Why so many Diggers voted ‘no' to conscription in WWI
Another, Private Arthur Giles stated forcibly that 'if they don't come of their own free will, let them stay away … the majority would only let us down when in a tight corner' and simply 'wouldn't [be] the same class of men at all'.
These entries reveal the 'stigma of conscription', a known phenomenon that occurred in countries that introduced compulsory military service, such as England and New Zealand. These comments played into concerns for the quality and calibre of conscripted men, whose motivation, discipline and military effectiveness would be supposedly less than those who had come voluntarily.
Loading
Other reasons that emerge in the soldiers' diaries is a distinct resentment towards military authorities. The Australian history curriculum teaches well-known, but mythologised accounts of the Digger as a larrikin who had a natural distrust of authority.
The accounts in the diaries do not support that narrative, but are related. They are littered with frustrating accounts of soldiers being used in ways that created palpable anger. Sergeant Major Eric Clarke of Fairfield wrote: 'We were all told to stand fast and record our votes for conscription … we were kept on parade in torrents of rain and a bitterly cold wind for five hours to record our vote, what is only for the result of same to be. In speaking of it afterwards we found that 90 per cent voted NO in [our] division'.
Similarly, Private Cameron Robertson of Rozelle wrote 'if men in Australia knew what they would have to put up with 'on active service' … they would see the authorities in hell before they came away. Yet they want conscription in Australia!! Hell! What a fallacy?!!'
Loading
The vote among the soldiers was every bit as charged and divisive as it was on the home front. Historian Gerald Kristianson remarked that those who voted 'no' on the home front were 'viewed akin to traitors' while those who voted 'yes' 'seemed close to being murderers'.
Digger Peter Turnbull gives us a sense of the intensity of the vote to the soldiers. 'We vote tomorrow for or against conscription, only two in our hut out of 12 are for it & we have been arguing all day, in fact nearly fighting,' he wrote.
Private Frank Molony, an architect from Petersham, wrote furiously of 'the rumour about that conscription has so far in the counting failed… Oh God make this a lie… if the country we love denies us. The Dead will give us more honour than our living.'
The vote extended to the many faces of Australia's wartime commitment, including women who made up more than one per cent of the Australian Imperial Force as nurses. Nurse 'Queenie' Avenell was not put off by the '156 dressings to do, about 30 one-armed men … [who] are going back to Australia and are all just shattered wrecks really'. Queenie interestingly 'voted for it. We have got to win the war by men'.
The very fact Australia and Australian soldiers were afforded the opportunity to vote on this important question is significant historically. The reasons behind how the Diggers voted were deeply personal and provide a glimpse into the divisiveness of the issue and how split the nation was on the proposal.
The results of the two referendums were honoured. No young men were conscripted to serve. Democratic norms were observed and the very freedoms for which the Diggers fought and died were preserved. Now that's worth celebrating.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Whitlam-esque': Zoe McKenzie blasts Labor's divisive tax hike on super accounts, slams Tasmanian opposition for triggering early election
Victorian Liberal MP Zoe McKenzie has lambasted Labor for continuing to advance its plan to hike taxes on superannuation accounts and impose levies on unrealised gains whilst hammering the Tasmanian opposition for sending punters to a winter election. Labor's plan to raise taxes on superannuation accounts over $3 million to 30 per cent and to target unrealised capital gains has sent shockwaves throughout the political and business arena, with financial doyens accusing the government of discarding decades of precedent. The Coalition was previously in talks with the Albanese government to revise certain elements of the legislation, chiefly the concept of taxing unrealised gains, however shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien officially confirmed on Thursday the LNP would oppose the bill. Yet, former Reserve Bank board members Donald McGauchie and Roger Corbett, in addition to a litany of major Liberal Party donors, have pressed the Coalition to remain at the negotiating table and to secure what it deems crucial exemptions for illiquid assets including farms and small businesses. Ms McKenzie, an outspoken moderate who holds one of the Liberal's last outer-suburban seats, railed against the policy, but did not address if the Coalition would resume talks with Labor to modify the legislation. 'I think this is a terrible piece of policy and a terrible precedent for the future, Labor is effectively saying that they will tax money in your pocket, and you do not yet have this money,' she told Sky News on Saturday. The Member for Flinders echoed criticism from industry magnates in relation to the controversial concept of taxing unrealised gains, stating, 'you may have it in the future, you may not have it in the future, but you will be taxed on it'. 'You may incur a loss in the figure, and you won't get that tax back and that's the principle that we must fight here, because once it's started, it could go anywhere,' indicating that the tax could be extended to a range of other assets including real estate and stocks. 'This is a devilish tax and should be fought by the Coalition parties most stridently, this government is very good at speaking liberal-light in terms of their economic narrative, but it is utterly Whitlam-esque in terms of its impact on the Australian economy'. While the Coalition has vowed to fight the legislation, the bill is expected to pass both houses of parliament unopposed, with the Greens joining with Labor in the Senate despite lobbying for the policy to be levied on those with super accounts over $2 million. 'The point is they're going after money no one yet has, these are paper profits, these are family businesses, these are farms held in super funds that people may well have to liquidate just to pass a putative profit that may not exist when finally realised in years to come," Ms McKenzie said. 'They will need the Greens support in the Senate and as you know, the Greens are pushing to lower that threshold from three million to two million. So, it gives the Australian people a very clear indication of what might happen when Labor and the Greens run the show for the next three years'. The shadow assistant minister then turned her attention to the ongoing political chaos in Tasmania. Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in parliament on Thursday, with the speaker casting the deciding vote, resulting in the state heading to it's second election in as little as 14 months. Ms McKenzie savaged Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter for sending the state to a snap winter poll and argued the opposition parties had collectively torpedoed a popularly elected government. 'I think the Tasmanian people would be very disappointed with what's happened this week, basically holding an elected government hostage, so it looks like they will be going back to a mid-winter election. We've all done them and they're horrendous," she said. 'I'm sure the people of Tasmania will not be grateful for being dragged back to the polls so soon after a federal election and indeed just 14 months after a state election." Tasmanians will have to wait until next Tuesday to find out when they will return to the polls, with the parliament scrambling to draft emergency legislation to fund government services of which are due to be tabled on the same day. Independent MPs including Craig Garland have called on the beleaguered Premier to resign, with Mr Rockliff guaranteeing he would not sell off state-owned assets to pay down debt if he won the election, of which served as a key factor in sparking the political row.
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Australian released from Iraqi prison after more than four years behind bars
The federal government is welcoming the release of an Australian engineer from a jail in Iraq. Robert Pether has been granted bail, emerging from a prison in Iraq after spending more than four years behind bars. Mr Pether was arrested in April 2021 alongside his Egyptian colleague, charged with deception, however, he has always maintained his innocence.
Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Former Victorian opposition leader John Pesutto served bankruptcy notice
John Pesutto has accepted a bankruptcy notice served to him yesterday, as the consequences of Liberal colleague Moira Deeming's successful defamation action against him continue to play out. One source close to the proceedings confirmed that the official notice had been served. Deeming successfully took Pesutto to Federal Court, which last December ruled he defamed her five times after an anti-transgender rights rally she organised in March 2023. That rally was unexpectedly gatecrashed by Neo-Nazis, and the court agreed with Deeming that in the aftermath, Pesutto defamed her as a Nazi sympathiser. Last month, a court ordered Pesutto to pay Deeming $2.3 million in legal costs by Friday, May 30, a deadline which he missed. Loading Only about one third of the money has been raised, including $212,000 via crowdfunding - and about $4000 of that in the past week. Under Australian bankruptcy law, Pesutto now has 20 days to either pay the $2.3 million in full or come to an arrangement where he can pay in instalments. Deeming's lawyers have previously said they plan to pursue third parties for costs if Pesutto is left bankrupt — including former premiers Jeff Kennett, Denis Napthine and Ted Baillieu and serving MPs Georgie Crozier and David Southwick.
