
The Unlikely Place Bidding To Host The 2036 Olympics
The first great upset of the 2036 Olympics may be upon us already: it's the takedown of South Korean capital Seoul as a potential host of the Summer Games by a little-known rival 200 kilometers to the south.
Chances are you've never heard of North Jeolla Province. Also called Jeonbuk State, it is southwest South Korea, bordering the Yellow Sea. Its capital Jeonju, whose name translates to 'perfect region,' is many things at once. An urban space with a famous traditional Korean village at its center all set in the midst of an otherwise rural area, Jeonju is known for grand gastronomy and a yearly fashion show where the clothes are made entirely of paper.
North Jeolla's selection as South Korea's candidate for the 2036 Games comes as a surprise among those who figured Seoul was the obvious nominee. The capital hosted a successful Summer Games in 1988 and has the infrastructure in place to do it again. Yet 88 percent of international sports tournaments in South Korea in recent years have happened outside the capital, a fact North Jeolla's Governor Kim Kwan-young made the most of while talking up his region's bid.
One potential red flag: North Jeolla hosted a disastrous World Scout Jamboree in 2023, where 40,000 scouts from 155 nations gathered on reclaimed mud flats that had been converted to a campsite. Poor planning, bad weather, and unsanitary conditions contributed to illness and injuries before a typhoon upended the entire function. Ultimately scouts were evacuated to different cities, where other arrangements were hastily organized. A post-mortem of the event revealed organizers had been unprepared.
Nonetheless, Kim's team has convinced South Korean sports officials, who backed the province over the capital by a margin of 49-11 in a vote this month, sending North Jeolla soaring over the first hurdle toward official candidacy. All that's left is for government ministries to sign off on the project before paperwork can be submitted to the International Olympic Committee.
Persuasive arguments put forward by Kim included the fact that Australia, which will host the 2032 Summer Olympics in Brisbane, has spread out its host cities to ensure development in three different parts of the country. Melbourne hosted in 1956, Sydney in 2000. It did not hurt that the governor was able to point out that Seoul is not as sport-centric as one might think: in recent years more than 88 percent of sports tournaments in South Korea have not taken place in the capital.
In proposing to hold different sports in different cities within the region (track and field in Daegu, swimming in Gwangju, gymnastics in Cheongju to name a few) North Jeolla has embraced a recent trend of Olympic decentralization that led to the French Alps being name as the host of the 2030 Winter Olympics. Part of Kim's argument was that hosting the Games would be a boon not just for one city but for an entire region, coloring it as a 'national project for regional development,' and thus good for the nation as a whole.
Even when hosted in a particular city, the Olympics do tend to reflect the spirit of a nation as a whole, at least in the eyes of viewers. Paris's mise-en-scene last summer was so quintessentially French that it was easy to equate the whole nation to the City of Light, despite the reality that life and culture outside the capital is often dramatically different than it is within. The same might be said of Rio de Janeiro in 2016 or London in 2012.
Though a date has not been set for choosing the 2036 Olympic host, it is unlikely to happen before 2026 at the earliest, IOC officials have said. Even the process for choosing the next summer Olympic host has yet to be fleshed out. The upcoming Games in Brisbane, as well as those in the French Alps and the 2034 Olympics in Salt Lake City, were essentially awarded by the IOC Executive Board in pre-negotiated deals. But in earlier times IOC members voted for the city they felt was best, lending an air of suspense to the proceedings but also opening the door to 'lobbying and also corruption" as outgoing IOC Thomas Bach put it bluntly in 2021.
If the new process has dispelled some of the drama around bidding, it has also streamlined the process and made it more sustainable. It will be up to new IOC President Kirsty Coventry to decide how the organization will go about picking the next host city, and whether she gives more power back to the wider IOC membership in making the call.
No matter how it is eventually decided, the race to host the 2036 Olympics is already shaping up to be one of the most intriguing in recent years.
Interested parties include Istanbul, whose Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu told Reuters that 'all 16 million Istanbulites are willing to host the Games,' as well as Santiago, Chile, which hosted the Pan American Games in 2023. Indonesia, which bid for 2032, has also pledged to try again for 2036. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which was chosen over Busan, South Korea to host the World Expo in 2030, is said to be interested, and India and Egypt may bid as well. Not all applicant cities will make it to the 'candidate stage' of the process.
The prospect of a Games in Africa has clearly interested the IOC, whose new President hails from Zimbabwe and is the continent's most decorated Olympian. But Coventry, unlike one of her challengers for the Presidency, has not gone so far as to guarantee that Africa will be attributed a Games during the next decade. Next year's Youth Olympic Games will be held in Dakar, Senegal, and is likely to be looked back on in deliberations about future bids.
Egypt already seems convinced that the 2036 Olympics may be out of reach. As he announced that the nation would bid for the Games, Mustapha Berraf, President of the Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa, added that it would be trying for 2040 as well.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What you need to know about Trump's travel ban
Donald Trump has banned people from 12 countries entering the US, in a move he said protects against "foreign terrorists" and other security threats. Some countries are subject to a full - with the order allowing countries to be removed or added from the list. The proclamation is due to come into effect just after midnight on 9 June local time. The ban echoes one in 2017 that Mr Trump implemented in his first term in the White House. This banned citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries - Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen - from travelling to the US. Here is everything you need to know. Which countries are affected? The proclamation bans nationals from the following countries to travel to the US: • Afghanistan• Myanmar• Chad• Republic of the Congo• Equatorial Guinea• Eritrea• Haiti• Iran• Libya• Somalia• Sudan• Yemen. The following seven countries are affected by a partial ban: • Burundi• Cuba• Laos• Sierra Leone• Togo• Turkmenistan• Venezuela. Both bans will affect foreign nationals from the designated countries who are outside the US on 9 June or do not have a valid visa. Visas issued before 9 June when the law comes into force will remain valid, the proclamation states. Are there any exemptions? said on Thursday that policy was a "key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil". His new list notably leaves out Syria, after Mr Trump met its leader recently on a trip to the Middle East. Athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup, 2028 Olympics and other major sporting event will also be exempt. The ban also does not apply to the following individuals: • Diplomats travelling on valid non-immigration visas• Immediate family members who hold immigrant visas• People who have been adopted• Afghan nationals holding special immigrant visas - generally people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there• People who hold immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing "persecution in Iran"• Dual nationals who have citizenship in countries not included in the travel ban Why has the ban been introduced? The proclamation states that America must ensure people entering don't have "hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles" - and don't support terror groups. In a video posted to social media, Mr Trump said an attack in Colorado, in which eight were injured, had shown "the extreme dangers" of "foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas". The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Mr Trump's restricted list, but Homeland security claimed he had overstayed a tourist visa. The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat. The White House said some of the named countries had a "significant terrorist presence" and accused others of poor screening for dangerous individuals and not accepting deportees. What has the reaction been? International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations have condemned the new travel ban. "This policy is not about national security - it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States," said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. The inclusion of Afghanistan has also angered some supporters, who have worked to resettle its people. Over a 12-month period to September 2024 there has been an estimated 14,000 arrivals from Afghanistan. Mr Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office. Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of the organisation #AfghanEvac, labelled the proclamation a "moral disgrace". "To include Afghanistan - a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years - is a moral disgrace," he said. "It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold." Meanwhile, the Iranian government offered no immediate reaction to being included on the list. What happened in 2017? Mr Trump's first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a "Muslim ban". It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes - or being held at US airports when they landed. Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic, despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign. The ban faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version in June 2018, calling it "squarely within the scope of presidential authority".


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Travel Ban: Exceptions Travellers Need to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some 19 countries have been affected by Donald Trump's new travel ban —Newsweek has broken down all the exceptions travellers need to know about. The Context The president announced on Wednesday that travel would be fully restricted from 12 nations: Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Meanwhile, travel for people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted. The new rules, which Trump said are to "protect the nation from foreign terrorist and other national security and public safety threats," come into effect as of June 9. He cited a recent attack in Boulder, Colorado that targeted a group advocating for the release of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, a 45-year-old Egyptian national, is facing attempted murder and federal hate crime charges related to the attack. Exceptions To Donald Trump's Travel Ban Exceptions to these new restrictions apply to the following groups of people: Any permanent resident of the United States and anyone with dual citizenship Foreign nationals with diplomatic visas (A-1, A-2), such as ambassadors, ministers or military personnel People with transit visas (C-2, C-3) People who work for international organizations such as the United Nations or the World Bank (G-1, G-4) People with NATO visas (NATO-1, NATO-6) Athletes and their teams, including supportive members and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State Holders of immediate family immigrant visas (IR-1/CR-1, IR-2/CR-2, IR-5) "with clear and convincing evidence of identity and family relationship" Children who have been adopted abroad (visas IR-3, IR-4, IH-3, IH-4) People with Afghan Special Immigrant Visas, given to Afghans who helped the U.S. government during the war there Iranians fleeing persecution because they are part of a religious minority, such as Christians United States Government employees U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also both have the discretion to put individuals forward for exception based on whether they would "advance a critical United States national interest," the White House proclamation says. For example, Bondi could make an exception for someone required to be present in criminal proceedings as a witness. What Happens Next Several of the countries affected by the ban have responded. Somalia has pledged to work with Washington, while Venezuela has hit back with Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello saying "being in the United States is a great risk for anyone." Trump said that "the list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made and likewise, new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kim Jong Un reaffirms 'unconditional' support for Russia's war in Ukraine during Shoigu visit
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un reaffirmed his country's full support for Russia's war against Ukraine during a meeting with Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu in Pyongyang, North Korean state news agency KCNA reported on June 5. Kim reportedly told Shoigu that North Korea "unconditionally supports the stand of Russia and its foreign policies." He also emphasized Pyongyang's continued commitment to the 2024 Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Agreement signed with Moscow. That treaty, signed by Kim and Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 19, 2024, commits both countries to provide assistance if either is attacked. Kim previously described the pact as having a 'peaceful and defensive nature,' framing it as a formal security guarantee between the longtime partners. Shoigu, on his second visit to Pyongyang since being appointed secretary of the Russian Security Council, reportedly discussed battlefield developments in Russia's Kursk Oblast, including the role of North Korean soldiers deployed in the region. According to the Russian Security Council's official readout, the two sides discussed "perpetuating the memory of the feat of Korean soldiers." Officials estimate that up to 12,000 North Korean troops have been deployed to Russia's Kursk Oblast since last fall to counter Ukraine's cross-border incursion launched in August 2024. President Volodymyr Zelensky previously reported that North Korean forces fighting for Russia had suffered 4,000 casualties, with two-thirds of the losses being soldiers killed. Shoigu, who served as Russia's defense minister until his dismissal in May 2024, now oversees national security matters as secretary of the Russian Security Council. The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Shoigu on June 25, 2024, for his role in leading Russia's war effort. Read also: Putin rejects Zelensky's call for peace talks, accuses Ukraine of deadly bridge attack in Russia We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.