logo
‘We are a passionately multiracial team': Zimbabwe return to England transformed

‘We are a passionately multiracial team': Zimbabwe return to England transformed

Yahoo22-05-2025

Twenty-two years is a long time, even in a sport that measures its games in days and its history in centuries. The last time England played a Test match against Zimbabwe, in 2003, Rob Key was in the middle order instead of the managing director's job, Jimmy Anderson was a 20-year-old tearaway playing in his very first series, and the England and Wales Cricket Board was just about to launch the world's very first professional Twenty20 tournament. Zimbabwean cricket has changed, too. Back then the team was in the earliest stages of a transformation that was meant to turn cricket from a minority game, played by the small white population, into a sport that better represented the whole country.
They have been hard years, riven by player strikes, political interference, maladministration and a miserable drop-off in results. The team temporarily withdrew from Test cricket, suspended their domestic competition and were repeatedly censured by the International Cricket Council. They lost so many players through emigration to England, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand, that even now you could build a hell of a good Zimbabwean squad out of people who are making a living overseas. And yet, at the end of it all, the process was, by one important measure, a success. The squad that came on tour in 2003 was majority white, the team that has come this year is majority black.
Related: Blast from the past: Zimbabwe are finally coming in from the cold
'Despite all the politics, despite all the chaos that we've been through, cricket is now a national game,' says David Coltart, 'supported by an overwhelming majority of Zimbabweans, black and white and other races.' Coltart is the elected mayor of Bulawayo, a white man elected in a mostly black city. He has spent his life navigating the bitter, heated, complicated politics of his country. He has been fighting for the Zimbabwe he believes in ever since the 1990s, first as a founding member of the Movement for Democratic Change and a key figure in the opposition to Robert Mugabe, then as minister for education and sport in Morgan Tsvangirai's coalition government.
More than five million people have emigrated from the country in that time. Coltart is one of the ones who stayed. 'I believe in Zimbabwe with a passion,' he says, 'I believe in its people and its future, and I believe it is a country worth fighting for.'
When Andy Flower and Henry Olonga made their public protest against 'the death of democracy' in their country in 2003, it was Coltart they asked to help draft their statement. 'My sadness is that Henry and Andy didn't stay in the country,' he says, 'because they remain hugely influential figures. It's not a criticism. I understand why they felt compelled to leave. But we need figures like them.' He mourns Heath Streak, who did stay, but who died in 2023. 'Heath provided inspiration to people on both sides of the argument. He was a white man who was fluent in Ndebele, and who attracted a lot of sympathy and affection from a lot of black people, and yet he remained an inspirational people for white farmers who'd been dispossessed of their land.'
For Coltart, the Zimbabwean team is emblematic of the society it represents. 'We punch above our weight.' Which is why he believes transformation had to happen.
'It was very necessary,' Coltart says. 'Cricket in Zimbabwe 30 years ago was a minority sport. If you just looked at the crowds they were, relatively speaking, very few black people in them. Even aside from the principle of the matter, that situation was completely unsustainable.' He just wishes it had been done differently. He makes a comparison with the redistribution of land, and the violent farm takeovers which were the cause of so much pain, grief and injustice in the 2000s. 'The land holdings were unjust,' he says, 'But we could have done it without violence. Now, there wasn't violence in cricket, but I think that when you look at the dreadful collapse of cricket in 2004, that could have been avoided.'
When Zimbabwe stopped playing Test cricket, Coltart helped lead the campaign to restore it. In government he spent a lot of time lobbying the English to start playing fixtures against his country again. The ECB turned its back on the country, even after the end of the Mugabe regime. It was only when Richard Gould took over as the chief executive of the ECB that things finally changed. 'They disregarded us and while I understand the reasons, I've never felt that England should not be playing Zimbabwe,' Coltart says. 'Although I'm a strident critic of the Zimbabwean regime, I've always believed in the power of sport to bridge divides.'
Even now, he would be against a boycott of Afghan cricket on similar grounds. 'Because if the players and the board members themselves are trying to do the right thing but are being constrained by the government, then you've got to support them and encourage them, not boycott them. Use the game, the opportunities it provides, to build relations, and to hold them to higher standards.'
He is still trying to do that in his own country now, as mayor. Bulawayo has just won the right to host the Street Child Cricket World Cup. But Coltart is deeply concerned about the way the sport is being run. 'There's still far too much politics involved in Zimbabwe Cricket, in the running of the organisation, and even in the selection policies. I still fear that we're not spending the money that we get as best we should. I'm a politician, but I don't think politicians should be anywhere near cricket administration. I would rather see people whose primary attribute is a great passion for cricket being involved in the running of the sport. I'd like to see our best players from the past dominating the selection panel, black and white.'
Still, he beams when he thinks that Zimbabwe are going to play a Test at Trent Bridge this week. 'Despite the politics, despite the abuse of the rule of law and corruption in the country, all the concerns that I have regarding the government, the vast majority of Zimbabweans are united. It's a wonderful country and you will see that in our cricket, we are a passionately multiracial team, and that's a wonderful projection of our country.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anger and Resignation as Trump's Travel Ban Hits Africa
Anger and Resignation as Trump's Travel Ban Hits Africa

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Anger and Resignation as Trump's Travel Ban Hits Africa

When Africans woke up to the news this week that seven of the 12 countries on President Trump's new travel ban list were African nations, the response, for many, was a mix of resignation and anger. Resignation because several African nations were previously banned during Mr. Trump's first term, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous country. Anger because they were unsure what African governments could do to get the ban lifted, if it would lead to family separations and how exactly each country landed on the list in the first place. 'I think it's a discriminatory decision, a decision he's taken out of racism,' Narciso Edjang, a 19-year-old medical student in Malabo, the capital of Equatorial Guinea, said of Mr. Trump's announcement. Equatorial Guinea is one of the seven African nations Mr. Trump targeted in the travel ban announced on Wednesday night. The others are Chad, the Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan. The ban goes into effect on Monday. Mr. Edjang had hoped to one day study medicine in the United States, where, he said, training was much better than in Equatorial Guinea, a country that is rich in oil but mired in pervasive poverty and inequality. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

New Trump travel ban for national security sparks uncertainty and questions
New Trump travel ban for national security sparks uncertainty and questions

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New Trump travel ban for national security sparks uncertainty and questions

The Brief A new Trump travel ban due to terror concerns has been implemented. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on Monday. A mixed reaction has followed with some FOX 2 - The Trump administration is expanding its travel ban, now blocking entry from a dozen countries, with restrictions added to several more. What we know The move is said to combat terrorism which was first announced last night and already, the new rules are facing pushback. The new order bans travelers from 12 countries, mostly in Africa and the Middle East, citing national security concerns, and it lays out partial travel restrictions for seven additional countries. Some are questioning the controversial travel restrictions. Ruby Robinson is an attorney at the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center. "Congress needs to step forward, there needs to be immigration reform," she said. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe," Trump said. Robinson said that it is similar to the so-called "Muslim ban" from Trump's first term. "We are not shocked, nor are we necessarily surprised by the fact that it has arrived," Robinson said. "I think many of us was expecting it." Some of the countries banned are already firing back by suspending visas for Americans. There are some exemptions for now, like those competing in the 2026 World Cup. But for some immigrant families, it adds a new layer of worry, those like David Fishman say. "People that are going to visit family will still go to some of these countries, but there is I guess somewhat of a fear that they may not get back in through," said Fishman, president of Cadillac Travel Group. Local travel companies are warning clients about necessary travel documents and updated visas. "We make sure that they can get there and get back and many times to be very honest. we tell them to go directly to the airlines," he said. "Because we don't want to be have the responsibility of the situation which is saying do not go." There is also an expected rush for those still needing government approval. "I expect anybody who had an appointment today or tomorrow to ask for their visa to be issued as soon as possible and to be on that first flight before this goes into effect," Robinson said. What we don't know The ban is set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on Monday. The president has said that banned list could be revised if countries make material improvements, but also that new countries could be added if threats come up. The Source Information for this report came from interviews and a proclamation from the Trump administration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store