
AI's killer app is hiding in plain sight
Homepage > News > Business > AI's killer app is hiding in plain sight Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Since November 2022, when OpenAI released ChatGPT, the world has been talking about artificial intelligence (AI) nonstop. Primarily, the narrative has been that AI is a sort of superintelligence that can do anything and everything, regardless of whether it's advantageous or disadvantageous to society.
However, AI as superintelligence that manifests itself in several different forms ranging from 'agents' to 'your personal secretary' never really seemed to materialize, and even when they have been brought to life, they've been lackluster or flown under the radar.
Which makes you wonder: How are people actually using AI? And more importantly, what's AI's killer app, what is the one use case that's really sticking?
What is the top use case for AI?
Similar to the AI superintelligence we've been promised, the consensus around what AI's killer app is has generally been elusive.
Because AI can be and do so many different things for so many different people, there was never really a consensus on what the top use case of AI was or is. However, that is beginning to change.
Data is beginning to emerge that suggests AI's killer app is 'search' and that the app AI has killed is the search engine.
Recently, The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) explored the effect that AI, specifically Google's (NASDAQ: GOOGL) AI Overview tool, has on search results, and the results were significant. Many of the world's most well-known digital publishers ( HuffPost, Business Insider, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal ) reported that traffic they received to their desktop and mobile sites via organic search is down and that it's having a significant impact on their businesses, because of AI.
Why organic search traffic is declining
Organic search is unpaid search traffic. It's when a user types a question into a search engine, gets returned a sea of blue links related to their search topic across multiple pages, and subsequently clicks on one of these links to locate the information or answer to the question they had. In many instances, depending on the topic searched, the link points to an article on a publisher's website.
Organic search has grown to be a critical component for many of these publishers and is often the largest driver of traffic to their websites, accounting for 40% to 60% of all traffic in some instances. This traffic translates directly into revenue for the publisher because more visits equals more ad impressions, which equals more ad revenue.
That being said, publishers sometimes go to great lengths to get their articles to appear higher in search results through various SEO practices. However, this is all changing to the detriment of publishers, thanks to AI.
How AI-powered search is changing user behavior
Because of AI, organic search traffic has drastically declined. According to The WSJ report, organic search traffic to websites owned by Business Insider declined by 55% between April 2022 and April 2025; traffic was down 7.5% for The New York Times and 5% for The WSJ in that same period.
Why is this happening? Because of AI-infused search enginges and platforms, a significant portion of users aren't actually clicking through to the linked articles that appear in search engines anymore.
Many search platforms, most importantly Google, which handles the majority of the world's search volume, have implemented AI into their search engines. Whether it's AI-generated summaries (as in Google's AI Overviews) or directly answering user queries (as ChatGPT does), AI is fundamentally changing the way people interact with search.
Traditionally, a user would type a question into Google, get a list of links, and click through to a publisher's website to read the full article. But with AI-powered search, that final step of clicking the link and spending time on the publisher's website disappears.
Tools like Google's AI Overviews scan the web, pull information from multiple sources (often including articles from major publishers), and display a synthesized answer at the top of the search page. There often isn't a need to click links or read articles. Chatbot-style interfaces like ChatGPT or Google's new AI Mode take this even further by engaging users in a conversational Q&A format, providing answers in real-time with very few links shown. Sometimes, they won't even show links unless the user explicitly prompts the AI to provide sources. In both cases, the AI is replacing the click-through process, which is exactly why publishers see their organic search traffic nosedive.
Why AI search is winning with users
AI searches and summaries are simply more efficient for users.
Instead of sorting through multiple sites in search of the exact information they're looking for, users now get fast, clear, direct answers when they use AI-powered search. This new AI search workflow cuts out the friction of the traditional search engine process, saving users valuable time by providing answers that are easier to digest.
Unfortunately for publishers or any business that relies on web traffic from search engines, AI-powered search is a major thorn in the side of their business models, even though it's an obvious win for users.
More than any 'personal assistant' or futuristic agent, AI's true killer app is shaping up to be search. Although the idea of improved search isn't as flashy as having AI complete tasks for us end-to-end (agents) or achieving 'superintelligence,' AI-powered search is a very large, practical market that was overdue for an upgrade. Beyond that, the search use case is accessible, which I believe has been one of the biggest obstacles to wider AI agent adoption.
AI-powered search doesn't require users to have specialized knowledge beyond knowing which search engine they want to use and what questions they want to ask. More advanced AI concepts like agents aren't second nature to most consumers just yet and will likely require some sort of re-education campaign before the vast majority of people have the skills and understanding to get the most out of those systems.
This makes me think that maybe AI has been overcomplicated and overpromised and that its builders will see more success and the much-needed profit they are seeking by building 'simple' products and optimizing 'simple' processes because it might just be the simplicity of AI-driven search that makes it so dominant. Without the need to reimagine how a process works or the need to learn an entirely new system or workflow before jumping in, users are naturally gravitating toward AI search. This is why search, more than anything else, is shaping to be AI's killer app.
In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI .
Watch: Demonstrating the potential of blockchain's fusion with AI
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""> AI Artificial Intelligence Kille App Search Search Engine Superintelligence

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump says US-UK deal ‘done' as steel tariffs still up in air
Donald Trump and Sir Keir Starmer have finalised a US-UK deal that will slash trade barriers on goods from both countries, but leaves the future of tariffs on British steel up in the air. The Prime Minister said the move marked a 'very important day' for both sides as the US president announced the agreement was 'done' in a joint appearance on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada. The deal will grant British carmakers a reprieve by the end of June as levies drop from 25% to 10%, while the aerospace sector will face no import taxes. But tariffs for the steel industry, which is of key economic importance to the UK, will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium. The Prime Minister described the pact as a 'sign of strength' in the transatlantic relationship, while Mr Trump praised Sir Keir as a 'friend' who had done a 'great job' securing the deal that eluded leaders before him. Following the hastily arranged meeting, the two leaders posed for pictures outside the G7 venue with the signed documents, which the US president dropped before Sir Keir picked them up. Mr Trump also mistakenly referred to the pact as a 'trade agreement with the European Union.' In an impromptu media spray, the US president was asked whether steel tariffs would be eliminated, to which he replied: 'We're gonna let you have that information in a little while.' The Department for Business and Trade said the two leaders had pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed'. Asked whether Britain would be shielded from future tariffs, Mr Trump said the UK was protected 'because I like them'. 'The UK is very well protected, you know why? Because I like them. That's their ultimate protection,' he said. The PM told the US President: 'Donald, thank you very much… A really important agreement. And so this is a very good day for both of our countries, a real sign of strength.' The terms of the deal were agreed in May, but neither Washington nor London had yet taken the necessary steps to reduce tariffs. Reports have since suggested the US could also push for the NHS to pay more for American drugs in exchange for softened tariffs, with White House sources telling the Telegraph the service would be expected to pay higher prices. Downing Street insisted the Government will 'only ever sign trade agreements that align with the UK's national interests' but did not rule out discussing the issue with Washington. The Prime Minister was also insistent that a nuclear submarine deal between the UK, US and Australia, called Aukus, is 'very important' to both the United States and Britain. He said it was proceeding despite Washington launching a review into the pact, which is worth around £176 billion and believed to be aimed at countering China. He said: 'We're proceeding with that, it's a really important deal to both of us. 'I think the president is doing a review, we did a review when we came into government, and that makes good sense to me.' Sir Keir and his fellow world leaders are locked in a week of intense diplomacy amid the spiralling conflict in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine. The Prime Minister joined Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, Mr Carney and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a glass of wine and informal discussions on Sunday night. Downing Street dismissed suggestions that the get-together had been a 'Trump-handling' exercise to prove the summit against the US president's unpredictability as leaders seek to put on a united front in the face of heightened global instability. On Monday, splits opened up in the response to Russia, which Mr Trump suggested should not have been kicked out of the former G8 following its annexation of Crimea in 2014. The US leader also signalled his reluctance to impose further American sanctions on Moscow despite a European push to heap more pressure on Vladimir Putin as he resists calls for an unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine. Standing alongside Sir Keir, who had earlier said G7 allies would seek to ratchet up measures against the Kremlin, Mr Trump said sanctions were 'not that easy' and would cost Washington 'a tremendous amount of money'. Asked whether Washington supported European efforts to impose further measures, he told reporters ahead of a bilateral meeting with the UK Prime Minister: 'Well Europe is saying that, but they haven't done it yet. 'Let's see them do it first.' Asked why he wanted to wait to impose sanctions, Mr Trump said: 'Because I'm waiting to see whether or not a deal is done… and don't forget, you know, sanctions cost us a lot of money.'


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Mike Lindell: MyPillow boss loses $2.3m defamation case
Mike Lindell, the chief executive of MyPillow and staunch supporter of Donald Trump, has lost a defamation case brought by a former employee of a voting equipment company.A jury in Denver, Colorado, ordered Mr Lindell to pay $2.3m (£1.7m) to Eric Coomer, a former security and product strategy director at Dominion Voting falsely accused Mr Coomer of helping to rig the 2020 vote, which was won by Joe Biden. During the two-week trial, Lindell stuck by baseless claims that the election was stolen from Donald Trump. Dominion itself has filed cases against several Trump allies who it accuses of spreading lies about the company's voting machines.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Eli Lilly nears $1.3 billion deal for gene-editing biotech Verve Therapeutics, FT reports
June 16 (Reuters) - Eli Lilly (LLY.N), opens new tab is in advanced talks to acquire gene editing startup Verve Therapeutics (VERV.O), opens new tab for up to $1.3 billion, the Financial Times reported on Monday, citing people familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.