km/h freeway speeds, but something to note if you spend a lot of time on the highway. Above: GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV takes on Beer O'clock Hill Paul did some off-road testing in the prototype we drove before the Cannon Alpha PHEV's official launch, and he was quite impressed with the Cannon's four-wheel drive capability, especially when compared back-to-back with the Shark 6, which infamously struggled with our rutted hillclimb at the Lang Lang providing ground. Key GWM additions over its BYD rival include front and rear diff locks in this Ultra spec (the Lux gets only a rear locker), as well as a low-range transfer case. Paul said the Cannon Alpha easily climbed our hill and demonstrated better tractability over obstacles and rough terrain – it also did the same hillclimb in both HEV and EV modes, which is impressive. Over the offset moguls Cannon Alpha PHEV also barely broke a sweat, with the traction control shuffling torque to the correct wheel(s) without requiring the diff locks to be engaged. Paul did note the stability control was a little intrusive in off-road situations, at least in pre-production spec, and the 70mm-lower tow bar had a habit of scraping things due to its shallower departure angle. As mentioned, GWM says the raised unit on production vehicles should help reduce that. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool There are Lux and Ultra trim levels, though depending on the powertrain chosen you might get slightly differing spec levels in the Ultra – the variant on test here. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha Lux equipment highlights: Cannon Alpha Ultra Diesel adds: Cannon Alpha Ultra HEV + PHEV add: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha was awarded a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on 2024 tests, and this rating applies to all variants including the new plug-in hybrid. Standard safety equipment includes: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool As with the wider Cannon Alpha range, the PHEV is covered by a seven year, unlimited-kilometre warranty plus seven years of roadside assistance and capped-price servicing. The high-voltage PHEV battery is covered by a separate eight-year, unlimited-km warranty. Worth noting is the first service is due within 12 months or 15,000km, after which intervals are 12 months/15,000km. GWM outpunches the warranties of both the Shark 6 and Ranger PHEV, though servicing costs add up quickly – even if it's cheaper to maintain than the Cannon Alpha HEV. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV shapes up as a proper Ranger PHEV alternative, for those on a budget who want proper ute capability with an electrified drivetrain. While the BYD Shark 6 has been the subject of much hype before and after its Australian launch, if you want a ute to do ute things while also saving money at the pump and reducing your CO2 emissions, I think the GWM is the better bet – especially after recent price adjustments put it within a whisker of the BYD. It looks tough, offers more size and space (if you excuse the tray-mounted spare), has a pretty plush cabin with heaps of luxury features, and can happily tow 3.5 tonnes and tackle some serious off-road trails. The Shark is an excellent lifestyle utility vehicle in its own right, but isn't as rugged or capable as the GWM in terms of off-roading and towing. The Cannon Alpha PHEV also drives pretty well, with its EV-capable drivetrain allowing for incredibly refined and quiet commuting in everyday scenarios, which is in stark contrast to rattly diesel engines or rev-happy petrol engines that power many rival dual-cabs. GWM has largely addressed previous complaints about its driver safety aids, which is a plus, though I can do without the naggy audible prompts when you switch adaptive cruise control on or off, and the system is incredibly conservative with gaps around the vehicle, which is frustrating. I'd also like to see a more sophisticated digital instrument cluster with the option of a virtual power meter or tachometer, and some off-road menus. With all that digital real estate, it seems like an oversight not to have it. The sheer size of this near-5.5-metre-long ute makes it difficult to park as well, even if you account for the litany of cameras and sensors dotted throughout the vehicle. I found the added size over a Shark 6 or Ranger a bit of a challenge in suburban shopping centre carparks, so I imagine driving it in the city – as a lot of ute drivers will – could prove to be a bit of a pain. Finally, the unusual placement of the spare wheel will be a problem for some. Sure, it can be removed or relocated (perhaps to a roof basket, which is hardly ideal either), but when the whole point of a ute is to have a tray it seems counterproductive for a decent proportion of that tub space to be occupied by the spare wheel. I think the entry-level Lux is the one to get, given it's actually cheaper than the most affordable 48V hybrid version. Given the gains it delivers in terms of electric driving and efficiency (as well as general driveability) compared to the HEV powertrain, my advice would be to save a few bucks and opt for the base PHEV rather than the Ultra-spec HEV. Interested in buying a GWM Cannon Alpha? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything GWM Cannon Alpha Content originally sourced from: GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons GWM Cannon Alpha Pros GWM Cannon Alpha Cons China's GWM is going Shark and Ranger hunting with an electrifying new plug-in hybrid (PHEV) ute. Okay, silly puns aside, the 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV dual-cab is a big deal for the Chinese brand, and on paper it shapes as a compelling alternative to the already popular BYD Shark 6 and incoming Ford Ranger PHEV. Priced from $59,990 before on-road costs, the PHEV version of GWM's flagship ute is within swiping distance of the Shark 6 while claiming a longer electric-only driving range as well as greater towing and off-road capability. It's also substantially cheaper than Ford's first plug-in version of the Ranger, Australia's most popular new model, while also offering a long warranty and capped price servicing. While Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) incentives for PHEVs purchased via novated leases have ended, the Cannon Alpha PHEV arrives at a pivotal time for the Australian automotive industry. WATCH: Paul's video review of the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype Punitive emissions regulations loom for auto brands from next month, and big, heavy and high-CO2 commercial vehicles including utilities will be the hardest hit. With dual-cab utes continuing to dominate the local market, brands are scrambling for cleaner and more efficient options to bring down their fleet CO2 emissions. Consider the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 39g/km CO2 claim versus the 234g and 225g/km figures of the diesel and hybrid versions, and you can see why GWM is going hard with the positioning of its new plug-in ute. So, is it any good? We spent some extended time living with it in and away from the city to find out. As noted above, the Cannon Alpha PHEV range starts from $59,990 plus on-road costs, or around $61,500 drive-away depending on state or territory – see the table below for more. For reference, the BYD Shark 6 is priced from $57,900 plus on-roads and is currently being advertised with sharp 1.9 per cent p/a finance, while the Ford Ranger PHEV kicks off from a much dearer $71,990 plus on-roads. The Cannon Alpha PHEV is more than $10,000 dearer than the equivalent Cannon Alpha Diesel in base spec, while the Hybrid (HEV) is about $3000 more affordable in flagship Ultra guise. In the scheme of things, it's not that big a gap. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool Just like any other Cannon Alpha grade, which itself is quite similar to the GWM Tank 500 with which it shares its underpinnings. This flagship Ultra grade offers all the fruit, from leather-accented seat upholstery and woodgrain-effect trim to big and bright displays for the touchscreen infotainment system and digital instrument cluster. You also get soft-touch leather-effect accents for the door tops and dashboard, which feel suitably luxe, and the smooth leatherette-clad steering wheel with cartoonish centre hub shaped as the Cannon badge all adds to the more upmarket and SUV-like ambience. Hell, there are even felt-lined door pockets like in a Volkswagen Golf! Perceived build quality is very positive, particularly for the ute segment. It feels plusher and more luxurious than more workhorse-style dual-cabs, and the array of luxury touches make it feel more car-like than a commercial vehicle. The cushy front seats in this spec are electrically adjustable as well as heated and ventilated, and you even get a massage function. The steering wheel is heated too, so you can see why these new-age Chinese vehicles have a lot of appeal on the showroom floor. I appreciate the fact the heated and ventilated seat controls are hard buttons on the centre console, but functions like memory positions and seat massaging are buried in the touchscreen, which is a little fiddly and annoying. The 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster offers a couple of main views, one with a central driver assistance display and the other with mapping. Annoyingly, there's no option to have a conventional power meter and speedometer; instead you get simple digital readouts which don't always communicate everything effectively. Meanwhile, the 12.3-inch tablet-style touchscreen also looks cool but has its quirks. The clarity and processing speed is good, and it's fully featured with native navigation and wireless smartphone mirroring, but I'm not a huge fan of the layered menu structure and the persistence with having the climate controls embedded in the display. Some of the menus also aren't properly translated from Chinese to English, meaning explainers for certain settings and functions aren't immediately clear. Still, the hybrid menus and various display graphics are quite neat to play with and observe – but really, GWM and other Chinese brands need to make their touchscreens a little less confusing. For example, you can swipe down from the top of the screen for some quick-access shortcuts, but you can't do this from the smartphone mirroring screen, as I found it. The rear seat in this Ultra specification is another standout, with both heating and ventilation for the outboard pews in addition to electric adjustment for recline and lower cushion extension. Where else do you see this? You do get rear vents but no additional zone of climate control like in the Tank 500, although there are amenities like a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders, as well as map pockets behind the front seats and your requisite child seat anchor points. Behind the cab and its electrically opening rear window, there's a 1500x1520mm tray accessed via a split tailgate that can either open conventionally or barn-door style. Due to the size and placement of the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 37.1kWh NMC battery, the full-size spare wheel has been relocated to the tub in an unconventional dune buggy or safari-style arrangement. The locally-led solution sees the wheel bolted to the side of the tub, though it can be removed if you need to utilise the full tub. GWM also fits a tyre repair kit as standard in the event you get a puncture without access to the spare. While it's not pictured here, there is a cover for the spare wheel that clips into the tub bracket, and there are magnets to stick it to the metal base. However, my colleague Max Davies saw the cover fly nearly completely off while driving at 110km/h on Victoria's Hume Highway on a windy day, which is why the vehicle is pictured here without it – it was an effort to reinstall too. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The PHEV is the most powerful Cannon Alpha variant on sale, as well as the most efficient. The PHEV can be fast-charged at up to 50kW using DC power, and boasts vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability with a 3.3kW discharge rate. It can also run on EV power, even when in high-range four-wheel drive mode. GWM has maintained the Cannon Alpha lineup's 3500kg towing capacity for the PHEV, bettering the BYD Shark 6 and matching the Ranger PHEV. Payload, meanwhile, is 50kg lower than the HEV's and up to 130kg down on the diesel's. As for fuel consumption, we travelled nearly 900km in the Cannon Alpha PHEV over a two-week loan, charging as regularly as we could but also spending plenty of extended stints behind the wheel. We saw an indicated return of 6.6L/100km over that period, which isn't bad considering there were plenty of cold days with only a partially charged battery, as well as the aforementioned long drives well beyond the battery's EV range. That real-world figure is also well under the lab claims for the Cannon Alpha diesel and hybrid variants. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool My testing was all done on-road and generally unladen, unlike Paul Maric's video review of a pre-production prototype, and we'll revisit the Cannon Alpha PHEV to fully test its off-road and towing prowess. Above: Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype I did a lot of general commuting to and from the office as well as a longer road trip down to the Mornington Peninsula, and while I'm in no way your typical ute guy, I found the Cannon Alpha PHEV surprisingly good to live with. With a full charge this ute hums along nicely in EV mode, both in town and on the freeway, where it doesn't feel much slower than the diesel version while being much quieter – the electric motor's 120kW/400Nm outputs aren't far off the diesel's 130kW/480Nm, anyway. That said, it feels heavier than its GWM siblings, which is unsurprising given the 300kg-plus weight penalty from the massive battery. While this lends a very planted and sure-footed feel on the move, it also means you can feel its mass shift more when cornering and braking. GWM's approach to plug-in hybrid tech is also a more mechanical system, sandwiching the e-motor between the transmission and petrol, meaning you can feel it shift through its nine cogs even in EV mode. WATCH: Paul puts the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype through a payload and GVM stress test While this means it lacks the EV driving style of the BYD Shark, it has allowed the Chinese manufacturer to retain a mechanical four-wheel drive system with low-range (4L) mode, as well as the Alpha's heavy-duty capabilities. Paul had no issues towing a 3.5-tonne caravan at GVM, though the dedicated Towing mode negates the ability to use cruise control and the prototype-spec Cannon Alpha couldn't be locked in EV mode when hooked up to the trailer. He also noted that the 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine did make a bit of noise under load when towing, even if the PHEV's overall performance felt "confident" and "punchy". Additionally, the Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype tested by Paul had tow bar that was quite low, reducing the departure angle for off-roading. Our production-spec vehicle is claimed to have a towbar that sits 70mm higher than the pre-production vehicle, though it's still mounted lower than most others. I grew quite fond of the Cannon Alpha's touring abilities on the open road, where it impressed with a reasonably quiet cabin at cruising speed and plenty of punch in reserve for relatively brisk overtakes – just make sure you're in the right drive mode. Every now and then when trying to set off quickly, or when giving it a quick squirt while rolling, I could feel the PHEV system take a moment or two before gearing down, activating both power sources and finally outputting what I was asking of it. Road and wind noise is generally kept to an impressive minimum for a dual-cab ute, and while the ride is a bit firm on its coil-sprung front- and rear-ends, in general it still rides more like an unladen SUV than a leaf-sprung alternative. The petrol engine can sound a little coarse when it's being revved out, but the transition between EV and ICE power is generally pretty seamless apart from the odd elastic feel in the lower gears. GWM's EV range figure of 115km is based on the NEDC cycle, so I decided to do a rough range test to see how close I could get to the claim. After fully charging using a 50kW DC fast-charger at the Portsea Hotel, I attempted to get home to Melbourne's eastern suburbs in EV mode. In theory I should have been able to get there, given the trip is 103.9km. My partner wanted to catch the sunset at Arthur's Seat on the way home, meaning a quick detour to Franklin's lookout, which is up a pretty steep hillclimb. Still, the total trip would only be 106km. Keeping the Cannon Alpha PHEV in Normal and EV modes, I made it to just after the Wellington Rd overpass on Melbourne's M3 Eastlink Freeway – roughly 85km from my starting point. Not bad given the uphill trip home and the skew toward 100km/h freeway speeds, but something to note if you spend a lot of time on the highway. Above: GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV takes on Beer O'clock Hill Paul did some off-road testing in the prototype we drove before the Cannon Alpha PHEV's official launch, and he was quite impressed with the Cannon's four-wheel drive capability, especially when compared back-to-back with the Shark 6, which infamously struggled with our rutted hillclimb at the Lang Lang providing ground. Key GWM additions over its BYD rival include front and rear diff locks in this Ultra spec (the Lux gets only a rear locker), as well as a low-range transfer case. Paul said the Cannon Alpha easily climbed our hill and demonstrated better tractability over obstacles and rough terrain – it also did the same hillclimb in both HEV and EV modes, which is impressive. Over the offset moguls Cannon Alpha PHEV also barely broke a sweat, with the traction control shuffling torque to the correct wheel(s) without requiring the diff locks to be engaged. Paul did note the stability control was a little intrusive in off-road situations, at least in pre-production spec, and the 70mm-lower tow bar had a habit of scraping things due to its shallower departure angle. As mentioned, GWM says the raised unit on production vehicles should help reduce that. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool There are Lux and Ultra trim levels, though depending on the powertrain chosen you might get slightly differing spec levels in the Ultra – the variant on test here. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha Lux equipment highlights: Cannon Alpha Ultra Diesel adds: Cannon Alpha Ultra HEV + PHEV add: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha was awarded a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on 2024 tests, and this rating applies to all variants including the new plug-in hybrid. Standard safety equipment includes: To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool As with the wider Cannon Alpha range, the PHEV is covered by a seven year, unlimited-kilometre warranty plus seven years of roadside assistance and capped-price servicing. The high-voltage PHEV battery is covered by a separate eight-year, unlimited-km warranty. Worth noting is the first service is due within 12 months or 15,000km, after which intervals are 12 months/15,000km. GWM outpunches the warranties of both the Shark 6 and Ranger PHEV, though servicing costs add up quickly – even if it's cheaper to maintain than the Cannon Alpha HEV. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV shapes up as a proper Ranger PHEV alternative, for those on a budget who want proper ute capability with an electrified drivetrain. While the BYD Shark 6 has been the subject of much hype before and after its Australian launch, if you want a ute to do ute things while also saving money at the pump and reducing your CO2 emissions, I think the GWM is the better bet – especially after recent price adjustments put it within a whisker of the BYD. It looks tough, offers more size and space (if you excuse the tray-mounted spare), has a pretty plush cabin with heaps of luxury features, and can happily tow 3.5 tonnes and tackle some serious off-road trails. The Shark is an excellent lifestyle utility vehicle in its own right, but isn't as rugged or capable as the GWM in terms of off-roading and towing. The Cannon Alpha PHEV also drives pretty well, with its EV-capable drivetrain allowing for incredibly refined and quiet commuting in everyday scenarios, which is in stark contrast to rattly diesel engines or rev-happy petrol engines that power many rival dual-cabs. GWM has largely addressed previous complaints about its driver safety aids, which is a plus, though I can do without the naggy audible prompts when you switch adaptive cruise control on or off, and the system is incredibly conservative with gaps around the vehicle, which is frustrating. I'd also like to see a more sophisticated digital instrument cluster with the option of a virtual power meter or tachometer, and some off-road menus. With all that digital real estate, it seems like an oversight not to have it. The sheer size of this near-5.5-metre-long ute makes it difficult to park as well, even if you account for the litany of cameras and sensors dotted throughout the vehicle. I found the added size over a Shark 6 or Ranger a bit of a challenge in suburban shopping centre carparks, so I imagine driving it in the city – as a lot of ute drivers will – could prove to be a bit of a pain. Finally, the unusual placement of the spare wheel will be a problem for some. Sure, it can be removed or relocated (perhaps to a roof basket, which is hardly ideal either), but when the whole point of a ute is to have a tray it seems counterproductive for a decent proportion of that tub space to be occupied by the spare wheel. I think the entry-level Lux is the one to get, given it's actually cheaper than the most affordable 48V hybrid version. Given the gains it delivers in terms of electric driving and efficiency (as well as general driveability) compared to the HEV powertrain, my advice would be to save a few bucks and opt for the base PHEV rather than the Ultra-spec HEV. Interested in buying a GWM Cannon Alpha? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything GWM Cannon Alpha Content originally sourced from:

News.com.au
4 days ago
- News.com.au
Best EOFY 2025 large SUV sales in Australia
Large SUVs and four-wheel-drives represent some of the most popular cars in Australia. But you shouldn't expect a great end of financial year deals on the most popular models – cars like the Toyota Prado and Ford Ranger. Instead, the best deals are found in cars that need a sales boost. Shop around and you can find are big savings on big cars – both in large SUV and four-wheel-drive form. LARGE SUVS Jeep Grand Cherokee: Jeep's five-seat family wagon is available from $62,000 drive-away, an outrageous discount of about $17,000. The brand initially misjudged prices for its big American contender, but has sharpened its pencil until June 30. LDV D90: 2023-place examples of the seven-seat LDV D90 SUV are on sale from $34,990 drive-away in basic two-wheel-drive form, a discount of about $13,000. Hyundai Palisade: In run-out mode ahead of a new model debuting soon, the Hyundai Palisade is available with a $3000 run-out bonus or $5000 contribution toward vehicles financed through Hyundai. GWM Tank 500: Hybrid versions of the GWM Tank 500 are available from $63,490 drive-away, a $2000 discount. Mazda CX-90: Roughly $5000 cheaper than its usual price, Mazda's CX-90 is available for a little over $75,000 drive-away. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: Drive-away prices and $3000 gift cards make the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport an attractive proposition. Chery Tiggo 8: This affordable seven-seater normally costs $41,990 drive-away, but is currently on sale for $38,990 drive-away, a $3000 discount.


Perth Now
5 days ago
- Perth Now
2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV review
China's GWM is going Shark and Ranger hunting with an electrifying new plug-in hybrid (PHEV) ute. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert Okay, silly puns aside, the 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV dual-cab is a big deal for the Chinese brand, and on paper it shapes as a compelling alternative to the already popular BYD Shark 6 and incoming Ford Ranger PHEV. Priced from $59,990 before on-road costs, the PHEV version of GWM's flagship ute is within swiping distance of the Shark 6 while claiming a longer electric-only driving range as well as greater towing and off-road capability. It's also substantially cheaper than Ford's first plug-in version of the Ranger, Australia's most popular new model, while also offering a long warranty and capped price servicing. While Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) incentives for PHEVs purchased via novated leases have ended, the Cannon Alpha PHEV arrives at a pivotal time for the Australian automotive industry. WATCH: Paul's video review of the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype Punitive emissions regulations loom for auto brands from next month, and big, heavy and high-CO2 commercial vehicles including utilities will be the hardest hit. With dual-cab utes continuing to dominate the local market, brands are scrambling for cleaner and more efficient options to bring down their fleet CO2 emissions. Consider the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 39g/km CO2 claim versus the 234g and 225g/km figures of the diesel and hybrid versions, and you can see why GWM is going hard with the positioning of its new plug-in ute. So, is it any good? We spent some extended time living with it in and away from the city to find out. As noted above, the Cannon Alpha PHEV range starts from $59,990 plus on-road costs, or around $61,500 drive-away depending on state or territory – see the table below for more. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert For reference, the BYD Shark 6 is priced from $57,900 plus on-roads and is currently being advertised with sharp 1.9 per cent p/a finance, while the Ford Ranger PHEV kicks off from a much dearer $71,990 plus on-roads. The Cannon Alpha PHEV is more than $10,000 dearer than the equivalent Cannon Alpha Diesel in base spec, while the Hybrid (HEV) is about $3000 more affordable in flagship Ultra guise. In the scheme of things, it's not that big a gap. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool Just like any other Cannon Alpha grade, which itself is quite similar to the GWM Tank 500 with which it shares its underpinnings. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert This flagship Ultra grade offers all the fruit, from leather-accented seat upholstery and woodgrain-effect trim to big and bright displays for the touchscreen infotainment system and digital instrument cluster. You also get soft-touch leather-effect accents for the door tops and dashboard, which feel suitably luxe, and the smooth leatherette-clad steering wheel with cartoonish centre hub shaped as the Cannon badge all adds to the more upmarket and SUV-like ambience. Hell, there are even felt-lined door pockets like in a Volkswagen Golf! Perceived build quality is very positive, particularly for the ute segment. It feels plusher and more luxurious than more workhorse-style dual-cabs, and the array of luxury touches make it feel more car-like than a commercial vehicle. The cushy front seats in this spec are electrically adjustable as well as heated and ventilated, and you even get a massage function. The steering wheel is heated too, so you can see why these new-age Chinese vehicles have a lot of appeal on the showroom floor. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert I appreciate the fact the heated and ventilated seat controls are hard buttons on the centre console, but functions like memory positions and seat massaging are buried in the touchscreen, which is a little fiddly and annoying. The 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster offers a couple of main views, one with a central driver assistance display and the other with mapping. Annoyingly, there's no option to have a conventional power meter and speedometer; instead you get simple digital readouts which don't always communicate everything effectively. Meanwhile, the 12.3-inch tablet-style touchscreen also looks cool but has its quirks. The clarity and processing speed is good, and it's fully featured with native navigation and wireless smartphone mirroring, but I'm not a huge fan of the layered menu structure and the persistence with having the climate controls embedded in the display. Some of the menus also aren't properly translated from Chinese to English, meaning explainers for certain settings and functions aren't immediately clear. Still, the hybrid menus and various display graphics are quite neat to play with and observe – but really, GWM and other Chinese brands need to make their touchscreens a little less confusing. For example, you can swipe down from the top of the screen for some quick-access shortcuts, but you can't do this from the smartphone mirroring screen, as I found it. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert The rear seat in this Ultra specification is another standout, with both heating and ventilation for the outboard pews in addition to electric adjustment for recline and lower cushion extension. Where else do you see this? You do get rear vents but no additional zone of climate control like in the Tank 500, although there are amenities like a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders, as well as map pockets behind the front seats and your requisite child seat anchor points. Behind the cab and its electrically opening rear window, there's a 1500x1520mm tray accessed via a split tailgate that can either open conventionally or barn-door style. Due to the size and placement of the Cannon Alpha PHEV's 37.1kWh NMC battery, the full-size spare wheel has been relocated to the tub in an unconventional dune buggy or safari-style arrangement. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert The locally-led solution sees the wheel bolted to the side of the tub, though it can be removed if you need to utilise the full tub. GWM also fits a tyre repair kit as standard in the event you get a puncture without access to the spare. While it's not pictured here, there is a cover for the spare wheel that clips into the tub bracket, and there are magnets to stick it to the metal base. However, my colleague Max Davies saw the cover fly nearly completely off while driving at 110km/h on Victoria's Hume Highway on a windy day, which is why the vehicle is pictured here without it – it was an effort to reinstall too. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The PHEV is the most powerful Cannon Alpha variant on sale, as well as the most efficient. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert The PHEV can be fast-charged at up to 50kW using DC power, and boasts vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability with a 3.3kW discharge rate. It can also run on EV power, even when in high-range four-wheel drive mode. GWM has maintained the Cannon Alpha lineup's 3500kg towing capacity for the PHEV, bettering the BYD Shark 6 and matching the Ranger PHEV. Payload, meanwhile, is 50kg lower than the HEV's and up to 130kg down on the diesel's. As for fuel consumption, we travelled nearly 900km in the Cannon Alpha PHEV over a two-week loan, charging as regularly as we could but also spending plenty of extended stints behind the wheel. We saw an indicated return of 6.6L/100km over that period, which isn't bad considering there were plenty of cold days with only a partially charged battery, as well as the aforementioned long drives well beyond the battery's EV range. That real-world figure is also well under the lab claims for the Cannon Alpha diesel and hybrid variants. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool My testing was all done on-road and generally unladen, unlike Paul Maric's video review of a pre-production prototype, and we'll revisit the Cannon Alpha PHEV to fully test its off-road and towing prowess. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert Above: Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype I did a lot of general commuting to and from the office as well as a longer road trip down to the Mornington Peninsula, and while I'm in no way your typical ute guy, I found the Cannon Alpha PHEV surprisingly good to live with. With a full charge this ute hums along nicely in EV mode, both in town and on the freeway, where it doesn't feel much slower than the diesel version while being much quieter – the electric motor's 120kW/400Nm outputs aren't far off the diesel's 130kW/480Nm, anyway. That said, it feels heavier than its GWM siblings, which is unsurprising given the 300kg-plus weight penalty from the massive battery. While this lends a very planted and sure-footed feel on the move, it also means you can feel its mass shift more when cornering and braking. GWM's approach to plug-in hybrid tech is also a more mechanical system, sandwiching the e-motor between the transmission and petrol, meaning you can feel it shift through its nine cogs even in EV mode. WATCH: Paul puts the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype through a payload and GVM stress test While this means it lacks the EV driving style of the BYD Shark, it has allowed the Chinese manufacturer to retain a mechanical four-wheel drive system with low-range (4L) mode, as well as the Alpha's heavy-duty capabilities. Paul had no issues towing a 3.5-tonne caravan at GVM, though the dedicated Towing mode negates the ability to use cruise control and the prototype-spec Cannon Alpha couldn't be locked in EV mode when hooked up to the trailer. He also noted that the 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine did make a bit of noise under load when towing, even if the PHEV's overall performance felt 'confident' and 'punchy'. Additionally, the Cannon Alpha PHEV prototype tested by Paul had tow bar that was quite low, reducing the departure angle for off-roading. Our production-spec vehicle is claimed to have a towbar that sits 70mm higher than the pre-production vehicle, though it's still mounted lower than most others. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert I grew quite fond of the Cannon Alpha's touring abilities on the open road, where it impressed with a reasonably quiet cabin at cruising speed and plenty of punch in reserve for relatively brisk overtakes – just make sure you're in the right drive mode. Every now and then when trying to set off quickly, or when giving it a quick squirt while rolling, I could feel the PHEV system take a moment or two before gearing down, activating both power sources and finally outputting what I was asking of it. Road and wind noise is generally kept to an impressive minimum for a dual-cab ute, and while the ride is a bit firm on its coil-sprung front- and rear-ends, in general it still rides more like an unladen SUV than a leaf-sprung alternative. The petrol engine can sound a little coarse when it's being revved out, but the transition between EV and ICE power is generally pretty seamless apart from the odd elastic feel in the lower gears. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert GWM's EV range figure of 115km is based on the NEDC cycle, so I decided to do a rough range test to see how close I could get to the claim. After fully charging using a 50kW DC fast-charger at the Portsea Hotel, I attempted to get home to Melbourne's eastern suburbs in EV mode. In theory I should have been able to get there, given the trip is 103.9km. My partner wanted to catch the sunset at Arthur's Seat on the way home, meaning a quick detour to Franklin's lookout, which is up a pretty steep hillclimb. Still, the total trip would only be 106km. Keeping the Cannon Alpha PHEV in Normal and EV modes, I made it to just after the Wellington Rd overpass on Melbourne's M3 Eastlink Freeway – roughly 85km from my starting point. Not bad given the uphill trip home and the skew toward 100km/h freeway speeds, but something to note if you spend a lot of time on the highway. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert Above: GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV takes on Beer O'clock Hill Paul did some off-road testing in the prototype we drove before the Cannon Alpha PHEV's official launch, and he was quite impressed with the Cannon's four-wheel drive capability, especially when compared back-to-back with the Shark 6, which infamously struggled with our rutted hillclimb at the Lang Lang providing ground. Key GWM additions over its BYD rival include front and rear diff locks in this Ultra spec (the Lux gets only a rear locker), as well as a low-range transfer case. Paul said the Cannon Alpha easily climbed our hill and demonstrated better tractability over obstacles and rough terrain – it also did the same hillclimb in both HEV and EV modes, which is impressive. Over the offset moguls Cannon Alpha PHEV also barely broke a sweat, with the traction control shuffling torque to the correct wheel(s) without requiring the diff locks to be engaged. Paul did note the stability control was a little intrusive in off-road situations, at least in pre-production spec, and the 70mm-lower tow bar had a habit of scraping things due to its shallower departure angle. As mentioned, GWM says the raised unit on production vehicles should help reduce that. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool There are Lux and Ultra trim levels, though depending on the powertrain chosen you might get slightly differing spec levels in the Ultra – the variant on test here. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha Lux equipment highlights: Automatic LED headlights Automatic high-beam Fixed side steps Electronically locking rear differential Hill ascent control Hill descent control 18-inch alloy wheels, machined – Diesel 18-inch alloy wheels in black – PHEV Full-sized steel spare wheel Tyre pressure monitoring Spray-on tub liner High-mounted tub light Rear privacy glass Black leatherette-accented interior Dual-zone climate control Light, Comfort and Sport steering modes Standard, Sport, Eco, 4L, 4H drive modes Auto Hold function 6-way power driver's seat 6-speaker sound system 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster 12.3-inch touchscreen infotainment system Wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto Cannon Alpha Ultra Diesel adds: 60/40 split tailgate Spray-on tub liner Electronically locking front differential Power-folding exterior mirrors LED front fog lights Panoramic sunroof Auto-dimming rear-view mirror Black leather-accented interior 8-way power driver's seat 6-way power passenger seat Heated and ventilated front seats Massaging front seats Driver's seat memory and welcome function Wireless phone charger (front) Cannon Alpha Ultra HEV + PHEV add: Analogue clock Head-up display Power-folding exterior mirrors with memory 64-colour ambient lighting Heated steering wheel Wireless phone charger (rear) 10-speaker Infinity sound system 2-way power-adjustable rear seats Heated and ventilated rear seats Semi-automatic parking assist Auto Reverse Assist To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha was awarded a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on 2024 tests, and this rating applies to all variants including the new plug-in hybrid. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert Standard safety equipment includes: 7 airbags incl. front-centre Autonomous emergency braking Adaptive cruise control Blind-spot monitoring Front cross-traffic assist Rear cross-traffic assist Lane-keep assist Lane centring assist Emergency lane-keeping Traffic sign recognition Parking sensors – front, rear Surround-view camera with transparent chassis mode To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool As with the wider Cannon Alpha range, the PHEV is covered by a seven year, unlimited-kilometre warranty plus seven years of roadside assistance and capped-price servicing. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert The high-voltage PHEV battery is covered by a separate eight-year, unlimited-km warranty. Worth noting is the first service is due within 12 months or 15,000km, after which intervals are 12 months/15,000km. GWM outpunches the warranties of both the Shark 6 and Ranger PHEV, though servicing costs add up quickly – even if it's cheaper to maintain than the Cannon Alpha HEV. To see how the GWM Cannon Alpha lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV shapes up as a proper Ranger PHEV alternative, for those on a budget who want proper ute capability with an electrified drivetrain. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert While the BYD Shark 6 has been the subject of much hype before and after its Australian launch, if you want a ute to do ute things while also saving money at the pump and reducing your CO2 emissions, I think the GWM is the better bet – especially after recent price adjustments put it within a whisker of the BYD. It looks tough, offers more size and space (if you excuse the tray-mounted spare), has a pretty plush cabin with heaps of luxury features, and can happily tow 3.5 tonnes and tackle some serious off-road trails. The Shark is an excellent lifestyle utility vehicle in its own right, but isn't as rugged or capable as the GWM in terms of off-roading and towing. The Cannon Alpha PHEV also drives pretty well, with its EV-capable drivetrain allowing for incredibly refined and quiet commuting in everyday scenarios, which is in stark contrast to rattly diesel engines or rev-happy petrol engines that power many rival dual-cabs. GWM has largely addressed previous complaints about its driver safety aids, which is a plus, though I can do without the naggy audible prompts when you switch adaptive cruise control on or off, and the system is incredibly conservative with gaps around the vehicle, which is frustrating. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert I'd also like to see a more sophisticated digital instrument cluster with the option of a virtual power meter or tachometer, and some off-road menus. With all that digital real estate, it seems like an oversight not to have it. The sheer size of this near-5.5-metre-long ute makes it difficult to park as well, even if you account for the litany of cameras and sensors dotted throughout the vehicle. I found the added size over a Shark 6 or Ranger a bit of a challenge in suburban shopping centre carparks, so I imagine driving it in the city – as a lot of ute drivers will – could prove to be a bit of a pain. Finally, the unusual placement of the spare wheel will be a problem for some. Sure, it can be removed or relocated (perhaps to a roof basket, which is hardly ideal either), but when the whole point of a ute is to have a tray it seems counterproductive for a decent proportion of that tub space to be occupied by the spare wheel. I think the entry-level Lux is the one to get, given it's actually cheaper than the most affordable 48V hybrid version. Given the gains it delivers in terms of electric driving and efficiency (as well as general driveability) compared to the HEV powertrain, my advice would be to save a few bucks and opt for the base PHEV rather than the Ultra-spec HEV. 2025 GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV Credit: CarExpert Interested in buying a GWM Cannon Alpha? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers here MORE: Everything GWM Cannon Alpha Tough looks, plush cabin Does ute stuff (mostly) well 85-90km EV range achievable Spare wheel impedes tray Still some safety assist annoyances Pricey servicing