Labour's open door to big tech leaves critics crying foul
The problem with the UK, according to the former Google boss Eric Schmidt, is that it has 'so many ways that people can say no'.
However, for some critics of the Labour government, it has a glaring issue with saying yes: to big tech.
Schmidt made his comment in a Q&A conversation with Keir Starmer at a big investment summit in October last year. The prominent position of a tech bigwig at the event underlined the importance of the sector to a government that has made growth a priority and believes the sector is crucial to achieving it.
Top US tech firms have a big presence in the UK, including Google, Mark Zuckerberg's Meta, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Palantir, the data intelligence firm co-founded by the Maga movement backer Peter Thiel.
If a government wants growth, then it is hard to look beyond firms with a combined market value of many trillions of dollars.
According to one former big-tech employee with knowledge of how the leading US companies further their interests in the UK, such heft brings immediate access.
'We never had a problem walking the corridors of Whitehall because we could claim to create thousands of jobs and create millions for the economy. Governments love job announcements,' said the ex-employee.
It is in this context that Peter Kyle, the tech secretary, has met people from the tech sector nearly 70% more often than his predecessor, Michelle Donelan – at an average of more than one meeting every week. The list includes multiple meetings with Google, Amazon, Meta and Apple.
UKAI, a trade body representing the UK's artificial intelligence industry, says smaller players are being squeezed out as a consequence.
'Our concerns is that there is a huge imbalance between a handful of global players who are able to influence directly what No 10 is thinking about on policy, and the thousands of other businesses that make up the AI industry across the UK,' says Tim Flagg, UKAI's chief executive. 'Our voice is not being heard, but the economic growth that the government seeks will come from these companies.'
Echoing the former big-tech employee, Flagg adds that big tech firms have the resources allowing them to build and sustain political relationships, 'getting them into the room and concentrating influence at a senior political level'.
According to one source who has observed the industry's interactions with the government, big tech companies also deployed those resources before the general election, allowing them to hit the ground running with established relationships after the Labour landslide.
Another talks of the Tony Blair Institute's 'phenomenal' access to No 10. The thinktank is backed financially by the tech billionaire Larry Ellison and has been a prominent voice in the debate over AI policy although it says it maintains 'intellectual independence over our policy work'.
For critics of the government's interaction with big tech, its attempts at reforming copyright law are an exemplar of an imbalanced relationship. Ministers have proposed letting AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission to build their products, unless those copyright holders 'opt out' of the process in an as-yet undetermined manner.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
A source close to Kyle has signalled that the opt-out scenario is no longer the preferred option out of four on the table, but the damage has been done. A campaign against the proposal has been backed by every leading light in the UK's formidable creative industries, from Paul McCartney to Dua Lipa and Kazuo Ishiguro.
If tech is the answer to the government's economic growth problem, then AI is a crucial element of that approach with its promise of runaway improvements in productivity – a measure of economic efficiency. But the mooted copyright policy has been a PR disaster, if measured in celeb-powered headlines. The News Media Association, which represents news organisations including the Guardian, also opposes the proposal. Google and OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, have come out against the plans as well.
A former government adviser who worked on tech policy says weakening copyright – which they describe as the 'lowest hanging fruit' on a list of pro-tech policy options – isn't the 'magic answer' to winning the AI race anyway.
'In taking this approach, government risks the worst of all worlds, which is devastating a sector where the UK is actually world-leading, while not actually taking the actions necessary to make the UK an AI superpower.'
The department for science, innovation and technology makes 'no apologies' for interacting with a sector that employs 2 million people in the UK, according to a spokesperson, adding that 'regular engagement' with tech companies of all sizes is fundamental to delivering economic growth.
In his conversation with Schmidt, Starmer said the key question around policies from now on would be 'does this promote growth or does it not promote growth?'. The tech industry is at the core of this approach, but in terms of the copyright debate it has damaged important relationships elsewhere.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage
Sir Keir Starmer is fighting to quell mounting Labour tensions over how to deal with the threat from Nigel Farage, as bitter Whitehall negotiations over the Government's Spending Review go down to the wire. Sources describe 'very unpleasant' exchanges between Rachel Reeves and senior Cabinet ministers, including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner, as the Chancellor prepares to give the NHS a £30billion boost at the expense of the police and local councils. Preparations for Wednesday's announcement have been held against the backdrop of slamming doors and raised voices, as No 10 and the Treasury work out how to divide a limited pot of public money in a way most likely to arrest the surge in support for Mr Farage's Reform UK. Ms Reeves is expected to set out plans for an extra £113billion in spending on infrastructure projects such as Sizewell C nuclear power plant, and an extra 2.8 per cent real-terms increase in the NHS's £200billion-a-year budget, amounting to an extra £30billion by 2028. But with the economy barely growing, other departments have had to take a hit as a result. A source said: 'It turned nasty between Yvette and Rachel. It was just as bad as that between Rachel and Angela, who walked out during her negotiations. 'Yvette was just passing on the concerns of the police, who said that without more money they would be forced to make stark choices about which crimes they prioritise. 'The anger of the police shows they've been briefed by Cooper on how the negotiations are going, and they're not happy.' Reeves plotting £3bn tax raid on pension By CALUM MUIRHEAD Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members. A minister said: 'The negotiations over the final settlements are still not sorted for some departments. They're going to carry on fighting it out over the weekend.' Another source added: 'Rachel will stand up and promise things she can't deliver. There will be a lot of guff about how she will deliver security for the country. 'But how can you promise to deliver security when Trump's doing what he's doing on tariffs and Putin is so active?' At the heart of the schism is an ideological divide between the party's Blairites, represented in No 10 by Liz Lloyd, Sir Keir's head of policy delivery, and Morgan McSweeney, the Downing Street chief of staff. Mr McSweeney is desperate to tackle small boats migration while Ms Lloyd is encouraging spending more on the NHS. Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Whitehall staff are flouting the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex 'by telling transgender women it's okay to use the female toilets'
Civil servants are flouting the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex, with some declaring it is 'completely the choice' of a man who is transitioning to choose which bathroom they use. A message sent to officials by the LGBT + network in the Department of Transport after the landmark court judgment said staff can decide themselves if they can use 'any appropriate single sex toilets and other facilities'. 'It is assumed that the individual knows which facilities are the best match for their gender identity and expression,' it added. The message, obtained using Freedom of Information requests, was sent to staff on April 22, the week after the Supreme Court ruling that men who change gender are not legally women. It says 'HR have assured us that all current guidance and policies still stand' and gives the example that a recently transitioned man may need to 'build confidence in his new gender expression' and that the bathroom they choose is 'completely his choice'. Members of LGBT+ networks in other government departments also sent messages expressing disappointment with the court ruling, including staff in the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology being told: 'While the judgment itself is outside of our hands, we want to say clearly that we're disappointed by the decision.' A message sent to officials by the LGBT + network in the Department of Transport after the landmark court judgment said staff can decide themselves if they can use 'any appropriate single sex toilets and other facilities' Elliot Keck, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, which compiled the research, said: 'The correspondence demonstrates how out of control staff networks are.' A Government spokesman said: 'Staff networks do not set policy in this space. We will update policy wherever it is necessary.' It comes as another report, by think-tank the Policy Exchange, has found that dozens of organisations question the Supreme Court's ruling on the definition of a woman. Independent MP Rosie Duffield said: 'Government ministers must lead from the top to ensure public bodies comply with the law.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Is Angela 'Two Homes' Rayner paying the council tax surcharge on her grace-and-favour second residence?
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was last night facing questions over whether she is paying her own council tax surcharge on her second home. 'Two Homes' Rayner moved into her four-bedroom, grace-and-favour residence in Admiralty House in December – four months before her Local Government Department started levying an extra 100 per cent council tax charge on second homes. Official records of MPs' expenses show that when she entered the Government, Ms Rayner designated her Ashton-under-Lyne constituency home as her 'primary residence', and her pre-Admiralty home – a rented London flat – as her second home. That allowed her to claim back the £1,621 council tax bill on the London flat from the taxpayer as one of the housing costs reimbursed by Commons authorities. But if she is still designating Ashton as her primary residence now, the £2,034 council tax bill for Admiralty House doubles to a whopping £4,068 if classed as a second home. And, as a minister living in an official residence, she would have to pay both that and the £3,338 bill for the Ashton house herself – a total of £7,406. Ashton does not attract a second-home premium because she has family members living there permanently, but questions have been raised as to whether or not she is paying the full £7,406. Tory Shadow Minister Richard Holden asked the PM and the Chancellor if they were paying council tax on their Downing St flats as primary residences, and was informed that they were. If she is still designating Ashton as her primary residence now, the £2,034 council tax bill for Admiralty House (pictured) doubles to a whopping £4,068 if classed as a second home But on asking the same of Ms Rayner, he was stonewalled with: 'The Deputy Prime Minister's council tax responsibility is properly discharged.' In a letter to Ms Rayner, Kevin Hollinrake, Shadow Secretary for Housing and Communities, asked if she had evaded the surcharge by 'flipping' her primary residence designation. He said: 'If the minister in charge of council tax has dodged the super-tax by 'flipping', this raises serious concerns about the ethics and integrity of Labour ministers.' She became known as 'Two Homes' Rayner after this newspaper revealed she shuttled between two council properties early in her marriage. When her office was asked if she was paying a bill of £4,068 in London and £3,338 in her constituency, a source said: 'The administration of council tax for Admiralty House is for the Cabinet Office and Westminster Council, as has been the case for successive Secretaries of State.'
